Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Rights and Democracy: Loyalty and Competence

by Paul Wells on Monday, February 22, 2010 1:40pm - 188 Comments

This one takes some twists and turns. Follow along!

Lawrence Cannon names Gérard Latulippe as president of Rights and Democracy. “An exceptionally qualified candidate,” says he. (Cannon also “expresses the Government of Canada’s support” for a forensic audit at an agency whose books are edited every year by the auditor general, an agency that was evaluated by Cannon’s own department in 2008 and found to have no irregularities in its books. A man of few words, or at least few coherent words, Cannon gives no explanation for his change of heart.)

Latulippe is the National Democratic Institute country director for Haiti. He has also worked for NDI in “countries such as Jordan, Libya, Iraq, Georgia, Mauritania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso and Egypt.” This blog is an unabashed fan of NDI, which admits a “loose affiliation” with the U.S. Democratic Party (its loose-affiliation counterpart is the International Republican Institute, and here at Inkless, we like them too.) NDI is a world leader in educating political parties about their own countries’ political systems and ensuring that elections are fought vigorously and fairly. But, as that notorious opponent of transparency and accountability Ed Broadbent likes to point out, Rights and Democracy has a broader mandate than NDI and IRI. That’s the “Rights” bit, which consists in advocating for the basic human rights of speech, association and so on, down to something as basic as the right to food in Malawi. Latulippe may be able to learn new tricks, but he will have to, because Rights and Democracy isn’t NDI, nor is it the “Canadian Centre for Advancing Democracy” advocated by Stephen Fletcher based on a report by Tom Axworthy and… and…

…Éric Duhaime?

Oh now that’s interesting. This corner is also fond of Duhaime (we like everyone today!), a wisecracking, whip-smart political staffer from Quebec City who served as an advisor to Mario Dumont right up until Dumont left his ADQ party in a flaming wreck. But before that, Duhaime ran the Quebec desk at the Office of the Leader of the Opposition back when the Leader of the Opposition was the then-beleaguered Stockwell Day. (Before that he was an advisor to Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe, forcing this other Éric Duhaime to note that he is “not the Éric Duhaime who changes political parties the way he changes shirts.”)

But I digress. Except I don’t, really, because when Duhaime, who now wants a Canadian equivalent of NDI, was working in Stock’s shop, the Canadian Alliance’s Quebec political lieutenant was… Gérard Latulippe. “Stockwell Day is our leader, he is the only one who can win in every region of Canada,” reads a letter by Quebec Stockaholics that Latulippe signed when things got a bit dicey.

So. An interest in democracy promotion. Bonds forged in the crucible of the Canadian Alliance. What else do Latulippe and Duhaime share?

That’s right. They’re both separatists!

You see, in 1994 Latulippe was delegate-general for Quebec to Brussels when the Parti Québécois was elected under Jacques Parizeau. Parizeau and his minister of international relations, Bernard Landry, couldn’t bear the thought that Quebec’s vast network of foreign bureaux be staffed by people who actually liked Canada. So they checked. And anyone who, having been asked, didn’t swear their loyalty to the notion of a sovereign Quebec, was fired. That’s how Gilles Houde lost his nice foreign post, and Reed Scowen. But Gérard Latulippe had no problem! He “gave more than the client demanded,” Le Devoir reported at the time, noting in a Brussels press conference at Bernie Landry’s side that he had secretly been a supporter of sovereignty for two years before anyone thought to ask. “The only desirable path for Quebec lies in a change of its political status by supporting, in the referendum, the accession of Quebec to sovereignty.” (The same Le Devoir article, from Oct. 12 1994 — I have no link but as a paying subscriber I have access to the paper’s archives — points out that Latulippe’s tenure in Robert Bourassa’s cabinet lasted only 18 months before he resigned as an MNA for “apparent conflict of interest.”)

Latulippe’s record on Rights-and-Democracy-ish issues includes a letter he wrote in 2001 after Elinor Caplan, a minister in the Chrétien government, said the Alliance was full of “racists, bigots and Holocaust deniers.” He called Caplan’s comments “odious and unacceptable” and compared them to remarks Yves Michaud, a longtime Péquiste gadfly, made about Jews a year earlier. Within three weeks in 2006 he wrote two long pieces about the Danish Muhammad caricatures, arguing against any appeasement of the Islamist backlash.

I don’t have a problem with those positions. I do have a problem with a guy who, in the year Quebecers had to make a decision about their future inside Canada or out, decided he preferred to be out. I would have thought the Harper government, which likes to warn Canadians against separatists when they aren’t on the Conservative payroll, would have a problem with Latulippe too.

In 1994 a former Quebec delegate-general to Mexico wrote in Le Devoir: “Loyalty has taken precedence over competence since the arrival of the Parti Québécois. The episode around the confirmation in his functions of the Quebec delegate-general to Brussels, Gérard Latulippe, illustrates this trend very nicely.” That former delegate-general was Mario Laguë, who quit his job rather than preach the gospel of Parizeau and Landry. Today Laguë is the communications director for Michael Ignatieff.

What to conclude from all this? I take it as a sign of progress. That last time the Conservatives sicced a notorious separatist with a shaky ethical past on a politically-motivated witch hunt, they had the separatist do the witch hunting. Now they are farming the witch hunt and the separatist-hiring out to different branches. Diversity is good!

——————

CODA

Latulippe’s office broke government rules on $73,000 contract

The Gazette (Montreal)
Fri Jul 3 1987
Page: A1/ FRONT
Section: News
Byline: By JENNIFER ROBINSON of The Gazette
Source: GAZETTE

The office of former solicitor general Gerard Latulippe broke government rules last year by not reporting a contract worth about $73,000 awarded to a Montreal consulting firm owned by friends of Latulippe and lawyers linked to his former law firm.

The contract, which went to Premar Inc. in June 1986, was not reported to the Treasury Board and National Assembly.

Under National Assembly rules, all department contracts and spending commitments over $25,000 must be reported within about three months to the standing committee on institutions. Lesser commitments are reported yearly. Standing committees serve as watchdogs of government spending.

Under Treasury Board rules, all departments must report spending commitments, contracts and subsidies over $5,000 to it. Although it is not spelled out in the rules, such reports must be filed within about three weeks.

Government officials could not explain to The Gazette why Latulippe’s office had failed to report the Premar contract.

“It was an error,” said Anne Le Bel, press aide for Latulippe, who quit his cabinet post Monday amid allegations of conflict of interest and favoritism involving his girlfriend, his former law firm and Premar.

“It must have slipped through,” Le Bel said. She could not say why the year-old error had not been corrected, but promised that it would be.

The omission of the contract sparked renewed calls from the Parti Quebecois opposition yesterday for a full-scale investigation into the events leading up to Latulippe’s resignation.

The solicitor general doesn’t just forget to report $73,000 worth of contracts given to friends, PQ whip Jacques Brassard said in an interview.

“The excuse that it slipped through doesn’t convince me,” Brassard said. “It certainly raises questions about how many other contracts the government has forgotten to disclose.”

Le Bel said the Premar contract – it was originally set at $65,000 but ultimately cost $73,000 – was the only such error or omission, as far as she knew.

However, government officials also could not explain why an earlier contract for $5,000 to Premar was also excluded from lists of government spending.

Le Bel said the $5,000 contract, awarded to Premar on Feb. 6, 1986, should have been listed under the Justice Department’s spending commitments. At the time, the Justice and Solicitor General’s departments were operating as one.

But the contract, awarded to Premar on Latulippe’s orders, could not be found yesterday in Justice Department records which have been submitted to the National Assembly’s standing committee on institutions.

In the week before Latulippe quit, The Gazette investigated his department and confirmed that:

* Latulippe awarded a contract last year to the Montreal law firm Denis et Comtois, which in turn farmed out part of the contract to Latulippe’s girlfriend, Diane Fortier. Fortier, a Montreal lawyer, worked for Latulippe’s former law firm, McDougall Caron, until she was fired last week.

* Latulippe’s office awarded three contracts worth a total of about $83,000 to Premar, which was then the management-consultant arm of McDougall Caron. Two of the contracts were awarded directly by the minister while the third was awarded after Latulippe told his aides to invite Premar to submit a bid. Only one of those, worth $4,950, was ever recorded in spending commitments.

* Before entering politics, Latulippe signed a severance agreement with McDougall Caron under which he was to receive a percentage of the fees paid by his former clients in return for helping the firm retain the clients. Latulippe said that so far he has received $85,000 under the agreement.

McDougall Caron last month requested the agreement be renegotiated. Latulippe said a dispute over this led him to resign so that he could bargain with the firm and settle the matter.

Bookmark and Share
  • Holly Stick

    Heh, heh.

  • OnTheJob

    "I do have a problem with a guy who, in the year Quebecers had to make a decision about their future inside Canada or out, decided he preferred to be out."

    What exactly do you have against self-determination, a UN recognized human right that was affirmed in the Atlantic Charter and is still recognized today? To paraphrase Iggy, nationalism is the public good of the 21st century, sez I.

    He didn't become a separatist to bug you, or to destroy Canada, bub. He did so because a people should not be compelled to be part of a union they don't want to be part of. That's ABC stuff, perfectly reasonable, not at all objectionable.

    Are you aware that political affiliation was "read in" to the charter, meaning that Harper CAN'T discriminate against him in an employment matter based on his former PQ affiliation? Jeepers, that's two human rights violations I've nailed you on, and I'm barely trying here.

    The English Canadian media's demonizing of separatists is profoundly ignorant and needs to stop.

    • Holly Stick

      How about the Government of Harper's demonization of separatists when it is convenient to their lying narrative?

      • OnTheJob

        How about the Liberal Party of Canada stealing public money to cheat in federal elections? How about Jack :Layton's use of private health clinics?

        Grownups talking politics here, sweetie; speak like an adult or GTFO.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jenn_ Jenn_

          How about how that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand?

          Grownups talking about a specific thing here, sweetie, follow along or GTFO. Actually, I don't mean that because I'm being demeaning simply because you are a man. And I believe in equality, freedom of speech, human rights, etc.

          But I do have to laugh at your demeaning, sexist rebuttal to Holly Stick (hint, may not be a woman named Holly, say the name out loud really fast) immediately following your post about "Jeepers, that's two human rights violations I've nailed you on."

          • Holly Stick

            Good catch there, Jenn.

            I don't take seriously anyone who pretends to be grownup while holding forth about "Iggy" or "Wellsie".

          • OnTheJob

            "I don't take seriously anyone who pretends to be grownup while holding forth about "Iggy" or "Wellsie". "

            It's not often that I encounter someone who needs to get laid more than I do, but, wow, you might've set a world record for uptightness with that post. To paraphrase John Riggins to Sandra Day O'Connor: loosen up Holly baby, you're too tight.

            But back on topic: denying Quebeckers the right to self determination is a gross violation of their UN recognized human rights.

          • kcm

            So too i imagine, is misogenie.

          • kcm

            yikes…misogyny…

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/TJCook TJCook

          "How about Jack :Layton's use of private health clinics? "

          I hadn't heard this. Where can I find out more?

          • OnTheJob

            There's this whizbang new search engine called "Google", typing jack layton private health clinic into it gets us this as the first result returned:

            "NDP Leader Jack Layton, who's campaigning as the defender of public health care, had surgery at a private clinic in the 1990s, The Canadian Press has learned.

            Layton had hernia surgery at the Shouldice Hospital, a private facility in the Toronto suburb of Thornhill, while he was serving as a Toronto city councillor. The NDP leader said he wasn't aware the clinic was private when he went for his surgery in the mid-1990s."

            http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNe…

            Personally I think using the hostile-to-one's-intellect excuse that he didn't know it was private to be vastly more objectionable than using the private clinic. It's the coverup, not the crime, that gets guys like Layton into hot water.

            But back to Wellsy's flagrant violations of the rights of Quebeckers to obtain employment and self-determination: what's the deal with that. anyway? It's not like Quebec separatism is even possible in our lifetime due to demographics, even Lucien Bouchard concedes that, so why so hardcore anti-sovereigntist?. And, as others point out, why the free pass for former ardent sovereigntist Stephane Dion?

      • kcm

        'The English Canadian media's demonizing of separatists is profoundly ignorant and needs to stop"

        Oh i wholeheartedly agree…when the intellectual/political class of Quebec stop blaming the ROC for all their or their provinces failings. Funny how ignorance and intolerance is a street with many on on and off ramps.

    • Jan

      From your post it sounds like the new Prez will be supportive of the Palestinians right to self-determination. This is great news.

  • jarrid

    Stéphane Dion supported the separatists in the 1980 referendum.

    Mr. Wells, does that mean he was an illegitimate leader of the Liberal Party?

    If we had to forego appointments to anyone with ties to the separatist movement at one time or another, you'd have to exclude so many potential Quebec appointees.

    Boy Wells, you really are scraping the bottom of the barrel here.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

      Why jarrid, you've changed your mind about separatists. Here's how you used to write when you thought they were bad.

      http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/04/30/new-fears-of-s…

      • kcm

        Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds…and in J's case, a love affair with cognitive dissonance.

      • kcm

        Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds…and in J's case, a love affair with cognitive dissonance.

  • jarrid

    So Wells jumps with both feet into Conservative Harper-hating mode.

    They hired a separatist! What a tired piece of drivel you've written here Paul.

    What's more interesting is your jumping into Conservative Harper-hating mode with both feet. Very very interesting, that.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

      Like you and Jolyon, I'm still scratching my head trying to understand the embarrassing road Wells has decided to follow, one that seems to be nothing more than an attempt to smear the government for acting like a government.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

        It might make more sense if you stopped scratching yourself.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

          For homo sapiens like myself , the absence of scratching does not wonders like it does for surrealist neanderthals like yourself. Thanks for the tip though. You keep working on those fleas, lice and mites.

    • kcm

      …very very interesting. with both feet too…jumping yet…fascinating…

      • Holly Stick

        Gawrsh, you'd almost think the Harper government had done something wrong… Nah! Can't be!

  • Mulletaur

    I love how the Western separatists work together with the Quebec separatists to destroy federal institutions. As they say in French, l'union fait la force !

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/canaidreform canaidreform

    Pity the poor, long suffering staff at R&D. They must now report to a man whose commitment to rights, democracy and Canada, itself, seems tenous, at best. Latulippe will most likely use the forensic audit (which, no doubt, will find nits to pick) as an excuse to replace the R&D staff with clones of himself. It will become know as the strategy to "clone the odium".

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jenn_ Jenn_

      "clone the odium" LOVE IT!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/PolJunkie PolJunkie

      clone the odium?!? LMAO!!!!!!

  • AntiSpin

    Paul, so political association is an immediate disqualifier for public service? With all due respect to Remy Beauregard, I see nothing in his CV that made him any more or any less qualified to be the president of Rights and Democracy than Gerard Latulippe.

    Your thesis that the Harper government is attempting to undermine R&D through the appointment process is far fetched and somewhat absurd. What your suggesting is that Harper et al are attempting to undermine a board that they appointed by having new board members interfere with the roles and responsibilities of the board and staff? There are much easier ways for Harper to achieve this goal then some byzantine conspiracy.

  • Tim

    I want to hear more about Latulippe's girlfriend and why she way fired last week from her law firm in Montreal.

    • Jan

      Do we know her name?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jenn_ Jenn_

    Okay, Paul.

    I can take a joke as well as the next person, and I will give you credit for the length of time you've been reeling this one out, but you've gone too far with this latest entry.

    April 1st is more than an entire month away!

    I mean seriously, do you really expect to get all the way to April Fools Day with this (admittedly, entertaining) story line you're spinning?

    Harper hiring a separatist. No, Harper hiring TWO separatists! Haha, chortle, guffaw. That's a really good one.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

    I posted Matas's piece here two weeks ago, Einstein. Do try to keep up.

  • Holly Stick

    They're rightwingers. They don't believe in grooming each other.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    None right now, but I practice up for them by reading your comments.

  • Maureen

    Just more and more reasons for all NGOs to be defunded immediately. Again – any government should live or die by their policies rather than farm out things to a third party, and what is increasingly obvious, unaccountable NGO. Annual audits only say -' this money was spent on what the organization said it was spent on' – it makes no judgment on if the spending was in keeping with an organization's mandate. It is like the auditor General's report which looks at the results of the spending.

    • Holly Stick

      A very bad idea. NGOs can do a lot that governments cannot:

      "…NGOs can play a crucial role in alerting States to their obligations, collaborating with States on their programmes where NGOs are better placed to forge links with communities and households, developing alternative models to State models of intervention, and monitoring State activities and their impact. Importantly, NGOs can serve as a facilitating link with communities and individuals, and feed information to and from State institutions to citizens. …"

      http://www.iwraw-ap.org/using_cedaw/ngos_cando.ht…

      Of course R&D is not an NGO, anyway. Pay attention.
      http://www.dd-rd.ca/site/who_we_are/index.php?lan…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    . . . discovers he is Tim Mak's father, but conceals the fact (for now) . . .

    • kcm

      But later confesses that Aurel Braun adopted him when his parents abandoned him to enter a Tibetan monastery.

  • small_c

    Thank you Paul for the backgrounds. i don't know what to conclude just yet but it is McCain-Palin strange why the Conservatives didn't get this out before you did. Are they asleep or laying a convoluted trap for Iggy in Quebec? Is this going to be an excuse to claim Parliament does not work again to the GG? Or another attack on the loyalty of civil servants? Well for one, I now longer care if we own the podium, I prefer to watch those Canadian soaps the Right wing & DieNasty (oops sorry typo)

From Macleans