A missed opportunity for diversity

Mark Steyn on the opening ceremonies: Where was the genuinely bizarro cavalcade?

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:00am - 228 Comments

That’s why the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a worthless piece of junk—because (at least according to the Supreme Court of Canada) it both licenses the Canadian state to restrain your basic liberties yet also exempts your (native) neighbour from those same restraints. Putting aside its other defects, no self-respecting citizen should take seriously a Charter that institutionalizes race-based discrimination as a constitutional principle. In this respect, the First Nations’ contempt for Canadian authority is most instructive. As Mohawk Grand Chief Mike Delisle explained to CTV, “We don’t consider ourselves Canadians.” Well, except for the purposes of federal welfare. And top billing at the Olympics ceremony.

Speaking of Canadian values, they sound so nice when you’re floating choreographically over the Prairies on a massive CanCon bender. But what do they boil down to on the ground? Mme Marise Myrand is a 389-lb. diabetic who lives in Ste-Marie-de-Beauce in la belle province. She asked her condo association to give her a parking space nearer the door of the building. The board responded that it wasn’t for them to take somebody else’s spot and transfer it to her, but suggested Mme Myrand ask the occupant of the other space directly. Mme Jocelyne Nolet is a short- order cook in her sixties with an injured shoulder, and declined to accommodate Mme Myrand. So the aggrieved wound up at the Quebec “Human Rights” Tribunal, which ordered the condo association to hand over the parking space to Mme Myrand by March 1 and, for good measure, fined all 35 of her co-owners a total of $10,000 to be given to the plaintiff in compensation.

It was reported that, in the course of her battle with her co-owners, Mme Myrand had been subject to “degrading remarks” about using her obesity to get a better parking space. In her judgment, Michèle Pauzé fined the association $3,000 in punitive damages because these remarks “heurtaient les valeurs d’inclusion promulguées dans notre société”—i.e., they conflict with the inclusive values promulgated by our society.

Oh, right. So privately expressing sentiments at odds with the state ideology may result in seizure of assets. Unless, of course, you’re a Mohawk who wants to kick out the lousy half-breed next door.

On March 29, the trial of Guy Earle opens at the British Columbia “Human Rights” Tribunal. Mr. Earle is a stand-up comic who late one night at a Vancouver comedy club put down some drunken hecklers. Alas for him, they were of the lesbian persuasion and so they hauled his homophobic ass into “human rights” court. Any Olympic tourists still in town may marvel at a country that prosecutes a comedian for his stand-up act, but no doubt Chief Commissar Heather MacNaughton, previously the presiding kangaroo of the Maclean’s show trial, will be more sympathetic to the notion that Mr. Earle’s jokes “heurtaient les valeurs d’inclusion promulguées dans notre société.

Odd how the “inclusive values” hymned by Commissar Pauzé require more and more muscle to enforce them. The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation, unless you’re a Mohawk who’s getting overly inclusive in his horizontal outreach. But the state apparently has a place in comedy criticism and parking-lot conversations and on all the other ever-multiplying front lines of diversity. A genuinely free society has to be free to say rude things to the morbidly obese or the Sapphically soused, because the price of smoothing out all the rough edges is a bureaucracy with powers ever vaster and ever more whimsical. Real systemic provocations to “les valeurs d’inclusion”—whether on Mohawk reserves or in Montreal mosques—will be given a pass on cultural grounds, but the apparatchiks of ideological enforcements will pick on softer and softer targets, like Guy Earle, and destroy their lives.

Canada’s “human rights” circus is an alternative Olympics ceremony all of its own. What a cavalcade it would have made: Indians, Inuit, and the disabled? Big deal. Where was the pre-op transsexual who sued the London health club for being denied the right to flaunt her wedding tackle in the ladies’ shower? Like Joni Mitchell’s song says, she’s looked at life from both sides now. What about an opening scene where the Olympic cauldron is lit and stand-up comedians of insufficiently diverse orientation are thrown into the inferno to placate the Gods of Inclusion while Maritime step dancers perform a synchronized Quebec parking-lot dispute? Instead of the usual Cirque du So Lame, couldn’t we have a real, honest-to-goodness genuinely Canadian bizarro diversity celebration? After all, it’s more real than the official version.

Bookmark and Share
  • Xty

    Are Mohawks Canadian or not? You do need to clarify this point. Sovereign nation implies they are not.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    They are both Canadian and Mohawk. They are not less Mohawk because they are Canadian or less Canadian because they are Mohawk. The Mohawk are a semi-sovereign nation in that Canadian laws apply on Kahnawake but, in addition, the Band has a lot more authority than an ordinary municipality.

  • Adam C. Sieracki

    I thought the opening ceremonies were nicely done. Granted, that hydraulic arm didn't come down…but this was a nice ceremony. And, unlike China, no fake singing and fireworks! (Nikky Yanofsky is amazing.)

    The issue with the Mohawk band[s] is interesting, especially given the fact that I look more 'naitive' than some of their very militant leaders. Will Shawn Brant get the boot, too?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    I am not defending the evictions at all, I am defending the Mohawks' right to make that kind of serious moral and political mistake. As Rumsfeld put it, Freedom is untidy. Moreover, we just don't, as a nation, have the political capital to start waltzing in and telling the Mohawks how to behave. They are not well-disposed towards us in the first place, they have a nearly unbroken 700-year warrior tradition (which now includes teeming arsenals), and they're prouder than the Highland Scots.

    Sorry about the threat, there's been a lot of vicious personal attacks on this site in the past week (which you wouldn't know about) and they put in a new rule that you're not allowed to blacken your antagonist's reputation.

  • Roslyn

    We just wasted a whole bunch of Canadian taxpayers' money on the inane and insane Olympics. As for Aboriginal people…LOL. Come and live in Montreal and you will see how well they live off the white man' s bucks. Need smokes, go to the reservagion; need booze, go to the reservation; want to play poker, craps, the slot machines, go to the reservation. They suck taxpayers' money from the Federal Goverment while the rest of us have to live on what we earn. Outside of the few Indians who worked on high rise buildings in the U.S., the rest are lazy slobs.

    • Racism_Sux

      how ignorant of you. It is highly illogical to stereotype based on a few. I am First Nation (or as you say, Aboriginal). I pay taxes, live in the city, volunteer in community events/organizations, pay for all of my medical, dental, etc. For you to imply that I am a lazy slob because i am Aboriginal is completely racist.

      Look in the mirror!

      • Xty

        Yeah, what a horrible comment.

  • vancouver guy

    God bless you, Mr. Steyn for having the courage to say in public what so many of us think in private. By the way, wasn't it those same inhabitants of the Oka reserve near Montreal who would not let the Olympic torch relay come anywhere near until everyone got down on their knees and begged permission to step onto native land?

    • Racism_Sux

      Wow… another ignorant person. You judge 1 millions Aboriginal people in Canada based on a few individuals in ONE community thousand of kilometres away from where you live.

      Sounds like racism to me. You are just looking for excuse to hate.

  • JonahH

    Also, I think my original point was simply that the Mohawk reservation kicking people out (which I do not condone) has absolutely nothing to do with the West Coast first nations. That would be like condemning the town of Timmins for the actions of the mayor of Trenton. Making the connection is quite ignorant (likely willfully) and indicative of Steyn's racism.

  • JonahH

    I don't agree with the actions of this one, isolated Mohawk tribe. But it should really be acknowledged that this reservation has absolutely nothing to do with the west coast first nations. They are a different people with different beliefs. Lumping all indigenous peoples under one arbitrary umbrella is really quite ignorant.

    Furthermore, I am curious about Steyn's opinion regarding Israeli citizenship policies. Pretty similair to this Mohawk band, no?

    • Mike514

      The opening ceremonies were a national ceremony, showcasing Canada, not merely Vancouver or the west coast. I would imagine that the First Nations asked to participate in the OC were intended to represent Canada's First Nations in general (of course, I could be wrong).

      To put it in perspective: This is why there has been criticism about the lack of French in the OC. Sure, they don't speak much French in BC. But this isn't only about BC. The OC represented Canada as a whole.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/jolyon jolyon

      "As of 2008, Arab citizens of Israel comprise just over 20% of the country's total population. The majority of these identify themselves as Arab or Palestinian by nationality and Israeli by citizenship." (Wiki – Arab Citizens of Israel)

      "Furthermore, I am curious about Steyn's opinion regarding Israeli citizenship policies. Pretty similair to this Mohawk band, no? "

      What are you curious about and how are Israel's citizenship laws like Mohawks?

      • JonahH

        Israel does have a history of denying citizenship based on race/religion. For example, the recent situation involving filippino residents of Israel . Also consider the "Right of Return" for Jews emmigrating to Israel, compared to the refusal of Israel to accept Gazan refugees. Israel may not be kicking out Arabs, but I'm pretty sure they're not letting any in. Even for Jews, some of the Orthodox Rabiis are trying to impose a sort of "purity test", disallowing conversions done by non-Orrthodox Rabbis in the diaspora.. Still, it may have been a hasty comparison on my part 'kcm' makes a very good point on this below.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

          Also, the situation within Israel proper is not the main thing: Israel has now been occupying the West Bank for 40 years and the West Bank Palestinians don't have citizenship. Indeed, what support a two-state solution has, either within Israel or internationally, is generally dependent on the idea that if the West Bank Palestinians got ordinary Israeli citizenship the Jewish character of Israel proper would disappear; so West Bank Palestinians' lack of citizenship is actually taken for granted.

          • Rob H

            Gee I wonder why the Israeli's are occupying the West Bank. Could it be they were shelled for 20 years from Syria? Could it be that Arabs want to kill all Jews in Israel? Gazan refugees! Gee how did they end up in Gaza? Were the Arab residents of Israel told by Arab armies to get out of Israel until Arab armies destroyed Israel in the 1967 war? West Bank Palestinians don't have citizenship because Israel has never claimed the West Bank, it is occupying it and has offered to leave if a peace deal recognizing Israel is agreed. BTW, what kind of visa did the filippino residents have?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

            The, ah, Filipino residents? Of where, Ramallah?

      • kcm

        No, it wouldn't be a good comparisan at all. The difference for the Mohawk would presumably be there aren't any more Mohawks anywhere else in the world, to ensure they continue to survive as a people. Somehow they;re going to have to figure this out. It's not acceptable in this age to deport or exclude people based on race or blood, whether they be Quebecers or aboriginals. But is a paradox, on the one hand nobody can in good conscience support racial separatism, on the other international and national law permits the right of self determination. How do you do that if you can't take measures to protect your minority culture?
        Personally i think FN's have got to get realistic about band size. Form regional associations that are large enough to realistically protect the culture without trampling on the rights of the majority, or institute race quotas. Maybe assimilation is inevitable…everyone becoming Metis??… but they, not us, should get to decide when and how much to assimilate.

    • Adam C. Sieracki

      Steyn isn't above double standards. Just ask him about Ronald Reagan and the Mujaheddin.

  • JonahH

    The First Nations represented in the OC were specifically the 4 BC tribes whose band leaders supported the games.

    It should be noted however, that many of the indigenous peoples on whose (unconceded) land the olympics are taking place are vehemently opposed to the games.

  • Speedy Gonsales

    Was it 'quantum quantum quantum' or 'quando quando quando'? I thought quando… Si, senor!

  • kcm

    I didn't like the ceremony too much either. But really, how do you do this without resorting to cliche? I'd imagine the next one in Sochi will be full of Cossacks and dancing bears. For Steyn this is just one more hook to hang his tiresome Trudeauopia narrative on…and a chance to herd all native opinion into the same leaky boat as the Mohawks…the fact is there is a diversity of native opinion out there on the issue of culture and how to defend it, the Mohawk in general seem to be at one extreme of it…Steyn's either too lazy or too smart to dig too deep. Complex nuance isthe enemy of oversimplfication for him, and why not when the latter is so much more effective.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/TheVeteran TheVeteran

    Mark, your incisive wit cuts through the PC BS once again! (Actually, I'm repeating myself…Political Correctness IS BS!!). I heard that that "person" pretend-flying over the Prairie wheat fields was actually a GIRL, not a BOY. I sure couldn't tell…which I guess means the organizers achieved ANOTHER wet-dream-fulfillment "equality" goal!!

  • ibivi

    My reaction to the OC was that every Canadian cliche was being trotted out and it was rather disconcerting that they couldn't come up anything more in depth about the geographical, historical and cultural diversity of Canada from aboriginal, French and English settlement to current times.

    Basically, it was a pitch to tourism.

  • zardas

    Mr. Steyn! Natives in Canada are not the only ones discriminating. There are at least three subsidized apartment buildings in the city of Toronto you can not get into unless you belong to certain ethnic groups. This is being done quite openly without any fear of Human Rights Commissions.

  • LeRoy Peach

    Does Mark not know that there are plenty of grant worshippers in Ontario as well. Except that they don't use the word "grant" there. When Ontario, which gets the bulk of government handouts, received a handout, it's called an investment. LOL

  • Racism_Sux

    If anyone has followed Mark Steyn, these types of comments are not unexpected from him. While he certainly portrays an excellent example of the freedoms of speech, he also portrays en excellent example of hopelessly biased, unscientific diatribe.

    The problem with both sides of this subject/argument is that people are oversimplifying the situation and painting a good vs bad, us vs them scenario, which is simply not true. Yes there are SOME Aboriginal people that are racist, but that IS NOT every Aboriginal person. Anyone to suggest such an ignorant thing is to be racist themselves.

    At the same time, there are SOME caucasian people who are racist, but i am not so foolish and mentally illogical to categorically state that all caucasian people are racist. The fact is, people are complex beings who make individualistic choices. The actions of one CANNOT condemn the future or reputations of others.

    Judging by the comments to this article, ignorance and racism seems to be bounding….

    • Xty

      It is hardly fair to accuse Mr Steyn of racism for pointing out the racist actions of the Mohawks.

  • Markus

    Racial profiling in Indian reservations?
    Controlling comedy?
    Taking people to court for upsetting minorities?
    Oh, you Canadians live in heaven. I mean Nirvana, or the great
    hunting grounds in the sky, or whatever…wouldn't want to upset
    anyone about being left out, or upsetting spiritual sensibilities or…
    not speaking French or…
    Oh, fuck it, it's all just too difficult

  • Casandra

    Wonderful people. Silly laws.

  • http://www.premieretreeservices.com tree removal company

    Is that peter pan on the picture?

  • mattbin

    So true, Mark. In reality, there is no "diversity" of any kind in Canada; it's just ideological claptrap. In reality, everyone looks, acts, and thinks exactly like you.

From Macleans