A missed opportunity for diversity

Mark Steyn on the opening ceremonies: Where was the genuinely bizarro cavalcade?

by Mark Steyn on Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:00am - 228 Comments
A missed opportunity for diversity

Left and middle: Photographs by Brian Howell

Judging by emails from readers in America, Britain, India, Australia, Europe, Africa and beyond, Vancouver’s Olympic ceremony was a gold medal snoozeroo of politically correct braggadocio impressive even by Canadian standards. A Florida correspondent suggested that Beijing’s decision in 2008 to downplay discreetly its official state ideology might have been usefully emulated by Canadian organizers unable to go a minute and a half without reflexive invocations of their own state ideology of “diversity.” A reader in Sydney said he had no idea until the ceremony that the majority of Canada’s population were Aboriginal. Actually, if they were, you’d be hearing a lot less talk about “diversity,” for reasons we’ll come to later.

But don’t take the word of doubtless untypical Steyn readers. Out on the Internet, the Tweeting Twitterers pronounced it a bust, and even in the Toronto Star Richard Ouzounian declared that “the eyes of the world were upon us and we put them to sleep.” On the other hand, the Vancouver Sun’s reporter cooed that this was “the Canada we want the world to see, magical and beautiful, and talented.” This just after she’d written: “Maple leaves fell from the sky. And then, the divine poetess Joni Mitchell and her haunting Clouds fills the air while a young boy floats and soars above the audience, undulating fields of wheat below.” I was pleasantly relieved to discover that a story about “the world’s most lethal cocktail” concerned some enterprising dealers who’ve been lacing heroin with anthrax, and not whichever malevolent genius came up with the idea of having airborne ballet dancers doing interpretative choreography over the Prairies to a mélange of Both Sides Now and W. O. Mitchell’s Who Has Seen The Wind. As is traditional, most of the creativity went into the audience estimates: apparently, this tribute to the only G7 nation comprised solely of high priests of the Great Tree Spirit, armies of Inuit sculptors, and Cape Breton chorus lines of federal grant worshippers was watched by three billion people “worldwide.” As if the Royal Canadian Mint could afford to commission that many commemorative authentic pewter maple-encrusted manacles.

Canada’s message to the world: every cliché you’ve heard about our plonkingly insecure self-flattering PC earnestness has been triumphantly confirmed. You need pay us no further heed until the 2068 Commonwealth Games opening ceremony. Half the countries, twice as long!

But, as it happens, if you chanced to be holed up in Vancouver for the duration, Canada is well worth paying attention to. The gulf between the self-mythologizing of the Olympics ceremony and its application on the ground was rarely more visible. For example, an overseas visitor to the Games, wearying of all the First Nations types prancing around the stadium and picking up a newspaper, would have surely been bewildered to have found reports of the self-same First Nations types giving 10-day eviction orders from the Kahnawake reserve to residents deemed to have insufficient “blood quantum” to pass the Mohawk racial-purity test. Apparently, most of the deportees are spouses or “partners” of full Mohawks.

To be honest, I was impressed to discover that there are actually people willing to move to native reserves. Truly, love conquers all. At least until the blood quantum theorists show up, and you find you’re living in some dystopian Nuremberg rewrite of Abie’s Irish Rose in which a sovereign jurisdiction of the Canadian state can break up your marriage on racial grounds.

And it’s perfectly legal!

Did I doze off and miss that at Vancouver? “And now dancing racists funded by Canadian tax dollars present an interpretative ballet symbolizing the great Canadian mosaic by performing racial purity tests on Donald Sutherland and k. d. lang, at the end of which they will be ceremonially cast out of the stadium while Michael Bublé and Nelly Furtado sing ‘Tell me when will you be mine/Tell me Quantum, Quantum, Quantum.’ ”

Whenever I write about immigration or Islam or multiculturalism or some such, there’s a little flurry of comments that I’m obsessed with racial purity. Hardly. My own “blood quantum” is hopelessly impure, so I’m in no position to start casting aspersions. Yet, if someone were to muse on the importance of, say, maintaining Anglo-Celtic blood quantum in the Maritimes, they’d be on a fast track to “human rights” hell—just for writing it. Because it’s incompatible with “Canadian values.” But if you don’t write it, if you just get on and do it, that’s entirely compatible with Canadian values—as long as you’re a First Nations guy.

And the Diversity Pansies haven’t a word to say about it.

Bookmark and Share
  • James in Houston

    Coming soon to a tropical island near you, the Akaka Bill, named after the Hawaiian Senator who authored it and rythms with – well, you get the idea. If passed (and President Barry is 100% behind it), native Hawaiian will be able to set up their own government on the Hawaiian Islands (presumably a monarchy) funded by Uncle Sam, appropriate their native lands, and be immune from the laws of the US. It will be the first race-based discriminatory government in the States.

    And in case you missed it, I did mispell Hawai'ian on purpose. One small protest agains nativitist PC.

    • Peter K

      Yeah, I heard about that, and it's not a good idea in the long run. Was there really such a big push from the Polynesians in Hawaii to have self-government?

      • mitch

        It's pretty obvious that Hawaii was taken in the first place to suit the interests of a small number of US businessmen. It really has no place being in the US. However, outright independence would be the honest way to approach the matter.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Because there are a million aboriginal Canadians and they won't be very happy if they're completely screwed over again.

    • http://twitter.com/FACLC @FACLC

      I thought there were zero aboriginal Canadians, and they were all part of a bunch of non-Canada 'nations' that a separate entity called Canada has signed treaties with. You have to decide which is which here.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    So? It's still the luck of birth.

  • Dennymack

    I lived in Canada for two years (I am from that place beneath Canada.) and I saw little of the Canada I know in the ceremonies.
    For the Mohawks, they have fallen into the inevitable trap of race based systems. You cannot use race as a basis for any decision without creating standards of race. You can't create such standards without creating a metric, and it will need terminology. In the bad old days, we had such a vocabulary: negro, half-caste, quadroon, etc. I am glad I don't have to teach my kids those terms, at least until they apply for college.

    • Marion

      Except that's also what the Indian Act is based on when it comes to determining who is a Status Indian and who isn't.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    I'm not aboriginal and I don't speak for the Mohawks.

    This is really not about what's morally right, Xty, it's about what's practicable. Repealing the Indian Act may well be the right way to proceed, but right now First Nations are very much against it and we can't act unilaterally without really causing a huge crisis.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    I am not defending banning mixed race marriages. If you keep up those kinds of personal and untrue attacks on me, I will report your comments and you will be banned from the site.

    • Xty

      But if you defend the evictions, then you are defending banning mixed race marriages, at least on Mohawk land.
      Why do you resort to threats? I was being neither personal or untrue, just trying to follow the logic of your arguments.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/janicemaerose janicemaerose

    Thank you Mark for drawing out what SOME people really think about Aboriginal people in this country and the manner in which you've organized your argument. I don't know if you've noticed, but the usual crowd of Macleans commenters don't represent a large part in this discussion.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    Jolyon and I are what, chopped liver?

  • kcm

    ..oops..steyn…

  • Dan

    haha yeah, good one, living on a reserve must be terrible. HAHAHAHAHAHA. You are hilarious, Mark.

    Wait, that's not funny.

    • DT in GT

      Kahnawake is not a reserve
      It's a narco-state run by gangsters who extort protection money from the feds a.k.a. me

      • Xty

        Yeah – when you live near it, you cannot escape that reality. It is a lawless zone.

        • theintellectual

          kahnawake is not unique. i used to live near a small town called beaverlodge, and the horse lake and kelly lake reserves accounted for about 80-90 percent of the crime in our whole area.

  • kcm

    Quit withe apartheid rhetoric, you just make yourself look adsurd. If we'd allowed FN's to manage/get paid for the resources on their own lands we wouldn't now be in the position of them being virtual wards of state. This doesn't begin to address the historical injustices and oppression done to them in the name of Canada…for you it's all been a one way street…which just goes to show how truly ignorant you are.

  • kcm

    You may not be interested in your culture…does that give you the right to speak for others who may be?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Thanks, kc, that was interesting. Your really know your FN issues, I must say.

    Very relevant to Kahnawake, I expect, since as our borderline fascist friend pointed out, there is no treaty there.

  • kcm

    i thought we weren't invited to this party…at least i didn't see the welcome mat.

  • kcm

    'That’s why the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a worthless piece of junk—because (at least according to the Supreme Court of Canada) it both licenses the Canadian state to restrain your basic liberties yet also "

    Oh dear Mark doesn't like section 35 entrenching Aboriginal rights in the charter…what a surprise? I love his succinct pithy dismissal of one of our founding peoples rights as "exempts your (native) neighbour from those same restraints" That's right Mark, they wrote it just to piss you off and yank the rest of our chains for past sins. But Mark's got a better idea…cept he never acually comes up with one…let's try assimilation, we just didn't stick at it long enough eh!

    • Rob H

      Indians didn't "found" anything. They are a recent addition to the lies of Canada created by the post war socialists.

    • Xty

      Sarcasm, because you don't have a valid point. I believe Mark's better idea is equal treatment under the law.

  • kcm

    "A genuinely free society has to be free to say rude things to the morbidly obese or the Sapphically soused, because the price of smoothing out all the rough edges is a bureaucracy with powers ever vaster and ever more whimsical"

    Yes i think i can agree with Mr Steyn on that score…lets roll up, or at least rein in the HRCs.
    But the we get this…
    'Real systemic provocations to “les valeurs d’inclusion”—whether on Mohawk reserves or in Montreal mosques—will be given a pass on cultural grounds, but the apparatchiks of ideological enforcements will pick on softer and softer targets, like Guy Earle, and destroy their lives'
    So, do you want the commissars to cease and desist altogether, or only enforce their edicts where you think they ought to be?

    • Xty

      It is clear from Mark Steyn's writing that he wants the HRC to cease and desist. But his point is valid – they are not only a real threat to freedom, they are also selective and pick on the weakest.

    • Rob H

      If you can read, the "cease and desist altogether" is Steyn's positiion and he is correct.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Yeah, it's completely insane. "It's your land except insofar as it has any value whatsoever." Thank God we're turning the corner.

  • http://aragoweb.com Texan

    I am just appreciative of Steyn for eloquently stating yet another reason us Neanderthals find the Junior Americans so cute and funny. Are there still men from Canada? Well yes, but they are either in the Middle East or on skates. Canadians are addicted to political correctness the way my brother was to booze. One day it cost him his home and he asked to move in; I told him to buzz off. Keep pushing your luck PC’ers. Boundaries are invaluable.

    • kcm

      Awhhh…it's not all bad…the upside of universal health care is that even our street people are relatively healthy.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/A_READER_ A_READER_

        Hm wonder if 'street' people and criminals get faster medical treatment then the rest of us waiting months and months on lists.
        Street people tent to be younger and their medical needs are self inflicted and due to life on the street, life threatening or otherwise.
        They also present the most energy sucking as they are 'hard' to deal with in any situation they are in, endlessly exhausing our emergency services for often nothing more than a self indulged bing of whatever the drug they are on, and usually in need of instant and or prolonged medical resources and attention.
        They'll never be taxpayers or very few will.
        You'll be seeing it differently when someone you love dies of cancer who had been placed on a 'waiting list' for nine months.

  • http://aragoweb.com Texan

    I am just appreciative of Steyn for eloquently stating yet another reason us Neanderthals find the Junior Americans so cute and funny. Are there still men from Canada? Well yes, but they are either in the Middle East or on skates. Canadians are addicted to political correctness the way my brother was to booze. One day it cost him his home and he asked to move in; I told him to buzz off. Keep pushing your luck PC’ers. Boundaries are invaluable.

    As a note, in 2003 I was forced to "surrender to the Crown" a can of mace my wife kept in her car for protection. I'm still bitter about that. If you confiscate mace from women how do you plan on protecting yourselves? I've seen the police, please don't answer with that.

    • kcm

      junior americans…sure you didn't refer to the customs as "boy"?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/minaka minaka

        A day without dragging in an accusation of racism where none is warranted is clearly unbearable for you.

        • kcm

          Hardly an accusation of racism, since i have no idea as to the ethnicity of the customs agent. More fairly a poke at yankee paternalism. I note that racism and it's adverse consequences for the "white race"is a perennial obsession of yours, not mine.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Chopped liver in Lent.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/janicemaerose janicemaerose

      Sorry guys, I had a glass of wine and missed a few of the reply comment sections last night. Jack, your dogged perseverence is impressive.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

        Thanks, janicemaerose! Every now and then I get the itch to drop in on the Steynettes and study the abyss of human folly.

  • kcm

    Delgamuukw was a very big deal on the reserve i lived on.[ it came in around the same time] Look at some of the prior rulings such as…forest ministries could hand out cutting rights on Fn's land as long as they left enough trees to enable hunting /trapping to continue. It was a joke. If we only really knew the half of how we robbed and swindled these people with a lawyers smile.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Of course there's dissent. The Mohawks are the most fractious and politics-addicted nation in the Americas. The reason you haven't heard about it is because you know nothing about them. Yet you feel happy commenting as though you knew something. What's new?

  • Kyle

    Damn you, Steyn! I'm was trying to read my way through a boring afternoon at work without getting busted. This article was too funny, though. I cracked up laughing and got the death stare from my German colleagues. Now i'm under pressure to work hard for the rest of the day. Damn you, Sir!

  • mitch

    "rights have that right" –> "whites have that right"

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Yeah, you're right, it does require more thought than you've put into it.

    The treaties are treaties which aboriginal Canadians have signed, before they were officially considered Canadians (though retrospectively we now consider them to have Canadians) with the Crown as Canadians; they are not treaties with Canada, which includes both both the Crown and Canadians of all sorts.

    You are welcome.

From Macleans