Signs of life for Michael Ignatieff

Prorogation allowed Ignatieff to see through the fog of his foibles and find his vision

by Paul Wells on Friday, February 26, 2010 9:00am - 116 Comments

Signs of life for Michael IgnatieffSo where were we? Ah yes. “It being 8:03 p.m.,” acting speaker Barry Devolin told the Commons on Dec. 10, “pursuant to an order made earlier today, the House stands adjourned until Monday, Jan. 25, 2010, at 11 a.m., pursuant to Standing Orders 28(2) and 24(1).

Devolin believed that to be true when he spoke. But 20 days later the Governor General prorogued the second session of the 40th Parliament, so your MPs are going to try it all over again when they return for the third session on March 3.

A lot has happened since then. It’s been a while since I threw a bunch of polling numbers at you, so maybe you’ll indulge me today. Before Christmas I interviewed one of Michael Ignatieff’s new helpers who had moved into the Office of the Leader of the Opposition along with the Liberal boss’s new chief of staff, Peter Donolo. This person said the Liberals’ immediate goal was to move to within a point or two of the Conservatives by spring. I nodded politely. Good luck with that.

The then-latest Ekos poll showed the Liberals 9.2 points behind the Conservatives. As I write this, the latest Ekos shows that lead has shrunk to 1.2 points. Asked whether the Harper government is on the right track, Canadians now respond “no” by 48 per cent to 41 per cent. In December they were saying “yes” by 45 per cent to 44.

This turnaround is entirely due to Michael Ignatieff’s bold and inspiring leadership. Just kidding. No, the news from that other popular Ottawa pollster, Nik Nanos, is less than encouraging for the Liberal leader: while Harper lost 2.8 points as “best Prime Minister” from November to February, falling to 32 per cent, Ignatieff fell 1.6 points in the same period to a dismal 16.1. That’s now fully two points behind the NDP’s Jack Layton.

And yet. Unappreciated and, one suspects, unnoticed by most Canadians, the Liberal leader has begun to move smartly to make himself and his party more relevant and more responsive to Canadian voters. Ignatieff spent 2009 looking rattled, uncertain, by turns timid and reckless. His recent behaviour suggests he surrounded himself well when he reached out to Donolo and crew last October.

Don’t take any of this as an endorsement of Ignatieff or a prediction of success for him. This corner’s crystal ball remains prorogued. But it is beginning to look as though the Conservatives can no longer depend on Ignatieff to do quite so much of their work for them.

First came the Liberal response to the prorogation itself. At first they seemed caught flat-footed by Harper’s decision. Protest came from outside Parliament and outside institutional politics, with a Facebook group and some modestly successful street protests leading the way. But the Liberals did respond, beginning in late January, with a series of round-table discussions on Parliament Hill on issues like jobs, veterans and health care. Under the rubric “Liberals Are Working,” they allowed Liberal MPs to catch up, for real, on some complex issues, and to show the country footage of themselves with brows furrowed, neckties loosened, hard at work.

Bookmark and Share
  • Orson Bean

    How about telling us what he actually plans on doing if he's elected PM? Just a thought.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

    Just like an election last fall was inevitable. Just like an election last spring was inevitable.

  • hosertohoosier

    That isn't generally true about Canadian elections. When you poll voters in Canada on the main factors behind their vote – parties, leaders or local candidates – parties come out ahead by a large margin. We look at star candidates more because they are interesting exceptions than because they are the rule. That should make sense because individual MP's [rightfully] have very little power due to our Westminster traditions of strong party discipline.

    In terms of ground organization, that probably is important, but it is both an effect rather than a cause of electoral success. Harper has been successful in part because he has a base of devoted supporters, but he has a base of devoted supporters in part because he has been successful.

    PS: the best way to get thumbs down is to find a way to offend Liberals and Conservatives with contrarian opinions. -10 is very hard to get – I think my record is -4 or so.

  • Amateur Hour

    I don't trust you. And stop stealing Barbara Kay's act!

    "Quebec's baby boom continues, as the birth rate rose for the sixth consecutive year."

    http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20…

    • Linda McQuack

      Just over 1.7 . That's some boom and is still well below replacement. And who do you think is having the kids in good old Quebec? Here's a hint- over 25% of babies had at least one parent who was born outside Canada;

      Quebec continues to lead the nation with the highest abortion rate. For every 100 children who see the light of day, 40 others are sucked out and toseed in the dumpster.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    Insightful piece.

    " But it is beginning to look as though the Conservatives can no longer depend on Ignatieff to do quite so much of their work for them."

    About time. The CPC is not at their best when they have no credible opposition.

    • Some thoughts

      They actually only look good when there is no credible opposition. An

  • Sigh
  • kcm

    Perhaps someone named McQuack shouldn't be commenting on abortion?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/YYZ YYZ

    Just to clarify your postscript: Do you mean saying something that offends both at the same time? For example, by saying something like:

    "Stephen Harper governs just like a typical Liberal"

    Is that what you meant? If so, I like it – I'll have to give it a whirl in future discussions.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/psiclone psiclone

    let me see it's been 4 years now that all of the web forum harper haters have been posting the same thing – yet what do we see … between you and me I doubt that there will be an election this year at all – and who knows next year the troops start coming home and that event will help harper more than these Olympics are!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PeteTong PeteTong

    I think it also helps to criticize Paul Wells at the same time:

    "Stephen Harper governs just like a typical Liberal and Paul Wells won't tell you this because he's a partisan hack who wants a Senate appointment".

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/YYZ YYZ

    Yes, yes – I see your point. Well done.

  • denis p

    Wells, you're true to Toronto-centric media form today. That being, harping on the Liberal talking points, and gleaning every little morsel of positive spin for the Liberals. Oh, and the prorogation thing is just a lot of media spin about nothing, since it has only survived with the medias help. And I'm sorry, but letters from Iggy won't cut it if he ever thinks of improving his numbers. Is it the water or the smog in Toronto that makes you people think like you do?

  • Mulletaur

    I don't recall saying either of those. Do you have a link ?

  • JWB

    Prorogued parliament. Thank you Stephen Harper!
    After witnessing the Olympics in Vancouver first hand I understand why. The games, our athletes and Canada have been absolutely amazing. The last thing we needed was left wing nut politicians grandstanding their position and taking media away from this very successful games.
    Could you imagine if parliament was in session, Jack Layton giving sympathy towards those criminals (i meant protesters), too much money this that blah blah blah.
    Shutting down the mouthpieces of the socialist left was a great decision!

    • kcm

      Parliament as a mouthpiece of the socialist left…very original…lose points for tautology though.

      • biff

        It wasn't the right that was dominating the last session by championing the rights of taliban monsters, while attacking our troops as war criminals.

        As for the mass graves of children recently discovered in Iraq – not even a stich of commentary for them. Not the type of victims favoured by the "progressive left".

        • kcm

          "It wasn't the right that was dominating the last session by championing the rights of taliban monsters, while attacking our troops as war criminals"

          You're delusional Biff…lost in your own little neo con world.

          Maybe it would help if it hit the news, i haven't seen any reports.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/prescott prescott

            His name is "biff"- kind of says it all.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/tedbetts tedbetts

    I would have said the opposite – they are at their best when they have no credible opposition, i.e. they can do what they please, relatively unchallenged and, whenever they want, they can always get everyone to focus on the incompetencies of the opposition and say 'they're worse' – but we don't really know, because they've never really faced any credible opposition. It will be very interesting to see how Harper and the Conservatives react. So far, the signs are not good.

  • Orson Bean

    Well, according to the Freakonomics guys, the more abortions you have, the more the crime rate goes down. So following McQuack's reasoning, yes, there won't be many of us around who are young, but it will be very safe out there . . .

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

    I didn't say that you said either of those. However, if I recall correctly, you were convinced there'd be an election last fall, and you were also pretty sure there would be an election at the start of 2009 (back when everyone was talking about coalitions). Am I wrong that you felt this way?

    • Mulletaur

      I don't remember taking either of those positions, but that's why I was hoping you might have a link to remind me. In any case, I really do think we are going to be in an election this spring.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

    I wouldn't know. I haven't lived in Toronto in my life. But thanks for coming out.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    Smashed, eh? Well, not only are you wrong and stupid, but I'd like to know who the hell you're playing to!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

      Dammit, PeteTong dares us all to get him wasted at his expense and nobody thumbs-downs him? And I get thumbs-down'd for trying? What is this, the Temperance League? Who are we playing to, exactly? I'd like to know.

  • Mulletaur

    This is more evidence that a spring federal general election is inevitable.

  • Orson Bean

    I really wonder about this fear of having ideas poached in any event, and whether it's a misplaced fear. Bear in mind that that's been said about the Reform-Liberals dynamic in the 1990s, e.g, that the Liberals "pached" the idea of fiscal responsibility, focus on debt & defict, etc. from Reform. First of all, Reform never had a hope of forming govt, given the Tory-Reform split at the time. Secondly, the record shows that we as a country became focused on the issue not because the Reform Party was pushing it, but because it was truly becoming a crisis of international proportions (e.g., we were in serious danger of having our debt downgraded and heading towards the third-world spiral).

    Bottom line to me is this is a sign of Liberals being scared of their own shadow. One of the most successful things the Liberals ever did politically in the last 20 years was the Liberal Red Book of 1993. And there was never any fear of poaching that I recall with that.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/PolJunkie PolJunkie

    "I'm convinced the outcome of swing ridings in "Battleground Ontario" will be more influenced by ground organization, likability of candidates, and power of incumbency than by the leaders."

    Battleground Ontario or anywhere for that matter is a myth. As long as the anti-Harper vote continues to split itself three ways, Harper remains safe.

  • sbt

    "They don't have the confidence."

    They have the confidence untl they don't and the only way they don't is by losing a confidence vote. That's the way the system works.

    ""You are obviously not part of the grassroots."

    You're right. I'm the person who supported the Liberals in the 90s and is now supporting the Conservatives. Perhaps if the Liberals can figure out why people like me are doing that they might win an election. Until then, enjoy the opposition benches.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

      So you supported the Liberals during Chretien and now support Harper?

      So is being obviously lied to some sort of fetish thing for you?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Halo_Override Halo_Override

    He must have meant the Toronto that lurks in your heart.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

    Hell, I'd like to hear what Harper plans on doing now that he actually is elected PM.

    Just to be clear.. by "plans" I mean what he actually intends to do, not what he's just going to tell people he's going to do before doing the exact opposite.

From Macleans