The World Desk

The World Desk

The World Desk

Michael Petrou writes about international news and Canadian foreign policy.

CIDA's Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund: millions raised, nothing spent

by Michael Petrou on Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:56pm - 119 Comments

Has anyone seen the new Alice in Wonderland movie? I haven’t, but every month or so I try to get straight answers from the Canadian International Development Agency, so I figure I’ve saved myself 11 bucks.

I called the agency yesterday with questions about the Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund. You probably remember this. It’s where the Canadian government promises to match funds Canadians donate to Haiti to help with, among other things, “early recovery” and reconstruction. I had heard from a contact who does relief work in Haiti that no one who has applied for money from this fund had heard back from CIDA. Seemed a little strange. It’s been two months since the quake and one month since the donation window closed on February 12. So I called CIDA to find out how much money has been raised, how much has been disbursed, where it’s been disbursed, and, if nothing has been disbursed, as my contact told me, when it will be.

The first thing you need to know about CIDA is no one who answers the media inquiries phone line is capable of answering questions. They can write questions down, though, which is all the job requires. Then someone else gets back to you – not by phone, mind. That would involve social interaction and thinking for one’s self. Dangerous.

Today I got an email response from a second media relations person, which didn’t answer all my questions. I called her up to ask for some clarity. She couldn’t provide it. She didn’t actually write the responses, you see, she just signs her name to the email. She said a third person will call me back. Now we’re up to three people answering one media request – not including however many people actually crafted the muddled response in the first place. (Hey, Stock – if you ever do get around to making some cuts to the public service, I have some suggestions.)

Anyway, here’s what I know so far.

As of the cutoff date, the 14 Canadian charities reporting donations to CIDA raised $154.4 million, of which $128.8 million is “potentially eligible” for the government’s fund matching mechanism. This is on CIDA’s website. What accounts for the $26 million difference is not. I asked the CIDA person I actually spoke to what “potentially eligible” means. She didn’t know.

UPDATE: CIDA says they are reviewing donated funds for eligibility based on these criteria.

I asked how much of the money raised through the Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund has been spent. CIDA’s response included a paragraph about where Canada has spent money that doesn’t come from the Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund, before adding the line: “Funds from the Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund will be disbursed in the near future.”

In other words, they haven’t spent a penny.

This rendered my question about who’s getting the money meaningless, but I still wanted to know when the money that Canadians donated in response to “urgent” appeals will actually be put to use. Here’s the response.

“CIDA officials are in close contact with the Government of Haiti and our humanitarian and development partners to determine the optimal use of these resources as relief, recovery and reconstruction needs are further identified. In keeping with its mandate to manage Canadian aid effectively, CIDA will disburse funds from the HERF as this process takes place.”

When I was in Haiti, a 19-year-old American in military fatigues showed up with boxes of latex gloves. His heart was in the right place, but he didn’t really know what he was doing and had a nervous breakdown after picking up an amputated leg when he was asked to clean a hospital’s waste-strewn yard. He went home the next day.

Some of us had a good laugh about the episode. But at least he accomplished something. He gathered dirty bandages and let Haitians know they mattered to him. That’s more than CIDA has so far accomplished with the more than $100 million Canadians have donated to its Earthquake Relief Fund.

Bookmark and Share
  • smeurice

    Mr Petrou writes. "I still wanted to know when the money that Canadians donated in response to “urgent” appeals will actually be put to use"
    AND
    "That’s more than CIDA has so far accomplished with the more than $100 million Canadians have donated to its Earthquake Relief Fund"

    Since Canadian donated money to aid agencies like the Red Cross, I assume that money IS being spent in Haiti. If not, it's the fault of the aid agencies, not CIDA. The money CIDA is talking about is the matching funds, which are a separate thing. So it seems to me incorrect to say that the money Canadians donated is not being put to the intended use. It's legitimate to ask why the matching funds havent been spent (though there may be a perfectly legitimate reason), but that's not actually the money that Canadians donated.

  • Rich

    Sounds like CIDA & FEMA handle disasters the same way! See no destruction, hear no destruction, speak no destruction! They'll just find another way to spend the money as soon as another disaster more to their liking (reputation) comes along! You have to wonder what would happen if this had occurred in our country?

  • JamesHalifax

    We've spent millions on Haiti so far, mainly in the form of military budgets and personnel & Equipment. The other money is standing by to be spent "Wisely" when the country is ready for it.

    Unfortunately, spending this money will have to be done without interference of Haitian politicians, who are wont to pocket the cash for themselves while their people suffer. Come to think of it…..that's how Haiti came to be the way it is in the first place.

  • Jennifer

    CIDA did send money immediately, that's from the money that they have sitting there that can quickly be released by the department as soon as something happens.

    While I am frustrated by how long it takes government to dole out the matching funds, I think the wording of the article is somewhat misleading. No one "donated to" the federal government's fund, they donated to a registered Canadian charity who then had to submit information to be eligible for the matching funds. I know the notion that every dollar is two dollars up until the February 12 deadline enticed many Canadians to give who might not have otherwise. For those who would have donated (or had already), great, it's doubled.
    The money is to be transferred to the individual charities and as Canadians we need to keep our politicians accountable to ensure that they actually deliver on that promise. Then the organizations who have had people working on the ground from day one (and in many cases, long before the earthquake) can spend the money as they see fit.
    CIDA is certainly cumbersome, but channeling the support to the organizations on the ground is surely a better way to help than sending bureaucrats in.

  • Some thoughts

    Its all about photo ops and nothing more with Harper and his crowd. No doubt some or most of the money will be spent on worthy causes like advertising for the recovery plan for which even with a mamoth deficit there always seems to be money. the only possible conclusion is that conservatives have no morals, no ethics and no talent for management. I know this is belaboring the obvious but someone has to explain facts to members of the CPC.

    • JamesHalifax

      "Some thoughts" ?

      Interesting monikor.

      One would think that the person who choose it would occasional write something that proves its accuracy.

      I guess we'll have to wait and see.

  • SKT

    Hello mate, I'd take a look at how 'investigtive journalism' has evolved in the Uk, where I am from. To start with, people found it interesting, but people grew up and had more important things in their lives to deal with other than listening to provocative journalists. Now, as some of them seemed to be intrusive to an extent that was uncalled for and also flawed as agendas were created and set before anything was asked or recorded, most of the journalists have been in the shadows.____I suggest, as a protective career move, you stick to things that don't intentionally stir things up when not knowing all the facts, especially when you have such a flawed argument (see a lot of these comments buddy) otherwise, I'll be heckling you in the dole queue along with all the people you have insulted.____If you have an issue with CIDA, I assume you have gone through proper complaint channels before airing you soiled underwear in public?____Ta ta!

  • David

    @cleargreen writes:

    "
    To The Committee Studying The Potential Placement of CIDA Funds:

    1. rent a freighter
    2. purchase: 2 bulldozers, 4 front end loaders with backhoe attachments, 6 tandem axle dump trucks
    3. load on freighter and sent to Haiti
    4. start clearing roads from the dump-site to cities and towns
    5. continue until cleaned up
    "

    Day 1: freighter unloads and leaves.
    Day 2: bulldozer severs last working water main in village — didn't bother to check with other aid agencies.
    Day 3: front-end-loader driver doesn't realize rubble was actually refugee camp.
    Day 4: drivers realized that cleargreen forgot to tell them send along diesel fuel, food, or water on the freighter.
    Day 5: drivers line up with Haitians from food and water from donor countries who planned a little better.
    Day 6: Haitian entrepreneurs disassemble useless equipment to sell for scrap metal.
    Day 7: US military agrees to fly Canadian "aid workers" home quietly to avoid international embarrassment.

  • BobbyB

    The Cons are dragging their feet as usual. They haven't spent the stimulus money they promised from last year! They promised matching donations on Haiti and that prompted more Canadians to donate more (myself included) and yet they are holding back that money which is urgently needed. and now that the rainy season is approaching more Haitians will be impacted even further!

    This government must give the money they committed and NOW to the agencies and let the agencies spend it. The Conservatives should not be allowed to spin their way out of this by inferring that the aid agencies are not organized. The Conservatives are the ones that are lying and are not organized!

    This sad example of a Canadian government needs to stop sucking and blowing and deliver on what they promise! Conservatives throughout Canada should be ashamed to be associated with the shady and duplicitous actions of this secretive government!

    Show us the money you lying Conservative hypocrites!

    • old fogey

      From listening to you leftist a-holes the money would be better spent on sponsorships.

  • JamesHalifax

    Jack's wisdom shines through:
    "It somehow smacks of lack of patriotism to display an open contempt for your own country on the op-ed pages of a major foreign newspaper."

    The same lack of patriatism that would make a man live outside of the country of his birth for most of his life? The same lack of patriatism that would cause a man to belittle the country of his birth, and the Canadians who live there?

    Oh wait…that was the other guy.

    As for the contempt shown…..that was for Chretien and his fellow crooks, not the country.

    • JamesHalifax

      An example:

      Jack wrote:
      "Democracy is not about bowing to the will of the majority, it's about not using violence to settle disputes."

      Actually, Jack Democracy is pretty much what you are saying it is not.

      As for not settling disputes with violence…there's a word for that to; several in fact. Go find the aforementioned dictionary and see if you can find one.

      As I wrote to Madeyoulook……your writing is fine Jack, but not everything needs to be a production. Your writing is like the beautiful set of a stage production…….being used by a troupe of lousy actors.

      Looks good…..but pretty much a waste of time.

  • JamesHalifax

    BobbyB…….hypberbole much?

    But then again, if you don't expect to be taken seriously, then why bother writing anything thoughtful. (or even a wee bit clever)

    Keep up the…umm……good work?

  • old fogey

    The world has it wrong when it comes to Haiti, instead of money ,send them birth control pills.

  • Anne

    I wonder how many staff members (higher ups) are driving new cars or mysteriously finished paying off their mortgages. etc.
    I generally don't trust charities or their distributions.
    I wonder what would happen if you called the U.S. and asked where the money went from the Bush Clinton fund?

  • Les

    P.S. What about Chile?

  • esabler

    The other question seems to be: why can't CIDA give an answer?
    Micro management to the nth?

  • K Morton

    Well we know from experience that 60% of program spending goes to administration. So thats a good 80 mil. Then there is fuel for the navy ships that carried supplies down as well as replacing the military supplies that were on board at retail + 20% or so that the government pays for everything.

  • a senior

    HAS ANYONE READ ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT IN HAITI……..who owns the land …what should be built….do we want this money to have lasting effect or be wasted…what is the rush………get an international group deciding what should the money be used for…someone said…housing………but housing on public land leads to public slums….so what is the solution…I dont want this money to have no lasting benefit…rushing in to waste the money is not the answer.

  • Gord Rodin

    Today is February 7, 2011 – i have yet to see how any of the matched fund CIDA proclaimed have been used, I have asked numerous times – NO RESPONSE. the bureaucratic mess in Ottawa is pulling strings that makes the govt look inept – then again … why would a 'matched funds program' be anything but matching the funds with the donor to give them the capacity to simply do more…. after all … someone had enough faith in their work to give them the money in the first place. Would ANY of those of us who are donors written a check to CIDA and said use it where you deem best … Canadians are NOT idiots.

  • Iron Mike

    I'd say this was worthy of Fail Blog if it wasn't so very, very sad…
    Do these people feel bad at all about how useless they are, how much they are ripping off citizens who donated, and how much the people of Haiti are suffering?
    What a bunch of xxxholes!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Jack_Mitchell Jack Mitchell

    There's a stark lesson here for CIDA, this Government, all Departments, and all future governments: if you don't respond to journalists politely, rapidly, authoritatively, and credibly on important files, the lack of adequate response becomes the story. Justly or not, the public expects nothing less.

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/canolli Canolli

    Exactly. A democratically elected government has a responsibility to its constituents.

    The media is the most efficient (if biased) conduit for us to stay informed.

  • gotham

    This is a good point. Though for some reason Canadian journalists are a particularly interesting breed. US and journalists from other countries do behave differently. Perhaps this has something to do with the foreign ownership restrictions that have turned our media market into an insular drink-our-own-bathwater market of information inflation and conflation.

From Macleans