Colby Cosh

Colby Cosh

Maclean’s man in Edmonton writes about everything. Follow Colby on Twitter: @colbycosh

Coulter: the she-devil in her own words

by Colby Cosh on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 11:38pm - 296 Comments

Ezra Levant, who was present at the venue for tonight’s aborted Ann Coulter talk at the University of Ottawa, spotted my quickie weblog entry about the cancelled event and had me chat briefly with the leggy agitator. Coulter tells Maclean’s she never had the chance to move on from a private dinner reception at which she was signing books, meeting local conservatives, and waiting for the all-clear from her bodyguard, who was on the scene at the university. “I was just reviewing my speech. It was a fine little speech, and by the way, I cut it down so we could have an extensive question-and-answer period. I gathered that I was going to have a very exciting crowd tonight.”

The police, Coulter says, “had been warning my bodyguard all day that they were putting up [messages] on Facebook: ‘Bring rocks, bring sticks, you gotta hurt Ann Coulter tonight, don’t let her speak.’ And the cops eventually said, we’ve got a bad feeling, this isn’t gonna happen. And they shut it down.”

Coulter agrees with the suggestion that conservative speakers face greater dangers and nuisances in trying to encounter audiences on university campuses. “I speak at a lot of college campuses and I need a bodyguard… Michael Moore does not; Judy Rebick does not. I think Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could have spoken tonight with less controversy.” She dismisses the possibility, however, that things are ever likely to change. “Unfortunately, conservatives are too polite, so they will never get a taste of their own medicine in that regard, in terms of angry mobs with sticks and rocks.”

She accuses the University of Ottawa’s academic vice-president, Francois Houle, of “inspiring hatred” toward her with his epistolary warning to her that she needed to be conscious of Canada’s criminal prohibitions of hate speech. Indeed, she says she intends, with Levant’s help, to ask police to proceed with exactly the same charges against Houle.

“He described the law to me very carefully—any speech that incites hatred toward someone based on membership in an identifiable group can be criminally prosecuted. Well, before I even set foot in Canada, he had identified me as having criminal proclivities because I belong to an identifiable group: conservatives. Or it could be because I’m a Christian, I’m a Presbyterian. I’m a female conservative. If what Francois Houle did to me is not a hate crime, then nothing is.”

After the event was cancelled by the police, Coulter says she went to her hotel room to relax and had a surreal moment. “I was watching the local news, which was all hockey and Ann Coulter, and some nut came on claiming that he was the organizer behind my speech. [murmurs in background] OK, his name is Craig Chandler. I sent an e-mail to my bodyguard saying Craig Chandler is disinvited from the event in Calgary. He’s on TV claiming to be the organizer and denouncing me!”

Bookmark and Share
  • denis p

    I guess the leftist university minions are starting to escape. It's been common knowledge ouruniversities have been trained by Marxist/Communist professors for decades. Back in the 60's these moustachiod,Lenin cap wearing academia has been spewing their poison to our children and as tenure would have it, are totally unaccountable. Canadians should be ashamed for letting this happen.

    • Oliver

      And I guess you've finally gotten out of your cave.

  • http://www.pgib.ca Craig B. Chandler

    From: Mark Kelley
    To: executivedirector@pgib.ca
    Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:56 AM
    Subject: Re: Last Night

    Hi Craig…there was some confusion on our end that you were one of the organizers bringing Ann Coulter to Calgary…but that was our error…which you immediately rectified in before you spoke about anything else. If this has caused any confusion or concern, I apologize for that, and thank you for speaking to us about your support for Ms. Coulter's right to free speech in this country. It was an enlightening, and timely interview.

    Thanks Craig,

    Mark Kelley
    Host- Connect with Mark Kelley
    CBC News Network

  • Dieter

    Look at the fallout

    Coulter claims University of Ottawa must have low admission standards. Well, she's not entirely wrong given the pathetic academic skills of Ontario high school graduates, who happen to be victims of an educational system which refuses to educate our very best.

    Coulter claims that Canada is Muslim friendly to a fault. Again she has a point when our Canadian university students embrace national hate fest (apartied week ) an event conceived by Palestinian terrorist groups and embraced by western left wing culture.

    Coulter claims that free speech Canadian style is free speech as long as Barbara Hall or Toronto Star censors approve of it. Sorry lefties, but this smacks or Orwellian thought control..

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/sprite1949 sprite1949

      Coulter claims…Coulter claims…Coulter claims…Who gives a sh** what Coulter claims?! From your comments, I would suggest you move to the gool Ol'US of A and join the Republicans who adore Coulter. You just don't stike me as much of a Canadian. Evil flourishes when "good students" do nothing. The Ottawa students protested against an individual who promotes "evil", like many of her colleagues on Fox. We know how they have twisted free speech. Best wishes to you as you start your American life.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/PhilCP PhilCP

      What brings you back? ;-)

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/sprite1949 sprite1949

        I do lay low most of the time. I don't want to be part of some of the regulars here who try to run the show, so to speak, and often hurl nasty insults at each other. "Speak your truth quietly & clearly & listen to others-Avoid loud and agressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit." (Desiderata) …sometimes, though, I don't practice what I preach. Oh well, nobody's perfect.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/PhilCP PhilCP

          I was actually "aiming" at Dieter, but I'll take the opportunity to praise your selection of the "Speak your truth quietly & clearly & listen to others-Avoid loud and agressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit." (Desiderata) quote; that seems like a very good rule to live by, and I'll strive to be truer to it than I have. Thanks!!

  • http://gapingwhole.wordpress.com/ Em.

    This whole thing is just ridiculous. As much as I think Coulter is insane and vile, and handling the situation like an insolent child (e.g. insulting the student body of UO), it's just so…disappointing that she didn't get the chance to talk so she could be judged on her speech.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/PhilCP PhilCP

      That's a decent summary.

  • kcm

    We kept Galloway out for this! Coulter's so mindboggling arrogant she actually believes that Houle is responsible for her predicament, when she aired the e mail. I'd pay good money to have the free speech privilege of hearing Galloway school this clown.[ and no i don't unreservedly approve of all of GGs more ridiculous antics. But i note, as with Coulter, he hasn't been found guilty in a courtrom of anything] We have a right to hear from either party, and make our own minds up.

    • Steve M

      Galloway was kept out because of his (alleged) efforts to provide money & supplies for Hamas, a banned terrorist organization, not for being a firebrand. Unless that's what you meant by "ridiculous antics".

      • kcm

        Alleged is the key word here. In this country you're still innocent until proven guilty. Galloway was banned on idealogical grounds.

  • Oliver

    The real problem here is that people are regressing to a simple "us vs them" mentality with such events.
    Left-wing against right-wing is a completely outdated way of looking at the world. I thought this was the 21st century…

  • Lord Kitchener's Own

    Unfortunately, conservatives are too polite, so they will never get a taste of their own medicine in that regard, in terms of angry mobs with sticks and rocks.”

    Of course there are no conservatives showing up a speeches with sticks and rocks!!! When all those town hall meetings were going on in the U.S. around Health Care, I didn't see a single conservative opponent showing up at any one of those meetings with sticks or rocks. Conservatives in the U.S. are fervent believers in the Second Amendment. When they show up to protest at a public meeting, they bring assault rifles.

    • Steve M

      Yeah, but most of those would be the type of people who take their guns EVERYWHERE, which is perfectly legal in many parts of the states.

      • Lord Kitchener's Own

        Oh, I realize it's perfectly legal to carry a firearm in many states (as is the carrying of rocks and sticks in Canada… if we leave aside for the sake of argument the fact that, as far as I've seen, none of the protesters in Canada actually had any sticks or rocks).

        As I mentioned elsewhere though, while I'm sure there are many Americans who are always armed, I do question whether or not there are many (if any) people, even in the States, who carry an ASSAULT RIFLE everywhere they go. I think, even in the Southern U.S. states, it would be considered somewhat out of the ordinary to see a man in line at the grocery store with an AR-15 slung over his shoulder. I could be wrong though.

        • Steve M

          So how many riflemen are we talking about here?

    • Jan

      Ann's buds are now making death threats against Dems re healthcare. Palin has put out a map of Dems to target in the next election using cross hairs to mark their location. I, for one, won't be taking any etiquette lessons from her ,

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SisyphusThis SisyphusThis
    • John D

      I don't understand. You mean she…bothered to try to find out what actually happened? Hows it that fun when you can quote and paraphrase Ezra Levant's version of events. Angry leftist speech-hating hordes!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

    There were people blocking doors. Apparently the ticket sellers had their table overturned. There was the fire alarm. There were threats. There was chanting that Coulter should not be allowed to speak. The venue was also very crowded.
    So no, there was no violence, but there was significant disruption (enough disruption to cancel the event) and threat of violence.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/M_A_N M_A_N

      …and ensure a full house at the much larger venue in Calgary on Thursday. Because on Tuesday, they still had tickets available…

      No, it's not a conservative conspiracy, but i think it's a nice opportunity for some free airtime and news coverage. In 2006, her speaking fee was 20,000. Today, it's 10,000. Why not grab the free publicity when it's there for the taking?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

        Well, it's not all about publicity. A lot of people like me lost the opportunity to see and hear her in person, and she lost the opportunity to connect with her supporters in Ottawa.

    • Joops

      Sounds to me like legal and legitimate protest.

      BTW the "blocking doors" was likely not on purpose, bud. The organizers had not planned a way for people to get in and out of the buildings easily. Chalk it up to crowd control failure, not protest tactics.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

        No, I am referring to someone who told me protesters had blocked the doors to prevent people from getting into the auditorium.

        It was too crowded for me to verify that remark. Sure, it was crowded, but I don't think it was a problem for people to get in and out. People did file away quite easily as time went on and disillusioned people felt the event was likely not to happen.

    • Jan

      The table turning over has been refuted. Go over to Big City Lib for details. Sounds like bad event planning – too small a space – totally inefficient way to screen people at the door. Makes you wonder if Coulter's speech was actually planned to NOT to happen. It certainly worked out well for Ezra's on going crusade.

  • The Grumpy Dwarf

    She dismisses the possibility, however, that things are ever likely to change. “Unfortunately, conservatives are too polite, so they will never get a taste of their own medicine in that regard, in terms of angry mobs with sticks and rocks.”

    Umm…do you think she missed the teabagger protests where people showed up…ARMED???????

    What a giant DB and waste of skin.

    • Steve M

      Yes, but were the Tea Party protesters going out of their way to bring their guns? Like it or not, it is perfectly legal to carry guns in many parts of the U.S., whether you are attending a protest or getting groceries, and many people do, just as you or I might never leave the house without our cellphones or sunglasses.

      • Lord Kitchener's Own

        I don't know if the Tea Party protesters were "going out of their way" to bring their guns. Maybe those guys go EVERYWHERE with an assault rifle strapped over their shoulder. I kinda doubt they go shopping at the mall with an AR-15 at the ready, but maybe they do (MAYBE. But, REALLY??? I get that many people carry guns in the U.S., but do you really think it's remotely common to see someone at a grocery store with an AR-15 slung over their shoulder???).

        Of course, the point is they did bring guns, whereas the "leftist" protesters here in Canada apparently didn't bring anything other than signs. Which says nothing about the relative passivity of the left versus the right, but does shed some light on whether Coulter is correct to state the conservatives are just too darned polite to try to intimidate their political opponents through implied threats. Sure, apparently (I have this third hand, Coulter says her bodyguard told her that the police told him that…) somebody on Facebook mentioned "sticks and rocks" in a post about the speech. However, I've seen no evidence anywhere that anyone brought any actual sticks or rocks to the speech (though I have seen video tape of protesters with AR-15's at the health care town halls in the U.S.).

        Of course, the absence of sticks and rocks didn't stop what seems to have been a fairly non-violent protest of about 200 people from being described in the media by Coulter's supporters as a violent mob of 2,000 people wielding sticks and rocks.

        • Bryan

          Bizarrely, in today's Ottawa Citizen, Coulter is quoted as saying that the gun laws in Canada should be more lax, because it's people and their free waving guns that make the US a much more polite society.

    • Jan

      The TB'ers have ratcheted it up to death threats now.

  • Guest

    From: Mark Kelley
    To: executivedirector@pgib.ca
    Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:56 AM
    Subject: Re: Last Night

    Hi Craig…there was some confusion on our end that you were one of the organizers bringing Ann Coulter to Calgary…but that was our error…which you immediately rectified in before you spoke about anything else. If this has caused any confusion or concern, I apologize for that, and thank you for speaking to us about your support for Ms. Coulter's right to free speech in this country. It was an enlightening, and timely interview.

    Thanks Craig,

    Mark Kelley
    Host- Connect with Mark Kelley
    CBC News Network

  • Randall

    I am reminded of Nat Hentoff's excellent book "Free Speech for Me–But Not for Thee: How the American Left and Right Relentlessly Censor Each Other". Neither the left nor the right have a monopoly on tolerance. A pox on both their houses.

  • John D

    Kady is investigating what actually happened last night and instead Macleans gets drivel like this.

  • Scott

    I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend till the death your right to say it
    – Voltaire (presumably)

  • Oliver

    http://www.cbc.ca/politics/insidepolitics/2010/03…

    Coulter might too polite, but she's certainly not too honest!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/sprite1949 sprite1949

    It has all been said on both sides, but I can't help but wonder if some of those who are defending Coulter's right to free speech, would have also defended Mr. Adolf Hitler's right to free speech decades ago? There are limits to free speech and I am proud if we in Canada can make the distinction.

  • Lord Kitchener's Own

    I think everyone's missing an important point.

    This is the University of 0. (0 as in "zero", as we used to call them when I was at Queen's and later McGill).

    We shouldn't waste too many electrons on this story. (lol, j/k)

    • Joops

      Still better than Carleton, where the K stands for Quality.

      (It's better when you say it out loud.)

  • scissorpaws

    This is a disgusting slur on what it means to be a Canadian, much less a Canadian university student. Since when are supposedly bright young minds twisted reactionaries incapable of intellectually challenging controversial ideas? What pathetic, simpiant wimps. Worse, what fools. It would have been a great speech and fascinating Q&A. Idiots.

    • MacLean's Regular

      "Since when are supposedly bright young minds twisted reactionaries incapable of intellectually challenging controversial ideas?"

      Coulter's ideas are mostly lies. And you can't challenge lies that easily.

    • Jan

      Yes, we could have gotten a few more 'take a camel' lines. Oh well, there's still Calgary.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/CTM Claudia Lemire

    I just wonder who in their right mind would pay to see such a person!

  • Val

    What is wrong with our Universities today? As long as one adheres to the one acceptable ideaology, they can be heard? What ever happened to the exploration of different view points and the pursuit of knowledge? Now only what comes through the appropriate filters is allowed? Campuses in Canada can spew anti-Semitic hatred with impunity, frighten someone who was willing to dialogue with them, and this is a free country, with free speech? Go Ezra Levant…someone has to fight for free speech!

  • Andre

    "It's not my fault.: A right winger's guide to public speaking."

  • Floyd

    Yawn. Sigh…

  • Revnant Dream

    I like Ann Coulter. Honesty with a sense of humor being so rare today. Not to mention her radiant wit with the use of irony.
    The left-Islamic axis have had their kilts held up. You have become naked to the rest of Canadians & it ain't pretty. In a Nation that prides itself on politeness. This set of events have destroyed that myth.
    Its obvious you detest free speech with violence or by petty written threats with talk of violence.
    You get lost in the person without realizing what you do to society. Children run by Academic red Bootle babies.
    Any way thanks to you speech fascists you have made Ann more publicity with opportunities she could never have dreamed about. Now your claiming she did this, not you. Its monkey time in the zoo.
    You nuts screwed the pouch, & you know it. Your true nature is exposed!
    JMO

    • MacLean's Regular

      "Honesty…"

      Stopped reading there. Ann Coulter is a pathological liar.

    • any-canadian

      Amen. Amen. I say to u..

  • Dan

    At least this whole thing FINALLY has us actually talking about free-speech and it's role in Canadian society. People like her talk, people listen. We have brains, if what she's saying is complete and utter dribble then the attendees can and would've seen that.

    Free-speech should be a complete right within this country. I don't care for hate-speech laws, even as someone whose protected MULTIPLE times under these laws. It's ridiculous, if you don't agree with what's being said and know it is wrong then you use logic and facts to tear the argument apart. They come out as a crazy and their 'hate-speech' as nothing more then the mumblings of a crazy person. We've gone too far Canada, but we can turn back.

  • kevin

    there is a lot to hate about a religion that preaches violence. how is one to point this out politely, exactly?

    "please don't cut people's heads off for being infidels?" "pretty please?"

From Macleans