Save the planet: Stop eating meat

The UN says so, and so do a growing list of school boards. Meet the new eco enemy.

by Katie Engelhart and Nicholas Köhler on Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:00am - 88 Comments
Save the planet | Stop eating meat

Photograph by Jessica Darmanin

In Paris, the food elite was shocked when Alain Passard, whose restaurant l’Arpège boasts three Michelin stars, scrapped meat from the menu to create a vegetarian oasis. In between waxing poetic about “the freedom of inventing a new universe” of vegetable delights, Passard has argued for the need to “replant the earth.” “The people who are into foodie culture now use the environmental credentials of their food as a source of status,” says Johnston. “That puts low-income shoppers, or even middle-income shoppers, in a difficult position, because they don’t have the economic or cultural capital necessary to participate in high-status eating.”

Such a display of conspicuous conservation apparently needs its own nomenclature. Hence the adoption of labels like “flexitarian,” voted the year’s most useful word in 2003 by the American Dialect Society, which defined it as “a vegetarian who occasionally eats meat.” Dawn Jackson Blatner, a Chicago dietician, first heard the term then. “I was like, ‘Oh my God, I’m finally something. I’m not just a lazy vegetarian. And I don’t have to feel like I’m secretly eating pork chops in a closet.’ ” Since then, Blatner’s 2009 book, The Flexitarian Diet, has earned her celebrity status. She has toured the offices of the “People magazines of the world” as an ambassador of “this minimizing meat movement.”

Cookbook authors Tara Mataraza Desmond and Joy Manning, a reformed vegan—she realized she missed eggs and bacon too much—grabbed attention with Almost Meatless, which offers such not-quite-vegetarian recipes as cod cakes cut with corn. Mark Bitt­man, a New York Times food writer, is another foodie who has scaled back on meat but hasn’t given it up. Bittman found fame with his cookbook, How to Cook Everything. He has since changed his mind, publishing How to Cook Everything Vegetarian; Bittman himself is vegan until every night at 6 p.m., when he permits his appetite anything it wants.

As with any sort of privation, cutting down on consumption has elevated meat’s status. A more discerning attitude may be transforming the way we consume meat, with the emphasis on quality and connoisseurship rather than quantity and endless choice. Such a reappraisal of animal protein as a complement to the meal rather than its focus has for some turned its role into something more akin to that of wine at dinner. Important, sure, but better savoured than swilled.

That brand of “mindful” meat-eating has made butchers into culinary stars and charcuterie into the new sushi. “What’s emerged alongside flexitarianism is an interest in butchery and nose-to-tail eating,” says Johnston. At his London restaurant, the St. John Bar & Restaurant, Fergus Henderson serves dishes that include generous heapings of offal. Gordon Ramsay, the celebrity chef famous from TV’s Hell’s Kitchen, has raised his own livestock on his most recent show, The F-Word, slaughtering pigs and turkey for service on the series finales. In Toronto, the model has been taken up by the Black Hoof. “If you’re going to kill the animal, you might as well have enough respect for it to use every part,” says co-owner Jen Agg. Specializing in homemade charcuterie, a rarity in the city, the Hoof keeps its own hogs. “I’m looking forward to the challenge of raising our own pigs and looking them in the eye and understanding that the walk from farm to table is an ugly walk for the pig,” Agg says. That kind of visceral awareness, too, will tend to promote meat moderation—if not exactly the kind Sir Paul is after, then something not far off.

Bookmark and Share
  • Bert

    Bunk ! Stop eating meat and deplete all the other foods. When will all those "so called know it all" dummies realize that a balance diet of all food groups is best for everything. Sure -everybody eat fish only and fish stocks are gone in a year. What a crock.

  • Jon Oxman

    Man the comments I read on here make me sick. No one can argue that the cost on the well being of the planet is worth five seconds of flavour and an early heart attack. I think hamburgers should be served with instead a serving of fries, a heaping pile of shit. It might make people wake up and realizes that there ignorance leaves everyone with shit on there hands.

  • Oxman

    I think hamburgers instead of being served with fries, should be served with a heaping pile of crap. It might help people wake up and realize that supporting this horrible practise leaves everyone with crap on there hands.
    More Forests less farmland.

  • David

    Anyone who still believes in global warming as per the IPCC has to be stupid, gullible, or have an agenda to sell carbon credits.

    That being said, the world definitely doesn't have enough food, water, and land to support 7 Billion people eating as much meat as North Americans do.

    We will run out of arable land, fresh water, and food crops like corn.

    Especially if we eat more meat, and continue with the lunacy of corn based ethanol.

  • Canooky

    I hope some of the veggies posting here take good care of their bodies. When they manage to eliminate my preferred sources, I'll be turning my fork and knife on them…and I like my red meat organic!

  • Peter N

    What I find most interesting about this article is the use PETA is making of the discredited Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) narrative to try to control everyone's behaviour through government regulation. Having found appeals to individual morality were not working as well as they would have preferred, PETA, along with many other groups, are trying to use the remnants of the tattered CAGW hypothesis – before it dissapears down the dustbin of history – to force everyone to do what they prescribe for us as the right thing.

  • John

    To those "meaties" who love their slaughterburgers, GO TAKE A SWIM IN A HOG LAGOON!

  • John

    To those "meaties" who love their slaughterburgers

  • John

    GO TAKE A BATH IN A HOP LAGOON!

  • Amber Thompson

    Junk science, switching all to a vegetarian diet, would be an ecological disaster. There is not enough arable land in the world to sustain it.

  • dee

    It's all about awareness. They should have played the documentary "Earthlings" for everyone to see. It is the treatment of the animals, from birth to death, the utter lack of a life they have, and the tortuous way they die that I protest.

  • Frank S

    Eating meat is not causing the problem. It is raising the animals! Let's eat the existing cattle herds, and not raise any more.
    Of course once we do this, we'll have to eat plants, which will cause us to flatulate just like the cattle did…

  • http://www.animalvoices.org Karl

    As resource extraction outstrips the natural regenerative powers of natural ecosystems your article tells us what we can do to manage our natural resources

    The Worldwatch Institute wrote ;'It has become apparent that the human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future."

    The facts are absolutely clear — Eating meat is bad for human health, catastrophic for the environment and a living nightmare for the factory farmed animals

  • Eddie

    I hear a lot about cruelty to animals and how bad it is to kill them. Has anybody stopped to consider what it takes to kill a plant or tree!? Plants are more important to the effort of combating global warming than animals. Grow more trees and plants. Animals are not the problem. Humans are.

  • wayne moores

    "In a timely fashion". Yes after the whistleblower who leaked the information forced them to admit it. That after they demanded he be arrested, not because what he leaked wasn't true, merely that he did it. Then after scheming to find a way to discredit anyone who dared question their dogma, ostracise any scientist or scientific journal that printed any "heresy" they didn't like. And only after contemplating destroying data and defying freedom of information laws in the U.K. Yes the comparison to recent "problems" the Catholic Church is having are quite compelling I would think. Cheers.

  • Guest

    I am a beef farmer and agree with parts of this statement. If consumers want livestock to be grass fed, hormone free, stress free, treated the way many city people think animals need to be treated, they have to be willing to pay for it. One comment on here about your dollar counting as a vote is right. If a producer will be paid more for implementing these practices they will.

    Also many people have to take a look at the "meat" that is causing massive health problems and obesity. Is your lean organic, grass finished steak grilled on the BBQ going to impact your health the same as a 99c fast food burger that many people tend to eat beacause it is cheap or convienient?

    Do you really think the world has the land base to grow crops for the world's population if we all became vegetarians? If "factory" farming was stopped and all animals had to "roam free" to be considered a food source, would we have the land base to feed the world?

  • Ross

    There is a widespread assumption that meat production consumes grain. The Australian experience is that normally our animals whether producing meat or not, are mostly raised (or in the case of kangaroos – freerange) on land that cannot grow crops either through landform or aridity. They do not use grain that might be used otherwise for food (or fuel). Vegeterianism supported by fish and poutry is a dubious proposition as the Japanese and others have overfished the seas on the one hand and the methane from poultry fames is pretty strong too. And if we all went vegan and got rid of any animal input, the planet would be hard pressed to grow the nut trees needed to feed us all. I do however think that feeding cows in feedlots is a tremendous waste.

  • Byron Miller

    Man was created to eat meat and vegetables.On a cold winter day, give me a fur coat, fur lined leather mits, leather boots that are insulated and a fur hat made from the pelts of some animal. And put the steak on to cook with some onions. God must have killed the animals that he made Adam and Eve's clothes from. That or they died of old age. Animals and man have lived side by side since the beginning of time. Only since the discovery of synthetic materials and over processed food has the uproar started over eating meat and killing animals for their fur and pelts. How much pollution do you think is created in the productions of all those synthetic materials?

  • Barb C

    But MURDER on another sentient being is abuse Jim, what ever way you look at it! All animals have family, emotions and the right to live out their natural lives without having to be sacrificed to satisty the blood lust of humans.

  • sackvillian

    The mental games we all play are amazing.

    Okay, global warming's existence, magnitude, and cause are contentious, fine. But ocean acidification is 100%, without a doubt, caused by CO2 emissions, and it is a massive problem that needs approaching. So how can anyone claim that because they think global warming is bunk, CO2 is harmless?

    And maybe some posters are right about the UN overstating the emissions due to meat eating, or maybe the more recent statistics claiming up to 50% of emissions are due to meat eating are right – it's also contentious! But the link between meat and atherosclerosis and other heart problems is undeniable. The wasted use of antibiotics on these animals is undeniable. The ground runoff their waste produces is undeniable. That most raised animals will suffer a great deal is undeniable. And frankly, the fact that most human beings would not be capable of inflicting the violence that their own meat-eating requires is also undeniable.

    But of course, if you replace meat with tropical fruits or other foods flown halfway around the world, or you don't eat a balanced diet, then of course there are negative sides to that too.

    The world is not black and white! So maybe we could have a civilized talk about what we eat and its human/environmental impacts, or the pollution we produce and its repercussions, without focusing solely on very narrow aspects of it and radicalizing ourselves in the process? Please?

  • Abida

    Since humanity started, man is eating the meat which comes out from the animal who eat greens. I can not see any truth about
    saveing the planet depending on not to eat meat !!!

  • nicky

    I come from India where my family practices AHIMSA, a notion of doing no harm. My parents and allsiblings but two have never eaten meat but our children eat meat. Guess what? There has been no incidence of allergies, cancers in our family, (122 people extended family) and longevity up to 90 plus, but the kids eating meat, are already starting to suffer from allergies and see vegetables as an inferior food. hundreds of years of wisdom down the drain as we give them meat which will make them sick. Progress? I think not.

  • Kat

    And when cows become an endagered species…what then?

  • Arno

    The cow you eat is already an endangered specie. Every day millions are threatened with death.

  • Kat

    And every day millions more are born because there is a need for beef. If raising cattle no longer has a value – there will be no reason to breed them and what then will be their purpose. They are not as cute as the infamous seal…PETA has already taken issue with the almighty cow. The environmentalists tell you that they are responsible for global warming to a large degree. If the cow were wiped out – that would be good for the environment – right?

    So we go the extra mile for the polar bear but plan to wipe out the cow?

  • Bilestoad

    I think instead of Meatless Mondays, we could promote Wild Meat Wednesdays. The problem is not meat, but factory farmed meat. Try deer hunting. I make an excellent teryaki vension tenderloin, and that deer was eating and farting and otherwise impacting the environment whether I was going to eat him or not.

From Macleans