In Afganistan the final battle begins

Paul Wells: This time the tactics are different and backup has arrived

by Paul Wells on Friday, April 16, 2010 10:10am - 57 Comments
afganistan, kaadahar city, canadian troops

Louie Palu/CP

“This is the edge of the moon,” Lt.-Gen. Andrew Leslie told me as we dismounted from our armoured vehicles at the foot of the Soviet-built mountain fortress of Sperwan Ghar. He pointed westward. “If you go 100 m that way, you will die.”

For now, this little outpost, only 30 km from Kandahar City in the rolling farmland of the Panjwayi district, marks the outer edge of the territory Canadian troops control and patrol. It’s impenetrable: a steep man-made hill with heavy guns, a moat, and a tethered balloon whose cameras allow the 200-odd Canadian Forces soldiers there to monitor and sometimes target insurgent activity in every direction.

But to the west, Canadians have left the area to insurgent fighters. There are perhaps only a few hundred of them in a local population of 3,000, Maj. Wade Rutland told Leslie. But the bad guys have “complete freedom of manoeuvre” in and around three villages, Zangabad, Mushan and Talukan, that Rutland called the area’s “insurgent Axis of Evil.”

Leslie stared out at green vineyards punctuated by the telltale pink of opium poppies. “Well,” he said, “this summer a few thousand of our closest friends are going to be paying them a visit.”

Andrew Leslie is the chief of the land staff of the Canadian Forces. Every few months over the last four years, he has come back to Afghanistan to better understand the progress of Canada’s war effort. These are not royal visits: as quickly as he can, Leslie gets out of conference rooms and onto the road, travelling by light armoured vehicle to visit soldiers at the forward operating bases and combat outposts on the leading edge of battle. For this latest visit, his last before he is replaced as chief of the land staff in June, Leslie invited Maclean’s along for the ride.

This was my third trip to Kandahar, after short visits in late 2007 and late 2008. In those earlier visits I heard about the frustrating business-as-usual all Canadians have come to recognize in the news from Afghanistan. Hardy and valiant Canadian Forces troops were more than able to beat back periodic Taliban offensives against Kandahar City. But they were desperately insufficient in number for the task of holding the vast territory beyond. The Canadians put a brave face on, but at best, for year after brutal year, they were buying time. Until what? It was never clear.

This year is radically different. The old status quo is gone, wiped away by thousands of newly arrived U.S. troops, with more to come soon. That buildup began, here in the Afghan south, only last autumn. It has been breathtakingly rapid. Block after city block of newly built U.S. barracks line the boulevards of the sprawling International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) base at Kandahar Air Field. In the forward bases Leslie was as likely to be briefed by a U.S. Army colonel or major as by a Canadian. In an unheralded departure from the tradition that U.S. soldiers take no orders from a foreigner, all of these forces, Canadian and American, are under the direction of a Canadian: Brig.-Gen. Daniel Menard, who arrived last November to serve as the commander of Joint Task Force Afghanistan.

It is hard to overstate the difference all of this new muscle makes to the strategic picture in Kandahar. A U.S. civilian official I met, viewing the landscape with the fresh eyes of a recent arrival, did perhaps the best job of summing up the new situation.

“The Canadians were out here for five years with a kind of augmented battalion. They call it a battle group but I think it only had about 1,200 guys in it,” said the U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “So the insurgents would come back every summer running the same play. If they were a football team, you would say they had one play in their playbook. The play is to lay up in the crescent around Kandahar City—from Arghandab to Zahri to Panjwayi to Dand, running north, west, south in that agricultural crescent,” he said, naming districts that are roughly equivalent in size to rural Canadian counties.

Bookmark and Share
  • ssdd

    This is an excellent article but does not paint the real picture of what our soldiers are going through in Afghanistan. Check out chucksbunk.blogspot.com & read Chuckies Bunker for an account from someone who has been there for 6 months.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SunshineCoaster SunshineCoaster

    It appears from this article that the important changes in tactics described by Paul Wells that promise a real chance at success in Afhanistan, have been implemented AFTER General Rick Hillier left the Canadian Armed Forces. His idea that "he would prefer to just kill scumbags" was perhaps not a very professional one. I suspect Hillier was not capable of serious thought about how to engage the Aghan population. Hillier's testimony at the hearings on Aghan detainees would also suggest that his policy of hear no evil, see no evil regarding treatment of Afghan detainees likely alienated the Afghan population resulting in increased casualties for Canadian Forces personnel.

  • M Shannon

    The author did a good job giving the army's explanation of what and how they hope to achieve. The problem is military perception of the situation is wrong. ISAF never "clears" area of the Taliban. The insurgents fight a bit and then if the pressure gets too high down tools and go back to farming or walk away to fight another day. Menard's notion that he'd be happy if they go someplace else is exactly the definition of "whack-a-mole". The vast majority of Afghans don't want any more big ISAF offensives- which are guaranteed to kill more innocent Afghans and destroy a lot of property.

    The spring's big pushes in Helmand haven't worked- the Taliban are still there and now four ISAF battalions are tied down in areas much smaller and less heavily populated than any of the main districts in Kandahar.

    The summer offensive in Kandahar will be hugely expensive and cause relatively heavy innocent Afghan and ISAF casualties. It's effect will be temporary as there is no Afghan government to take over and ISAF will eventually withdraw leaving the field to the Taliban.

    The chances are very high we'll be discussing the latest ISAF plans to pacify Kandahar at this time next year.

    • ssdd

      Just curious, where do you get your information on what the vast majority of Afghans want.

      • M Shannon

        There was a poll published this week that indicated the vast majority of Kandharis were against the upcoming offensive and for negotiations. A second poll showed over half thought well of the Taliban. Whatever NATO has been doing to win over the locals it hasn't worked and they are seen as a foreign occupation force by large numbers of the population. The police are almost universally disrespected and I suspect the higher opinion in which the ANA is held by most Afghans is a result of lack of exposure and better behavior due to ISAF mentoring.

  • Richard Nelson

    Paul, a couple of questions for your considerations …

    1. I seem to remember that General Milner's predecessor as temporary Commander JTF Afghanistan had written that one of the Armed Forces' main uses in this post-Soviet era was cementing our commitments to our allies. With that purpose, how important is it to our forces' being there that the Afghan campaign (or whatever it is) be going well or ill? That is, as long as NATO is committed, should we (Canada) stay committed?

    2. Is one of the problems here that we expect our generals to defend public policy to the media & the public? Even under governments not as committed to message control it would be unusual to have Public Service officers around the Director or DG level to be speaking on the record in defence of broad government initiatives; but we expect 1- to 3-leaf generals to do that, and doesn't that (inevitably?) lead to their sounding like brainless cheerleaders?

  • orval

    Superb journalism. Excellent reporting. It is refreshing to know it still exists. Thank you.

    I hope you follow up with a visit to Brussels. I am anxious to know your views on our standing with our NATO Allies. As you know, we are in Afghanistan not because we want to help the Afghans (we do) but because we are a good and dependable Ally.

    You are right to point out that American combat troops under the command of a Canadian general is a big deal.

  • Sooraj

    Hardy and valiant Canadian Forces troops were more than able to beat back periodic Taliban offensives against Kandahar City. But they were desperately insufficient in number for the task of holding the vast territory beyond. The Canadians put a brave face on, but at best, for year after brutal year, they were buying time. Until what? It was never clear.
    Coach Hire
    nitric oxide supplements
    Pubic lice

  • http://mediaculpapost.blogspot.com/2010/04/and-even-more-mark-steyn-self.html Guest

    Nice work on an important subject, Mr. Wells, although at some point it would be nice to see some discussion about what it really means to for a society like ours to be at war with the 14th century (have to look elsewhere, perhaps). It’s also a bit sad that the number of comments for a good piece of journalism seem to be in inverse proportion to its quality. An article by one of your colleagues has over 500 comments – as well as an Editor’s note apologizing for significant erroneous quotes – typical errors, in that particular case. Clearly not everyone at Maclean’s works as hard.

From Macleans