A soldier’s choice

A Canadian soldier’s fateful choice in Afghanistan lands him on trial for murder

by Michael Friscolanti on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 8:00am - 69 Comments

Sean Kilpatrick / The Canadian Press

A military courtroom is not much different than the civilian version, except for a few distinct touches. When the judge shows up, everyone salutes. When a jury is chosen, the panel has five members, not 12. And when a witness is summoned to testify, he doesn’t walk to his seat. He marches.

In the courtroom where Capt. Robert Semrau is standing trial for murder, the witness box itself is also unique. Unlike on TV, where people answer questions in a chair directly beside the judge, the witness stand here is located just a few steps in front of the defence table. Intentional or not, the effect is dramatic: as each witness talks about Capt. Semrau, nobody is closer than Capt. Semrau.

Despite the intimate set-up, Cpl. Steven Fournier never locked eyes with his former commanding officer. Not once. Hour after hour, question after question, the prosecution’s star witness kept his gaze focused on the jury—the same jury that will decide whether his words are believable enough to send Semrau to prison. “I was just shocked,” Fournier said, recalling what he saw that day in Afghanistan. “None of it made sense.”

The captain and the corporal were part of a small, specialized unit of Canadian “mentors” working side-by-side with the Afghan National Army (ANA), and as the sun rose over Helmand Province on Oct. 19, 2008, they set out on foot for a sweep and clear. Their mission—Operation Atal 28—was to troll for Taliban, pick a fight, and shoot to kill. If the intelligence reports were accurate, up to 70 insurgents were waiting.

One of them was perched high in a tree, the eyes and ears of his comrades below.

Two hours in, the patrol was taking enough enemy fire to radio for backup. A pair of U.S. Apache helicopters swooped in, spraying the cornfields with the rat-tat-tat of 30-mm cannons. Later that morning, as Semrau and his Afghan colleagues continued marching south along the Helmand River, they stumbled on two of the choppers’ targets. One was dead, his stomach cut open by the rapid-fire bullets. The other—the man who’d hid in the tree—was still breathing.

According to one eyewitness, the Taliban fighter was lying in a pool of blood on a dirt path, and had a hole in his back “the size of a dinner plate.” His left leg was riddled with shrapnel, and his foot, barely attached, was twisted completely around. From what Fournier could see, there was also “a fist-sized laceration to his stomach.”

A grainy cellphone video recorded that morning by an ANA soldier shows the bearded man sprawled on his back, his eyes closed and his torso covered by a light blue blanket. He is young, no older than 35. Not once does he appear to move.

The senior Afghan officer on scene was a company commander named Shafiqullah. According to Fournier, he ordered his men to leave the wounded fighter and resume the patrol. “No treatment needed,” Fournier said, quoting Capt. Shafiqullah. “If Allah wants him, he will die. If not, he will live.” At Fournier’s urging, Semrau did ask his Afghan counterpart for permission to snap a picture of both casualties, in case they turned out to be high-value targets.

Bookmark and Share
  • Hypocritics

    one thought: “Who is the a–hole that turned him in?”

    • citizen_CA

      Whatever Fournier thinks, he is a "rat".

      • jade_lee

        Your comments sound like something an inmate in a prison might say but not law abiding people.
        People who break the law go to jail when convicted and then they are released upon serving their sentences and they go on with their lives……that is how it works folks.

        • hil-62

          thank you jade_lee for that mind blowing revelation

          the issue is the law is flawed and this man should open our eyes to a flaw in the system

        • Tee

          Okay there buddy.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

    Ugh. This one gives me trouble. I believe Captain Semaru did the right thing, and don't agree with that portion of the Geneva Conventions. Yes, allowing mercy killing allows an individual soldier to play God, but then so does shooting at the enemy in the first place – if we're giving them the authority to do the latter, I can't see how we can deny them the authority for the former, especially when it's done to prevent what appears to be obvious suffering.

    At the same time though, I understand that the Conventions are as they are and we have to live up to them. I can only hope that those in charge of arbitrating these things are of similar mind as myself and don't judge him harshly. The only way, in my eyes, that Capt. Semaru could have conducted himself better would have been to inform his superiors of his actions upon his return.. but I don't hold it against a person if they don't wish to martyr themselves.

    • jade_lee

      This soldier was acting as a mentor and as a mentor he failed and communicated the wrong message. As a Canadian I insist that Canadian soldiers follow the laws of war and if not they are punished like any other law breaker.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tridus Tridus

      This is a difficult case, and shows the failure of mandatory minimums.

      You're right on both counts. He tried to do the right thing, but the "right thing" is technically against the law.

      The proper course of action is to find him guilty, and sentence him to time served. There is no way this deserves life with no parole for 10 years.

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/inuvikphil inuvikphil

    This is ridiculous — in a warzone, some measure of trust has to be given to the soldier.

    The poor insurgent guy sounds like he was twisted and in terrible pain; realistically he would have just laid there in the sand in pain for a few hours before dying.

    A charge of murder is not justified AT ALL in this case, and hopefully the jury will see there is no benefit in putting this man behind bars, as though he was a danger to society.

    • jade_lee

      He broke a law. If you don't like the law change it but mercy killing is illegal. How is this mentoring when we don't translate our values to those we mentor?

      • Mohawk

        He was hit by 30mm shells in the torso and leg. A 30mm shell to the torso means either you die slowly, or insantly depending on the hit location. If he had left the man there to die, it would be paramount to torture. Think on it.

        And laws are not the be all end all. I bet you've broken the law.

      • Hypocritics

        So nice to sit behind a computer screen in a comfortable chair and claim a soldiers action on the battlefield to be llegal.

        He was in a "damned if you do and damned if you don't" situation, and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he made humane call.

        To quote the movie Apocolypse Now: "Charging a soldier with Murder in a war, is like handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500"

        • jade_lee

          Go read "Heart of Darkness" and think about "the horror! the horror!".

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/citizen_CA citizen_CA

    Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan should refuse to go out into the field until the charges are dropped against Semrau. How can a soldier be a soldier, when his/her own country prosecutes them for something like this. It is unbelievable that this is even happening to Semrau, and that we are paying for this trial to take place. We are at WAR! We send soldiers to war to shoot/kill the enemy.

  • Ariadne

    I believe our Canadians soldiers are facing two wars, one at the front (the terrorists), and at their back (Canadian Media). The former wish to kill them, and the later wish them to be perfect at all costs.

    • Eddie

      may i be so bold as to rephrase you statement about the media,"…the later wish them to be perfect at all costs." the media actually wish them either dead or at least wounded enough to return home. it makes for a 'better' story and adds to the ratings that they want. it is all a matter of economics for them. this whole issue is "no news". a soldier in a war zone made a spur-of-the-moment field decision. NO ONE, and i mean, NO ONE – civilians, politicians or brass – who was not there with him at the time has any right to judge him. but the media does not understand that. they want only the ratings, and a Pulitzer or whatever award they can get out of it.

  • West Coast

    What a joke. Let the man go back to his family and then bring the rest of our boys home. Bush dropped the ball at the outset of this war when he went and branched off to finish Daddy's fight in Iraq. I am saddened that this farce of a trial has been allowed to happen and that this good soldier is facing jail time when criminals like Bush and Harper still roam free.

  • Starlight

    We, as soldiers do not get a choice on if we get to go, or not. I feel for the Capt, and can not begin to imagine what he, and his family are going through. The sad truth, is that something must be up with the combat team (In house fighting) as I can assure you, that the Capt I had the honour to serve for, could do nothing wrong, and we would of backed him to the bitter end. Despite if the action would of been right, or wrong. As a combat team/section/platoon, we are a family with unbreakable bond/trust for one another, and would do anything for the other. This soldiers code is something I haven't heard of, but I know I always had one round in my pistol, reserved for me to prevent capture , and even worse beheading. I would (in the after life, if such exist) guard over anyone who loved me enough to prevent that type of pain, or to be the next taliban freak show on You Tube having my head cut off, with the chance my children could see that.

    It seems obvious that his men didn't respect or like him, and perhaps are making this out to be something bigger then it really is. Remember how troops got back at their WO, by pouring naptha and other items in his coffee… Troops don't do that to people they respect!!

    Right, or wrong, I hope that the Capt is cleared of all charges, as to go through war, and see the things we see, is a sentence all in its self. As for the the other members of that OMLT section, I hope to god that I never have to work with you, as career is above honour in your opinion, and opinions will have people killed in the line of fire..

    A proud Canadian Soldier Pro Patria (Remember…. Never Pass a Fault)

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    For refusing to walk on while a dying man lay in agony, this Canadian soldier risks watching his two kids grow up from across jailhouse bars. The soul aches trying to establish where justice lies in all of this.

    Whatever the outcome of this trial, may these two children never lose sight of the humanity and compassion of their father.

    I hope the immediate family is coping as best as possible, although I really cannot begin to imagine. Does anyone know whether there is a way to support their needs (like a donation to a foundation, or a local service club or R.C. Legion, that might be watching over them)?

  • jade_lee

    How would you wish a seriously wounded Canadian soldier to be treated by the Taliban fighting them?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

      Are you serious? I don't want ANY of our allied soldiers alive in Taliban custody. You will not find a Talib signature on the Geneva conventions. Disturbed beauty sleep would be the very least of my concerns.

      • paul franklin

        Currently there is an American soldier that has been a POW for several months http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07… http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/07/02/afgha…
        Note the date and that it has been almost a year and this poor kid is still under Taliban control.
        This is why we act morally.
        If they see us doing the wrong thing then these POW's will die and or be tortured is that what we want?

        An Isreali soldier is still under enemy control.. the Isrealis actually started a war to try and free him http://www.mia.org.il/

        We must think and act according to laws and rules.
        That is the CDN and CF way.
        Paul Franklin
        (ret Master Corporal)

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

          Paul, I have read your above and below comments, and I am woefully inadequate in any attempt to express my admiration, gratitude and respect towards your service. I wish you a long, happy and (as) healthy (as possible) life. If you are ever within a hundred yards of me, I've got the first round covered. And the second, and third.

          We act morally because that is how we want to act. The hope that our enemy might act similarly is secondary, and (at least in this conflict) perhaps misguided.

          Continued…

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

          …continued.

          Capt. S. had the option of walking away and letting a dying man die in agony; according to evidence he was expressly ordered to do just that. He chose (and here is where we get to the "act morally" part) another gesture. You argue persuasively that you would refuse that the unwritten "pact" or "code" ever be applied in your situation — and I celebrate that you have recovered from your wounds as well as you have. But that argument insists on top-notch trauma care being provided to a dying man who was, let's be honest, not going to get top-notch trauma care. There is no tourniquet for intestines slithering about in the dust. If the Taliban feel this incident justifies in any way the mistreatment of any of their prisoners, that says nothing about Capt. S., nothing about our values, and everything about them.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/citizen_CA citizen_CA

      Regardless of what I/we wish, Canadian soldiers (wounded or not), would end up in a decapitation video on Al Jazeera.

  • FormerRcemeRat

    Captain Semrau should be discharged only.Jack Granatstein's quote is true to life. The main reason Kurt Myer was treated so lightly after WW2 was Canadian soldiers took few prisoners after over 100 North Novies were murdered. It's called war and our troops are in one. Capt. Shafiquiian's order was the route cause…What is the facebook contact so I can be # 7,695.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/M_A_D_world M_A_D_world

    Given the choice; would you rather die on that road on your own or end the pain? There's no way to write something like this into a rule book as it's too circumstantial. Hopefully when the trial runs it's course the jury will properly weigh the circumstances vs the rules accordingly.
    I hope they handle this right or it could be the last time such incidence gets recorded.

  • wafer

    Taliban, are these the same people that mercifully cut people's heads off on television? Clearly jade_lee has absolutely no concept of mercy or the condition of the taliban that was torn apart by 30 mm bullets. Who would want to be a Canadian soldier these days when they are constantly being torn apart back "home" by politicians and press while putting their lives on the line as asked by Canada. The people that should judge this case should be people who have walked a mile in their shoes.

  • Mike T.

    We don't put rules in place then later decide if they are meant to be followed, sorry.

    And Canadian civil juries don't sit 12.

  • Hilary

    “The public would certainly denounce it if it happened in the reverse: if a Taliban killed a wounded Canadian,” says Chris Madsen, a military law expert at the Royal Military College. “That’s the big test. Would it be shocking enough if it happened to our side?”

    I am not sure when Chris Madsen was elected the official spokesperson for the Canadian public, but if this had happened in reverse i would like to think we would all be able to keep our minds open enough to appreciate the fact that that situation would have been the story of a man, quite possibly living in poverty and fear his entire life and driven to support an extremist group like the Taliban who was able hold onto his humanity and empathy enough that he was willing to put a canadian hero out of his pain and suffering and leave him at peace.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Battersea Battersea

    Our Fallen Heroes

    No matter how many times we see this on TV it is always an emotional and traumatic sight. An escorted black hearse with entourage carrying another fallen young soldier speeds along the “Highway of Heroes” to rendezvous with the Chief Coroner in downtown Toronto.

    During this journey along the “Highway of Heroes” the route is lined with ordinary people wanting to pay their respects in support of one of their own. Also bridges spanning the highway provide another platform for ordinary folk to welcome home their fallen hero’s. Some waving the Canadian Flag, while others just wave most of them shed tears as the motorcade speeds by them.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Battersea Battersea

    Why do we send our brave young men and women to a war torn country knowing that there will be casualties and some will not return alive? We are told that they are serving only as peacemakers and training the Afghans to fight their enemy, the Taliban! However, in the stark reality of warfare, roadside bombs do not distinguish between “friend and foe”.

    In addition to witnessing the horrors of war, they have to operate with their hands tied behind them; blind folded and feet shackled together. The “Geneva Convention” also provides a set of guidelines for warring combatants on how to morally conduct their selves before, during and after battle has been fought.
    The Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war.

    OUR troops as with all other NATO members are required to follow these set of protocols. Whether these conventions are recognized by our enemies cannot be assured or guaranteed during today’s conflicts.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Battersea Battersea

    There is a distorted morality in the minds of the Military’s upper echelon and our “Teflon” Political Leaders, who together train our young men and women for war. These new recruits have no doubt heard of the many horror stories, but none of them are prepared for what they will experience. Sent there in an advisory capacity only they accompany the Afghan Army; they cannot give orders, directions or take the lead if they find it necessary.

    They are the hosts and our soldiers are the guests.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Battersea Battersea

    The recent article in MacLean’s regarding “A Soldiers Choice” whereby Capt. Robert Semrau has been charged with Murder (A Mercy Killing) on the field of battle and brings to light the helplessness and brutality of warfare.

    I am totally at a loss to understand these predefined rules for combat; on one hand a “soldier” pursues the enemy. He/she has orders to “search and destroy” all combatants; he/she has been given the authority of “Playing God”.

    But when an act of kindness for another human being (albeit an enemy combatant) to relieve that individual’s suffering, that soldier, the one we trained and sent over there, has now been charged with murder? I would also question the actions or lack thereof taken by the senior Afghan officer in charge of not providing aid as required by the Geneva Convention?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Battersea Battersea

    This whole debacle reeks of conspiracy in the name of Political Correctness; to demonstrate to the world that we Canadians must be seen to be “Squeaky” clean at the expense of one of our soldier’s who was there to serve his country and assist indigenous peoples in their struggle to rid the evil Taliban.

    For your information I am not a conscientious objector or dissident! If asked to serve my country I would without hesitation. But I would expect those in charge to have the intestinal fortitude to stand up and support the young men and women asked to perform a duty of numerous horrors and nightmares.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Battersea Battersea

    I sincerely hope that Maclean's will continue to cover this sad story enough to muster all the support it can for Capt. Robert Semrau. Keep up the good work MACLEAN'S!

  • jade_lee

    After reading all the comments here it appears that you all support euthanasia. Correct? How about sucide? Mercy killing in war is a slippery slope where had we truly believed in this practice historically, I am sure many returning veterans without legs or being burnt beyond recognition would be dead today. The fact is that when a person is severely injured their body releases it's own pain killers, "endorphins", so stating that one kills an injured person to decrease their pain is playing judge and jury. It's a very difficult decision to not stand by this soldier but I don't in his decision to end a persons like due to the soldiers perception of the enemies pain.

    • Wally Jones

      What would you have done if you were in Capt. Semrau's shoes at the time?

      • jade_lee

        I would not have shot the injured taliban! I would have reminded the men I was there to mentor about our obligations when at war to assist a dying enemy medically.

  • jade_lee

    life

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tridus Tridus

    My problem here is with the sentence.

    Technically, he broke the law. But it's clear that he did so for all the right reasons, and made the more moral of the two options available to him. Leaving the man to die is inhumanly cruel. The commander of the mission had ordered them to move on, and not wait for a medic (which considering it was enemy held territory was probably a good idea).

    What else could he do? He should be found guilty, sentenced to time served, and released. Ten years is NOT justice! It's a stark example of the failure of mandatory minimum sentences.

  • D M

    The tactical situation made this an even more daunting choice. It was obvious that the ANA commander was not going to stay and call in a medivac (if there was even one available), and if the ANA was not going to stay, the thought of one or two Canadians staying behind to wait for the man to die (while giving what aid they could) or get medical help was not a good one.
    With all due repect to Cpl Franklin, he was with Canadians and had full medivac capability.
    I would not want to be in the situation that Capt Semrau faced because it is damn easy to judge back here.

  • notyourprincess

    jade_lee, get a 'life.' Mercy killing takes place more than you know, in situations where seniors or cancer patients are having to endure so much pain that an overdose of Morphine 'happens.' I would hope that if I or any family member were in that situation, someone would be merciful in our suffering. I don't really think endorphins really 'cut it' when your abdominal cavity is exposed nor I doubt that a tourniquet would be any benefit.

    • jade_lee

      how would you know that?

      • notyourprincess

        jade_lee, it's easy…I'm smarter then you. Deal with it.

From Macleans