Not available in Canada

MS patients eager for a breakthrough surgery are facing more resistance than they expected

by Anne Kingston on Monday, May 31, 2010 1:04pm - 108 Comments

Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

Like tens of thousands of Canadians afflicted with multiple sclerosis, Rebecca Cooney greeted Paulo Zamboni’s much-publicized research late last year with excitement. Zamboni, an Italian professor of medicine and a former vascular surgeon, brought a fresh lens to a disease long diagnosed as an incurable neurological condition: he found that all 65 MS patients in his study had stenoses, or blockages, in veins in their neck or thorax, a condition he dubbed chronic cerebro-spinal venous insufficiency, or CCSVI. After their blockages were cleared with a basic venous angioplasty, many found their symptoms improved; others saw the degenerative disease’s progress halt altogether. Zamboni’s findings were hailed as a potential breakthrough in MS research, a field focused on drug trials. Proof that the disease had a vascular component, a theory bandied for a century, was viewed as a potential game-changer offering rare hope for MS patients.

One of them was Cooney, a 42-year-old Ottawa resident diagnosed 12 years ago. Since then, crippling fatigue forced her to quit her federal government job as an international financial underwriter. But when she set out late last year to find out if the treatment could work for her, she discovered her M.B.A. and years of Byzantine deal-making were no preparation for the Kafkaesque maze before her. Like many others, Cooney learned the extent to which MS has been colonized as neurologists’ exclusive turf. When she visited her neurologist for a referral to a vascular specialist last November, he refused. Zamboni’s work intrigued him, he told her, but lacked scientific rigour and has not been duplicated. His resistance was echoed by the neurological community and the MS Society of Canada, which called for clinical trials, which can take years. “He told me: ‘I would be a laughingstock if I referred you,’ ” Cooney says.

Undeterred, she travelled to a Detroit hospital in February, paying US$3,000 for CCSVI imaging based on Zamboni’s complex protocol. Cooney returned to her neurologist with scans showing severe stenosis in two jugular veins. Still, he refused to give her a referral. Her GP was more helpful, calling vascular specialists—all of whom said that because Cooney has MS, she needed a neurologist’s referral. Finally, she emailed a cardiologist who had treated a friend. “I told him I had headaches, numbness in my left arm, pain in my chest, and severe stenoses of my jugular veins—all of which is true,” she says. She didn’t mention she had MS or that the reason she wanted to see him was so that he could track her progress after CCSVI treatment, which she received in the U.S. last week. He agreed to see her next month. Cooney regrets the omission, she says: “I want to be able to tell my doctor everything.”

Of the CCSVI procedure itself, she says: “I’m not expecting miracles.” But four days later, she reports the ringing in one ear has vanished, as have her crushing headaches. She’s also able to bend her right leg getting out of bed in the morning and has renewed strength in her hands. When asked where she went for treatment, she refuses to say for fear the clinic will be shut down.

She’s not being paranoid. CCSVI resistance mobilized quickly. Deborah Thorarinson of Calgary found herself in a twilight zone late last year when she called every private clinic in Calgary and Edmonton on behalf of her husband to see if they offered CCSVI imaging. All said no, using wording that was eerily similar. “It was like they were reading from a script,” she says. Her husband travelled to Vancouver’s False Creek Heathcare Centre, where he learned he had severe stenosis. In April, Mark Godley, False Creek’s medical director, told Maclean’s the clinic would start offering CCSVI treatment starting this month, a statement he was forced to amend after running into bureaucracy. (He now says it will be offered in a clinical trial within the next few months.)

Last month, Montreal’s Westmount Square Medical Imaging, the only other private clinic in Canada offering CCSVI scans to MS patients, was ordered to stop by the Collège des médecins du Québec, the body governing the province’s medical doctors. Jeffrey Chankowsky, a neuroradiologist and McGill University professor, was stunned, he says. He’d scanned 125 people willing to pay $450 and had a waiting list into June. In a letter, the Collège said CCSVI has yet to be proven “a medical fact,” even though 47 countries now recognize CCSVI as a medical condition. The letter also noted that neither the Quebec Neurological Society nor the association of Radiologists in Quebec had signed off on it. “It’s the first time we’ve ever been told we couldn’t scan a body part,” Chankowsky says. The clinic routinely provides imaging, such as a virtual colonography, for conditions with no medical indication. “Nobody is stopping us from doing that. But somebody’s stopping MS patients from screening their necks.” Yet someone without MS can have CCSVI screening, he notes.

The medical double standard extends to venous angioplasty, a procedure done in Canadian hospitals for 25 years. (The accepted treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension, for example, is a venous angioplasty and stenting.) Yet when treating MS patients’ blocked veins, venous angioplasty has been deemed “experimental” by the medical establishment and by provincial governments that refuse to cover CCSVI scans or treatment until more research is done.

Sandy McDonald, a vascular surgeon in Barrie, Ont., currently conducting a CCSVI imaging clinical trial, performed six venous angioplasties on MS patients pro bono this year and witnesed improvements. Venous abnormalities in any other part of the body are treated, he says. “Why should the neck veins of MS patients be any different?”

That question is being asked at a parliamentary subcommittee investigating CCSVI that met for the second time this week. It’s a forum that pits the MS establishment’s wait-and-see clinical-trial approach against MS patients who don’t have the luxury of time. In early May, Janet Salloum testified on behalf of her 32-year-old sister Michelle, a mother of three who has been immobilized since her MS diagnosis 18 months ago: “It’s like watching someone drown while people test flotation devices,” she said. McDonald, who receives 300 calls a day from MS patients wanting to be scanned, also appeared, estimating that scans and treatment cost some $1,500, less than the cost of a month’s prescription for many MS drugs. Cooney also testified, as a co-founder of msliberation.ca, a group pushing for CCSVI testing and treatment in Canada.

Progress is being made. Detroit-based physicist Mark Haacke has worked with clinics and hospitals across Canada setting up CCSVI imaging based on Zamboni’s protocol. He expects five sites to offer it by the end of June. Haacke believes a CCSVI-MS link exists but wants the conditions to be seen as separate. “We need to stop saying CCSVI is related to the etiology of MS, but rather point out that there is another disease called CCSVI and many MS patients have it.” Double-blind research studies are important, he says, but shouldn’t prevent doctors from treating MS patients with CCSVI on compassionate grounds: “Not to deal with a clear vascular problem is a violation of the Hippocratic oath and is unconscionable.” Last week, Haacke filed paperwork to create the International Society for Neuro-Vascular Disease, a hybrid that will focus on MS and other blood-brain barrier diseases such as ALS and Alzheimer’s. It’s a beginning. Once specialists can let go with their preoccupation with protecting turf, who knows what medical miracles await.

Bookmark and Share
  • Danica Fletcher

    Thank you Macleans and Ann Kingston for taking on the challenge of enlightening Canadians to the plight of MS suffering. It has been a wild ride for us since Nov 2009. Yes there is help, no there isn't. Well if you have moneyand can travel outside of Canada there is help, if you have a diagnosis of MS no help in Canada. I copied your article today and took it to my GP to get her up to speed with what is going on. With a shocked look she said" you mean if I had blocked veins I could get testing,surgery and treatment in Canada, but since you are an MS patient you can't? Then she stated "thats f—-'n ridiculous". I told her that after meeting with my neurologist last month I was so excited that UBC was recieving funding for CCSVI trials from the MS Society. That balloon was quickly popped when I found out the details. The $750,000 is to be shared with U of Sask The study is for 30 MS patients from each university who are preferably identical twins. One with MS and the other without. The Buffalo study is for 800 MS patients who may have blocked veins. Now that is f—-'n ridiculous. The study will be too small to be conclusive.

  • Herbert .

    Has anyone ever heard of a drug that is given unknowingly….usually by gang members…to make someone feel like committing suicide . Please reply if you know. My daughter is now feeling this way after dating a ex-gang member .

  • http://www.bluelock.com vCloud

    I’ve noticed several MS patients are beginning to file Human Rights complaints. Discrimination means making a distinction between certain individuals or groups based on a prohibited ground. Under the Canadian Human Rights Act and Human Rights Codes/Acts of all provinces/territories, one of these prohibited grounds is mental or physical disability. It seems it would be a totally valid case if put into motion.

  • http://www.stalmark.pl Kotły na eko-groszek

    It's scary what you're saying, we have twenty-first century and this situation here: (

  • http://www.financialcrisisblog.org/ financial_opera

    An oral drug for multiple sclerosis has been approved for some MS patients in Canada.

    Previously, drug treatment options for MS patients in this country were limited to medications taken regularly by injection or infusion.

    Gilenya, also called fingolimod, is a capsule taken once a day for people with the relapsing-remitting form of MS. These patients have relapses that continue to worsen in severity, disability level, or who are unable to tolerate injections.

  • Iva

    within a month, sorry

  • sandra

    Thank you for writing such an informed and educated article on CCVSI. The public needs to know and my sister really needs this procedure. Blame the govt for getting the BIG BUCKS from selling drugs as usual as they don't want the truth to be known.

  • http://for-greet.squarespace.com Colleen O'Shea

    On June 14th, the MS Society of Canada will announce which CCSVI research projects it will be funding. With the bulk of the International Review Committee comprised with Neurologists, I wonder if good choices will be made in how this money will be spent and whether these projects will have the relevance necessary to make the medical community embrace CCSVI. Since the W5 Program in November, 2009 and the beginning of the Liberation Rush, the knowledge of how to treat CCSVI has grown immensely. Doctors have learned that detecting CCSVI can be tricky and sometimes the hunt for the stenosis ends up being in valves or an annulus close to a valve and not the valve itself. The CCSVI Community has gone from being scared of stents to realizing that stenting prevents restenosis and stents are safe if performed in centers experienced in endovascular procedures. The amount of discovery around CCSVI in the past 6 months has been immense, and research projects should focus on this new knowledge and not on old-school concepts based on what neurologists thought was Multiple Sclerosis.

  • Deb

    I for one will not be giving any more money to The MS Society. They have not been supporting the people they are suppose to be helping. It took them a long time to ask for funding money and the studies they are suggesting are not being ran by specialists in that area of expertise. As well I see conflict of interest as the MS Society gets some funding from drug companies. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe it was just recently that they asked for this research money. I saw a program on W5 last November on this topic and if they were really working for people with MS as they have led us to believe when they ask for our money, it is to help people with MS.
    Why were they not asking for government funding, the next day after the program aired. Don't tell me that their phone lines weren't ringing off the hooks.
    From now on my donations and fund raising efforts will not go to bias CCSVI studies with people that are trained in this area, not funded or controlled in any way by drug companies or by neuro's..
    Shame on you MS Society!!

  • http://for-greet.squarespace.com Colleen O'Shea

    CCSVI is a paradigm shift, and that's not an easy pill to swallow. Imagine you're the MS Society and you're entire existence has focused on MS being a neuological disease. Then Paolo Zamboni (and let's not forget the team at CTV and others that brought the story to North America) comes up with this theory that puts everything you've been working towards at question. It doesn't help that your advisors are cynical, territorial and maybe even a bit paranoid, they're part of the culture that makes up what you do. And you've been doing your best. Raising money. Disbursing those monies. Funding research for medicines that might make the big difference.

    My reply is too long so see part 2

  • http://for-greet.squarespace.com Colleen O'Shea

    Asking the Feds for $10 million was seen by many as opportunism, piggybacking off the grass roots protests held on May 5th. I prefer to call it "s a v v y " – at least it looks like a step in the right direction – and completely opposite of how they were reacting in their "CCSVI Educational Seminars" a few months ago. They're learning too. They have no choice with the waterfall of anecdotal evidence thats faciing them. But if they're serious about embracing CCSVI they'll need people on their Board who are advocates, people who had CCSVI and have been treated, and they will need independence, leadership and courage to move this forward – the key ingredients for any business which needs to reinvent itself. CCSVI is the start, there's still a lot to be done and there will probably be room for neurologists. But they won't be the top dog anymore. Unless, of course, the research gets rigged and the results are inconclusive and the medical community dismisses CCSVI as being "trivial".

  • Jim Anderson

    One rational voice so far in a flood of evangelistic sentiment. A simple cure for a complex disease? How wonderful! Open the veins, drain the brain of too much blood, and the circulation in your legs will improve! I think I will learn the procedure and liberate both veins and wallets..

From Macleans