Not available in Canada

MS patients eager for a breakthrough surgery are facing more resistance than they expected

by Anne Kingston on Monday, May 31, 2010 1:04pm - 108 Comments

Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

Like tens of thousands of Canadians afflicted with multiple sclerosis, Rebecca Cooney greeted Paulo Zamboni’s much-publicized research late last year with excitement. Zamboni, an Italian professor of medicine and a former vascular surgeon, brought a fresh lens to a disease long diagnosed as an incurable neurological condition: he found that all 65 MS patients in his study had stenoses, or blockages, in veins in their neck or thorax, a condition he dubbed chronic cerebro-spinal venous insufficiency, or CCSVI. After their blockages were cleared with a basic venous angioplasty, many found their symptoms improved; others saw the degenerative disease’s progress halt altogether. Zamboni’s findings were hailed as a potential breakthrough in MS research, a field focused on drug trials. Proof that the disease had a vascular component, a theory bandied for a century, was viewed as a potential game-changer offering rare hope for MS patients.

One of them was Cooney, a 42-year-old Ottawa resident diagnosed 12 years ago. Since then, crippling fatigue forced her to quit her federal government job as an international financial underwriter. But when she set out late last year to find out if the treatment could work for her, she discovered her M.B.A. and years of Byzantine deal-making were no preparation for the Kafkaesque maze before her. Like many others, Cooney learned the extent to which MS has been colonized as neurologists’ exclusive turf. When she visited her neurologist for a referral to a vascular specialist last November, he refused. Zamboni’s work intrigued him, he told her, but lacked scientific rigour and has not been duplicated. His resistance was echoed by the neurological community and the MS Society of Canada, which called for clinical trials, which can take years. “He told me: ‘I would be a laughingstock if I referred you,’ ” Cooney says.

Undeterred, she travelled to a Detroit hospital in February, paying US$3,000 for CCSVI imaging based on Zamboni’s complex protocol. Cooney returned to her neurologist with scans showing severe stenosis in two jugular veins. Still, he refused to give her a referral. Her GP was more helpful, calling vascular specialists—all of whom said that because Cooney has MS, she needed a neurologist’s referral. Finally, she emailed a cardiologist who had treated a friend. “I told him I had headaches, numbness in my left arm, pain in my chest, and severe stenoses of my jugular veins—all of which is true,” she says. She didn’t mention she had MS or that the reason she wanted to see him was so that he could track her progress after CCSVI treatment, which she received in the U.S. last week. He agreed to see her next month. Cooney regrets the omission, she says: “I want to be able to tell my doctor everything.”

Of the CCSVI procedure itself, she says: “I’m not expecting miracles.” But four days later, she reports the ringing in one ear has vanished, as have her crushing headaches. She’s also able to bend her right leg getting out of bed in the morning and has renewed strength in her hands. When asked where she went for treatment, she refuses to say for fear the clinic will be shut down.

She’s not being paranoid. CCSVI resistance mobilized quickly. Deborah Thorarinson of Calgary found herself in a twilight zone late last year when she called every private clinic in Calgary and Edmonton on behalf of her husband to see if they offered CCSVI imaging. All said no, using wording that was eerily similar. “It was like they were reading from a script,” she says. Her husband travelled to Vancouver’s False Creek Heathcare Centre, where he learned he had severe stenosis. In April, Mark Godley, False Creek’s medical director, told Maclean’s the clinic would start offering CCSVI treatment starting this month, a statement he was forced to amend after running into bureaucracy. (He now says it will be offered in a clinical trial within the next few months.)

Last month, Montreal’s Westmount Square Medical Imaging, the only other private clinic in Canada offering CCSVI scans to MS patients, was ordered to stop by the Collège des médecins du Québec, the body governing the province’s medical doctors. Jeffrey Chankowsky, a neuroradiologist and McGill University professor, was stunned, he says. He’d scanned 125 people willing to pay $450 and had a waiting list into June. In a letter, the Collège said CCSVI has yet to be proven “a medical fact,” even though 47 countries now recognize CCSVI as a medical condition. The letter also noted that neither the Quebec Neurological Society nor the association of Radiologists in Quebec had signed off on it. “It’s the first time we’ve ever been told we couldn’t scan a body part,” Chankowsky says. The clinic routinely provides imaging, such as a virtual colonography, for conditions with no medical indication. “Nobody is stopping us from doing that. But somebody’s stopping MS patients from screening their necks.” Yet someone without MS can have CCSVI screening, he notes.

The medical double standard extends to venous angioplasty, a procedure done in Canadian hospitals for 25 years. (The accepted treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension, for example, is a venous angioplasty and stenting.) Yet when treating MS patients’ blocked veins, venous angioplasty has been deemed “experimental” by the medical establishment and by provincial governments that refuse to cover CCSVI scans or treatment until more research is done.

Sandy McDonald, a vascular surgeon in Barrie, Ont., currently conducting a CCSVI imaging clinical trial, performed six venous angioplasties on MS patients pro bono this year and witnesed improvements. Venous abnormalities in any other part of the body are treated, he says. “Why should the neck veins of MS patients be any different?”

That question is being asked at a parliamentary subcommittee investigating CCSVI that met for the second time this week. It’s a forum that pits the MS establishment’s wait-and-see clinical-trial approach against MS patients who don’t have the luxury of time. In early May, Janet Salloum testified on behalf of her 32-year-old sister Michelle, a mother of three who has been immobilized since her MS diagnosis 18 months ago: “It’s like watching someone drown while people test flotation devices,” she said. McDonald, who receives 300 calls a day from MS patients wanting to be scanned, also appeared, estimating that scans and treatment cost some $1,500, less than the cost of a month’s prescription for many MS drugs. Cooney also testified, as a co-founder of msliberation.ca, a group pushing for CCSVI testing and treatment in Canada.

Progress is being made. Detroit-based physicist Mark Haacke has worked with clinics and hospitals across Canada setting up CCSVI imaging based on Zamboni’s protocol. He expects five sites to offer it by the end of June. Haacke believes a CCSVI-MS link exists but wants the conditions to be seen as separate. “We need to stop saying CCSVI is related to the etiology of MS, but rather point out that there is another disease called CCSVI and many MS patients have it.” Double-blind research studies are important, he says, but shouldn’t prevent doctors from treating MS patients with CCSVI on compassionate grounds: “Not to deal with a clear vascular problem is a violation of the Hippocratic oath and is unconscionable.” Last week, Haacke filed paperwork to create the International Society for Neuro-Vascular Disease, a hybrid that will focus on MS and other blood-brain barrier diseases such as ALS and Alzheimer’s. It’s a beginning. Once specialists can let go with their preoccupation with protecting turf, who knows what medical miracles await.

Bookmark and Share
  • Brian

    Ah, yes. Our "best in the world" health care system at work again.

  • kevin pasowisty

    i was diagnosed with primary progressive ms ten years ago. i am disgusted with our government and the neurological doctors who refuse the idea of ccsvi being a possible medical condition. i must agree with everyone that this is a violation of the hippocratic oath that the doctors should be standing behind. maybe we should file a class action suit against them as this might light a fire under their butts and make them get closer to finding answers to this horrible condition.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SteveZan SteveZan

    Anne, you wrote a wonderful piece regarding the plight of MS patients. My wife Michele and I needed to circumvent the process as well and traveled to India for the treatment and like many others following this story the results have been improved health. Unfortunately after a recent visit to our neurologist, I am even more resigned to the fact that doctors are more concerned with their domain versus the welfare of the patient they claim to serve. His defense and negativity did more to unnerve my wife than the treatment she experienced. Not even a single comment as to how she was doing after the treatment – sadly I was not present to remind him of the PERSON that sat in front of him that day. Maybe a revisit of the Hippocratic oath is in order, Here are two from the Modern day oath that all neurologists would be reminded of….

    I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

    I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug

    Discouraged by their position but determined to do whatever it takes to improve the health of my wife

  • http://howtoloosebellyfatfast.net how to loose

    One of my friends has MS and, i think it is a terrible disease… but most of the people do not know much about MS, and i hope, no one will have to learn….

  • Lyn

    Thank you so much for this article. So many news articles have incorrect information and miss the whole point of the stuggle that MS patients are having as well as the struggle that the "good" Doctors are having trying to treat a simple medical problem that thousands and thousands of Canadians have.
    Letting these Canadian people suffer and die is paramount to denying staving children of the world food or medication to the worlds AIDS sufferers. The point being it's WRONG and we, being the MS patients and the Doctors who are trying, need help from everyone in Canada. We need everyone to stand up and say, "This is wrong and we need to allow treatment to MS patients now." Please support us because the MS Society of Canada is NOT supporting us and either are the Neurologists. We are not the property of the formentioned people, we are Canadian citzens with a terrible disease and we need help and it's available yet we are being denied.
    Thank you MaCleans magazine please keep up with news articles until we are given the treatment we need!

  • Johanne

    Entrez le texte ici!

  • Tom Hennessy

    This is a finding JUST published about the continued use of drugs PAST the two year mark AGREED upon and WHY it seems these drugs WERE used past the agreed upon mark. It looks like the investigators have found an odd relationship between these .. people .. if one can use the word loosely.

    "The scientific advisory group included representatives from the four drug companies, two MS groups, and the neurologists treating patients, all of whom had lobbied for the continued use of the drugs on the NHS."

  • Chris Sullivan

    Dr. Duncan, the MPP for Etobicoke, and Dr. Carolyn Bennet, the Liberal Health Critic, in a Parliamentary Subcommittee, had as witnesses, Dr. Sandy Macdonald of Barrie and Dr. Mark Haacke, professor and inventor of MRI techniques, and may soon have Dr. Paulo Zamboni as well. They also had an MS patient who had the procedure in Poland and is now improving. These doctors, and many others from around the world, all support this treatment. This is a clear case of discrimination, tantamount to enslavement, of people who through no fault of their own have become the chattels of wealthy members of the neurology-pharma complex. At the time scientists were investigating (again) the vascular origins of this disease, back in, when, 1977, 1965, 1934, 18??, MS victims were being given experimental surgery with irrigation of their spines (sound painful?). What would these healers do without subjects to experiment on? Dr.Jock Murray of Halifax, before the same Subcommittee: "If they all got treated, no-one would go in a trial."

    The MS Society who are trying to get 10 million dollars from the Canadian taxpayer, have sat on their hands since last November, offered an amount for research into CCSVI that is a pittance, have as sponsors major drug vendors and high priced neurologists on their boards, and are not qualified to do science. They do not represent people with MS. They are as guilty as anyone of discrimination against people who have the luck to have this disease, which is used as a cash cow and source of subjects for arbitrary experimentation.

  • D Myles

    Where are the Political Leaders now? A perfect oppourtunity for a leader to take charge and be known for something REKNOWNED. Stand up and say yes to this procedure and every person in Canada will know who you are and what you've done. This is going to happen soner or later. So put your name on it NOW. This is a no loss situation. This can be done by a Provincial or Federal leader.
    The news headline will read "Stephen Political Leader has put a STOP to NEEDLESS MS SUFFERING"

  • Carolina

    I'm from the Netherlands and my husband has MS. The situation here is about the same as in Canada. Therefore we are forced to go to Bulgaria next week for the diagnosis and (possibly) the treatment. I could have written this article myself! I am happy to see that somebody finally gets it, and puts it in the exact right words. Why are people with MS dinied testing voor CCSVI just because they have MS??? It is completely ridiculous. Everybody with a normal IQ should be able to understand this. Is it the arrogance of the medical scientists who don't want to acknowledge that they have been on the wrong track for ages? Is it a lack of empathy, or is it the power of the farmaceutical industry, that are afraid that their absurdly expensive medicines will be redundant? I think it is all of it together. But who really cares, it is an utter disgrace! I totally agree with the comment that the medical science will probably understand that it was a disgrace in a few years time, but that thought doesn't comfort MS patients, because they may be incurable by the time that all of them say sorry!

  • Andrea

    Great article. Great reporting. It put into words my frustration. I sat in on the Sub-Committee meeting described in this article. I was moved to tears by the testimony of the two individuals afflicted with MS – who have seen profound improvements after the Liberation procedure.

    Shame on the neurological community and the MS Society of Canada for a wait and see – research, research, research stand. This is not a new drug. This is a procedure that is in current practice…I guess just not for MS patients!!!!

    Prohibiting MS patients the same kind of care and access to treatment is "criminal".

    Janet Salloum's statement – It’s like watching someone drown while people test flotation devices – is a brilliant analogy.

    Mark Haacke's comment – “Not to deal with a clear vascular problem is a violation of the Hippocratic oath and is unconscionable.” – says it all. Shame, shame, shame.

    Perhaps a class action law suit against the Government of Canada and the Provincial Governments is in order!

  • Anon, MD

    Understanding this with numbers (and no, it's not because of gvt or money)
    3% of doctors innovate
    15% will try something new

    Everybody else won't budge unless it has been studied significantly or extensively. And then there are those (about 20%) who won't change their practice methods unless threatened one way or another.

    This isn't a new problem in medicine or even an uncommon one. Aspirin for instance was discovered to be beneficial during heart attacks in the 1950s, but it took 30 years before it was adopted in practice. Another example is that a surgeon has to establish himself within a department and be working for some 10-odd years before being permitted to venture with a new idea or method.

    Now add the fact that physicians are by nature conservative in their practice, territorial and can be quite defensive when faced with things they don't understand, I ask you: is the article that much of a surprise? The only fault we can attribute to "the system" is that it has removed the sense of competition and that leadership has been perpetually deferred.

    Some food for thought: how is it, when the world has moved into the information-age, are doctors still struggling with the computer age (less then 25% of practices have complete digital records).

  • http://www.blockedveinsmsresearchgroup.com/ Martha Wilder

    Blocked veins Research Group is proposing two new board members for the MS Society Board so we can influence research priorities and get more money for CCSVI research. Please follow us on facebook.com for more information. You can join the MS Society and fill out a proxy form to nominate our candidates.

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/CCSVI-Blocked-Veins…

  • Deborah

    As a Canadian citizen with MS I am very grateful for the spearheading of Doctors worldwide who are forward thinking and open minded about CCSVI and it's effects on the body. My neurologist debunks this treatment and has told me not to hold out any hope for it. I thank the Doctors out there who value the treatment of their patients as primary. These Doctors do not impose onto their patients their own narrow minded beliefs/guesses about a disease whose cause is still not known. How do we find a cause and or a cure if we are halted by limitations set by neurologists who are not able to see beyond or even consider the possibilities. It is not about who owns this disease and who should be treating it. It is about finding a cause and a cure plain and simple.

  • Tom Hennessy

    Those people who say the REASON for the LACK of momentum FOR this treatment is that "neurologists will lose money and neurologists are soooo money hungry they are fighting it tooth and nail" .. just may be right.
    "The news this month that maternal health is improving across the world, public health experts should have been celebrating"
    "The journal also revealed that some women's health campaigners had put heavy pressure on it to delay publication of the data because they believed it might threaten their funding"
    "Epidemiologist Elizabeth Pisani, currently a visiting fellow at DePaul University in Chicago, says that death has become a valuable commodity for people seeking funding to support their cause"

  • http://twitter.com/canadiandmbfan @canadiandmbfan

    Isn't the MS Society suppose to advocate on behalf of those suffering from this terrible disease? Sounds like there not doing their job and people wiht MS shoud form a better advocacy group.

  • Tonie Turner

    Excellent article. Thank you as a MS'er. I have had MS for 11 years…
    I have R&R (Relapsing & Remmiting) MS. I take no medication. Thank God. However, my last attadck (optic neuritis) has diminished my eyesight. Do I need to wait for more damage? No is the answer.
    All goes well, I will be going to Albany, New York in September 2010 to spend my Canadian dollars to a health center who cares about healing.
    I am ick of complaining how our Canadian government is not standing beside thousand of people with MS.
    This is a possible cure for us!

  • kathy hutchinson

    JMG obviously, IMO, has vested interest in the pharmaceutical Empire and/or neurologic generated $$$$. I believe the donation of 50 yrs of people.s lives and the consumption of the experimental poisons is quite enough!

  • Marcella Baseggio

    Thank you for bringing the MS dilemma to the forefront of a suffering population. We hope that you will pursue this issue as it falls under the category of investigative jounalism. It therefore merits all the attention and coverage the media can provide. With 3 afflicted family members, we are faced with severe resistance and are fighting a monolythic battle with the medical profession, specifically the neurologists. My family physician regards Dr. Zamboni's discovery as "quacky". Cats or dogs requiring an MRI, would not be rejected. This is all about providing the "gods" (doctors/neurologists) with job security. Only in Canada!

  • Roger Ironmonger

    Many MS patients do not have the luvury of waiting. Please help these people by signing… Thank you.

  • Moirya Mamede

    Thank you, Macleans.ca for your article. I am glad to read compassionate words. I, like many other MS sufferers, am rapidly losing any quality of life. How shameful our health system has become. To be a Canadian with MS is a death sentence. I have been a defender of our universal health care system in Canada. But now I see that it is universal only for those who have the good fortune of not having MS.

  • Tom Hennessy

    I wonder whether it could be done within the Aboriginal Health Care system .. ?

  • JHP

    Out of the shadow of an intransigent medical community in this country, I am travelling to far away Bulgaria to receive what surely could be provided here in this country. Perhaps I can be called lucky, having been diagnosed 27 years ago, and still being able to stagger off to work, but my mother was not so fortunate. I will never forget the ruthlessness with which this disease overcame her, to the point of absolute incapacity and ultimately death from blood poisoning resulting from a bed sore. Perhaps I will not follow this path, but the thought that I might makes my trip to Bulgaria so much more important, not just for me, but for my entire family.
    When I come back after hopeful great success I pledge to fight for the rights of MS sufferers in this country to access a treatment that should be their right.

  • John Robson

    This article was very alarming to me & those friends who read it…let the MS patients sign whatever waiver so they can get whatever treatment that will ease their pain!

  • Heather Macgillivray

    Although late to the table, I'm in the process of researching Canadian media health specialists in order that I may send them a copy of a letter I have written to members of Federal and Provincial Parliament. After watching the Subcommittee on Neurological Diseases hearings, just sending a letter to MPs and MPPs seemed as though I would be screaming into the wind. Now that I've brought myself more up to speed on the media coverage CCSVI has already received, I wonder if there is any way to win. Your article perfectly expresses the cruel and appalling situation in which we, Canadians with Multiple Sclerosis, presently find ourselves. Thank you for so boldly expressing our pain and frustration.

From Macleans