This is not Obama’s Katrina. If anything, it’s Bush’s second Katrina.

What other ticking time bombs await?

by Andrew Potter on Sunday, June 6, 2010 8:51pm - 81 Comments

WIN MCNAMEE/ ABACA USA / KEYSTONE

The only substance possibly more toxic than the thousands of barrels of oil that continue to gush daily into the Gulf of Mexico from BP’s broken Macondo well is the flood of commentary spewing from the mouths and pens of U.S. Republicans and their allies in the partisan press. The right-wing talking point of the moment is that this spill has turned into “Obama’s Katrina,” marking the moment when the President’s fundamental inadequacies as a leader are laid bare for all to see. But that’s only when they aren’t blaming “government” itself, or at least the quaintly misguided left-wing conceit that government can do anything usefully at all.

There’s been no small amount of revenge-seeking by Republicans who have always felt Bush was treated unfairly over Katrina. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Dubya’s long-serving hit man Karl Rove pointed out that while Bush had to work through and with local authorities in Louisiana, the Gulf is an area of undisputed federal authority. He took great pleasure in turning Obama’s own words against him, suggesting the President might rue his complaint about Bush’s response to Katrina: “I wish that the federal government had been up to the task.”

Except the real lesson from Katrina was never about the obligatory cosmetics of federal leadership and the need for the president to be seen to be Fully Engaged in Doing Something. What made Katrina such a perfect symbol of Bush’s legacy was not that he was slow off the mark in taking charge. Rather, it was his cheerful indulgence of cronyism and you’re-doing-a-heckuva-job incompetence, which revealed the entire ideological thrust of his administration, namely that the federal government could never serve as a positive force in American life.

That essential point was made last week by Fox News commentator and former Mike Huckabee adviser Jim Pinkerton, who wrote on his blog that Obama has “finally confronted the reality that the federal government doesn’t work very well. Uncle Sam doesn’t have core competencies, he has core incompetencies.” This is, of course, just the latest version of the long-standing Republican gambit of denouncing the inadequacy of the very government they’ve been in charge of for most of the past 40 years. The strategy is always the same: once in power, start stuffing the most important agencies with partisan hacks who are either complete boneheads or actively hostile to the institution they serve. This ensures either regulatory failure or regulatory capture, which is subsequently used as proof that government is useless.

This is pretty much what happened with the Minerals Management Service, the agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior responsible for regulation of offshore oil drilling. As is now well known, the agency became thoroughly corrupted during the Bush years, to the point where dozens of MMS staff were caught doing drugs and sleeping with their counterparts from the energy industry—and that’s when they weren’t accepting free gifts and holidays from the companies they were supposed to be overseeing. Meanwhile, MMS scientists who raised concerns over the safety and environmental impact of proposed drilling projects were repeatedly muzzled by their bosses, even as energy companies were routinely permitted to more or less write their own inspection reports.
Occasionally, the Republican inclination to tweak the nose of their most loathed institutions results in pure comedy, as when Bush sent John Bolton to Turtle Bay to piss on all the rugs at the United Nations. But more often the result is nothing short of tragic.

While it has largely fallen out of the public’s interest, the methane explosion at the Upper Big Branch mine in West Virginia that killed 29 is in many ways even more scandalous than what is happening in the Gulf. The company responsible, Massey, had been repeatedly cited over the past few years for methane-related safety violations. Yet even though it was widely known to be running multiple unsafe operations, had one of the worst safety records in the country, had paid over US$4 million in criminal and civil fines for safety violations after a fire at another mine that killed two people in 2006, and had millions more in outstanding unpaid citations, the company was allowed to keep operating, and keep killing its workers.

Like the BP spill, the mine explosion happened under what was nominally Obama’s watch. But in both cases, the disasters were the inevitable failures of a regulatory apparatus that had been deliberately and systematically sabotaged under Bush’s two terms. That is why the BP spill is not even close to being “Obama’s Katrina.” If anything, it is George W. Bush’s Second Katrina—or, if you count the mine explosion, his Third Katrina. Or, if you count the regulatory capture of the SEC by Wall Street and the way permitting investment banks to self-regulate contributed to the mortgage crisis, his Fourth Katrina.

The question that should really be worrying Americans is just how many ticking time bombs the Republicans have left strewn throughout the federal regulatory infrastructure. Where will the next disaster strike? Which agency will be held responsible? The only certainty is that the longer the Democrats are in power, the easier it will be for Republicans to blame the President, or, ideally, blame the very idea of government.

This isn’t mere partisanship, it is nihilism. And it is pure poison in a democracy.

Bookmark and Share
  • scissorpaws

    You could, in Canuckistan, include the memorable event at Walkerton, Reaganite Mike Harris successful deregulation of the water safety bureaucracy. Reagan began by deregulating the airline industry, I wonder how that contributed to 9-11. For these people it's ideology. Bush and Harris and Harper and Reagan are ideologues who believe in Laissez Faire capitalism because it's simplistic. The trouble is, it doesn't work. It's a fairy tale no less than was Communism.

    • hosertohoosier

      Airlines aren't responsible for airport security – airports (which are usually publicly owned) are. Secondly, Jimmy Carter deregulated the airlines, not Reagan. I suppose he is a laissez faire ideologue too?

  • Leo

    You lock stepper who walk the Bush walk and drink yourselves drunk on the koolaid, I am laughing my you know what off watching your country fall apart, thats the way empires fall you know…from within. It is plain that for 8 years Bush play president, the guy was an idiot, but you right wingers see an intellegent guy, your brain dead.

    In the mean time I will watch the ticking time bombs go off, til you are no more, hey, the world would be a better place without you. You don't own the world.

  • Wargasm

    Bush did it.

    Right.

    So… how are those circulation numbers looking, Macleans?

  • taxslave

    Not sure why everyone is so quick to blame Junior. He does not have the IQ necessary to have caused all these problems. All he did was read the script provided by his backers and sign what he was told to.

  • MediaWatcher

    Bush is also responsible for the War of 1812, childhood obesity, train wrecks, rain on weekends, and ants at your picnic. Obama is the glorious one…come to save us all…praise Obama Hallelujah!!!

  • Nick

    The article is spot on. Funny to watch right wingers wriggle around; merely showing outrage and nothing any more tangible than that simply due to the fact that they've got nothing with which they can disprove the author's arguments.

  • MediaWatcher

    The only real 'poison' in our democracy is the sick, infantile, pandering leftist media. So a single mine explosion (not exactly a safe industry) is worse than the leaking of millions of gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico? The accidental death of TWO people, FOUR years ago is evidence of long standing malfeasance? Psss…don't let the construction industry know, Potter, as they have much more blood on their hands. And of course there was no shenanigans going on while Clinton was in the White House?? I guess providing, you know, facts…and references…and details are not important to the modern journalist. You can apparently make any unsubstantiated anecdotal claims you want as long as you have righteousness on your side. I am not sure which is sadder….Potter, or the magazine that publishes this twaddle.

  • Peter Michael

    This article is a good example of how the left wing shapes the news to suit their purposes. It is an example of telling a lie by the omission of fact.

    The fact is that the BP oil well in question was given the go-ahead by Barack Obama's team in the Department of the U.S. Secretary of the Interior. That happened in February 2009. Obama's boys let this project go ahead without environmental scrutiny because they said there wasn't much chance of an oil spill.

    So, Andrew Potter is manipulating the scenario for his own devious ends which only serves to underscore him as a disreputable writer/academic.

  • Peter Michael

    Given the fact that it was Obama's team that paved the way for the oil spill, what responsibility do the Maclean's editors have when a writer (Andrew Potter) submits a story which is inaccurate because it is based on the omission of salient facts? Are they complicit in this or is their fund of knowledge so limited that the Maclean's editors didn't know that this BP well was under the jurisdiction of the Obama team?

  • Ariadne

    It only shows how a person with so much Charisma does not necessarily translate to good governance. As an observation so far, Obama and his wife is great in photo ops, showing face, rubbing with personalities, great in talking, talking, talking, and talking some more. That is why journalists and personalities (whose career depends on talking words) love him. If America's choices of presidency is limited between two kinds of presidents, one who talks too much (Obama) and a bumbling less talker Bush then America's problem has no end in sight.

    • GUEST

      or maybe a president who is competent and not corrupt? both parties are basically the same thing, despite all the name calling back and forth.

  • nik

    The author is absolutely right. Politians come to power to not to rule, but to make money. "Deregulation" and incompetent government create more opportunities for private companies to make more money.
    deregulate baby, deregulate…

  • Bruce F

    You all make me sick. Stop blaming the Govt for our absolute failures as humans, also Bush and Co. never lifted a finger to help those people after Katrina struck. Have you seen the place lately, still demolished. There is no pride in America anymore.
    Stop this partisan crap, What could Obama do short of what he has already done? Lets see you brainiacs fix that leak, good luck.
    The CEOs and huge money will and always will be the ones who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Don't be so naive.

  • Don

    How long do you have to be in charge of all aspects of government before YOU take responsibility.?Yes Bush didn't take control but neither did Obama and his appointed staff. He says the buck stops with me but never fails to say….this is the last administrations fault….I'm just going to fix it. Give us a break…..when you take over a business and run it for over a year….you had the opportunity to make changes and when you don't.

    If it's always the other guys fault we will never make head way.

From Macleans