Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

What goes on here

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 9:35am - 5 Comments

It presently is garden party season in Ottawa—the Speaker’s reception at Kingsmere was last evening, the leader of the opposition hosts at Stornoway tonight, there’s probably something at 24 Sussex at some point. The press gallery is in these cases invited to mix with the political class in smart casual wear and, at least in the case of 24 Sussex, an inflatable castle is provided for children.

Recently in Washington, Vice President Biden hosted a similar fete and subsequent pictures of the press frolicking with members of the Obama administration have apparently started something of a debate. The Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder has gone to some length to explain his attendance. Glenn Greenwald, Matthew Yglesias, Jim Newell and Ta-Nehisi Coates add their thoughts. The following from Coates.

Consumers of news should ask themselves a very simple question when they see these sorts of events: What is the White House’s agenda? What is their interest in inviting a gaggle of journalists and their families over for a party? What are they trying to achieve?

By the logic of the  press corps, these White House social events have no real effect on the news narrative. I find that interesting. There are some very smart people in the the White House. It would seem that by now they would know their soirée press strategy has been a miserable failure. And yet they press on. I wonder why?

Some full disclosure, such as it is.

I’ve been in Ottawa for approximately two and a half years now. I’ve not partaken of a garden party, though I’m not sure if that has to do with any specific ethical reasons, so much as a general aversion to socializing.

Two years ago, I participated in a forum on media diversity at Rideau Hall that included lunch.

I also once had dinner at Stornoway. Shortly after Mr. Ignatieff became leader each major media outlet’s Ottawa bureau was invited over for an evening. I was seated by Feschuk and, if memory serves, we most passed the time making juvenile jokes while the adults discussed more serious matters.

Bookmark and Share
  • John D

    Maybe sometimes a party is just a party.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/bergkamp bergkamp

    Our pols don't need garden parties to schmooze reporters because Canadian msm is already corrupted and tame.

    Watching reporters talk about auditing Parliament books recently reinforced my belief that journos are more worried about staying in the loop than they are publishing scoops. Reporters are taking pols side before the facts are even known – many reporters are reassuring public that our pols don't have moats so there is no funny business going on – while at same time completely ignoring McGregor/Maher's story the other day about Sgro and her interesting arrangement with her children.

    I wonder if the garden parties are held to thank msm for being so compliant for the past year and to encourage them, and their sheep behaviour, to continue on in similar vein for another year.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    Agree with John above… I am heartened when politicians drop their "open season" hostility towards each other and the press on occasion. I guess it just like the illusion of being governed by human beings I guess.

  • john g

    Interesting Aaron, thanks for sharing.

    I have to wonder though…comments about aversion to socializing aside, what "ethical" considerations would compel you to miss a social event for journalists and politicians? It's not like there can possibly be any question about where you stand to anyone who reads you. You are probably one of the most, if not THE most, anti-Conservative journalists in the press gallery. You don't even pretend to be balanced in your writing or to hide your contempt for the Conservatives, and many times (though less often in recent times thank goodness) you've deliberately taken stuff out of context to take a shot at the Conservatives. So why skip a party on those grounds?

    Unless you fear for your safety at a Conservative-sponsored event?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/amherstvw amherstvw

    Ambinder: "Journalists, if they're good for anything, should use whatever access they have to consistently and relentless pressure powerful interests. "

    I worry about journalists (elsewhere) who have happily complimented the sense of humour of cabinet ministers who run old, bad jokes through their Twitter account. Or those who reduce journalism to 'Hot and Not' and over-simplify things into one of those two boxes. Politics deserves more thoughtful treatment – it is not entertainment 'news'.

    Although it is sometimes 'harder to get ahead' by steering clear of 'the politicians' in any organization, it also prevents people from being drawn in to headline national broadcasts about how the NDP and Liberals will merge tomorrow and that they already have a name picked out … The Liberals? I'd like to know why the Liberals are suddenly so relaxed about the Afghanistan detainees. The fake lake can take care of itself now.

    An important story for me, in terms of weighing objectivity, is how my local newspaper(s) are about to start receiving Ottawa news filtered by a national party's advertising person … now a 'journalist' ?

    How much arm's length journalistic ethical reflection will happen there?

From Macleans