The angriest men in news

Pierre Karl Péladeau and Kory Teneycke hate Canadian news channels so much that they’re launching one

by Philippe Gohier on Wednesday, June 16, 2010 1:04pm - 185 Comments

Dozens of reporters squeezed into a cramped room at the Sun’s headquarters in Toronto on Tuesday morning to hear Pierre Karl Péladeau and Kory Teneycke confirm what everyone already knew going in: Quebecor Media Inc. is launching an all-news television network to compete with CBC News Network and CTV News Channel.

The channel, dubbed Sun TV News, is slated to launch January 1, 2011, and promises “hard news and straight talk.” On Tuesday, that “straight talk” mostly took the form of potshots at Sun TV News‘s eventual competitors.

“Canadian TV news today is narrow, it’s complacent, and it’s politically correct,” Teneycke, the former director of communications for the Prime Minister’s Office and now the vice-president of development at Quebecor, told reporters. “It’s bland and boring, and Canadians, as a result, have largely tuned out.” Sun TV News, he said, will be “unapologetically patriotic” and “controversially Canadian.”

Populist sales pitch aside, neither Péladeau nor Teneycke were willing to brand the content they plan to broadcast as “right-wing,” much less endorse the channel’s nickname in the media: “Fox News North.” Still, it’s clear both men see an ideological chasm between what makes it to air on CBC’s and CTV’s news channels and what Quebecor plans to offer. “English Canada today is ill-served by the incumbent specialty news channels,” Peladeau, Quebecor’s president and CEO, said. “As a result, far too many Canadians are tuning out completely or changing their dials to American all-news channels.” To get those viewers back, Péladeau’s channel will offer a distinctly Fox News-like mix of news and confrontational commentary. Just don’t call it Fox News North.

Many hurdles remain before Quebecor can start beaming that “controversially Canadian” content to Canadian audiences, not least of which are the regulatory hoops through which the media giant must jump. The company is currently petitioning the CRTC for what’s called a category 1 license, meaning cable and satellite providers would have to offer the channel to subscribers; category 2 licenses, by contrast, allow cable and satellite companies to ignore the channel entirely. To Quebecor, the difference is hardly arcane: CBC News Network is said to collect $65 million in carriage fees thanks to its category 1 license; CTV News Channel, with its category 2 license, takes in a comparatively modest $15 million.

Péladeau has been a steady presence on Parliament Hill over the past 18 months, gaining access to some of the most senior people in government. In fact, he’s racked up over two dozen lobbying meetings with a mix of government ministers and high-ranking bureaucrats, including two with Stephen Harper in early 2009—back when Teneycke was still working in the PMO. In the meantime, Teneycke’s recruiting net has landed him two prominent press gallery veterans in David Akin and Brian Lilley, with Teneycke promising more additions to the roster soon.

As could be expected, the channel already has its critics in the media. In a widely-circulated blog post, Don Newman, the former host of Politics on CBC, wrote the channel would polarize Canadian political parties by “urging them to be more rabid.” Sun TV News, in Newman’s view, is “the last thing Canada needs.” But at Tuesday’s press conference, the angriest people in the room weren’t the reporters covering the announcement; they were Teneycke and Péladeau, who were all-too-eager to promise to lay waste to their rivals.

“We’re taking on the mainstream media,” Teneycke warned the assembled journalists. “We’re taking on smug, condescending, often irrelevant journalism. We’re taking on political correctness. We will not be a state broadcaster offering boring news by bureaucrats, for elites, and paid for by taxpayers.”

What was once a conservative pipe dream has come a long, long way in a remarkably short period of time. The “Fox News North” project now finds itself bankrolled by one of the richest men in Canada, headed by a former top-tier government official, and on track for a January launch. Apparently, that’s a lot to be angry about.

Bookmark and Share
  • martin in toronto

    Great! Canada needs another all-comedy channel. Right-wing news? No such thing. right-wing opinion? sure … just watch those paragons of virtue bill O'Reilly and his fellows. Now THERE'S a standard to sink towards …

    heh heh heh …

    Get out the popcorn.

  • Gaunilon

    The fact that Newman really doesn't like it is a very good sign. Clearly this new operation is doing something right.

    As to the anger: good. I've been angry about the slant I see in CBC news coverage for quite a while, particularly as I have to pay for it. I would willingly pay double that amount every year to see the CBC crushed by a determined rival.

    • Tony

      Amen, this could be another nail in the CBC's coffin

      • t-man

        I am hoping it will be

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/MostlyCivil MostlyCivil

        No, no you meant "allow another voice in the media spectrum" not "crush the cbc until it's dead and off the air", right?

        Because it would be hypocritical to want one off the air and not the other. Or did I misread my talking points memo?

        • Oliver

          Gaunillon is a bit of a mystery. He sounds like he knows what he's talking about most of the time but every now and then he comes up with statements like the one above that go against all other previous impressions.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

          Who cares if the CBC remains on the air or not, if they lose all their remaining viewers. However, when their viewers flee, I'd like to see their billion dollar subsidy disappear as well.

        • Gaunilon

          "Or did I misread my talking points memo?"
          Not at all – you've clearly read your talking points memo just right. What you have misread is my comment, as well as the "Reply" threading system on which you responded to the wrong guy.

          Anyhoo, the best option is an unbiased news source, or at least one that makes an honest attempt. We don't have such a thing in Canada. The second best option is multiple news sources from a variety of viewpoints. We don't have that either in Canada, but this could be the start.

          As to the CBC, my anger at what I view as their abuse of the public's money and the public's trust inclines me to think that they should be taken off the air as a point of justice, even if another equally slanted (but hopefully not publicly funded) network replaces them.

  • martin in toronto

    Just a thought here … why are the MENso upset? Can't get richer? Can't get their own way? And why MEN? Not enough women? (maybe women are smarter, and don't pay much attention to this kind of right-wing trash?) This whole idea sounds more and more like a public ca$h-grab by greedy Conservatives. The fact that Sun News will be asking the CRTC for 'must provide' status only reinforces my thought … if it was any good it would be able to make in on its own, not through force-feeding to the lumpen-proletariat, eh?

    • Bonko

      Here we go with the man hate. At least you're explicit Martin, I give you credit ( this word means "props", in Toronto speak) for forthrightness. Phillipe, how can you even mention the word hate adjacent to conservatives when all you have to do is read the comments on your own blog to see the left has a virtual monopoly on hate in Canada? Look! Looooooooooooook! It's hideous!

      Thirty percent of women support the Conservatives, which is only marginally lower than their support among men and, depending on the poll, actually higher than female support for Liberals. Women care about taxes and crime and the economy too, you know, they're not all ill mannered ill tempered greedy bimbos looking for a handout as Liberals would have you believe.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/prescott prescott

        Stepford women support the mysoginistic Reform/Allianc types. Fortunately 70% of Canadian women have too much self-respect, whereas it appears that abt 65% of men do. What can one say about the minority who do support this divisive, fiscally irresponsible, vindictive group of socially regressive and insecure men, except …………….EVOLVE.

  • Bonko

    Lame headline, there's no anger like Liberal anger, as evidenced by the violent, angry mob that shut down Coulter's speech at the U of O.

    Our boy Kory is right: Canadian MSM is politically correct to the point they just can't do their job. We also have the highest concentration of media ownership in the developed world so unless you are a corporate lickspittle you will support Sun TV and you will like it, mkay?

    I'll say this: Sun TV is going to make money hand over fist and will be wildly popular very quickly. It's the best thing to happen to Canada since poutine was invented, I am so happy about this.

    • martin in toronto

      Whoa … Ann Coulter chickened out of that speech, remember? Her decision, based on her 'handlers' (including the likes of Levant). She, like most Conservatives now in Canada, is a fraud looking for more money from someone else's pocket. She got scared of actually having to defend her views by people better educated than her.

      Real thinking Conservatives need to get a debate going with people who can actually THINK and who take time to listen to others, not just shout, stomp and declare. The angry right-wing in Canada is starting to just shout, stomp and declare, rather than listen and think. The last time we had a thinking Conservative government here was under Joe Clark who, if not particularly successful, was at least enormously decent and thoughtful as a human being.

      Remember Ms Coulter's comment to a Muslim student, to go get a camel to go somewhere? Say … there's a great right-wing thought … right up there with short-term creationism. And Glenn Beck is news? Heh heh heh … more popcorn, please.

      Conservatives = greedy. Never forget this … Dief, Mulroney and now Harper, all ready to sell our country for private profit. Coulter and her ilk are just useful cannon-fodder for the big money. She will be disposed of by them as soon as she is no longer useful.

      • Gary

        "She got scared of actually having to defend her views by people better educated than her."

        HA HA HA! Ann would chew EVERY leftard on this site and spit them out.
        Go ahead try to debate her big boy! She will have you crying like a baby toot sweet!

        • Risingsun

          Really, you are using the word "debate" and "ann coulter" in the same sentence?! Come now, let us behave a little more honestly than that. I laughed though, so, thanks for that.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    I think people may have misunderstood the PC part of the message. The Sun media empire is known for its "populist conservative editorial stance" but even better known for another feature.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunshine_Girl

    If the National is going to keep up, weatherwoman Claire is going to have to get some new outfits.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/MostlyCivil MostlyCivil

      Ok, I'd tune in for that, at least…

      • Michael the 2nd

        Amanda Lang please and thank you….

  • the dude

    I'm sure it will have the same stellar production values that made 'Last Bride Standing' Sun TV's flagship show.

    :*)

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/MostlyCivil MostlyCivil

      Come now, that was a perfectly adequate banquet hall.

  • madeyoulook

    The rabid comments here a wee bit much. If the network does well, good on 'em, and if the network does poorly, then close it up.

    Which brings me to the nonsense about the CRTC 'crats basically granting companies the license to print money if they award a category 1 license. Here's a radical thought almost nobody will like. How about the CRTC just gets outta the damn way, cable & satellite distribution companies can carry (or not) whatever they choose, and we the consumer can pay for what he or she wants to watch? Gee, I wonder what will happen to CBC Newsworld if it loses its $65 million freebie — oh wait, the whole entire CBC lives on taxpayer-supported freebies. All right. Kill the CBC, then the CRTC gets outta the damn way…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/YSP YSP

      I think if you're ideologically pure enough that you don't want your cable fees subsidizing some channel or other, you do have the option of not getting cable. Jus' saying . . .

      For me, not getting cable iss just basic microeconomics. The marginal benefit of cable drivel is less than the opportunity cost. Despite being a utility, cable just doesn't have a lot of utility.

  • t-man

    Maybe it will dare to mention climate gate! the CBC has pushed Gore and suzuki long enough.Go kory!

    • Comrade Leftie

      Doesn't t-man have anywhere else to lurk and spread the tired lies. Go on and call me names…in fact "Call me a Camel"

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/prescott prescott

        T = tyranesaurus rex (extinct) – and so will go the likes of the old red-faced and scowling old boys who just can't keep up with the ever-changing times.

        • Gary

          TyranNOsaurus Rex……….close relatives still alive…………they are called birds!
          Speaking of keeping up and all!

    • NiceGuy

      Don't you understand? You're not allowed to have a different view on anything considered 'settled' by those in the know. 'Settled' subjects include: immigration, multiculturalism, abortion, justice reform, gays in society, the inherent evilness of men (unless you're Chavez or Marx), equalization payments, religion in schools etc etc etc. Now back to our regular CTV/CBC programming…an indepth discussion with Nicaraguan plantain farmers….zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ottawa_Centrist Ottawa_Centrist

    I'm still confused why this network leased space in the National Press Building. Wouldn't it be easier to keep everyone under the same roof in Langevin Block?

  • Oliver

    I guess it goes to show people don't really listen, they only hear want they want to hear: obviously the CBC isn't neutral, but to say it's a socialist news media is taking it way too far. People get told the CBC is biased and they simply believe it rather than make their own opinion of it.

    As far as what this new news channel is supposed to be or going to be, I'll admit I'm skeptical but I don't know if its because of all the bad press around it. I just hope it won't simply be a Fox News North like it's being branded (perhaps unfairly) by a lot of people in the media. and for waht it's worth Newman's column on CBC about it makes perfect sense if it does end up being a carbon copy of FOX news.

  • John Cornelsen

    Its shocking, read one national newspaper you read them all. Listen to one national TV newscast you see them all. AP controls them all. However it happens the news media conspires to shame our country and put down the very things that other countries see as great. Our Military, our govenment, our generousity to other nations, our open arms to other races and cultureS… Canada is No. 1. If this new channel can build up what is right in Canada and make us proud to be Canadians, I'll watch. I'll event PAY to watch it. The other media I'LL just catch FREE online. Why should I pay for that drivel! Ohh yes, the best time in Canada was proagation, the leftist progressing defeatists parties and media had to stop their crying at protesting every time Harper stepped on their feet! And regarding the cost of security at the G8 and G 20. Looks like he is doing the job right. The whole world will reflect well on Canada as 3000 reporters tape thier comments by our wonderful indoor reflecting pool!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/prescott prescott

    Teneycke said that he well be "unapologetically patriotic". BEWARE this type of talk. One would do well to heed the words of those of history whom we so admire.

    Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
    ~ Thomas Jefferson

    Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels.
    ~ Samuel Johnson

    Patriotism is a kind of religion; it is the egg from which wars are hatched.
    ~ Guy de Maupassant

    Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.
    ~ George Washington

    • Bonko

      Since when do Liberals admire Americans? Nice try poseur, but you hate liberty nearly as much as America, so you don't get to quote giants of liberty like Jefferson and Washington.

      Beware those who are patriotic, or so asocial anti-Canadian Liberal prescott would have you believe. How perverse is that?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/prescott prescott

        Here is the perfect example of "an angry man" (bet he crows how 'patriotic' he is to all who will listen). "Bonko" is an a propos handle, amigo.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/hollinm hollinm

    What a bunch of whiney babies. Oh we are so much more sophisticated than the Americans. Oh we don't want ideologues screaming at each other.
    Listen to yourselves. You are a bunch of bombastic hyperventilating nut bars.
    Its called free enterprise and they will succeed or fail based on the quality of the product.
    No amount of Liberal spin on this board or others will change the fact this new station will hit the airwaves on Jan. 1/11 and we shall see.
    In the meantime the media is terrified to death that Kory will be able to achieve his objective.
    Now we need the CRTC to decouple the cable packages so we can pick and choose what we want to watch. No more CBC/CTV.

  • Marlene Stobbart

    Frankly, it would really be really educational – IF we had true broadcasting without any bias. At this time one, by watching the talking heads, can soon identify their political bent and therefore one doubts ! .

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/deporkinheimer deporkinheimer

      I'm looking forward to the Sunshine Girl

  • Philanthropist

    'Angry' applies to those opposed to the new channel like the frightened Don Newman, the guys creating the new channel are simply pointing out the obvious.

    It's about time a difference of opinion made it into the mainstream in Canada. The ferocity of opposition to new ideas is the best reason for those new ideas, left-wing liberal 'progressive' Canadians are very too narrow-minded and this new channel will help them the most.

  • Spen

    I hate the left leaning Canadian News organizations so much I cant wait to sign up just to get an alternative point of view for once. That goes for Canadian Magazines as well. What, are you all afraid of a little competition!

  • Rob'd ByCons

    Hello, this is a suposiTORY propaganda mac hine, nothing more. They probably will have their license tomorrow, Friday at the latest. God help us all.

  • s_c_f

    The premise of "hate" and "anger" in this article is ridiculous. There is a market that Quebecor intends to serve, and they expect to succeed. In fact, you can be sure that a lot of people will be very pleased about it. If critics like Gohier are so critical that they wish to ridicule this new venture, then that makes you wonder where the anger really lies.

  • SpenBC

    BOO! Be affraid leftards, be very afraid! I just read the following in the Hill times.

    Turmoil spreading in federal Liberal Party
    Jean Chrétien message on Ignatieff's leadership resonating loudly within Liberal ranks.
    By CHANTAL HÉBERT
    Published June 14, 2010 1 Comment
    "An increasingly irreconcilable difference of opinion between Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff and his most successful living predecessor, Jean Chrétien, is at the root of the spreading turmoil within the federal Liberal Party.

    While the two men share a strong belief that a Harper majority victory in the next election would have profound and—from their perspective—tragic consequences for the country, Chrétien is convinced that little short of a pre-election recasting of the progressive side of the federal landscape can ensure that Conservative rule does not become the new normal in Canada. "

    Seriously, how arrogant can Liberals be. No one but they can secure "Canada". They stink of entitlement!

    Read More here: http://www.thehilltimes.ca/page/view/hebert-06-14…

  • SpenBC

    Yeh it just keeps getting better. When's the Liberal party wake. Will there be any booze?

    Liberals squander serial opportunities to regroup, rebuild
    Much of the buzz about an ill-defined union with the NDP is cover for the apparently endless Liberal leadership struggle.

    Jake Wright, The Hill Times
    "I’m here in the spotlight: Grit Leader Michael Ignatieff. Grits, now behaving as Ignatieff’s worst enemies, have become PM Stephen Harper’s best friends.

    Politicians have much in common with budgies: When not pecking at foes, they preen in the mirror. So no one should be surprised that Liberals are again squabbling among themselves over control of the party's top perch even as Stephen Harper wings away with the juiciest worm."

    Love it!

  • http://twitter.com/nickprice91 @nickprice91

    Pierre Karl Peladeau is not my man

  • J. Lebel

    Here are a few comments on this story, unfortunately not arranged in the best fashion ever.

    1- Péladeau compared his new network to a sort of English LCN (The News Network in French). LCN is an all-news channel with some opinion, mostly populist but not easily definable on a left-right axis.

    2- Sun News is designed to appeal primarily to a Western audience. Just search «Sun News It's Time» on Youtube and you'll have a pretty good idea of what I mean by that. For the ones with no time, let's just stay that audiences in Quebec or Ontario will not resonate so strongly with cowboy images, «Canada is the greatest place on Earth», 5-lane highways («we work hard» apparently conjures up that sort of pictures) and military sounding music, complete with drum rattling. I'm not denigrating that, just saying it caters to an audience which I am not part of. Business is about defining your target customers, and Peladeau's move appears as quite smart to me.

    3- One big test for the channel will be the way it portrays the CPC and Harper, as well as how it treats stories related to them. This is a legitimate concern in light of the chief executive's close proximity to the conservative party. If it becomes a conservative mouthpiece, something will have been lost in the way of media fairness, no matter what your beliefs are.

    4- All that rhetoric of «straight talk» sounds like an embrace of both populism and radicalization. I don't mind hearing conservative voices in the media. I'm all for it. What I don't want to see is the extinction of nuance and a new focus on confrontation of radical views. As Educ Alcool's campaigns have it, moderation tastes a lot sweeter. Politics, like all things human, are not an affair of black and white, but rather tend to decline themselves in infinitely varied shades of grey.

    So as of now, it's hard to say if it's good or not. Meanwhile, I let you all ponder on this.

  • http://laurencemiall.com Laurence Miall

    One of the most Canadian of all things is mimicking exactly what has already happened in the USA. I don't think the head honchos of Quebecor are exactly the "two angriest men in Canada" — perhaps two of the most calculating. Just as Rupert Murdoch did to our south, they've discovered a market niche; it's composed of people who ARE genuinely angry but genuinely have no clue why. They feel under attack from Muslims, gays, the CBC — you name it — because already-rightwards-drifting media tells them to be so. Fuelling these irrational outpourings of fear and loathing is Quebecor's meal ticket; at least it appeared so to me last time I wasted my time reading one of their papers.

    And love the comments about our supposedly "socialist media" here in Canada! Childish name-calling only gets worse than this when the dreaded "Nazi" word is petulantly carted out. Is Britain socialist because it has the BBC?

    Come on, CBC is pretty lacklustre and often patronizing, but socialist? We don't live in a socialist country, hence CBC could hardly be part of some socialist state apparatus, could it? Furthermore last time I checked, CBC was gladly advancing the usual business agenda by placing commercials every ten minutes in the majority of its shows.

    • Ryan

      Ugh, the media here is liberal biased, get over it. You liberals will never admit to it though because that would mean admitting you're wrong. And that's something liberals never do but yet always should be doing.

    • Ryan

      Just to note, I put absolutely no effort in that response. I won't even call it a response. It's just that when you're on the left, you really can't see how liberally biased the media is. Once you step over to the right, it becomes clear as day when identifying what the media is. Jon Stewart, for example. Or even Colbert. When I thought I was a liberal, I thought they were centrist, though probably slightly left leaning. Then once I realized I was actually conservative, I was able to look at them in a different light and noticed that their bias was almost always liberal. They can try to hide it, but overall, they just don't.

      It just becomes easier to identify the slant of the media, both left and right, once you're conservative.

      • Risingsun

        Would you say it is equally the same from this conservative viewpoint with respect to right wing news. You think it's pretty centrist, but it`s actually far right? Speaking of trying to hide it, doesn't "straight talk" sound exactly like it should be centrist, but in fact is far right wing? So, my point is that both sides see their side as being in the middle, and the other as a nut, but both are wrong( and right?) Clearly we suck, each and every one of us. I wish we could separate from each other. You and your everything is black or white, and me, and my everything is relative, just go opposite ways and never come back.

        • Ryan

          I'm not going to say right-wing news is centrist…

          I'm only going to say right-wing news is right and yes, centrist or left is wrong.

    • Ryan

      One more thing: we are under attack by some Muslims at least. That whole jihad thing, ya know?

  • Dave-O

    They should rethink the name Sun News has the internet tied up and youtube searches defaults to Sun News not Sun TV News.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Open_Democracy Open_Democracy

    If it's anger they are looking for, maybe they should offer John Baird a position as head anchor for the nightly news.

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/

From Macleans