Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

'So what does success look like?'

by Aaron Wherry on Sunday, June 27, 2010 1:32pm - 8 Comments

The text of Mr. Harper’s opening statement to the meeting of the G20 today.

“Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Canada and to the magnificent city of Toronto, which is our country’s largest city, and I would like to say, home of the most solid financial sector in the world.  We are very pleased and proud to be holding the G-20 Summit.

“In welcoming you, I’d like to make a few observations about what we must achieve here.  At Pittsburgh last year, the G-20 officially declared itself the world’s premier forum for international economic cooperation.  Now with such a claim and with the global recovery that remains fragile, it is incumbent upon us to act with the same unity of purpose, the same sense of urgency and the same commitment to the enlightened exercise of our national sovereignty, as we did in the depths of the crisis in order to begin to develop a framework for strong, sustainable and balanced growth that we promised the world in Pittsburgh.

“The coordinated actions taken to date by the G-20 are producing positive results that are benefiting the entire world.  However, the recovery remains fragile.  To be frank, private sector demand is not yet where it should be in some of the G-20 countries.

“Since we last met, new risks have unearthed in the global economy.  To cite a couple to which the IMF drew attention recently, fiscal deficits, debt level, debt levels in advanced countries, as well as the premature end to stimulus.  I would add to these the need to follow through on regulatory reforms in the financial sector, and of course, the silence on protectionism.  The recent skittishness of markets is telling us that they are awaiting our actions, actions that must be decisive, but also coordinated and balanced.  Here is the tightrope that we must walk to sustain recovery.  It is imperative we follow through on existing stimulus plans, those to which we committed ourselves last year, but at the same time, advanced countries must send a clear message that as our stimulus plans expire, we will focus on getting our fiscal houses in order.

“Financial consolidation plans must be credible.  They must lay out easily understood objectives, and member countries must be accountable for achieving these objectives.

“Specifically, we should agree the deficits will be halved by 2013.  We should also agree that government debt to GDP ratios should be stabilized by 2016 at the least, or put on a downward path.

“Since some of us will meet these objectives earlier, we should agree to consider them as minimum fiscal targets.

“Yet this fiscal consolidation will only succeed if we take concerted action across the G-20 to support global demand to tackle structural rigidities and unacceptably high rates of unemployment and reduced global poverty.

“The whole world is watching us, because the fate of millions of people depends on our actions.

“So what does success look like?  According to my rough estimate, global output could be boosted by a cumulative 6.5 per cent over the next five years if we act in a coordinated manner and avoid pitfalls. This could raise global output rates by $4 trillion, the creation of 52 million new jobs and 90 million people lifted out of poverty.

“But if we fail to take decisive, coordinated and balanced actions, a bleak scenario might emerge where millions of people could lose their jobs.  This is the responsibility we have, not only toward our constituents, but also toward all the citizens of the world.  We must go on to lay the foundation for strong, sustainable and harmonious growth.

“Ladies and gentlemen, now as before, we must work and act together.  Once again, welcome, and I hope all of our discussions will be productive.

“Thanks.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Dale

    success looks like a city burning that Harper has no intention of winning seats in. success if leaving downtown toronto stuck with a massive bill so harper can feed his ego on the world stage.

  • Thwim

    Private-sector demand isn't where it should be in some of the G-20 countries? But Mr. Harper.. isn't the market always right?

    Ladies & gentlemen, may I present to you one of the primary problem of the supply-side economics. Works just great so long as you keep demand high.

    The problem is that demand is not the same thing as need, and when those get too far apart.. well.. welcome to our world.

  • wilson

    Success:
    G20 leaders agree to Stephen Harper's call for deep cuts to deficits by 2013

    G20 deals on deficit, debt stabilization 'a strong win for Canada'

    “Honestly, this is more than I expected, because it is quite specific,” said Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel. “It’s a success that industrialized countries as a group accepted this.”

    Success:
    Canada beats back bank tax at G20

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/s_c_f s_c_f

      Wow. Amazing work by Harper and the government.

      • Thwim

        Except, like most things by Harper's gov't.. completely lacking in substance once you look past the flash.

        The "deep cuts to deficits", the deals on deficit and debt stabilization has the out for nations which are undergoing "particular circumstances" — a hole big enough to drive a continent through.. and a couple probably will.

        As for Canada beating the bank tax.. all that got accomplished there was status quo, with the notice that individual nations are still free to apply levies or taxes if they wish to their banks to cover future failures. I love how simply being able to do nothing is now considered "Amazing work" by Harper's crew.. although, given their previous performance, I suppose that's not entirely an unreasonable assessment.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

          Well, Thwim, if you actually expected concrete binding actions coming out of this, you need to give your head a shake. The fact that Canada's stance is the driving force behind the vocabulary of the declaration is, at least, something.

          And yes, it is most imperative that "all 20 nations agree to tax our banks so that they feel they now have the license to engage in irresponsible conduct because at least the next bailout is now paid for" NOT be part of the text.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thwim Thwim

            Did you really think there was a realistic shot in hell of that clause getting in there?
            You do have a clue how many of these politician's campaigns are bankrolled by the very banks that would have had to pay this, right?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

            That clause was not getting in there. Because Canada had the moral authority and the actual results of recent history to see to it that it would not.

            The Euro and US banks would likely not care a whit, since the costs would be passed on to the consumer, and the moral hazard would, in their twisted mind, be pre-paid by the bank-tax nonsense. So no, I do not expect "the very banks that would have had to pay this" would have been as opposed to this scheme as you presume.

From Macleans