Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

Afghanistan: Plan and execution

by Paul Wells on Sunday, July 4, 2010 10:10pm - 6 Comments

I was sad to see I overlooked the publication a couple of weeks ago of James Traub’s New York Times Magazine feature on the attempts by U.S. Army soldiers, operating under Canadian command, to get the whole counterinsurgency thing working in Arghandab, not far from Kandahar City. I ran into Traub and some of his subjects — Lt. Col Guy Jones, Hajji Jabbar, and the guy Jones referred to as “State Department Chris” — when I visited the Arghandab District Centre briefly in April.

Traub goes into fascinating detail about Jones’s attempt to make himself and his troops subordinate to, and supportive of, the local face of the (knock on wood) legitimate, elected, effective Afghan government: Hajji Abdul Jabbar. The whole idea is to get the population to stop dithering between support for the Afghan government and support for, or acquiescence to, the Taliban. The whole idea is to get people comfortable with the thought of allied troops going home because they feel growing confidence that Hajji Jabbar and his peers and higher-ups have the task of government increasingly well in hand.

A postscript to Traub’s piece points out that, days before the article was published, an insurgent bomb killed Hajji Abdul Jabbar.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    I missed that report. Maybe the NYT should be more reliably on my daily wanderings online. Thanks for the link, Paul.

    There was a line that bothered me in that report, though: about Panjwayi and Zhari. It suggested that at one point the hostilities got too hot for the Canadians so they sent in the Americans to clean up. Are there more details about those events? Is it true Canada couldn't handle the fighting, or is this unfair Yankee bravado not in keeping with actual events? And if Canada couldn't handle it, was the trouble arising from number of our soldiers, or availability of the right fighting hardware, or were we just militarily incompetent? I will presume it not to be the latter until presented evidence. But then what does it say of our leadership over there to send inadequately numbered and-or equipped allies to get in over their heads?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Sir_Francis Sir_Francis

      I'm not at all sure that the Canadians were pulled out of the operation completely. It merely says that the Canadians were "overwhelmed". It's entirely possible that the U.S. Stryker unit was sent in to support us, not replace us. The American Stryker is a variant of our LAV III and would fit in seamlessly with the operations of a CF mechanised battalion. At any rate, the article is vague on those kinds of operational details.

      What bothered me is Jones' suggestion that we "compare the Afghans to sheep". Way to win hearts and minds, there, buddy. Hey! I know! Let's not compare the Afghans to sheep.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Sir_Francis Sir_Francis

      I was struck by the stated premise of COIN, the Army's new counter-insurgency plan: "you cannot defeat an insurgency by killing insurgents, because their ranks will continue to grow as long as the people from whom they draw recruits view their own government as illegitimate".

      That sounds very much like saying that insurgents (i.e. terrorists) are motivated by their oppression under corrupt regimes. If that's true of the Taliban, it's presumably true of Al-Qaeda as well. So, is it now official American military doctrine that terrorism is actually caused by something other than the mere barbarity of Islamic madmen, and are Pentagon planners and "pinko terrorist-hugging leftards" like "Taliban" Jack now on the same page?

  • Wascally Wabbit

    I wonder how much public support in North America will be effected by the revelations of the upcoming film of the Pat Tillman story – and the accusations that the US chain of military command – with Gen McCrystal and Donald Rumsfeld prominent – ordered a de facto execution of Tillman because he might come back to the US with tales – and evidence – that showed how badly the war was going… http://www.thenation.com/blog/36997/upcoming-pat-…

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/BGLong BGLong

    I remember reading a poem years ago. I don't actually remember the poem but I remember the
    title .. "These Are the List of My Despairs" … and they just keep coming …

    http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175269/

  • Mulletaur

    Glad they are finally trying this approach even if it is a bit late in the game.

From Macleans