Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

Brain food II: Smart aid for Africa

by Paul Wells on Tuesday, July 6, 2010 10:33pm - 0 Comments

The other $20 million the Prime Minister announced today at Perimeter Institute may be the smartest and boldest investment a Canadian government has made in development assistance in decades.

It’s $20 million over four years to support Perimeter director Neil Turok’s African Institute for Mathematical Studies, which the  cosmologist has branded as his NextEinstein initiative. Turok’s South African, and his idea is simple: there is no good reason why the next Einstein or Newton or Stephen Hawking shouldn’t be a young African man or woman. That continent is many things but of course one of them is a massive untapped human-capital resource: if you unleash some of those hundreds of millions of minds you help Africa and you help the world.

Turok has put everything he has into the notion by launching the first AIMS school in Capetown and planning to build a network of such schools across Africa. He told me about his plans in this 2009 interview. They’re almost unbelievably shoestring operations by the standards of Perimeter: Turok told me it takes about $1 million a year to run one of the places. And the payoff? Students educated at home for one-fifth the cost it would take to educate them at Cambridge or UBC. Staying home to tackle local problems. With a network of contacts among other AIMS grads from across Africa, a built-in antidote to the factionalism that helps hold so many of those countries back. Taught by bright young scholars from home and abroad, and able to plug into that global knowledge network just like any scholar.

The second AIMS in Abuja, Nigeria opened in 2008. Now things get harder. Dakar, Senegal is next, in 15 months: a francophone country with far less-developed physical and social infrastructure than Capetown and Abuja. The (new) (not-in-the-spring-budget) money Harper announced today will help in this crucial next phase. And how significant is this modest $20 million over four years to what Turok’s trying to accomplish?

“It’s the largest single investment in the Institutes ever, by a factor of twenty,” Turok told me today.

Really? Yes, or close, exchange rates being what they are lately. The president of Senegal recently pledged 1 million euros as host of the next AIMS. And Google gave the project a $US1 million grant last year. The Harper government has given it all a mighty push, especially because it may inspire copycats. As one person familiar with the AIMS project pointed out today, can you imagine France letting another country take the lead in such a spectacular fashion on a development project in francophone Africa?

AIMS isn’t the only so-called “smart aid” project in Africa. The Nelson Mandela Institute’s African University of Science and Technology is another; the Mandela Institute’s Funmi Arewa attended yesterday’s announcement. David Strangway’s Academic Chairs for Africa project, still more ambitious, is another.

Eager readers will already have raised two obvious counter-arguments. One is that $20 million is chump change next to the billion and then some that was pledged for maternal and child health at the G8. Well, sure. But on the scale of Turok’s project, which I hope I’ve been able to sketch for you, it’s hardly trivial. And as Dambisa Moyo and the evidence of your own eyes tells you, some very large fraction of traditional subsistence aid to Africa has gone utterly to waste over the last half-century when it hasn’t actually managed to make things worse. The failure of traditional aid is of course no guarantee that a different kind of program will succeed. Rather, it’s an argument for prudent investment to ramp up a highly promising project to a wider scale. Sort of like today’s announcement.

Second, of course, is the you-can’t-get-there-from-here argument. I’ve heard it at length from a European diplomat who’s spent serious time in African universities: have you seen some of these places? They don’t need physicists. They need bed nets, drainage ditches and wheat.

This argument made Abba Gumel laugh out loud when I rehearsed it at Perimeter this afternoon. He’s a Nigerian who runs the Institute of Industrial Mathematical Sciences at the University of Manitoba. He called the bed-nets-before-string-theory argument “totally wrong” and said that what’s made the developed world develop was scientific advancement. “Take that away, and Canada would be a developing country.”

Your mileage may vary. Anyway now we’re going to give this other thing a shot. “Canada is famous as a country with a big heart,” Turok told the crowd after the PM spoke. “It’s fast becoming famous as a country which is smart.”

Bookmark and Share
  • madeyoulook

    I was excited when you introduced this idea last year, Paul. I am thrilled that it will get off the ground. Thank you for keeping an eye on this, which I hope will do far more for our African brothers and sisters than twenty million for some bizarre human rights office in Montreal ever did, or will. This is indeed "smart aid for Africa." But it seems even more to be "aid for a smart Africa." Bravo.

    A few tentative successes should lead Turok and Harper and anyone else to trumpet quite loudly, and encourage individual Canadians (who already throw massive coin into charitable pits for Africa) to direct some of their own charitable giving to this project.

    I hope you will continue to report on the progress of these institutions. Given your enthusiasm, I am pretty sure you will. Why, in two or three years, maybe a Canadian national news magazine could send an interested reporter/columnist to travel over there and talk to people in the programs.

  • Emily

    Meh….I give up.

  • LaxAtlDfwYow

    I applaud the initiative — it's perhaps brilliant — and the Harper government for supporting it. What remains massively frustrating is how this government can be so smart and innovative on "little" things and so incredibly stupid and even wasteful on so many other issues.

    Bi-polar government anyone?

    • Emily

      It's an effort to buy a UN security council seat.

      Yawn.

      • AT1

        Nice…so if and when we get the UN Security Council Seat, you and others can comfortably claim it was bought.

        In the meantime, why not just address the merits of this funding?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

      Bi-polar government anyone?

      I don't think so. I have not heard of an Antarctic Policy for Canada.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

        Near brilliance!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/tedbetts tedbetts

    It is flashes like these – even if they have bubbled up and been promoted and fought for by civil servants for years before seeing the light of the public eye and public dollars – that confirms for me that Harper could have had a majority, perhaps even a strong one, long ago. Nothing in this is partisan or ideological in the face of contrary facts or any of the many other things that Harper does to shoot himself in the foot, head and gut.

    It is a great use of our tax money for a program where the usefulness and effectiveness can easily be shown and therefore accountable.

    • Emily

      Yes, there being so many post-doc candidates in Africa looking to move up.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless
        • Emily

          NOT post doc candidates. Sorry.
          http://aimssec.aims.ac.za/

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

            What part of "later" confused you?

          • Emily

            The part that involved eons.

          • cats

            Racist.

            (No other possible explanation. Have a mice day!)

          • UgandaGuy

            Debbie Downer?

          • Emily

            It would make much more sense to get more Africans into basic university at this stage, than worry about post-docs.

          • Mike T.

            I do think that the strongest criticism of the program is that it might be more effective to spend the money giving a greater number of people a more basic education.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

            giving a greater number of people a more basic education.

            This program will not prevent that from happening. I think one could very easily argue that this program will end up, over time, encouraging exactly that.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

          I looked through the lineup of students in that link, and I hold out hope that one or more from that cohort might truly distinguish him or herself as a great world thinker, and that the others might apply their developed skills to benefit their fellow citizens.

          I also confess I felt a twinge of concern. How do we KNOW these are the continent's best and brightest and most motivated? Africa has a notorious history of the offspring of presidents, ministers and generals trekking off to study in the best schools around the world. What safeguards are in place to prevent nepotism from populating this group of promising students?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

            These won't be perfect safeguards against nepotism, but:
            - Look at how they're dressed. I studied in France with the son of a former Latin American president, who was a really nice guy but he was dressed a little less modestly than these young people.
            - They're signing on to do two years of calculus homework. The general's kid usually finds an easier way to get ahead.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

            Thanks, Paul. Your excellent second point is much more reassuring than your first: for what they're getting into, they'd better really really really want to be there.

          • Kaplan

            Heh. The general's kid usually finds someone to do his homework.

          • Stewart_Smith

            Many of the world's best schools commingle the best and brightest with the less so offspring of benefactors. As long as enough of the best and brightest do indeed get in… it actually doesn't hurt that they are provided with some well placed connections.

  • Mike T.

    It has the benefit of also being a "look over there!" argument every time somebody points out that the Canada under Harper will not be providing desperately needed maternal health initiatives if they include abortion.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

    Kudos to Stephen Harper for investing in this Worthwhile Canadian Initiative ®. A smart investment, and a bold one, just like the CERC program.

    • Emily

      AHAHAHAHAHA!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    That is really good. I think there are more fundamental problems underlying Africa's situation, but this is a very good start. It sure beats handing out food.

    Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, you feed him for life. Same principle works with nations and technology.

    • Emily

      Except none of this involves fish.

      It involves the kind of education that doesn't happen in minutes.

      • AT1

        And your point is….

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

          Actually if you teach a man to fish… then you have to agree to pay him his pogey outside of the fishing season.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Gaunilon Gaunilon

    "….what’s made the developed world develop was scientific advancement. “Take that away, and Canada would be a developing country.”"

    Well, he's wrong about that one. What made the developed world develop was the rule of law. Canada is too young as an example, but most of Western Europe was more "developed" – in the sense of being relatively peaceful, ordered, and free – in the Middle Ages than much of Africa is to this day. It had little to do with technology and everything to do with a common understanding of basic human rights. Science flourished in these places because of their relative peace and prosperity, not the other way round.

    • Emily

      You have a very odd understanding of history.

      Where…between the Inquisition and the crusading and the endless wars did Europe become peaceful and ordered and free?

      Scientists fled for their lives…for centuries.

      • Mike T.

        I'm not sure that this isn't going a bit too far, but certainly of all the abstract nouns G mentions above, the only necessary one for scientific development is order.

  • Neil from Calgary

    We need more initiatives like these if we want to elevate African nations out of poverty and into a competitive global economic environment with the tools they need. The funding announced by the government fits with the idea that if something is already being well-run by a non-governmental organization that properly understands the issue at hand, do not duplicate those efforts by creating a government-run agency that would only fall prey to political grandstanding and inefficiency. Leave politicians to what they do best: wasting money here in Canada.

    The government has been sending signals over the last four years that they want greater accountability in the way our dollars are spent on foreign aid projects, and so far their reforms included reducing the number of nations in receivership in order to focus funding on countries on which the funding will be best-used and will have the greatest impact. Among other, more controversial decisions, such as shifting aid dollars to the Americas from Africa. The way I see it, what better way to improve accountability in the way our dollars are being spent than by simply topping-up funding for great initiatives that already pull rank from the intellectual and business communities. This funding has Canada written all over it, which will boost our international profile without the risk of government mismanagement tainting a well-meaning program.

    Hey, who wants to bet the Prime Minister will be Dakar next year handing over an over-sized novelty cheque?

  • http://www.cita.utoronto.ca/~ljdursi Jonathan Dursi

    I think this is a great idea, and I can enthusiastically commend a governement with which I seldom agree on significantly advancing this initiative.

    I taught an advanced scientific computing course in SA last summer; I sympathize with those who argue that the continent needs bed nets and antimalarial/antiretroviral drugs to prevent needless deaths, but it *also* needs to develop its human capital so that it can move towards becoming a family of developed nations.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    The structure of these look a little like the IIT's in India. Hopefully they will have the same kind of success.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Inkless Inkless

      The Mandela Institute's AUST was specifically modeled on the IITs. In fact, until I googled it yesterday, I was still under the impression it was called African Institutes of Technology; that was the working name as recently as last year.

  • RunnertheFirst

    “Canada is famous as a country with a big heart,” Turok told the crowd after the PM spoke. “It’s fast becoming famous as a country which is smart.”

    And by inference was not smart under previous governments.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

    If my understanding is correct, this program is even better than I first thought.

    It would be natural to assume that Turok is looking to recreate an African Perimeter but he is being much more pragmatic.
    From wikipedia

    "The goal of the programme is to produce students capable of doing a high quality research-based Master's degree. Special emphasis is placed on intuitive understanding, problem solving skills, collaboration, scientific writing skills, and computer modelling…"

    This is brilliant because it recognizes the challenges in higher education in Africa and addresses them in a precise fashion. It will identify the top students in an African country, provide them with much needed skills, and then upon graduation from the AIMS program certify their achievements. I would guess that eventually AIMS graduates will be not only be acceptable, but sought after by top graduate programs worldwide.

    for Emily (not Post-Docts, rather a prep school for graduate studies.)
    for Crit. CERC is a mule of a program, this is a thoroughbred!

  • Orson Bean

    BTW, on a somewhat related matter, there's an excellent article in the recent edition of Atlantic Monthly about the nature and effect of current Chinese investment and development initiatives in Africa. Informative and balanced, and it offers up a counter-point to the argument that's been frequently made in a lot of circles lately that the Chinese are "getting it right" and the West "has it all wrong" re African policy. As usual, reality on the ground is more complex than that . . .

  • jkg

    This is a great development, but the more important aspect of it is that having focused on theoretical physics, this was support for fundamental research as opposed to applied research. This is often very forgotten in scientific research, since the strive for innovation has put more focus on the applied section of the research stream. If the Harper government is serious about pursuing this type of support at home, I would like to see more emphasis on fundamental research funding. This type of research is hard to attract private sector support because there is no immediate return on the work. Universities recognize the importance of marketing their laboratories to private sector investment, but if it tilts too far, then you will have very few students involved in fundamental research. As a result, applied research teams will have to seek out external models and techniques for their programs.

    I am unsure how this is part of their overall science and technology strategy as government officials have been going on BNN and emphasizing the partnership between academia and companies to accelerate innovation and development. Indeed, it makes sense for governments to do this as it relieves some public funding, but if there isn't a concerted effort to keep fundamental research laboratories functioning at least close to their applied counterparts, it might be difficult to increase let alone maintain the private sector support universities have cultivated.

    Paul, is an initiative like this a one-off event, or do you think that the government's strategy has fundamental research support as an integral of its policy?

    • jkg

      *integral part

From Macleans