Sun surges: Yet another apocalypic theory to worry about

In 2013, our sun will hit its solar maximum, creating disturbances that could take out the power grid

by Kate Lunau on Monday, July 19, 2010 11:07am - 0 Comments

NASA/Getty Images

In March 1989, six million Quebecers lost power for nine hours after a massive solar flare—an explosion of magnetic energy from the sun—created electric ground currents here on Earth, collapsing the power grid. Another geomagnetic storm, in 1921, brought ground currents 10 times as strong. But the fiercest one ever recorded, called the Carrington Event of 1859, electrified telegraph lines—even setting telegraph papers on fire—and created northern lights visible as far south as Cuba and Hawaii. If such a storm were to strike today, the consequences would be devastating. But NASA researchers say severe space weather could be on the way.

Every 11 years, for reasons that aren’t completely understood, our sun hits what’s called its solar maximum: an especially active period when sun spots, solar flares and “coronal mass ejections—these clouds of plasma that flow out of the sun at millions of kilometres an hour,” as astronomer Sten Odenwald puts it, are more likely to occur. The resulting streams of particles and pulses of electromagnetic energy create what’s called space weather, which can have all sorts of impacts here, throwing the Earth’s magnetic field into disarray and disrupting everything from GPS systems to the power grid. We’re now coming out of a quiet period for the sun, as it wakes up and moves toward the next solar maximum, expected in 2013, and experts say we should be preparing for the worst.

If the 1921 storm were to repeat itself today, massive blackouts would affect more than 130 million people, according to a 2009 NASA report on space weather, and over 350 transformers would risk permanent damage. Water distribution would be “affected within several hours; perishable foods and medications lost in 12-24 hours; loss of heating/air conditioning, sewage disposal, phone service, fuel re-supply and so on.” The social and economic impact might last for years. A repeat of the Carrington Event (thought to be at least 50 per cent stronger than the 1921 superstorm) could cripple banking systems, air travel and satellites; in the first year alone, the report warns, it could cost $2 trillion, 20 times more than hurricane Katrina.

Whether we’ll actually get such a superstorm is hard to predict, since the science doesn’t yet exist to accurately forecast it, says Richard Fisher, head of NASA’s heliophysics division. However, in the report, researchers noted that the electronic power grid, “modern society’s cornerstone technology,” is especially vulnerable to solar activity. Coronal mass ejections temporarily compress the Earth’s magnetic field, “stretching it out on the midnight side, opposite the sun,” Odenwald says, generating currents in the ground powerful enough to melt copper windings in transformers. At the solar maximum, he adds, there might be 10 coronal mass ejections in a week.

While we’d be more affected by a solar storm than ever before, we’re slowly becoming better prepared for it, too. “To a degree, we can see [storms] coming,” Fisher says, thanks to remote sensing in space. NASA recently launched the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), which shows material streaming off the sun in previously impossible detail. Another device, called ACE, is “like a wind sock for solar wind,” Fisher says, and can give some advance warning of impending storms. That way, power grid operators can reserve capacity to counteract their effects, a lesson learned after the Quebec disaster; operators can switch satellites off-line, reroute flights, or warn people to put off “hunt[ing] an oil pipeline on the bottom of the ocean by GPS navigation,” Fisher says. Whether there’s a superstorm coming from space or not, it’s best to be prepared.

Bookmark and Share
  • Ben Dubzee

    Cool article Kate!

  • Scew Off

    Waste of time.
    More mass media hysteria, regarding science fiction!

  • mark

    Neat, More like this!

  • Gaunilon

    It's true that we are more dependent on vulnerable networks than ever before, and therefore stand to lose more if a network goes down.

    However, a lot of progress has been made in the last two decades in radiation hardening of electronics on satellites. Anything can happen of course, but I'd bet we're less vulnerable overall than we were in 1989 to EMP and HEP.

    Ground loops, on the other hand, is a different beast altogether.

  • Michael

    I could use a day off in 2013, bring it on.

  • Oliver

    Interesting.
    I just hope planes don't fall out of the sky or anything. Machines frying, as long as no one gets hurt, is tons of fun.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Raging_Ranter Raging_Ranter

    First melanoma, now this. We must destroy that scorching devil before it destroys us. Can't you people see that?? WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH YOU??!!!!

    • cshe

      It definitely has to go!!

      Get our top scientists on it right away so we can stop worrying about Global Warming.
      oops!
      "climate change".

  • jeff

    I'm guessing this won't be a day off but maybe a year off. This would be a good reason to have cash on hand or gold. This would make a mess of almost everything and eventually cause riots and looting.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

      My guess is that it will be more like the great black out of 2003. Lots of cheap ice cream!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ottawa_Centrist Ottawa_Centrist

      "eventually cause riots and looting."

      Only if it occurs during NHL playoffs. Best move to Toronto soon as it will be riot free.

  • robins111

    Hey we can probably solve this problem by sending billions of dollars to Africa, and Dolton can create a new tax/fee to fend this off.

    I can see a new agency created within Ontario, Kinda like the Moonies, but called the sunny's

  • Arielle

    I don't really understand this article. It mentions 11 year cycles, but then gives dates that would not be part of that 11 year cycle. 2013 – 11 is 2002 (I don't remember any event of this sort in '02), 2002 – 11 is 1991 (again, I don't remember anything occuring then either). The article mentions 1989, which would not be part of an 11 year cycle, nor would 1921…the only one that did fall in the mentioned 11 year cycle dates was that "Carrington Event" in 1859. The years I get seem to be 2013, 2002, 1991, 1980, 1969, 1958, 1947, 1936, 1925, 1914, 1903, 1892, 1881, 1870, 1859, 1848, etc….what am I missing here?

    • Gaunilon

      It's not exactly 11 years, it's an average of 11 years when considered over the last 250 years. Actual individual cycles range from 8 to 14 years.

    • MaryJos

      Like the environment, those kinds of event do not follow schedules like we all seem to live on in this century. The 11 years they are talking about is an average so it can be 11, 12, 13 years. I read another article from NASA that stated that solar maximum can take up to 13 years to occur and when it take that long, the storms are more severe. These are just observations and are not precise science…

  • Samset

    Quebec lost power from sun spots. Quebec lost power fron Ice. Quebec lost power from the snow. Quebec lost power from the rain.
    And we all know why. Cheap shoddy work. A lifelong occurance. They are used to it. Particularlly since they can lobby all this into a federal relief program. They actually pray that thier gambits will hurry up. No wonder Our Queen avoided the place.

  • Syco

    I'm posting from the Northern US. Hey, science types out there – should we be worried about consumer electronics? If so how to protect them? I've got a laptop, cell phone, stereo, LCD TV, etc. Unplug, turn off, cover with alum foil??

    • steve Lloyd

      wrap it all up in tin foil or similar, unplug, and make sure you have a good ground, or a shielded room thats grounded. but this all is probably a none event but please don't quote me as I have had dealings with both Murphy and Mother Nature
      In the same boat
      Steve

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Maplesoon Maplesoon

    The solar maximum in 2013 is not expected to be particularly actively, only in relation to the half decade preceding and following it. Also, the maximum number of solar mass ejection events, as this refers to, does not relate at all to the size or severity of the individual events.

    The real story is that if you want to see the Northern Lights, a trip north of Edmonton in 2013 will be a pretty sure bet.

    • saskboy

      No need to go north of Edmonton. In southern Saskatchewan in 2004 there was a night in July or August with fantastic aurora that appeared overhead even.

  • bryndog

    It doesn't matter because the world's going to end in 2012 anyway.

  • http://brosstumble.tumblr.com darcybross

    People would take this article much more seriously if it didn't HAVE A TYPO IN THE TITLE. Apocalyptic not apocalypic methinks. Yeesh.

  • William

    I hope it take out the whole planet. Maybe that way people will learn how to use that thing between their ears more. They've gotten lazy and worthless over the years.

    • The Canadian

      Very True….

  • saskboy

    Anyone looking for some advance warning of a solar storm can get alerts sent to their phone. http://www.spaceweather.com and they have cool photos and videos most days too!

    Since there's not much a person can do to prepare individually for a global crisis caused by satellite destruction, the website is mostly good for getting nice photos of aurora or space events. However, your standard Winter or tornado preparedness kit should always be kept up to date so you're not a burden on authorities dealing with an international crisis.

  • Eyes Wide Open

    Don't worry, global warming will kill us first! Not!!!

    My junk Alarmist journalism! These people need to get a real job! Note that the current solar cycle is predicted to be a weak one so the likelihood of such an 'event' is diminished. Note that despite the reference to solar maximum in 2013 (which will likely be late!), the Quebec outage that was referred to in 1989 actually occurred at solar minimum! Go figure!

  • steve Lloyd

    Having been a comunications tech for decades I have been here before, but the older technology was less prone. now in the latest tech scene I am seeing a lot of young people without a history in these events and don't see as much preparation put into the technology. technology according to the C.E.O's. God help us !

  • The Canadian

    The people of Earth need a huge sh*tstorm from the sun to come and mangle this planet, one that throws us back to the stoneage…so maybe people can understand what the f*ck we're doing wrong. We are not the pinnacle of nature and we are shown that everyday with the forces of nature. We have long since tarnished our reputation for being privledged to be here. We are an ungrateful species and I believe a sh*tstorm will realign our preceptions on what Life is all about. At the very least it will kill off all those who cannot contribute to life in a meaningful manner and make more space for the ones who care to be here.

  • Nostra Damus

    Suns spots have been blamed for everything from power failures to long hair on men and boys during the 1960s. Why do things go wrong? Tiot happens.

  • Greg

    Certainly pretty freaky! We treat our planet very poorly, this would just be another difficulty we would have to overcome. Can technology take the stand and save us?

  • Meme Mine

    Another fear factor story that MC's makes fun of?
    Excuse me, YOU are the ones pushing the CO2 theory that says my kids will die on a planet that will be in a climate crisis.
    YOU are the hysterical fear mongers and we know it. Nice try.

From Macleans