Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Hey look: In which a list is made, with funny remarks interspersed

by Paul Wells on Friday, July 23, 2010 11:21am - 0 Comments

For my column in the print edition this week, comedy hijinx galore on the general theme of “what do you do after you eliminate the obligatory long-form census questionnaire?”

Bookmark and Share
  • http://www.nissology.com Hans

    Other than Tony Clement and Stephen Harper, I have failed to observe the swollen group of agititators that demanded a change to the census rules. I have further failed to observe the wave of knee-jerk apologists blogging in support of the change. This leads me to believe that this census manoevre is really merely just another tedious ploy in the long game that is Harper's vision for creating a more conservative Canada. How dull, how vain, how silly, how crass

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/LynnTO LynnTO

    "Galore" stems from Gaelic origins, circa 1675, if google is any indication.

  • Mulletaur

    The Harper Conservatives are like the Taliban, they want to abolish rationality.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/CndnRschr CndnRschr

      C'mon, comparing the government to the Taliban is unwarranted hyperbole. But there is a clear intent to appeal to base feelings, regardless of whether that makes any scientific sense. Hearing the governments responses such as claiming that the non-obligatory long form going out to more people will effectively substitute for the mandatory short form, clearly indicates a complete lack of understanding of statistical principles such as random sampling, representation and avoidance of bias, never mind loss of continuity with prior data collection. It's both ignorant and anti-intellectual. There was a guy (Tim Powers) from a Conservative policy group on CBC radio One this morning claiming that 49% of Canadians are against the mandatory census long form. What is the question they were asked? Do people understand what the information s used for, that it is de-identified and used in aggregate? Are we to dumb down our intelligence such that we make decisions based on gut feelings? The government made a dumb move that will weaken our ability to plan society and they did it for selfish reasons – it is certainly not in the national interest.

      • Mulletaur

        No, it is not unwarranted hyperbole, it is the God honest truth. Or the Allah honest truth, as you prefer. Rationality, critical thinking, evidence based policy and democratic accountability are slowly being abolished in Canada by the Harper Conservatives from government, salami slice by salami slice, all in the name of dogma. Harper is Canada's Mullah Omar. And the people yet sleep.

  • CndnRschr

    Nice column. I thought, after watching the interview with PW on the National last night, that Paul had assembled some carefully packaged thoughts. Actually, the responses were a little too scripted and packed with insights that needed expanding. Still, this debacle is a canary in the coal mine and its falling off its perch. What is truly behind this calculated move?

  • erasma

    Excellent column, very funny and effective. Keep up the good work.

  • http://www.leatherfurniturestores.net crew

    I am a full internet marketing. I am proud to join this community. I am sure to get useful information to my knowledge. I like leather products because of its superiority in the appeal of other materials. Thank you.

    leatherfurniturestores

From Macleans