Colonel Williams’ wife, under attack

An accused killer’s spouse struggles to rebuild her shattered life

by Michael Friscolanti and Cathy Gulli, with Martin Patriquin on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 9:52am - 321 Comments

Jim Rankin/Toronto Star/ Jerome Lessard/QMI Agency

On July 15, 2009, an hour before Col. Russell Williams was sworn in as the new boss of CFB Trenton, a two-seater jet skidded off the air base runway and smashed through a fence.

The plane, a 1950s-era Canadian Forces Silver Star, was being delivered to a private buyer in the U.S. when something went wrong during takeoff, forcing the pilot to abort.

For a few minutes, at least, the crash threatened to spoil Williams’s big day: his official change-of-command parade. But as emergency crews raced to the plane, they found a scene that could have been much worse. The pilot was conscious and alert, and the jet, resting on its belly, was still intact. So shortly after one o’clock, with the pilot safely in hospital, the festivities went ahead as planned.

GO TO LIVE BLOG from inside Col. Russell Williams’ hearing, day 2

If the accident was an omen for the unthinkable things to come, only Williams could have known that at the time. In the eyes of everyone else gathered at his swearing-in ceremony—including his wife of 18 years, Mary-Elizabeth Harriman—the colonel deserved what he was about to receive: the reins of Canada’s largest and most strategically important air base, a vital hub that does everything from search-and-rescue operations to welcoming home the flag-draped caskets returning from Afghanistan.

Harriman, a senior official at the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, sat smiling in the front row that Wednesday afternoon as her husband, dressed in his crisp air force blues, accepted the commander’s pennant from his predecessor, Col. Mike Hood. In his speech, Williams thanked the friends who had come to celebrate his prestigious posting. He thanked Hood, now a brigadier general, for his “outstanding leadership” over the previous two years. And he thanked his wife, a woman who had watched him go from rookie officer to the prime minister’s personal pilot to the senior man at 8 Wing, an assignment that almost surely would have ended with a promotion to general.

Following military tradition, Hood, the outgoing commander, presented Harriman with a bouquet of flowers. “She was very excited about Russ’s new job,” says one air force employee, who spoke to Harriman that day. “They were very much in love.”

RELATED:
Col. Russell Williams to plead guilty
—Accused killer and former base commander will plead guilty to all counts, says lawyer (October 7, 2010)
Colonel Williams’ wife, under attack
—An accused killer’s spouse struggles to rebuild her shattered life (July 27, 2010)

If detectives are correct, by the time Harriman was handed those flowers, her husband had already broken into 33 different homes—including one house six separate times—and stolen hundreds of women’s undergarments, including bras, panties and even bathing suits. And in the coming months, with his wife oblivious to his perverted double life, Williams would allegedly graduate from lingerie burglar to serial predator. Now locked in a solitary cell, awaiting his next court date, the former air force star is accused of sexually assaulting two women and killing two others: Marie-France Comeau, a 38-year-old corporal stationed at his base, and Jessica Lloyd, 27, a Belleville, Ont., woman whose body was dumped at the side of a dirt road.

Comeau was buried at Ottawa’s National Military Cemetery on Dec. 4, 2009. In the days after her funeral, while police hunted for a killer, the colonel and his wife attended a number of Christmas parties at CFB Trenton, including four in one night. Lloyd vanished on Jan. 28, a Thursday. Williams and Harriman were together at their Ottawa home that weekend, his last as a free man.

Bookmark and Share
  • Sal123

    So many of you who comment know NOT of what you speak. Firstly, it seems to me that some poster here doesn't know his English too well when he can't recognize 'adjectives! Secondly, my hubby served with the Airforce for over 30 years and we've been in Trenton and yes I've met the ex Colonel very briefly and you would never know he was a monster but he is!! He and his wife almost lived separate lives; she lived in Ottawa and he lived in Trenton, occupying a 'married quarter' (on base, as is regulated) plus he fluctuated between there and his cottage in Tweed. Occasionally his wife came to Trenton for a visit while other times he visited Ottawa on a weekend (when he wasn't elsewhere on duty). I can truly say (am willing to swear on a stack of bibles) that in no way did Ms. Harriman know anything of 'his' double life. So bottom line here is please 'think' and do your research before speculating as you have done. So now that the case is 'almost' all over (he will rot in jail, thank God)… I say 'almost' simply because there remains ongoing investigations throughout other bases on which the ex Colonel served during his military career. His 'activities' didn't just begin in 2006!!! He's a monster and a real sicko!!

  • Sal123

    Hey TIRED, there you go again…. please get your facts right …. Ms. Harriman and the ex Colonel lived apart most of the week except on her occasional visits to Trenton or his odd weekend to Ottawa. She knew nothing of his monstrous activities. My hubby was in the military for many years and a lot of time we were apart due to his military temporary duties away. It amazes me to see so much speculation here rather than facts. It only takes a bit of research to learn those facts!!!

  • Grace

    I feel obligated to defend the writers of this article. I thought it was well researched and within the bounds of good journalism. I did not think there was over emphasis on Ms. Harriman's profession in the charity. It was well balanced. I enjoyed knowing she was mentioned in the House of Commons. In every way before and after this tragedy came to light Ms, Harriman has tried to be a decent human being. No wonder her friends and co workers are protective of her. She deserves such loyalty.

    • Ruth

      Good for you Grace ! Ms. Harriman has been through so much the passed year. I hope she never reads many of the uncharitable comments made about her !

  • Pat

    There has been over the last few years many instances relating to current/no longer in service personnel from the Canadian Forces,namely MichealWhite in Edmonton,and now this in Trenton ,Ontario.Ive herd of ex miltary personnel,threatoning people in the work place([ll rip your arm off,and beat you over the head with it.)I think there are a lot more disturbed C.F.personnel than we know of.

  • Anna

    I found it difficult to believe that the wife did not know something was wrong. He kept all that stolen lingerie in their homes. How did she not see it? Also, it is a bizarre decisionon her part to keep the 2 homes. How can you live in the homes you shared with a monster? How do the families of the victims feel- remember, many of the victims lived in the neighborhood. And how can she speak out about her concern for her financial well-being but not the victims? Seems shallow, materialistic and self-centered to me. Wish they'd both disappear from the face of th earth.

  • Anna

    So she knew nothing, is a kind hearted soul, yet continues to visit her husband, this serial rapist and killer in jail? And she wants to keep the homes where the horrific deeds were committed? Any reasonable person would be too disturbed and horrified to live in those homes. And what about the impact to the victims that still live in the neighborhood? This woman is beyond sick!!!

  • Anne

    We should start our own fund for victims of these horrible crimes.
    We should ask the miliary and Mary Liz for a donation.

  • Amy

    This article is embarrassingly skewed in sympathetic favour of the wife. I agree 100% that she should receive NONE of his assets – they should go to a victim's services fund. People are getting their priorities messed up in my humble opinion. I have sympathy for the women her husband murdered, not for the murder's wife – she's still breathing the air and financially secure. Those dead women are secure in the ground. And maybe I have it backward, but I find it kind of cold that she has not spoken publically to express her pain for the victims or their families. Strikes me as self concerned.

  • Jan

    I think we should sue her to get back the money the police paid her for the floors they scratched and the lamp they damaged. Why didn't she get the money from her killer husband, like she got the property and the pension? Oh, yeah, because she would have had to stand in line behind REAL victims.

    Piece of work, the both of them.

  • Anonymous

    You have to be joking.  The poor woman has suffered enough.  I can only imagine how devastated she must be through no fault of her own.

  • Ruth

    Personally I would have sold both houses and moved somewhere else. Why keep a house that has such bad memories of someone that betrayed you? As for the person sueing; give me a break – what does the wife have to do with that? It wasn't her that committed the crimes so why should she pay for it? As for making a six figure salary – if it was a guy no one would say anything – because it is a woman, everyone is badmouthing her? Would that I could make such a salary.

  • Tired

    According to other news sources – Williams snuck out of bed/house to do his dirty deeds – leaving Harriman fast asleep. Now – I sleep deeply but…. I know when my spouse gets up – one just knows!! Am getting a bad feeling here!!

  • jeff

    Ruth, I'm not sure what is so hard to understand. The women is sueing to get damages and the man who committed the crimes is sheilding his assets by transferring them to someone else. This isn't allowed,period.

    People would say the same thing about a man making a six(6) figure salery if he was being a greedy SOB too.

  • jeff

    no so hard to do. I'm a couch sleeper and my wife wouldn't miss me either. My wife has a bad feeling either way.

  • Kathryn_C

    I guess your spouse keeps pretty regular hours?____My own used to work road construction and left at the crack of dawn some mornings but not always. Likewise he was often on the road and could be away from home all together for most of the week. One adjusts and where once you always woke when he left, after a while you don't.____ No doubt a military wife has had to do the same over the years.

  • From Belleville

    It took 6 pages to inform us, repeatedly, of Williams wife's pain and charity work? There has been no new information presented within this article. Is it an attempt to drum up support and sympathy for the wife, to justify the exchange of assets so that victims could not recovery anything from Williams' estate? The wife has a 6 figure income; my guess is that the income level of the victims combined cannot compare. Yet the wife is justifying her greed by stating she has to "secure her future?" Let's face it, would someone live in the property that has been violated in spirit by her husband and then violated by the legal system with searches and warrants? Or, more realistically, is she going to sell it and use the proceeds to buy another home?

    William's assets should be frozen until he is sentenced, at which time the wife and the victims should have equal dibs on any assets. Of course the wife wants her financial situation to remain hidden because she really can't justify the deal, as she is extremely secure, financially. It is disappointing to see someone who is supposedly so charitable jump in there like a dirty shift, and have no regard for the victims of the crimes.

    And yes, she does visit the jail regularly.

  • Tired

    The ugly truth is that she will never be able to sell that house – who else would want it?? Bernardos home in St. Catherines had to be bulldozed. The cottage in Tweed will likely suffer the same fate too – so much for the assets!

  • sandras

    How would you know that she visits the jail regularly?

  • Sara

    This article is mis-named. Harriman does not seem to be under any kind of "attack". Unless the story is referring to the 21 year old actual victim who is suing Harriman for removing Williams' name from the deed of Harriman's house. Harriman isn't under attack at all. Seems that Macleans is sucking up to Harriman with this mis-named article hoping that she will grant them the first exclusive story. I do feel bad for Harriman, but she isn't a victim. The victims are the women who Williams attacked and/or murdered and their families. Harriman should have issued some sort of starement of support to and of the victims. Also, she shouldn't be making the Ottawa Police department and Canadian tax payers pay to replace her hardwood floor which apparently got scratched while the police were searching her beloved Ottawa home for evidence against Willliams.

From Macleans