Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

The state long ago stopped caring about your toilet ownership

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:04pm - 0 Comments

Further to this, the word “toilet” does not appear on the new National Household Survey. The word “bathroom,” as in the 2006 census, appears only to note that such rooms not be counted.

According to Statistics Canada, the census last asked about toilet ownership in 1961. The question that year asked “whether there was an inside flush toilet and whether there was one or two or more.”

The Prime Minister at the time was noted nanny statist and famed Ottawa elitist John Diefenbaker.

Bookmark and Share
  • LiveBloggin Junkie

    Monomania (mon·o·ma·ni·a):
    1. Pathological obsession with one idea or subject.
    2. Intent concentration on or exaggerated enthusiasm for a single subject or idea

    Congratulations! 26 days of censomania Aaron! Don't stop now!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/ChrisWPG ChrisWPG

      And 26 days of LiveBlogginJunkie's posts on the topic, maybe you can get joint treatment?

      • LiveBloggin Junkie

        Dude, I would love some 'joint' treatment!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

      It is an affront to treat falsehood with complaisance.
      Thomas Paine

      • Orson Bean

        I think we all figured out that Clement & Co. were spewing falsehoods about this issue some time ago. Except for the terminally obtuse, and they're beyond help anyway.

        It's like ice cream — I really really like Haagen Dagz Vanilla Swiss Almond, but that doesn't mean I want to eat nothing but that, every meal, for 2 weeks straight. Nor would it be healthy to do so.

    • John D

      Are you talking about Clement's obsession with bedrooms and bathrooms?

    • Gaunilon

      To first order, the number of posts Wherry does on a particular topic are directly related to the potential impact he perceives that topic to have on the political balance between the Conservatives and the Liberals.

      The equation is N = k*x where N is number of posts, k is a constant, and x is perceived impact. The census has a fairly high perceived impact of 5, so with a standard k of 75, we can expect roughly 375 posts on it. Something like the Liberal bus tour had x = 1 at first, but then as the bus tour broke down x went negative so the posts stopped. Items like Clement's attempted water rescue have negative x all along, so no posts. (N is lower-bounded at 0, of course)

      Naturally a more detailed analysis takes into account that k is not truly a constant, but rather a function of what other issues might simultaneously have an even greater strategic impact. At this point the analysis gets complicated, because the k for various issues are coupled. Analytical solutions are no longer available and one has to resort to numerical approaches.

      • a-non

        Yah, it gets messy because x is a function of N. Depending on the topic, there are probably decreasing or increasing returns. For the census, I imagine it's quickly decreasing. For something like an adultery scandal, it's probably increasing for a while. Steady state equilibrium first-order approximations are usually the best we can do.

        OH WAIT, out here in the REAL WORLD, we're supposed to do things by COMPLETE RANDOM and not based on intelligence and evidence. Sorry for that.

        • Gaunilon

          Don't forget non-steady-state solutions: the equation can be re-expressed as x = N/k such that perceived impact on Liberal/CPC fortunes depends on number of posts….in this case if N is time dependent, it begins to look like Hooke's Law, simple harmonic motion results, and one gets the strangely regular oscillations we saw between the Guergis and Detainee Docs posts in May.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Stewart_Smith Stewart_Smith

            Perhaps Wherry only posts posts that he believes Gaunilon will comment on?

  • wsam

    We should abolish all knowledge.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/McC_ McC_

      sounds almost Socratic

      • wsam

        It's from the director's cut. The commentary is hilarious.

  • Olaf

    At this point, I think Wherry's just recycling older posts so he doesn't have to actually do any work.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

      In fairness, he did say "further to this" and linked to his older post about toilet questions in the census.

      • Olaf

        What is it with your unhealthy obsession with fairness, CR? I'm slagging Wherry here, and if I want to do so unreasonably and without actually clicking on the links he provides, and embarrassing myself in the process, I don't see how that's any of your business.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Douglass Douglass

          Lol! Not to bother with logic when assumptions can get you through the day! Thanks for the laugh!

          • Olaf

            It's not so much that you shouldn't bother with logic, it's more that sometimes there's just no time to be reasonable. I'm on a pretty tight schedule here: I need to get in at least 6 or 7 snide anti-Wherry remarks come end of work day. Sometimes my integrity must be compromised to hit quota.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

            Sometimes my integrity must be compromised to hit quota.

            Couldn't you just lower the quota? What if you restricted yourself to just one or two snide anti-Wherry comments per day, but you made sure they were real humdingers?

          • Kevin

            He said "need" – that's a mandatory requirement. If he voluntarily reduced the quote to 2, bias would creep in and the results would be untrustworthy. Haven't you been paying attention?

          • Sigh

            Perhaps if he sent out his anti- comments to more bloggers, that would counteract the creeping bias resulting from the change to voluntary?

          • Olaf

            First of all, you seem to be under the impression that I set my own quota. Now who's making the assumptions?

            Second of all, I've always been, by nature, a quantity over quality type guy.

  • Emily

    Well there you are, nobody cares about your toilets. So that bidet you've secretly installed won't be asked about either.

    • a-non

      Bidets are European and thus elitist anyway.

      • Emily

        Exactly, it would ruin their red-neck credentials permanently.

        • wsam

          Which is why bidets should be included on the census. That way we can compare bidet ownership in Southwest Calgary with Toronto's Annex neoghbourhood. Then we'll know where to find the real toileting elitists.

          That's what is really going on. The Conservatives don't want anyone to find out about their elitist toileting habits.

          Also. People who have bidets don't have to wipe their bums, so they don't. Which is disgusting.

          • Emily

            Gee….you mean some Calgarians might be…you know….secretly French?

            Actually I think you'd have to wipe, or your nether parts would be all wet.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/ChrisWPG ChrisWPG

            LOL it's funny how many people "think" they now how to use one but really don't.

          • Emily
          • Olaf

            Chris, please be careful. Emily is quite adept with wikipedia.

          • Emily

            You betcha! ;-)

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Raging_Ranter Raging_Ranter

            They're for taking a drink after you've gone. Aren't they?

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

            That response may be the best explanation for your avatar's photo that anyone couldl ever come up with.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Raging_Ranter Raging_Ranter

            I detect a strong anti-simian bias here.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

            Is that scent stronger or weaker than the peculiar scent emanating from your face?

            Here. Have a face cloth, some soap, a toothbrush and some Crest. And allow me to introduce you to the sink. Hot is on the left, cold is on the right. You're welcome.

            Uh, no thanks. I'll pick the bugs out of my own fur, but it was kind of you to offer.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Raging_Ranter Raging_Ranter

            But I pee in the sink.

          • madeyoulook

            Given where you quench your thirst, that shouldn't trouble you too much as you get busy with the toothbrush… I said it's a TOOTHbrush, Ranter! EEEEeeeeeewww, let me see if we have another one. And I will hasten to teach you about the bidet thing right after that.

          • Orson Bean

            First time I spotted a bidet in my life was in Calgary, circa around 1980 or so, at my best friend's very wealthy dad's house. We were quite mystified on first spotting it. Given what I know about his dad, I'm quite sure he was not a Liberal or NDP voter.

          • wsam

            Did he wipe his bum properly?

  • RDB

    The horse is dead, Wherry. Stop shooting its brains out. Ever hear of a summer vacation? I recommend you take one. Maybe to therapy for your compulsive-posting-on-the-same-topic disorder or maybe to a nice swamp where you can spend time swatting away mosquitoes the way I swat away your mind-numbing posts on the way to the interesting ones.

    • Emily

      Yes, Cons want this issue to go away, so anyone that writes about it gets insulted.

      • avr

        Wherry has a bad habit of getting obsessively deranged about a single imagined scandal for weeks or months on end, treating it like the total apocalypse that hardly anyone outside his little echo chamber will. Afghan torture, prorogation, the census, ad infinitum. Mocking that isn't trying to change the channel because of some desperate strategic imperative; it's just fun.

        • Emily

          Actually he's a journalist following up on a story so it doesn't get lost in the ether….exactly the way he's supposed to do.

          • RDB

            Well you might say that. Unfortunately, if he bores us to death he might get us to tune out instead.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Halo_Override Halo_Override

          If you beat your children every day, should I only phone the police once?

          • wsam

            You shouldn't beat your children. It's bad.

          • http://intensedebate.com/people/Halo_Override Halo_Override

            Bleeding heart.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

          avr, Aaron will be very hurt. You didn't even mention Omar…

    • Dave

      Since when has the death of a horse ever mattered?

      The Tories still drop the word "sponsorship" and "coalition" into every other clause.

      Or at least Pierre Poilievre does.

    • Jan

      Not when used as a beer cooler.

      RDB – Craig from the Blogging Tories Forum – is that you? I can see how you'd be jealous of the numbers.

      • RDB

        How come no one believes I'm just bored? How cynical you all are.

        • wsam

          I believe you.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/tobyornotoby tobyornotoby

    Maybe the prime minister could show some leadership and change the channel for us. All he has to do is stroll over to the parliamentary press gallery and take some questions.

  • Mandatory Jedi

    Well then…what's the point of filling in the census if I can't brag about my 43 toilets!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/TwoYen TwoYen

    More than 50 percent of Japanese households have a bidet. Does that make them French? No. Nor does it make ownership of a bidet a sign of elitism.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Crit_Reasoning Crit_Reasoning

      I agree that bidet ownership doesn't make them French or elitist. It just means that more than 50% of Japanese households have achieved rectal hygiene.

      • wsam

        You wrote rectal hygiene!!!! Ha! Ha!

        The Samuri were elitist and they were Japanese, exclusively.

      • Dave

        It's a bidet, not an enematic anal probe.

        • a-non

          Well since we're discussing Japanese hygiene practices, I'm going to point out the existence of "washlet syndrome".

        • wsam

          anal probe! Ha Ha!

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/Raging_Ranter Raging_Ranter

          Though I find that since my purchase of the enematic anal probe, I've used the bidet a lot less frequently.

  • Margaret

    I think Diefenbaker was the ugliest thing ever hatched by the human race.

    • wsam

      That's racist

  • Margaret

    I love this column.

    Keep up the good work.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

    The state long ago stopped caring about your toilet ownership

    Shame, that. Ours is running a bit, and I think there's a seal that's a little brittle from age. I was kinda hoping there would be a government grant program, or something.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Raging_Ranter Raging_Ranter

      There was an eco-grant in the city of Ottawa for those who replaced their toilets with low-flow models, but they nixed it.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/madeyoulook madeyoulook

        The taxpayers were flushed with rage in opposition? Good. It was a crappy idea, after all.

  • hosertohoosier

    Diefenbaker WAS a big supporter of a nanny-state, who arguably ran to the left of the Liberal Party. He expanded the size of government faster than GDP, AND pushed the Bank of Canada to cut interest rates, emphasizing a concern for unemployment over inflation/the exchange rate (a decision that resulted in a spat between Diefenbaker and the governor of the bank of Canada – an incident of particular relevance to at least one Maclean's staff member).

    Real Government spending, 1957-1963 (1986 dollars)
    195719882
    195820832
    195920995
    196022004
    196125479
    196226804
    196327692

    • hosertohoosier

      They looked fine in excel!

      1957: 19882
      1958: 20832
      1959: 20995
      1960: 22004
      1961: 25479
      1962: 26804
      1963: 27692

From Macleans