Outraged moms, trashy daughters

How did those steeped in the women’s lib movement produce girls who think being a sex object is powerful?

by Anne Kingston on Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:00am - 0 Comments

Bennett Raglin/ Getty Images/ Cole Garside

A few weeks ago, when she was chatting with her teenage daughter, Olivia, Leanne Foster mentioned the word “feminist.” “She just wrinkled her nose,” Foster recalls. “It was ‘Eww, yuck.’ ” Olivia, an articulate 15-year-old who’s about to enter Grade 10 at a Toronto private girls’ school, thinks feminists are about as relevant to her life as a rotary-dial phone. “When I hear the word I think of the hippie-ish generation where they’re all ‘girl-power,’ ” she says. And not in a sexy Spice Girls “girl power” way, more in a humourless, style-less way: “They refuse to wear perfume because they don’t want to be seen as sex objects,” she says dismissively.

Like many other teenage girls, Olivia regards the fight for female equality as over. “In the Western world, we’re pretty equal,” she says.

She has every reason to think so. Going to university is a given. So is having a career—perhaps in business or maybe medicine. She’s surrounded by smart, independent women, including her mother, who holds a Ph.D. in education and is the director of LINCWell, a student enrichment support centre at St. Clement’s girls’ school in Toronto.

Yet Leanne Foster, whose position puts her in the daily orbit of the age-old divide between teenage girls and their mothers, is not as sanguine as her daughter about female equality. She sees a unique generation gap emerging: on one side, mothers who came of age during the women’s movement of the 1970s fighting for equal opportunities, “empowerment” through financial independence and rejecting female “objectification”; on the other, their daughters, raised in a hyper-sexualized culture replete with Bratz dolls, porn-inspired American Apparel ads, and the message telegraphed by Kim Kardashian and her tabloid-cover cohorts that a leaked sex tape is the quickest route to female success.

For these girls, Snoop Dogg’s misogynist Bitches Ain’t S–t is not an affront but a ring tone, and “slut” and “bitch” are not put-downs but affectionate greetings between female friends. Snooki, the 22-year-old star of the reality show Jersey Shore, whose ambitions consist of getting drunk, vomiting on camera, and spending days in a tanning salon, is the star of the hour. “I love Snooki,” says one 20-year-old. Olivia agrees. “It’s so ridiculous, it’s funny,” she says of the show. “I don’t relate that to my life at all. I wonder, ‘Why would you do that?’ But it’s enjoyable to watch.”

Meanwhile, their mothers, who walked in Take Back the Night marches to raise awareness of violence against women, are horrified, particularly by the sight of Snooki getting punched in the face by a man—footage used by MTV to promote the show.

Some of them see a clock ticking backward. “It’s worse than the 1950s,” says the mother of a 24-year-old, referring to the ubiquity of Photoshop and cosmetic surgery creating beauty standards more unattainable than ever.

Kimberly McLeod, a Toronto social worker who counsels mothers and daughters and has two girls, one 11, the other 14, is dismayed by the constant bombardment of sexualized media images directed at girls. “I don’t meet many girls who feel good about themselves, even though they’re totally gorgeous,” she says.

But the generation that grew up reading Our Bodies, Ourselves is most apoplectic over what they see as the unrelenting pressure on girls to be sexual, and not on their own terms. “I’m so deeply pained to see where women are today and how girls—and I mean girls—are being groomed to believe their purpose in life is to be sexual beings that please men,” says Nancy Vonk, the co-chief creative officer of Ogilvy & Mather in Toronto and the mother of a 16-year-old daughter. Vonk recalls wearing satin hot pants when she was 15. “But it was a different time,” she says. “Back then there was at least equal premium put on intellect and what was in your head. It was the opposite of ‘Go out and please men.’ ”

Bookmark and Share
  • Laura

    How can girls today NOT be slutty? Come on, look at what "feminists" (and other liberals) want to teach in sex ed. Why do grade school kids need to learn about masturbation, how to wear a condom, oral and anal sex? BTW, nobody needs a teacher to tell them about masurbation. They can figure it out all by themselves. I have no objection to kids learning about sex, but not the way it's presented in schools. It should be up to their parents, or at least handled in a much more sensitive way in school. Kids today are as desensitized to sex as they are to violence. They don't learn to have respect for their bodies, instead they are taught that sex is just great fun, and how to avoid pregnancy and disease. There's a lot more to sex than the physical aspect of it. For girls especially, there is a spiritual and emotional element and this is what feminists have destroyed with wanting women and men to be exactly alike.

    • Blacktop

      It has been going on, getting worse ever since the 60's.
      In my youth girls in the 40's were often not even allowed to date until they were 16 or 17 and then an aunt was in the next room. Girls who did were sluts. The boys who did were uisually much older as per my other post.

      I think oyou arte deasd right in your words above.

      • Blacktop

        correction: you are dead right

  • Carol

    I CANNOT stand feminists and I do consider myself a very modern woman. These girls are nothing more than Modern day Tramps and it will all catch up with them at about AGE: 50.

  • Derek

    Just thought I'd point out, this attitude toward sex is far from new. The "good old days" when sex was exclusive to 1 person your entire life was a short period in the 20th century at best. Did the romans and the greeks not have orgies? The Babylonians, the Sumarians? Did The King of France not send boat loads of 12 and 13 year old girls to Canada to keep the lumberjacks and fur traders "happy'? There are sex guides written by Catholic monks from the dark ages. The Kama Sutra is ancient. When it was translated in the 19th century into English do you really think it was just a marriage guide? I'm not sure that girls now are worse than they were 15-20 years ago. Even 30 years ago. The Womens lib movement was at the same time as the Hippies who did mind altering drugs and slept around worse than any other living generation. The reason it seems worse now is simply due to media attention. The only change I really see is the massive amounts of gorgeous models in mass media advertising, as that would certainly make anyone feel inferior and thus cause lower self image.

  • http://mach1231.tripod.com Max

    How do people use selective memory to not conveniently remember to Rolodex their own memories of growth stages and spurts? Too embarrassing I guess. Canada is giving me such a complex. And Conrad Black wants to come back HERE? Good god, man stay put when youre free. Would you trade palm trees and white sands for this poppycock…Canada is nutty,neurotic and a polite acting prude. So there.

  • Molleigh

    The 60s were a rebellion against the 50s and the 50s were an attempt at normalization due to the atrocities seen in World War II. And so on.

    I find it hilarious the amount of people that believe the good ol' days were all moral and right. Yeah. What about the girls that had to 'go away' to help an aunt? Or went to 'study' abroad in Europe? Or that young couple so in love? Their firstborn was 4 months premature and 9 pounds, 2 ounces! If you believed those lines you were a complete and utter twit. Of course the girls going away to help an aunt or going to Europe generally were going to the home for unwed mothers. And if you were so lucky to be allowed to keep your baby, you would be forced to marry the father. Yeah, those good ol' days.

    • Blacktop

      What you say is true as I have posted otherwise to a degree. But the instances you talk about, while present were a very small fraction. The trip to Europe was more often an attempt by a snotty mom to get her dfaughter to forget an unacceptable (meaning poor with nothing to offer but his bod)). Your view is distorted – not that all iof that didn't happen b ut not in thenumbers suggested by you.

      • Molleigh

        If you have studies showing the numbers, I'd be interested in seeing them since the studies I've seen state the contrary. Comparing now to the 1950s when people were more 'moral' is laughable. It's a same song, different chorus. The only difference is people generally don't lie to try and cover up their children's mistakes. I'd suggest you stop glorizing the past and see the past for what it actually was.

  • ruckus

    i recently read an article that intelligence is rated as one of the top three characteristics that men want in a potential mate. compared to 1930's, intelligence didnt make the top 10. this change appears to be due to the work equality factor (women are worth something besides just child-bearing) and hopefully, the men actually enjoy being able to talk to women about stuff. it simply wasnt a factor 100 years ago. cultural evolution is slow and sporadic. it swings back and forth, slowly advancing as social expectations shift. but like it or not, women have way more power over their own bodies now which in turn means they have power over their relationships with men. sex will always be there. it will always be a factor in business and social relationships. and that power will only get more focused as women figure out how to expand into what really is unknown territory for them.

    • joe joe

      i like my wmen dumber than posts. what the hell are you talkig about?

  • Greg

    What exactly are these "Outraged Moms" outraged about? Their daughters are simply following the feminist formula they were brought up on: no respect for men, they are just useful idiots, no respect for sex, it is just for fun and/or profit, and no respect for marriage, that is a patriarchal hell. Unfortunately, following this philosophy also results in men having no respect for the woman, and, in the end, her having no self-respect either. The biological imperative is still to couple up, but even if this new generation of sluts can find men to marry them, it will not be long before their husbands are led astray by the next generation of increasingly youthful sluts. And with little or no guilt, given their wives' chequered history. Thanks Mom!

  • joe joe

    I think it will be great when this generation of feminists dies off thus leaving their prehistoric ideas behind. Newsflash…equality is here…everyone knows it but you. Oops, gotta go…a girl with nice big titties just walked by the window and i have to yell touch your toes out the window at her so I can objectify her the way she asks for…she's a little fatter than what i usually go for (5,6 130 pounds) but I'll make an exception because by wearing what she is she's totally asking for it.

    • Maria

      Great post…you missed a few stereotypes in there…lets see if I can fill in some the blanks…after you give the fatty what shes been asking for by wearing what she's wearing, you should go to university to become a doctor…it will suck at first as there will only be men in your class (because women's brains are very small, unable to hold much information based on this inadequate size), but the good news is, once you get out and become a doctor you can perscribe lot's of medication to all those crazy women…as thats how male doctors roll baby.

      • Karnesy

        So many magazines and websites today harp on the youth of today, but we don't see the same attention brought to the modern day problems of helicopter parenting, kid-in-a-safety-harness effect and how modern parents have really, REALLY dropped the proper parenting ball and how it's affecting two generations of youth, (Gen Y'ers and Millenials) and how we as a society address it and fix it rather than blaming today's girls.

    • maria

      …when you later get married, its also important that you cheat on her with your receptionist, knock her up and keep her barefoot and pregnant (because what guy would want two incomes to buy toys with), and then beat her from time to time as long as the stick you use is an acceptable width (as all guys do)….maybe you can even have a teenage daughter you can later be told by feminists to feel bad about in terms of what she wears and how she uses her sexuality since its men who run the fashion industry and encourage underage sex among their daughters don't you know…your only down time will be watching all the tv shows you love that are the worst offenders of perpetuating gender stereotypes like sex and the city and legally blonde

  • Karnesy

    Today's young women have completely different challenges to face than their mothers did in times past. Today's mother's of Gen X'ers, Gen Y'ers and Millenials had to break far more glass ceilings than today's young women. Girls outnumber boys in high school graduations as well as university graduations. One could even argue women are at the "top" right now. Women magazines openly bash men at every turn. However, aren't parents at fault for the values instilled in their daughters?

  • Karnesy

    Wouldn't mothers be the source of these young girls misplaced affections? What about these girls father figures? The modern parents in the western world have REALLY goofed the younger generation and are now simply pointing the finger because it's easier. Some of these reasons of sexual wanton image projection in teen and even tween girls could be parental indifference, material-over-affection and the helicopter parent effect are also causing teens (both male and female) to engage in many types of provocative behaviour in an attempt to regain any semblence of control over their own lives and bodies, for better or worse.

  • M

    In all candor, given the fact that feminists have sought to promote promiscuity as empowerment, and demands children as young as 5 be taught explicit sexuality, inferring that it's their right to engage in it where ever and when ever, and their parents have no say in the matter, what the hell do you expect? They have sought to redefine sex as love, they demand prostitution be legalized, which translates to promoting it as a career choice. Their advocacy has been a regressive promotion of exploitation and enslavement and those who disagreed were pilloried.

    What these so called feminists can't seem to come to grips with is the damages they didn't mind inflicting on other people's daughters has damaged their own. Perhaps they thought their daughters were more intelligent than "the masses"? Here's a clue for them, you raised sluts, because that is what your ideology is in aid of, it's intended purpose was to discourage morality, self respect and any consideration for things other than the shallow, trivial demands of an air head.

  • Been Done

    According to statistics, 3/4 of all girls age 18 have performed fellatio on boys. This also becomes a power over boys seeking thrills. Mothers, your daughters are natural sluts.

    • notaredneck

      Yes, and nine out of ten boys haven't had fellatio performed on them. This it the gist of this issue.

  • http://www.jakewright.ca Jake

    There is a crazy generational difference in women that can be seen as good and bad. Being a 36 year old single male I am shocked how many young girls (19-26) are willing to be friendly so to speak where as my generation has always had a stick up it's … errr ear. I do worry though about how overly sexual young girls are as much as I have reaped the benefit from it, it's becoming a bit of a turn off and has reduce young women just to that a "sexual commodity." I work on the Hill and the issue is less relevant there but off the Hill it's a world of depressed, anxious, insecure women who find acceptance in the beds of men who eventually grow to resent and dislike their female companions who aim for a life only viable on Television.
    I think this change in direction with women is a media driven problem that plays to a Generation that has reject the men hating attitudes of their mothers and swung too far in the other direction, but to play the Devil's Advocate it doesn't help that we have a generation of men with prolonged adolescents .

  • Aaron

    I hate this article, more cherry picked man hating feminist shrill

    Notice in the article when it talks about women in the CORPORATE world were more prone to lose their jobs during the recession than men, not once did it consider that maybe women perform poorly compared to the best which are usually always men. At the top of every field it is filled with men but Feminists like to compare themselves to the Homer Simpson variety in a childish form of "one up ship".

    Then of course it COMPLETELY leaves out the fact that 70% of all jobs lost were to blue collar slobs like me who were all men.

    Go to Hell Macleans!

  • I Ching

    There are only two kinds of people in society — male and female — and if they can't get along then society falls apart.

    Feminism is a disease which has succeeded in creating distrust and antipathy between the sexes. And like a disease it will only end when it has run its course and destroyed its host.

    Feminism like communism is against the Natural Order and like communism is destined to fail. But in the interim it will share another feature with communism it will destroy the lives of many people.

    A man would be crazy to get married today and there is zero incentive. If he wants sex it is easily available if the woman wont spread her legs by the 3rd date he can just date another woman. So sex is not an incentive. And certainly he will be financially destroyed in a divorce and be a 14% dad when he loses his kids.

    Its no wonder that the marriage rate in the West is falling while divorce rate keeps climbing.

    See
    http://www.flippertv.com/nomarriage/
    http://www.marriageandwealth.com/nomarriage.html

  • Linda Lee

    I once heard Muriel Arpin, a longtime advocate of Canadian feminism, explain an error made by the suffragettes in the early 20th century. “They focussed too much on getting the vote,” she said. “They believed once they got the vote, everything else they wanted would follow. It didn’t.”
    In the late 60s/early 70s, I reported “women’s news” during a time of tremendous change for women. I was also an active volunteer in “the movement.” From 1972-74, I wrote a weekly newspaper column entitled “Feminist” in Manitoba in which I attempted to articulate what the changes I and my “sisters” were advocating meant to us, to our world, and to the future. One of my “hopes” was for a day when women could make choices for themselves without fear that their choices would be used to limit or judge or prejudice the choices made by others.
    We are, after all, individuals.
    Each individual makes her own choices; each generation chooses its own battles.
    As a young woman, I battled for the right to make my own choices, and for the right of my daughter to make hers.
    Forty years later, as a mother, I’m proud to report that she is.

  • A single 31 year old

    heck, I'm too old but would love to date one of your sons…

  • Jen

    I had a stronger reaction to this article than I thought I would because I wish it were wrong. However I work for a company that represents peer to peer executive learning throughout Toronto and I am sorry to report that my recruiting consistently turns up far fewer female executives than male. We happen to be really fantastic at preparing people for promotions and an accelerated career path and I honestly wish I knew how to get more women involved.

    • Phil King

      Perhaps many women simply have different aspirations than many men? For example, how many primary school teachers are women versus men? None of them will be executives, but is their job not terribly important to society?

      My last boss was a woman, but she felt it took too much of her time away from her daughters, so she left for a new part-time non-exec position so she could have more time at home with her kids. There's only so much the job could change, and a 30 hour work wasn't in the cards given the workload.

      I don't know, I think we all get caught up in this equality "ideal" without stopping to think that maybe different members of society simply have different goals in life, and being an "exec" may simply not be something a lot of women aspire to.

      If they don't value it, why would they pursue it?

  • Hyrum

    This is disgusting I can tell by the majority of messages being posted here that the respondents are either Male or Females who have fallen into this trap where they beileve that feminism has run its course and usefullnes.

    Feminism is no longer about equiality in our western society as women can do pretty much any job they wish. But feminism is now about respect and the question of wether women deseve the same treatment as men in society.

    it is very evident from the comments that many of the readers of the article have missed this point. they have shown such a lack of respect for women in many of theri comments and just repeated antiquated norms and ideas about proper male role models and the ills of single motherhood.

    the question is abotu respect and if it cannot be shown for a simple article trying to bring light upn this complex issue then how can it be expected of society. after all society constructs and reproduces it beliefs through the media.

    • MB101

      Thank you. While I don't consider myself a die-hard feminist, I am an advocate for respect for all people. Especially young people. It really annoys/offends me (as a mother of teenaged girls) to hear people say "oh…you have GIRLS!!" (as though they are locusts). It's all so disrespectful, old boy's club and biased, in my opinion.

  • Jane

    I'm not sure if the issues is limited to girls or to teens. The media has targeted everyone with messages brainwashing us to be materialistic. I know as many teen-aged boys who worry about their appearance and need expensive accessories to feel like they are valuable. The sexualization of younger and younger girls is end results of make-up, clothing, shoe and other retailers trying to make as much money as they can. Reality TV is about getting people to watch commercial with inexpensive programming rather than investing in a team of good script writers and trained actors and actresses. What is worrying is less about sex and more about the quality of person that is being created, if all their mental energy is engaged in turning men into drooling sex slaves, is any thing left for caring about their communities, environment or the lives of others. Premarital teenage sex has been going on even back in the days when girls were turned out of their homes and shunned in the streets and told quite emphatically they were going to hell. The sex isn't the problem, its the focus on materialistic and narcissistic values to the point where other things are excluded.

    • dick

      i agree. sex isn't the problem. how can it be? its at the core of our existence. we live in awe-inspiring times with a expansion of goods and services and knowledge of ourselves that wasnt available before. but rather than use our increased knowledge and prosperity to enhance our lives, we've substituted human potential with shallow cultural values and prolific marketing. hopefully, its a phase that we grow out of.

    • MB101

      Thank you Jane! I'm so sick of MacLean's trashing young girls. Teen sex has been around since the beginning of time (my own grandma — God rest her soul — would also agree with me!). So has makeup and trashy clothing. I DO believe that this barrage of celebrity-watching TV/media and "Reality" TV is however, indeed a problem.
      We need to stop picking on girls and we need to raise bar for ALL teens. There are lots of good ones out there!

  • Phil King

    The problem for feminists today is that all the big battles have been won and what's left to fight over is far more murky and difficult to identify and define.

    It's very easy to fight for obvious equal rights in law, but it is far more difficult to argue that say "50% of all politicians SHOULD be women", since that involves telling women what they should value and what they shouldn't.

    So the former is an external fight for rights that unifies, whereas the latter is an internal debate between women primarily, and one that is fractious.

    Besides this, the article is, in my opinion, trying to extract more meaning from the actions of adolescents than is really there.

    Teenagers are crazy, but most of us come out of it okay in the end. LOL

  • b.a.p.s.

    why dont moms get rid of tvs and computers and then their daughters will listen to them and wont see a double standard?

  • Connie

    I wonder if many feminist moms raised daughters without fathers. Because girls raised without any male attention when they are young and don't get male attention in a sexual way have always gone berserk and acted needy of male approval when they are sexually mature. That is because being overtly sexual is an easy way to get male attention if not approval. Girls raised with male attention from Fathers and brothers aren't so needy and don't develop the habit of being sexually overt.

    I am raising a teen daughter and I don't have problems with her selling herself out to men. In fact she has only had one boyfriend in her life, broke up with him after a few months and has since then held men at a distance and while she goes out with them she has not allowed any of them to act possessive of her.

  • Yasmeen Ghebari

    How many times in the article have you mentioned a tv show or movie? Does anyone else see how much of an impression the media has with this situation? I sometimes wonder why these girls are acting the way they are and why my friends and I are not, and my answer is TV. I watch TV for maybe 2 hours every week, and my TV shows consist of nothing to do with reality TV or MTV. "I don't relate that to my life at all. I wonder, 'why would you do that?' But it's enjoyable to watch." The fact that this young woman ENJOYS watching Snooki throw up on Jersey Shore is enough to tell us of what it is doing to her. She thinks she is an outsider watching this, but the fact that she is even WATCHING that television show tells us about her mindset. What ever happened to reading? What ever happened to discussion that did not involve the latest celebrity sex tape?

  • traylong

    Every few months Macleans has an article like this highlighting young girl's sexuality. It's really been quite a common theme in our popular culture how promisciuis girls are becoming. Where are the similar articles about boys? After all half the young people having sex are of the male gender.

From Macleans