Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Please give generously

by Paul Wells on Friday, August 13, 2010 2:04pm - 0 Comments

From the Inkless emailbox:

Dear Paul,

In recent weeks, the Fraser Institute has been pilloried and criticized in both the mainstream media and among the country’s political and academic elites for our support for making the 2011 long-form census voluntary, rather than mandatory.

Our rationale for opposing the mandatory long-form census comes down to a core belief that Canadians should not be forced to disclose private and non-essential personal information to the government.

In its current format, the long-form census requires Canadians to complete 40 burdensome pages of intrusive personal questions. Canadians are forced to disclose this information without good cause. The census has simply become a cheap way for academics, economists, and social scientists to get information that should be acquired using market surveys of the kind that are routinely conducted on a voluntary basis.

Having census data collected by a central government agency does not serve Canada’s interests, and it does not serve your interests.

If, like us, you believe that a less intrusive government will help make Canada a stronger and more prosperous nation, then help us continue our efforts to independently measure the success or failure of government policies.

Please donate to the Fraser Institute.

Sincerely,Brett Skinner

Dr. Brett J. Skinner
President

Bookmark and Share
  • Mulletaur

    What I love about the Harper era is that is helps everybody identify their enemies clearly. Before, the Fraser Institue was an eccentric right wing think tank. Now it is a threat to democracy. Nothing like painting a great big target on your foreheadd.

    • Sean

      I think they're really only a threat to desktops from thudding heads.

      • Holly Stick

        It's not so much a think tank as a belief tank.

        • Orson Bean

          . . . much like the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Same sh*t, different pile.

          • http://dredtory.blogspot.com/ Sir_Francis

            Yeah. And don't forget StatsCan, that hive of unCanadian cultural-Marxist technocrats.

  • frobisher

    The Fraser Institute is always Right. Even when they're 'basically' wrong.

    • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

      Very cute. Thanks for showing up.

      • frobisher

        No, sir, thank you. You brighten every corner with your insights. How dark this den would be without the occasional bruit of…

        "Next."

        • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

          Thanks for the vote of confidence!

        • http://stumblingabordeaux.blogspot.com Patrick

          The only reason I reply to his comments is so that we can all enjoy that wonderful "Next."

          It's like music to my ears.

          • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

            So then why did you reply to comments of mine where I don't use that term? Wow. Next.

  • MJH

    I agree with the Fraser Institute. Why is the Government funding surveys for big business? Let them do their own surveys!!

    • Sean

      You do know the primary reason for the census is inform public policy and decision-making?

    • cln

      Conservatives rule by distorting facts. Business pay for this data, it is not free. Government collects the data for policy making and recoups some of its cost by selling data to business.

  • westmalle

    The census decision is done, over with. No election is happening so this is truly obsessing over nonsense.

    Although I would love to see the opposition parties slogans for Election '10:

    Liberals: We will prorogue less often! We will jail all census deniers! Free Omar Khadr! Extend Michaelle Jean! We will continue to spend on stimulus but will feel really really guilty about the deficit!

    NDP: The stimulus spending we voted against is too slow! We want more of the home reno tax credit we voted against! The deadline for infrastructure stimulus we voted against must be extended!

    Bloc Quebecois: —-silence—-MPs are in line at caisse de depot cashing their federal pension and vote-subsidy cheques.

    • cln

      Conservative Platform for 2010
      - You get to buy guns and settle differences with a gun fight;
      - Home schooling for all children;
      - Free to hate
      - Life will be simple – you do whatever you want, pay for everything and get suckered by big business;

      • RunningGag

        I think you missed the point. Although, with some tweaking, your list wouldn't be too bad.

        - Allow those who are capable, to own a firearm
        - Home schooling equalization (as in: work to allow parents who choose to home school, the ability to do so effectively)
        - The freedom to express what you want, assuming it isn't an incitement to violence
        - Give people the chance to live their lives their own way, as free from government interference as reasonably possible

        I know that last one doesn't appeal to some people (on both the right and the left), but it does appeal to many.

  • John

    I'm baffled. For weeks now all the usual suspects have sat down in front of CBC cameras demanding that census shirkers be thrown in jail. The same individuals have come back this past week demanding that Omar Khadr be released from jail. On both issues they call the governments' response "crazy". Crazy? Only on Planet Toronto, not in the real world.

    • MostlyCivil

      Wait…who, exactly, has demanded that "census shirkers" be thrown in jail?

      And what's with the Toronto hate? Did you get a parking ticket there once or something?

    • DerekPearce

      NO ONE at all is demanding that census shirkers be thrown in jail. The government can find a million ways to keep the long form compulsory without a penalty of jail time. How disingenuous.

    • cln

      Have your imaginary friends being telling that? Are you watching CBC or Conservative Broadcasting Corporation?

  • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

    Come on. -17 points? Methinks someone is trolling the thumbs-down button. Easier than addressing me directly, isn't it.

    • Inkless

      Try it yourself. Try voting anyone up or down more than once. You can't. That net -17 is the sum of all the different people reading and voting.

      That being said, too much of this comment board is skating too close to abusive personal insult. On every side. Could folks maybe be a little less desperate to have the last word?

      Everyone: if you're on the sixth or eighth round of "I know you are but what am I," maybe you've made any point you were going to make.

      • chet

        Except the "different" people, who you describe (no dobut in an effort to legitimize your supportive commenters as representing the Canadian mainstream) represent a parroting of your largely leftist progressive views.

        Indeed it is such echo chambers that lead cultural elite progressives to believe that all right minded thinking Canadians view the world as they do.

        The old actress walking onto the stage for one too many times also has a back stage entourage cheering her on, leading her to believe she is a thing of eternal beauty… all the while the audience winces as she enters the stage.

        Presenting onto the stage…today's progressive, insular media!

        • June Kim

          Love the analogy.

          The PPG are an insular club. They drink with each other, attended the same schools, and live in the same neighbourhoods. They're pretty disconnected from reality and this encourages the group think mentality.

          From personal experience, the Ottawa bubble is very toxic. Politicians and the press need term limits. Crappy journalists are kept on for years despite not being profitable. Honestly, Peter Mansbridge should have been fired long ago; he's continuing to hemorrhage viewers.

          There is indeed a reason that the Canadian press is failing. No one wants the product they create.

          All the while, they'll happily continue to drink at Hy's, remain smug, and never, ever, criticize each other.

          If done right, Sun TV has the potential to kick some major ass.

          • Jon Pertwee

            yes because finding a cheap way to chip away at an argument like Chet did merits something. Wait it merits nothing.

      • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

        You're right. I even tried deleting cookies and caches, no luck. I read somewhere that it could be done, but if it can, it's beyond my obviously amazing hacking abilities.

        However, as chet points out, it's pretty clear the slant of the people casting votes on here. I mean, if my comment was that bad, it'd be pretty easy to post something in response, wouldn't it? Lord Kitchener might have made an effort. Sean, Patrick, and Holly Stick resorted to their usual schtick, I'm afraid.

        • s_c_f

          I suspect that when you login, you are identified by IP address. If it were cookies, then you could logon with two different browsers (which is not possible). It is possible to hack it (for instance using IP proxies would work), but it's not simple. It's certainly not worth the trouble.

          If you really want to get a lot of negative votes, say something conservative on Wherry's blog. Could be anything remotely related to rightward thinking. If it's not anti-government or leftist, just watch the thumbs down accumulate.

          • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

            It's certainly not worth the trouble.

            Well, given my experience on these here Internets, I think there are plenty of types for whom it would be worth the trouble.

            Still, more than a net twenty click thumbs down. Then again, just recently I got more than a net twenty clicks thumbs up on a post that chastises social liberals and feminists. So, who knows?

          • MostlyCivil

            I don't know. I've found disagreeing on a Steyn post to be the quickest way to a minus 75…

      • Claudia Lemire

        Mr. Wells, I find this very helpful,
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgqM7zrgCLI&fe…

        Enjoy!

      • Orson Bean

        Wells: thanks for giving the children a well-deserved remprimand.

  • Tony

    My money is on the way

  • Agha Ali Arkhan

    To paraphrase Prime Minister Lester Pearson: Make a decision; people will adjust. No one was criminalised for not doing the mandatory census even though the bureaucrats had the power to do so. Making the long census voluntary removes this power from the bureaucrats. This removal is a good thing. Adjust. People who feel the need to retain this power with the bureacrats should go live in some other country. You are not welcome in a free nation.

  • Tony

    Yeah, and did you hear from Canada's favourite 'Fiscal' Conservative Andrew Coyne? No, see the CBC cartoon characters are on a 3 month holiday – kinda like Greece.

    • Tony

      My money is on the way from The Conservatives who cannot defend my ideas, and battle the lame media, to support a group that may well do so.

      • Tony

        What happened here is the Conservatives threw out a bone to see what support/reaction would transpire – no build up – no support – just a kick – The news-cycle will turn; they know that – if anyone looks like fools, it is the media (as always- but always forgiven) – no friend of the Conservatives anyways. But if they wanted my vote – they lost it.

        • Tony

          Then 500 people show up on boat – that has been tracked since it was off the coast of Australia (supposedly) but guess what? its not full of s**t from China that used to be built here -it full of terrorists!!!!

          • Tony

            Yeah, those dirty terrorists jumped over the red taped line and set sail for Canada – Sound the Alarms!

  • chet

    Still waiting for some acknowlegment of something "left wing"

    from our leftist propagandists masquarading as "journalists".

    Untill then, let us sit back in wonderment as they conjure up shock and dismay at a "right wing" organization daring to frame a message of a "non-progressive" nature.

    Tell us Paul, what is it like living in a word without the basic bell curve, where there is only a right wing tailing off, and nothing but a purported "center"? A one winged bell curve…only from today's "balanced" progressive left media.

    • MostlyCivil

      I think the Fraser Institute has lost the ability to shock. But you're right about one thing…they do, in fact, "frame a message". Not well, and not generally with any supporting data, but they keep trying.

      • Jon Pertwee

        ha ha that description could be used to frame Chet too

  • chet

    There are a few really good rounds of "name that party" going on in conservative blogs and media…the dreaded Anne Coulter leading the charge as of late.

    In case those who are deprived of the other side of the news (most news consumers) are wondering, "name that party" is a game played whenever a democratic party member is embroiled in a scandal. While republican membership in a scandal garners headlines, and first paragraph coverage, entire scandals involving democrats go by, in article after article in which the reader is given no idea that the "politician" is in fact a democrat.

    Doesn't fit the "progressive" media narrative and all that, eh Paul?

    Now, back to trashing the designated "right wing" organization of the day.

    • prescott

      Hello – wrong country. You might want to send your opinion to an American magazine.

  • chet

    Perhaps now is a good time to delve into the hanging narrative.

    What is a hanging narrative you ask? Well, it is a media meme which has been wholly discredited by all reasonable objective facts which the media overtly refuses to re-address.

    In short, the media tells a story..that they desperately want to tell, for(invariably lefist) deological reasons, yet when a preponderance of objective facts surface to contradict that ideolocially driven story, the media refuses to cover it. By omission, perpetrating a falsehood on the general public.

    Numerous examples abound, but the coverage of Obama, by the likes of Paul Wells (who considered Obama to be a transcendent political figure of historical proportions… based on little evidence but reams of leftist ideology… now absolutely refuses to revisit the subject) serves as an enlightening example of this phenomenon.

    Instead we are treated to attacks on "right wing" organizations.

    • Jon Pertwee

      Chet see prescott's very apt comment to you previously

      • chet

        Yes, yes, now that Obama is a complete failure, we must stick to strict juristictional boundaries and all that.

        Back when Obama was "the One", well comments by "journalists" here abounded. Now? Well, ahem…that is…uhhm… another country and we don't comment on US politics…

        • Inkless

          Readers with any interest in checking "chet's" deluded fantasies against reality — anyone? Nobody? Thought so. Oh well — are invited to peruse the record. Here's what everyone at Maclean's, from Steyn to the interns, has actually written about Obama over the past three years.
          http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/barack-obama/

          It makes a mockery of "chet's" simplistic caricatures, which may help explain why "chet" is at least the third name he's used on these boards since Obama was a candidate. Must suck to burn through the credibility of your made-up personas at such a high velocity.

          • Jan

            Actually he lost me at 'hanging narrative'. I'm shocked to find out it's not that well hung.

          • Orson Bean

            "It makes a mockery of "chet's" simplistic caricatures, which may help explain why "chet" is at least the third name he's used on these boards since Obama was a candidate. Must suck to burn through the credibility of your made-up personas at such a high velocity. "

            It kinda reminds me of what certain stock promoters do: after a while, find a new shell company with a different name.

  • Holly Stick
  • Philanthropist

    The census is used by unscrupulous liberal politicians to tailor bribes using taxpayer's money. There is no good reason for government intrusion into our private lives.

    • cln

      Wow, another shallow insight of a Conservatives.

  • maggie

    At least you can chose if you want to donate to them which is more than Canadians can do if they do not want to 'donate' to Macleans magazine.

  • cln

    The irony is that the Fraser Institute use the data of the long form for its research. Next time, it will just coin up some numbers that fits their imagination.

  • peter

    Mr Well's…pretty much the reaction you expected? Dangling raw meat in front of the salivating dogs who frequent this page must seem pretty tame to you…so what's up with this post? Is the FI not supposed to use data that is out there. perhaps, like Suzuki, they should just make it up?

  • Holly Stick

    What makes you think they don't? However, you are lying about Suzuki.

From Macleans