RCMP and the truth about safe injection sites

The Mounties were set to publicly acknowledge the benefits of projects like the Insite facility. Then they backed away.

by John Geddes on Friday, August 20, 2010 2:42pm - 122 Comments

Austin Andrews/Zuma/Keystone/ Arlen Redekop/The Province/ Tom Hanson/CP

It would have been quite a news conference, and it very nearly happened. Last fall, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, after months of intense, private talks, agreed to face the media together to declare their agreement that research shows the “benefits” and “positive impacts” of supervised injection sites for intravenous drug users.

For the RCMP, making such a statement would have been a turning point: the Mounties would have had to distance themselves from dubious studies, commissioned by the force itself, that were critical of Insite, Vancouver’s pioneering safe injection facility. And that would have been a politically awkward move for the federal police, since Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative government is firmly committed to shutting down Insite.

But senior officers seemed ready to take that dramatic step. “I can confirm we are good to go from our end,” said Chief Superintendent Bob Harriman, a top RCMP drug enforcement officer in Vancouver, in an email he sent on Oct. 28, 2009, to Dr. Julio Montaner, director of the B.C. centre. Harriman’s email included “proposed messaging for [a] joint media release” of the RCMP and the research centre. The RCMP would acknowledge “an extensive body of Canadian and international peer-reviewed research reporting the benefits of supervised injection sites and no objective peer-reviewed studies demonstrating harms.” As well, Harriman said the RCMP would admit that “reviews” commissioned by the force, which contested the centre’s research, “did not meet conventional academic standards.”

The proposed joint media release was never issued. Nor did the RCMP officers and the centre’s doctors appear together for their planned news conference. According to Montaner, two days before the scheduled event last December—after a venue had been booked at the University of British Columbia and “the banners were ready”—he received a telephone call from Deputy Commissioner Gary Bass, the most senior RCMP officer in British Columbia. “He said, ‘Julio, can’t do it,’ ” Montaner recalls. “I said, ‘What do you mean, Gary?’ He said, ‘I’m really sorry, I’ve been ordered not to go ahead with the news conference.’ ” Montaner says Bass made it clear that the order came from RCMP headquarters in Ottawa.

Even after that setback, Montaner pursued his grievance further up the RCMP chain of command. He’s known for his tenacity. Along with heading the research centre, Montaner is a professor of medicine at UBC, and it was announced recently that he will receive the Order of British Columbia for his groundbreaking AIDS work. A charismatic figure in the international movement to combat the disease, Montaner straddles science and advocacy. When his negotiations with Bass didn’t pan out, he pressed on early this year to develop what he describes as a remarkably productive relationship with Deputy Commissioner Raf Souccar, a high-ranking RCMP officer in Ottawa, who is responsible for the force’s federal and international operations, and has an extensive background in drug investigations.

Despite forging those key links, Montaner finally failed to get the RCMP to agree to publicly admit any mistakes on Insite. On June 24, his centre instead filed a complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP, hoping that the watchdog body would, among other remedies, order the force to acknowledge that it had wrongly tried to discredit the centre’s legitimate research demonstrating Insite’s benefits. However, the commission sent him a letter late last month saying that sorting out this tangled episode went beyond its mandate. At that point, Montaner told Maclean’s his story in an interview and his centre provided key documents supporting his version of events. The RCMP declined to make a senior officer available to be interviewed for this article or to answer any questions.

Insite has been controversial ever since it was established in 2003 as North America’s first legal facility where drug addicts could go to inject themselves. Located in the heart of Vancouver’s troubled Downtown Eastside, Insite has 12 booths where users inject the illegal drugs they bring in with them, with nurses standing by. They’re given clean syringes, cookers, filters, water and tourniquets. More than 400 overdoses have occurred at the facility, but nobody has ever died there from one. Counsellors and social workers are available to help addicts who want to make a bid to change their lives.

The former Liberal government allowed Insite to open by exempting it from drug enforcement laws for three years. Health Canada provided funding to evaluate it as a sort of pilot project in harm reduction.

Montaner’s centre took on the bulk of that research. Although he’s emerged as a forceful advocate for Insite, he denies his centre set out to produce supportive findings. “We honestly came into this without knowing if it would be all good, all bad, or somewhere in between,” he says.

Bookmark and Share
  • Hanselsva

    To hollinm: What dialogue? What needs to be discussed? And how does your name-calling retort referring to someone's intelligence level further the 'dialogue'? The in-your-face fact of the matter, the thread that runs through and through news events this summer and back to his 'firewall around Alberta', is that Stephen Harper will continue to try to impose his view of the universe on Canadians, and will -as is more and more apparent – go as far as he can to do it. Accountability? Transparency? This government is by far the most secretive and controlling Canada has ever experienced, and despite comments that I've read that the site is the responsibility of the Vancouver Police Force and thus the RCMP should have had nothing to do with it, SOMEONE pulling strings in Ottawa has clearly gone to some lengths to hush up the positive research, which by the way comes from many sources around the globe, not just here in Canada.

  • Holly Stick

    John talks about the Drug Prevention Network of Canada on page 2; more about it: http://creekside1.blogspot.com/2010/08/who-muzzle…

    The "privately funded" (according to its President) organization has a website here: http://www.dpnoc.ca/default.html

    Funny thing though, when you click on the link for Scientific Studies & Reports, you get crap. The website as a whole looks pretty astroturfy to me, like the "Friends" of Science or something. I wonder who is funding it? Do any of our tax dollars make their way to it, say through REAL Women or other parasites on the Government of Harper? Or do they get contracts to do secret studies that the government never releases to the public?

  • Holly Stick

    Here is more about Insite and good and bad research in 2008:
    http://www.canadianmedicinenews.com/2008/10/whats…

  • Holly Stick

    The Canadian Association of Police Boards oppose the changes to the census also:
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/otta…

  • http://www.lethbridgerealestateblog.com lethbridge realtor

    While I understand the logic behind them, it seems to me that using tax dollars to fund anything which supports criminal behavior is not right.

  • Brick Wall

    Read these if you want even more background to this:
    http://www.pivotlegal.org/pdfs/RCMPsecretlyfunded…

  • Brody Abel Williams

    I said it time and time again , poverty pimps are leading you all to believe they are a great service. Its time Coastal Health look after this health problem and bring the the heath care that is truely needed by health care workers , instead of so called none-profits cashing in and playing cut throat with each other, a prime example would be the Contact Center that was closed as a direct result of the Portland Hotel Society wanting the money that was allowcated to the Contact Center to be diverted to the Washington Needle Exchange and to Insite $200,000 Dollars for each project , this also leaves breeding ground for addicts to be exploited to keep these projects operational ,each addict that works a shift handing out needles and crack pipes recieves $ 27.00 for the their efforts . There are a number of east side society's all fighting for the money that is given out to keep this viscous cycle perpetual. I hear alot of talk about marginalized people but when they are incarserated or in the courts not one of these gutless wonders are there to represent them or to show thier support.

  • K A Rogers

    Okay. I understand I’m a very late arriver here, but…..  I’d like someone to explain what is being solved by these “safe injection sites.” There is no treatment, no counselling, unless requested, and no future that I can see. It would seem that this is a place where drug addicted people can spend what is left of their lives doing illegal drugs with no fear of jail time. I see it has been said here that its of no concern to the taxpayer. WHAT???? Maybe…if you don’t pay taxes. Where do you think the building, the maintenance, the running of, etc. comes from? The tooth fairy?
    I have a license to use marijuanna, due to an injury suffered that has caused CRPS. I do use it…very occasionally. Many reasons why I don’t use it more. One is I am not an advocate of drug use. Secondly, I can’t afford it. Yes, I’m legal, but I still have to purchase the product.
    If there was some plan to help junkies “kick” the habit, as well as the required help, I would be a strong supporter. I can well imagine there are many that are addicted that would give almost anything to be clean. Of course, theres also some that have no plans to ever give up the habit. I have no reservations with trying to help those that really wish to once more become productive citizens. I’m concerned that these sites are generally viewed as a hang out for junkies, where the law can’t touch them. Go and sit outside one of these buildings for a while, and then give me your impressions.

  • kugig

    Injection drug users cost Canada $1.37 billion in tax dollars because of the street clean up, policing, and most of all health care due to HIV and Hep C. In Alberta alone a single drug user cost tax payers $49,000 per year, now if you look at the cost of running a place like Insite which is $3 million per year (roughly $14 per drug user) would you not say thats a considerable savings? According to data collected from the Vancouver police there was a decrease in public injection, petty crime, and drug related crime in the area in which Insite operates, not to mention the reduction of HIV and hep C cases within the vancouver east side.

  • dfghs

    what about the children being born to the addicts? they deserve a chance, and treatment. What about the police that gets stuck by a dirty needle, or the nurse treating an HIV positive patient. Everyone, not just the drug users are affected by their infections…If we could help prevent the number of cases of infectious disease withing the drug using community we can help keep our police and health care workers safe too.

From Macleans