Tony Blair interview: On the Iraq war, George W. Bush, his wife

And dealing with the royals after Diana died

by Jonathon Gatehouse on Thursday, September 2, 2010 11:43am - 0 Comments

Q: Do you think Labour’s recent defeat could have been avoided?
A: Yeah, this was not an election we had to lose at all. And the fact that the Tories didn’t win an overall majority shows that. My constant refrain before I left was that if Labour wasn’t driving through a strong agenda of change, we would lose traction. And that’s what really happened in the end.

Q: Are you in touch with Gordon Brown?
A: Yes. Even though we had a disagreement that was pretty savage at times, I still have a great respect for the work he did as chancellor [of the exchequer], and also the work he did on the banking crisis at the time he was prime minister. The friendship goes back a long way and hopefully will continue, even though we had a profound disagreement.

Q: What about the far-reaching budget cuts David Cameron’s government is proposing? Do you see any alternative?
A: You’ve got to tackle the deficit, that’s for sure. But how that’s done or when you withdraw the fiscal stimulus are delicate matters of policy. And one of the things that I decided when I left was not to comment on my successors, at least when they are there.

Q: As a Mideast peace envoy, you’ve been trying to bridge the gap between Israel and the Palestinians. In the book, you say the breakthrough in Northern Ireland came when outside parties got a grip on the peace process. Face-to-face negotiations start again in Washington this week. Do you think President Obama and the other people you are working with have the necessary sort of hold now?
A: Yes, I do. The single most important thing is that Obama started this as his presidency began. I think this is probably the most important moment since Oslo. There is a real chance of success. If it fails we’re in deep trouble.

Q: Some people believe a deal between Israel and the Palestinians will be a sort of magic bullet for the West’s problems in the Arab world. Do you share that view?
A: I do believe that if you reach a just and fair settlement between the Israelis and the Palestinians it will have a massive influence on countering extremism. Which is not to say that the Israel-Palestinian situation is the source of the problem, but it is very potent fuel.

Q: This memoir offers detailed policy prescriptions for Labour’s future, peacemaking, and the economy. It raises an obvious question: do you ever see yourself making a comeback?
A: The truthful answer is that in British politics, I don’t see that. But you never know what will happen. I might have done the European president’s job last year, but it wasn’t to be. So, I’ve never ruled out the possibility of going back into public service.

Bookmark and Share
  • No NDP

    Britain is now governed by a couple of pansies.

    • John D

      Better than being governed by the US

      • Charlie

        You ignore the colossal good the US has done world-wide.They are the first to respond to tragedies everywhere.Lighten up.

        • rabro

          Yeah, like occupying the airport in Port- Au -Prince and preventing NGA planes from landing. 7000 US soldiers on the ground, doing what? Ten days later still no street cleared into the city. And what about the dismal New Orleans performance? I hope we never have to depend on there help !

        • jdude

          Really? I didn't see the US running to Rwanda in the 90s.

  • http://www.thepolitic.com Mark Peters

    Great interview.

    I disagree with Blair's assertion that a deal in the Middle East will have a "massive influence on countering [Muslim] extremism." The only deal Muslim extremists will accept is the destruction of Israel and the return of the land to Arab hands, which cannot and isn't going to happen.

    • Charlie

      I must agree with you Mark.All the past events and the audio from Muslim countries proves your point

  • rabro

    Mr.Blair has all the attributes most other successful politicians have:To convincingly present any lie that will serve his purpose.Act like a used car salesman without any scruples. Cooperate with powerful figures no matter how wrong their action.
    But the deeper insight in his twisted character is given by his opinion that Hussein ,despite lack of WMD, was so bad a guy that he needed to be eliminated anyway.Sounds pretty childish,doesn't it? And it certainly does not justify the killing of 100,000 Iraqis in the process and the destruction of the country's economy! Why could not have Britain's ever so excellent Secret Service have knocked Hussein off? And why did not the CIA do it? Because they wanted a war and Iraq was handy.Hitler's invasion of Poland supposedly had different reasons but just as little justification.
    Hitler, Bush and Blair will be remembered as the war mongers that they were.
    Murder is not ameliorated by polishing your apple!

  • Johnny two shoes

    I think it's too bad that he gets remembered for disasterous Iraq and not the successes in Nothern Ireland and democratic change in Britain. Those two contrasting situations I think are great examples of how political success can be found when you have a good understanding of and empathy for 'the enemy'. From my limited experience I think that politically, there will be limited success in the Muslim world until we learn to deal with and understand it's complexities instead of simplifying it down into a dick measuring contest, and the age old mantra that the Arabs only understand raw and brutal force.

  • http://www.drewberrymortgageinsurance.co.uk/ MDrewberry

    Really interesting interview, it is still difficult to tell if he's telling the truth or a 'story'. Not sure he knows the difference between spin and reality anymore.

  • Gary

    Blair is a delusional war criminal. Bush has been smart enough to remain silent about his war crimes but this clown drones on mindlessly.

  • PolJunkie

    "So even on the basis of what we know now, I still think the world is better off and safer without him."

    I've always considered Blair to be an intelligent man. I now have to reassess that one.

    • Adrian Bashford

      Agree!

      He lost me when he said this: "They often distrust the simplicity of his world view. Where sometimes such simplicity does illuminate the choice for us. I find this in the Middle East. There is, in fact, a pretty stark choice: does the region embrace the 21st century or does it go for a kind of religious regression?"

      He apparently didn't see the platform that Bush built his campaign on… laden in all sorts of religious regression, and an attempt to unify church and state. So pick… US Christian-centric religious regression, or Arab muslim? The Church of England would be proud.

  • Christian Odenthal

    So his biggest mistake was the fox hunting ban. What a joke!
    Besides his decisions in foreign policy, London is a massive financial centre. Most european hedge funds and private equity companies are based there due to the low regulated british financial market. London is the world capital of foreign exchange trading.
    Britain was hit extremely hard be the crisis and is deep in debt now. Everyone knows what happened in other countries.

  • Charlie

    And you live in which alley?

From Macleans