'Made in Dagenham'

Sweet 1960s sensibility and labour unions

by Tom Henheffer on Thursday, September 9, 2010 9:56pm - 0 Comments

It starts off lighthearted, with a crowd of women bicycling from work. They party, dance the Watusi with their husbands, and break the day-to-day grind and industrial roar of their sewing machines with joking cat-calls aimed at male coworkers. Made in Dagenham is a dramatization about the sewing machinists strike at Ford’s Dagenham plant in England, which led to the passing of the British Equal Pay Act, and to the eventual passing of similar legislation around the world. Sally Hawkins plays Rita O’Grady, the strong-willed, soft-spoken machinist who led the women to strike for equality despite pressure from their husbands, their union and their political representatives. It’s a purely feminist film that feels like a combination of Milk and Mad Men—an honest look at the role of women in the ’60s, working overtime, cooking supper, fighting for civil rights and getting the kids off to school while their husbands sleep on the couch. It’s a film that blatantly condemns sexism and shows, despite its mostly light tone, the real cost of fighting for civil rights. The bee-hived and bobbed characters are fully fleshed and well-rounded even though they fit into ’60s archetypes,  and the period piece balances optimism and realism in a way that’s both compelling and fun to watch.

Made in Dagenham premieres at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 11th, with a second screening on September 12.

Tags: ,
Bookmark and Share
  • frank

    A bril film, very watchable.

  • Stephen

    Soooo are you trying to tell me that portraying all the men as chauvinist oafs who laze around on the couch as at all in any way "realistic" and "honest". You got to be kidding, right?

    I for one grow tired of these revisionist, misandrist (male hating, for those of you unenlightened, no doubt theres' more than a few) movies that portray all men in a negative light.

    A truely realistic film would have also shown that there were no doubt many who were sympathetic for their cause, and helped them along their way. How else would the pay equity act even have passed if not for cooperation from men?

  • Stephen

    Next time don't be so foolish in your review, inappropriately calling dishonest films "honest". Besides, I'm willing to bet anything the men of that time put in much more hours, time, and energy into the workforce (which the vast bulk of them too had to fight for their rights in, they just did it before women because there was more of a need too), and weren't all just lazing around and dismissing women's efforts.

    I'll be glad to see the final stake through the coffin of these kind of delusive films, and the deluded and deluding critics that support them. Something tells me, mercifully, that day's coming soon, esp considering the "voice of the people" over at the IMDB gave this a mediocre 7 out of 10 stars.

    Happily, I'll go with the voice of the people on this one.

    • marionpec

      stephen > It's everything but misandrist and shows how many men supported and helped the female strikers ..

      Apparently some people still think that being a feminist means hating men .. And comment on movies they haven't seen ..

From Macleans