Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

Why buy the cow when the public will buy the milk for you?

by Aaron Wherry on Friday, September 10, 2010 1:33pm - 0 Comments

Some years back, Matt Welch dissected the notion of public funding for professional sports venues in a piece for Reason magazine. And in light of word the theoretical owner of a Quebec City NHL franchise isn’t interested in building an arena for that team, one passage is perhaps particularly noteworthy.

The money quote from baseball’s most nauseating bit of self-mythology, the 1989 Kevin Costner vehicle Field of Dreams, was, “If you build it, they will come.” Like much of the national pastime’s lore, the truth is actually much closer to the opposite: Build a stadium with tax money, and they will eventually leave…

Keating made the obvious but infrequently stated point in a March 2000 article for USA Today magazine: “Another major downside to government-built and -owned ballparks is that clubs are transformed from owners to renters. It is always easier for a renter to move to get a better deal. So, government officials who advocate taxpayer-funded sports facilities to attract or keep a team virtually ensure that teams will continue issuing threats and moving.”

The paper by Raymond Keating to which Welch refers is available here.

Bookmark and Share
  • gottabesaid

    Long-term viability isn't the issue… getting an NHL team in there is good enough to shore up Quebec City votes for the Conservatives for the next couple of elections, at least. That's what matters.

  • bergkamp

    Why buy the cow when the public will buy the milk for you?
    Some years back, Matt Welch ….

    Now we are talking, Wherry!!!

    Aren't Cons somewhat committed now to building arena or face backlash in their only area of support in Quebec?

    I can't decide if Cons have reason to believe that people aren't going to mind Feds building arenas during tough financial times or are they about to be in an almighty car crash with public opinion.

  • Kevin

    Bread and circuses.

  • ChrisWPG

    Hmmm maybe a chunk of money spent on community centers and amateur sports venues would be money better spent for the good of Canada…. and it would be nice if it didn't have the ring of pork bellying at the same time, but alas I am a dreamer.

  • brooster

    The sad post-script to these grand schemes for financing corporate cashboxes is that, once the venue is actually operating, the average working-class stiff often can't get a ticket or can't afford one.

  • Winnipeg

    We won't forget this in the west come election time.

  • Stewart_Smith

    No need to worry. The only true blue conservative in parliament has spoken and all deals for arenas are now dead. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/maxi…

    • Jenn_

      Wow. Way to stand up Bernier!

      Obviously, the time for a leadership review is nigh, and there will be another hat in that ring.

    • madeyoulook

      “The project is simply not profitable and will constitute a financial burden for taxpayers for decades to come, even in the best scenario. That’s why not a single private player has been found to invest in it,” Mr. Bernier said.

      “Since our governments have been throwing money in all directions for decades, there is obviously no way to refute such arguments [that Quebec City should get its turn]. But the fact that we are caught in this unending spiral of spending and debt accumulation is precisely what has brought us to today’s intolerable situation,” he said, pointing to Ottawa’s $56-billion deficit. “We cannot continue to pass on to our children the bills for all the projects that we cannot afford to pay ourselves.”

      I have never joined a political party in my life. If Bernier leads one or starts one on his own, I am so there.

    • madeyoulook

      From his blog statement:

      As the great French economic Frédéric Bastiat wrote, “Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavours to live at the expense of everybody else.” When such large amounts are in play, it is impossible to calculate exactly who has received how much. We would need to go beyond a single file and take into account all public spending items, going as far back as possible.
      That’s what Quebec separatists like to do. They keep telling us that Quebec has been on the losing side of the financial equation and that Ottawa has systematically been favouring Ontario for more than a century. Meanwhile, people in the rest of the country believe that Quebec is the spoiled child of the federation. Each region can point towards many examples to nurture its frustrations. It is a pointless debate which can only divide our country.

      http://www.maximebernier.com/en/2010/09/ma-positi…
      I don't suppose the CPC has a leadership review in the works…?

      • JustinWordswrth

        Excellent! One of my favourite quotes.

  • Jenn_

    OK, we have a serious, serious problem here folks.

    These are the Maclean's blogs. The place where we gather to argue with each other about everything political under Canada's sun.

    Yet, I can't seem to find a single solitary commenter who favours Federal tax money going to support this arena, or any other pro-sports venue.

    Do you realize what that means? For the first time ever (in the years I've been coming here, anyway) WE ARE UNITED!

    Now what the heck are we going to do?

    • brooster

      Oops! Disregard this unattached comment, intended as a reply to Jenn_ (above)

    • Cats

      Yes. The Liberals/NDP/BQ are way off base here.

      So far only a few renegage Tories have been willing to speak out against this. The rest of the caucus has yet to take a position.

      All Macleans commenters have universally bashed Ignatieff's judgement !!

      BEST CATS!

    • tobyornotoby

      How did you even write that in your dazed state Jenn_? I'm using a surrogate typist to get out this last gasp of divisive snark before I succumb to sentiment and good cheer …

  • brooster

    "Do you realize what that means?"

    It means nobody in Quebec City is reading/commenting en anglais.

  • madeyoulook

    Nicely said.

  • Tceh

    None of that logic matters. Canadians from coast to coast get to kick in $ to a vote buying scheme and the renter will promote the deal on his shiny new TV station that cable subscribers are forced to pay for. Its all good in Harper's myopic world.

    "Quebecor CEO Pierre Karl Péladeau – whose interest in buying such a franchise is widely known – also happens to be the driving force behind a new Conservative-friendly television network dubbed Fox News North."
    http://www.thestar.com/mobile/news/canada/article…

  • ChrisWPG

    I must admit I'm stunned over the governments, and the oppositions stand on this. ei taxes are about to go up and the deficit is at levels never seen and we are thinking of building arenas.

  • madeyoulook

    Ahem. (tap, tap) Is this on? Can they hear me? Can you hear me? Good.

    May I have everyone's attention, please? I would like to take this opportunity to welcome everyone to the Great Canadian Small-Government, Respect-the-Taxpayer Party. It is wonderful to see so many of you here. We were worried the traffic was so bad; we were wondering if you would ever show up. No matter. It is nice to finally have some company.

    I personally was not sure I would see the day when my good friend Aaron Wherry — (points, pauses for round of applause) — would quote approvingly from a Reason piece to make a point. I must say it is a very heartening development, and bodes very well for a new era of respecting the hard-working honest Canadian taxpayers. Welcome, Aaron, and I look forward to working with you in the future (pauses for standing O).

From Macleans