Third world America

Collapsing bridges, street lights turned off, cuts to basic services: the decline of a superpower

by Luiza Ch. Savage on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 7:32am - 313 Comments

Despite its position as the world’s unrivalled superpower, international comparisons show the U.S. slipping on a number of fronts. On education, the United States has been falling behind, in everything from science and engineering to basic literacy. The U.S. once had the world’s highest proportion of young adults with post-secondary degrees; now it ranks 12th, according to the College Board, an association of education institutions. (Canada is now number one.) In 2001, the U.S. ranked fourth in the world in per capita broadband Internet use; it now ranks 15th out of 30 nations, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. “We have been involved for three decades now in paring back public commitments and public spending, and that started with the Reagan revolution. We are living with the outcomes and consequences,” says Michael Bernstein, an economic historian at Tulane University in New Orleans.

Meanwhile, prolonged rates of high unemployment are taking a toll on families today, and will for years to come. Studies have shown that the longer a person is unemployed, the more difficult it is to find a job—partly because skills deteriorate, and partly because employers become suspicious of why someone hasn’t worked for a year. “The United States is expanding its underclass of a whole group of individuals who will become less employable, less integrated, more subject to criminal and other deviant behaviour—and probably become part of the larger problem of structural poverty in America as well,” says Sherle Shenninger, director of the economic growth program at the New America Foundation, a Washington think tank.

Arianna Huffington sees an even starker big picture emerging from the reams of bad economic news. “As we watch the middle class crumbling, for me this is a major indication that we are turning into a Third World country,” said Huffington, founder of the Huffington Post, in an interview. “The distinguishing characteristic of the Third World country is you have the people at the top and the rest—you don’t have a thriving middle class,” says Huffington, whose new book is entitled Third World America: How Our Politicians Are Abandoning the Middle Class and Betraying the American Dream.

America is moving “from the Jetsons to the Flintstones,” she argues. “The American dream was already based on the idea you could work hard and do well and your children will do better. Now we are confronted with downward mobility across the board. You have the phenomenon of unprecedented numbers of college grads who can’t get jobs.” The current public sector cutbacks in education and infrastructure will only make things worse, Huffington says. “You are both hurting people in the present, and basically undercutting your economic growth and prosperity in the future.”

But the problem isn’t simply a product of the current recession or the 2008 financial crisis. It is now well understood that for years Americans lived beyond their means on borrowed money.

The real estate bubble enabled many homeowners to borrow against inflated house prices, giving families the feeling that their wealth was increasing. It was all a mirage. Low interest rates and easy credit allowed consumers to spend enthusiastically, masking the fact that the standard of living and incomes were stagnating, and public and private investment was lagging.

Over the past decade, private sector job growth was sluggish. Combined with recession job losses, there are now only as many private sector jobs as there were in early 1999, a decade ago, while the population continues to grow. And incomes stagnated for a full decade—the longest such period since the U.S. Census Bureau has been keeping track of household income.

“There is certainly a serious erosion of both the American social contract and the American dream for a great majority of Americans,” says Shenninger. “There is a worrying trend that the private sector has not been able to generate jobs for now more than a decade.”

While business productivity increased—workers created more output per hour of work—that did not follow the traditional model of translating into higher wages. “Eighty to 90 per cent of productivity gains went to corporate profitability—which means that in order to make up for the gap in demand, working families resorted to relying on rising housing prices and debt,” says Shenninger. Workers lost the ability to bargain for wage increases as they competed with lower-wage workers in Europe, Asia and other emerging markets. Meanwhile, corporate earnings exploded.

Clyde Prestowitz, a former Reagan administration trade official and president of the Economic Strategy Institute, says the scope of the problem came into focus for him one day last year when he read, in the same newspaper, that China was launching a new 240-mile-an-hour high-speed train, and then an article about city leaders in Pittsburgh considering a tax on university tuitions in order to fund the municipal employees’ retirement pension plan. “I thought, the Chinese are building world-record trains and we’re taxing kids who go to school!” says Prestowitz. “We’ve been in decline for quite some time—we haven’t recognized it and have been fooling ourselves. But we’ve gotten to the point it’s hard to not see.”

There are numerous theories about the path America took to get where it is. Prestowitz blames the American approach to trade and globalization. A former trade negotiator who worked on NAFTA and advised Ronald Reagan’s commerce secretary, he argues that at the root of the problem is a long-term American naïveté about global trade, a case he makes in his book The Betrayal of American Prosperity.

Bookmark and Share
  • richard wilson

    Trust me, my wife and I have already thought of how to smuggle ourselves into Canada. Things get worse here, and they will, we are going to upper BC.

  • Rio

    9/11 inside job

  • Johnny_Warbucks

    Excellent article. And this is only the tip of the iceberg.

    Just recently, I watched a show on this very topic on the History Channel, it was titled "The Crumbling of America" – It is the scariest thing I've ever seen…well, not counting the warmongering, of course. The program starts by describing the empire (in those words) – which I thought was enlightening in by itself for them to recognize this monstrosity for what it is. It then drew a comparison between the Roman Empire and the [USan] Empire. They first explained how Romans built the most modern, advanced and wonderful aqueduct known to humanity but as soon as the warmongering started to rage, they let it go to pieces. They pointed out that deterioration of the infrastructure is always what marks the beginning of the decline of any and all empires. American infrastructure (roads, bridges, the electrical grid), they explained, earned the US its superpower status. However, although it was built with the best and most advanced technology of the time, it was only supposed to last 50 years. It's now been over 50 years since that expiration date. At the rate we're going, won't be back till we have dirt roads again, horse and buggies and we light ourselves with candles. But let the wars rage on for they are, after all, the ones making the rich richer and the poor poorer.

    The end of the USan Empire is in sight in more ways than one.

  • identalias

    Stop your spin, Prestowitz. US is going down because it's evil, and it's evil because it's run by evil scumbags.

  • Just Sayin

    Apple i-PAD
    Service-sector (sic) value added:
    US: 77.4%
    Steve Jobs $70M salary
    Corporate HQ $1.23B operating costs
    231 American retail mall stores $3.4B operating costs
    Passive Investor dividends $0 B
    Cash on hand $40B
    American mall service worker salaries $41M ***(0.1%)*** <— worker share
    Japan: 12%
    S. Korea: 0.4%
    Taiwan: 2%
    China: 1.8%

  • philippe M

    While the USA has been playing the superpower and spending enormous amounts of money of chasing Bin Laden and Saddam, and offsourcing its' manufacturing industry to China for the benefit of some happy few on Wallstreet, it has betrayed it's own people.
    Luckily the fourth power is on the side of those on the benefitting end of the current policy to keep the people ignorant about what's been going on. Everyone who has travelled the world, has seen and knows the US has been in decline since 20 yrs. Only when one walks around Washington the feeling is as how Rome must have felt a couple of years before the end. The place is not connected to the USA reality, but to the superpower status. It's a sham.

  • F.Clifford

    Bob Dylon said it best with "sundown on the union" nobody paid attention,,,its time to revive that 30 yr old message,,,,yes why not have a good old revival,,,,Americans are good at revivals,,,,,

  • Ted

    Americans don't care about education or the future…..They're waiting for `Rapture` and then all will be okay !

  • Sharon

    In Canada, there are a lot of taxes. I support that. I am coming from the middle class. Not the poorest, or the wealthest one. America has made a lot of mistake by spending on a lot of money and borrowing a lot of money from the world. That's how they are going to be third world. I am sure, the third world sound horrible. Canada might be next. I wish there'd be someone else like Jean C, the prime minister to help save Canada. Paying a lot of taxes is going to help to save Canada in some way because Canada owe over billion to the world. If Canada already owed to the world, and getting rid of the debt then Canada would be safe and won't be going to Third World. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!! If Canada is going to be in Third world, then all of us, good citzens will be broke and becoming like Amercian. Stupid Government and people. I'd rather die than see the world collapse.

  • Minna

    Many people seem to forget that Barack Obama is president of the US, not King of the Universe. He can't just say "I want it this way!" and have it happen. He has to get a certain number of Republicans to agree to vote for any legislation he advocates, and they won't, so that's that. It was also sad so see how "his" Democrats, that herd of feral cats, refused to support the vision of their own clear leader, who had received such enthusiastic and widespread support from the voting public. Now they're just going to lose, lose lose in every upcoming election — which will probably, and sadly, include the next presidential one — and the nut cases will be back in power, but this time with ghouls like Sarah Palin leading the way. I am thankful that we live in Europe now so my kids will get to skip the resurgence of the TCR (Truly Crazy Right). I miss home for home's sake, but I definitely don't want to be around for that particular Tea Party.

  • anonymous

    fact of the matter is…the U.S, and everything about it…SUCKS!!!!…

  • Kasia Yechimowicz

    If the US spend that money as a government rather than merely handing the funds over to corporations they'd go twice as far. Anything private will eat up huge sums as profits that never return to the economy.

  • Anonymous

    Many of the comments here show a total lack of macroeconomics. There is no such thing as a national debt in a sovereign country. The United States did not even have a budget until the administration of Warren Harding. The Secretary of the Treasury doesn’t even need the consent of Congress to erase the national debt. The only debt that a sovereign country can have is a balance of payments debt.

    MONEY = DEBT. Your money is a debt instrument “A Federal Reserve Note” backed by the full faith and credit of the American people. Likewise, Treasury Bills and Treasury bonds are government debt same as money. Treasury Bonds pay interest and have expiration dates in order to make it worth the bearers saving in order to gain interest.

    Treasury Bills and Bonds are redeemable in cash, otherwise known as Federal Reserve Notes or Treasury Notes.

    Cash or Treasury or Federal Reserve Notes are Credits on the bottom of the government balance under liabilities sheet. This same cash or Bills appear on private balance sheets as debits at the top of balance sheets as assets.

    This system was set up by Alexander Hamilton, our first Secretary of the Treasury.  

  • madeyoulook

    Shenninger: But we are not willing to borrow at historically low rates to keep teachers at work or improve public infrastructure at home.

    WHAT??!!!??? Not willing to borrow? How can anyone so stupid coordinate inhale-exhale?
    http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/debt_deficit_…

  • s_c_f

    I know, there's a lot of nonsense in there. It's plying the usual craziness that it's okay when small businesses go bankrupt, but a laid-off teacher is a national tragedy. Bye bye Chrysler, AIG, Lehman Brothers and GM, farmers and forestry workers, house builders, electricians and renovators. Johnny's middle school teacher? Untouchable.

    The underlying themes are:
    1. Private sector earnings may go up and down, but the costs of the public services they support must always go up – even to the point of sending the government into bankruptcy if necessary.
    2. Private sector workers are subject to the laws of supply and demand. But no matter how inefficient, out-of-touch, anachronistic or ineffective a public employee may be, he must never be laid off.

  • RagingRanter

    More borrowing is the last thing the US needs. They need an improved economy and more revenue. Raising corporate or income taxes would be suicidal. The economy is just too fragile. That leaves a national value added tax (like every other developed country has) and perhaps higher fuel taxes to fund infrastructure. No politician in the US has the stones to suggest either of those solutions, so they'll likely end up raising income taxes on higher income earners, instead of consumption and fuel taxes across the board. Politically less painful, but self-defeating. The revenue increase won't be nearly enough, and the economic damage caused by steep increases in income taxes will likely negate the revenue gains. I'd hate like hell to be an American right now. Three layers of government that are structurally insolvent, and not a single politician with the brains to realize it. The Democrats think they can solve everything with more program spending. The Republicans think they can solve everything with cutbacks and tax cuts. The fact is, they need massive cutbacks in some areas and the introduction of a national consumption tax. But nobody gets elected on such a platform, so it won't happen.

  • f4hq

    Ron Paul

  • http://classic.buzzflash.com/?time=12 Kevin Schmidt

    Tax middle income earners more? You don't know what you are talking about! Keynesian spending has proven to be the way out in this situation. We could also force the big banks to start lending the ONE TRILLION DOLLARS they have squirreled away for take overs of smaller banks that are being forced to pay more for the FDIC insurance shortfall caused by the big banks.

  • Mike

    Aw come on! I understand your point and it is well taken, but saying that American is headed toward becoming a "Third world" nation… that's way over the top. Take it from an American who is and has lived in a "Third World" country for the past 10+ years.

    These glitches and troubles are absolutely laughable compared to what people who truly live in poverty deal with each and every day.

    The top 90% of wage earners in the U.S. are still among the wealthiest 10% of people in the world.

    I get your point, but you go over the top and thus detract from your argument. Perhaps you should actually try visiting a third world country before you start making outrageous claims.

  • Emily

    Savage isn't the only one making the point. Many economists and other world observers are doing so as well.

  • Jan

    The wealthy have a knack for survival, but how is your middle class doing? You need them well off enough to buy all that stuff you're bringing in from China.

  • Tim

    Wealthy upper class doesn't mean it's not a third world country, in fact it's one of the definitions of a third world country. Put simply America's rich are too rich and their control of the government means they'll never be taxed appropriately. If you look at actual first world countries are (by some metrics America is already a third world country by the way!) the rich are far closer to the middle class in assets.

  • http://classic.buzzflash.com/?time=12 Kevin Schmidt

    Since you want to cut public services, then it is obvious that you won't mind if we cut the ONE TRILLION DOLLAR imperialist war machine in half, cut out all corporate welfare and raise taxes on earnings over $250,000.

  • sean

    we have to keep sending money to israel though. matter of national security
    screw the public system

  • madeyoulook

    Keynesian spending has proven to be the way out in this situation.

    Someone else without foresight, or kids, or at least any concern for their future welfare.

  • Minna

    YOU SAID IT. There are just not enough ways in the US to get the amassed wealth at "the top" back into the economy.

From Macleans