Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

Canadians feel variously about thing they only sort of pay attention to

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, September 15, 2010 4:52pm - 0 Comments

Two polls this week on popular attitudes toward the business of Parliament—one from Nanos, the other from Pollara. The feelings toward Question Period are predictably sour and there are a couple points where it appears Canadians are generally unhappy with the present state of affairs. Nanos, for instance, finds more are dissatisfied (44%) with the effectiveness of the House of Commons than satisfied (35.4%). Pollara finds more would prefer a majority government (40%) than a minority government (22%).

And yet, go further into Pollara’s data and the attitudes toward our present situation are rather forgiving (with one particular issue of concern).

Specifically, Pollara asked its respondents to judge the effectiveness of the minority Parliaments that have ruled since 2004. And here is how those numbers break.

Overall. Effective 55%  Not Effective 37%
At representing the views of Canadians. Effective 48%  Not Effective 44%
At addressing Canada’s short term needs and interests. Effective 56%  Not Effective 36%
At addressing Canada’s long term needs and interests. Effective 36% Not Effective 56%

Later, Pollara asked respondents to compare minority and majority governments.

Minority governments consider and represent the views of more Canadians than majority governments.
Agree 47%  Disagree 39%
Minority governments pass more legislation than majority governments.
Agree 14%  Disagree 56%
Political parties do a better job of working together in a minority parliament than in a majority parliament.
Agree 52%  Disagree 33%
Canada’s long-term needs and interests have been neglected during the current period of minority governments.
Agree 63%  Disagree 25%
This period of minority government is turning me off of politics and public policy.
Agree 38%  Disagree 48%

Bookmark and Share
  • Dan

    Abortions for some, miniature plastic flags for others!

  • Crit_Reasoning

    Polls like these should come with skill-testing questions. I bet there's a significant chunk of the population that doesn't even know what a "minority parliament" is.

    • Claudia Lemire

      I do agree with that!

    • AaronWherry

      Note the question from Pollara that asks what kind of Parliament—minority or majority—we have.

      • Crit_Reasoning

        Thanks. I'm actually quite impressed that 82% of respondents knew that we have a minority parliament, and that 58% rate themselves as "knowledgeable".

    • ZestyMordant

      I was called by a polling firm once. They asked me to identify two cabinet ministers and their ministries. Not totally sure, but I assumed they used that to assess my level of awareness.

      • Orson Bean

        If you got that right, I assume that puts you in the upper 5th percentile of Canadians, or something like that.

  • Tim Paye

    neat – they showed definitions to 1000 people.

    the actual majority vs. minority comparison questions that Wherry teases us about are in these data. it's a wash re the chretien and mulroney years compared to the martin and harper years, and nobody remembers or knows about the other eras.

  • cory dildon

    It quite obvious that politicians spend more time trying to find things about individual politicians to allow them to " call them out and ask for resignation" instead of working towards issues that Canadians find important. All it amounts to is name calling and finger pointing , "we need a report , public inquiry ,blah ,blah" all these things cost money( usually millions of dollars) and for what?

    • Emily

      Answers?

  • Claudia Lemire

    Thanks, glad to know!

  • mildheadwound

    And the winner, for most pointless and obfuscated headline is …

    Considering it's not effective, in the slightest, i find it hard to believe so many people feel their parliament is worthy of this 55%. In secondary school, isn't that only a C-? When the parties force their MP's to vote along party views, (ie. guns, oil, war), basically you're taking your percentages, and knocking them down to 1 of 3. These views, of course, are rendered by special interests, and have essentially nothing to do with their constituents, or the Canadian interests in general.

    • LynnTO

      It's 55% of the population, not 55% effective.

  • George Piskor

    Let's give the body politic more credit. It's not so much that Canadians are "forgiving", but rather "discerning".

    Thus, the polls may be interpreted as:

    1. Given a minority government, it's doing as well as can be expected with limited legislative potential and a required short-term focus, and
    2. Canadians feel a majority government is more appropiate to deal with strategic national and economic issues on the radar.

    It's not much of a stretch to conclude that Canadians are frustrated with the lack of strategic policy views offered by both major parties.

    • Orson Bean

      And they're right to be frustrated. I'm reminded of that account (I can't remember who gave it) of Iggy's Big Thinker's conference, or whatever the hell it was called. The anecdote was along these lines: after all these speakers had finished outlining all these huge challenges Canada is going to face (e.g., aging population, productivity gap, health care funding, etc.), Paul Martin turned to somebody beside him and said "We're f_cked".

  • Blacktop

    Question period is a childish display of stupid members. Questions should be in wriring and answered in writing. Get rid of the camera.

    Only a fool wouold give the present process any value as far as governing and challenging is concerned.

  • Fred Flintstone

    So let me get this right … less than .003% of the population of Canada was polled to provide these opinions. We should believe that this is what Canadians are thinking? I bet if I ask the same questions from 10 of my neighbours I'll get at least 8 different answers each time. That's the problem with this country, we all like to whine and moan about things but we never go far enough to effect any real change. These results do not hold any weight what so ever and both Nanos and Pollara should be embarrased for the poor job they've done and for obvious disrespect. Less than 3 people polled for every 100,000 … what a joke … that's the best they could do.

    • Poker Face

      *sigh*…

      When a sample (n) of a population reaches a certain point, it becomes representative, plus or minus 5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

      This typically happens when n>300.

    • john g

      Ladies and gentlemen, meet our new chief statistician.

      • madeyoulook

        Yabba dabba doo!

  • hellohellomike

    Yeah…. sure, I guess.

  • http://www.trpornizle.net rokettube

    en güzel rokettube videoları,
    en muhteşem sex izleme sitesi
    en kral rokettube yeri
    kaliteli pornoların bulunduğu tek mekan
    yabancı sitelerden özenle seçilmiş muhteşem ötesi porn sitesi…

From Macleans