Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

Suddenly a new national institution

by Paul Wells on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 11:55pm - 0 Comments

On a busy day, nobody will notice that the federal government and the Government of Alberta today each gave $25 million to a new National Music Centre in Calgary. And yet more people should notice. Added to $25 million from the City of Calgary, that’s $75 million toward a projected $120 million (or so) for the new institution. The rest will come from private fundraising, apparently. In Calgary that’s hardly an unrealistic expectation.

I’ve chronicled the development of this project for more than a year. In July of 2009 I wrote about the short-listed candidates for the centre’s architectural competition. A few months later I wrote about the winner, Portland up-and-comer Brad Cloepfil, whose design looks like this:

Here’s who should care about this announcement:

• People who were arguing, quite fiercely, that the National Portrait Gallery should not be relocated from Ottawa, on the (to me, mystifying) basis that all national cultural institutions should be in the national capital. Ever since that odd debate led to the death, for now, of the whole portrait-gallery concept, the Harper goverment has been cheerfully naming national institutions right and left. Here’s one in Winnipeg and another in Halifax and now this third one in Calgary. Not one of these three institutions was the Harper government’s idea; but they are ideas that will now proceed, with a “national” brand, thanks to the Harper government. The people who once thought they were winning the argument against dispersing national cultural institutions have apparently forgotten the argument ever happened. This government hasn’t.

• People who want, or who really don’t want, the feds to spend $175 million on a hockey rink in Quebec City. Obviously $25 million isn’t $175 million, but it’s non-trivial and it’s being spent in Calgary and I’m pretty sure somebody in Quebec City can be found who’ll call this a great injustice.

• People who think a major new music-oriented institution would be an excellent idea. This is the group I’m in. But this group can be subdivided into (a) people who want a major new investment in the arts in Calgary; and (b) people who might have any other idea. The latter group(s) have not paid much attention to the National Music Centre project and they need to start, because between the $25 million from the feds and the $50-odd million from fundraising, it’s about to suck a lot of oxygen out of the room for anyone else with an infrastructure project. If I were, say, the National Arts Centre in Ottawa, or the gregarious and empire-building new dean of music at the University of Toronto, or anyone else looking to expand music facilities in Canada, I’d look to Calgary and wonder whether my job just got a lot harder.

Meanwhile, there is this new National Music Centre project in Calgary. It has gone from the drawing board to reality (or getting there) with breathtaking speed. It is part of a broader multi-use revitalization of Calgary’s hardscrabble East Village whose total public-private price tag will probably be up around $1 billion. It is all bigger news than the attention it will receive.

Bookmark and Share
  • madeyoulook

    Here’s who should care about this announcement:

    Those Canadians, born and unborn, present and not-yet-immigrated, upon whose tab the bill has been thrown?

    Apparently not. That one's not on your list.

    • BGLong

      Sure. But while they're elbowing the drunken Maritimers aside trying to find a
      place on the sidewalk to hold out their Tim's cups they'll have lovely music in
      the background. Maybe a Stampeders reunion.

    • mhiggins

      Sometimes, when you invest capital is something, you get a return in the form of capital gains. Calgary is not exactly overflowing with world-class cultural venues, and this "is part of a broader multi-use revitalization of Calgary’s hardscrabble East Village whose total public-private price tag will probably be up around $1 billion", so I think that the marginal returns here will be quite big. It's a good-faith effort to enrich the public space and the economy of the city.

      • Mike T.

        Your other arguments are well worth considering, but a capital gain can't be realized until the structure is sold. And since if it's sold it's unlikely to be used for the same purpose, the other benefits you describe could easily be lost.

        • mhiggins

          I abused the term capital gains there. I was thinking more of gains in economic activity as a result of the investment. I'm assuming there will be an increase in the tax-base in that neighbourhood as well, which means capital costs will be offset somewhat by future revenue.

    • Mike T.

      Since the centre will likely be available for their use as well, it's reasonable that some of the cost be amortized over their lifespan too. Otherwise we'd just be gifting them an institution! Make those freeloading future generations pay their own way, says I!

  • Tony

    My advice to "People who think a major new music-oriented institution would be an excellent idea" would be to move to where the money is. Art builds around real capital – hence cities such as New York, London, Paris, Tokyo etc, etc.

    • Mike T.

      And yet every large (and most mid-sized) city in the first world has a symphony, of some sort.

    • Tony

      To further my argument Mr. Wells ( Jazz Dude), where were the big man of jazz born and raised and where did they go? Why? completely debatable why they were born in one location and moved to another, but certainly not by design

  • Holly Stick

    Cantos Music Foundation already exists in Calgary and has a great collection and programs; but it will be even better when it has more room and can display more instruments. Plus the Canadian Country Music Hall of Fame, another Calgary fixture which will be housed in the fancy new place
    http://www.cantos.ca/ http://www.cantos.ca/canadian-country-music-hall-…

    It's well worth spending public money on public arts instead of corporate welfare to the business of professional hockey.

  • madeyoulook

    Here’s who should care about this announcement:

    Judging by the image you provided… the ALBERTA MOTOR ASSOCIATION, that's who!! They've done away with cars and stop signs and traffic lights, in oil country!!?!!

    At least Coyne will be pleased that the helmet-less cyclists are not being harassed by nanny-state troopers…

    • tobyornotoby

      Good one ;-)

  • Crit_Reasoning

    Great article, Paul! Lots of good reasons for Canadians everywhere to care about the National Music Centre announcement, not just those who live in Calgary. It's exciting that this project is coming to fruition so quickly.

  • Stewart_Smith

    Well, lets all hope Ignatieff doesn't inadvertently say something mildly critical and screw this one up as well.

    • Patchouli

      More clout in opposition than PM has in power! Not fair!

  • http://www.TennisVagabond.com Big Dave S

    As with Warman's CHRC campaign against Nazis, my head is against it but my heart is for it.

  • http://www.twitter.com/globegenius Karen

    People who should care and don't:

    1. The artists who painted portraits of Romeo Dallaire. http://starportraits.ca/season1/ep102.php
    It's true that each could likewise tackle this subject :: Heritage Minister MP James Moore :: miraculously obfuscating the Minister's ungainly height and unbalanced girth. Such a portrait would undoubtedly revive The National Portrait Gallery! Yet who among those who have painted Romeo Dallaire could bear to suck up to James Moore and paint his ugly mug?

  • Peterborough Dave

    What the hell is a national music centre doing in Calgary? Isn't that like building a new wing of the Smithsonian in Oklahoma City or a new wing of the Tate in Newcastle?

    • Doc Rion

      Let me guess where you're from… Evidently it's your belief that people of culture, education and insight only live in "central" Canada, right? It's a mystery why non-"central" Canadians should view people in Montreal and Toronto as elitist, self-centred, ignorant snobs. All Canadians should benefit from a national resource such as the NMC… not just the "central"-ists.

    • Inkless
      • Inkless

        But that's not even the right answer, because the Lens and Metz galleries were the brainchild of one prime minister. This case is different. There will be a National Music Centre in Calgary because some people in Calgary wanted to have one. The idea never occurred to anyone in, say, Peterborough.

        • http://twitter.com/ScottBelyea @ScottBelyea

          "The idea never occurred to anyone in, say, Peterborough."

          Who, after all, already have the Canadian Canoe Museum. Beat that for Canadian culture!

          And well worth a visit, by the way.

        • noob_goldberg

          Good ideas always seem hard to come by in Peterborough.

          Peterborough is the place you move when housing prices get too high in Oshawa.

          • Peterborough Dave

            Touche

        • Peterborough Dave

          Hey hey hey…a hotbed of culture we are in Peterborough, pal. Careful or we'll send um, some, junior hockey players to your house…

          Oh nevermind.

        • Karen

          Mutatis Mutandis fail…

    • Orson Bean

      Another point is that it's absolutely ridiculous, in a country as large as Canada, to have, or expect to have, every major cultural project or institution located in the Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal corridor.

      By your logic, I guess we should move the museum of anthropology from UBC to Ottawa where it belongs? And I guess the Yanks should move the Getty Museum (including that beautiful building that's organically integrated into the surrounding LA landscape) from LA to New York where it belongs?

      And while we're at it, what is that Guggenheim Museum doing in Bilbao anyway?

      • Peterborough Dave

        Damned I knew I should have removed the "Peterborough" from my name before posting….

  • D-R

    Ottawa was built for no other reason than to house our national institutions. Putting them in other places is typically nothing other than pork barrelling, like the gallery in Calgary. I suspect this done for the same reason.

    I doubt this will have to do with actual music, it'll probably just focus on the most pretentious subset of music.

    • Stewart_Smith

      Well even the Calgary elites need someplace to go that serves a decent latte.

    • Holly Stick

      The Cantos Music Foundation is already based in Calgary, as is the Canadian Country Music Hall of Fame. Why the hell should they go anywhere else?

    • Orson Bean

      Your argument might make some sense if Canada wasn't the second-largest country in the world. If all of our "national institutions" were housed in Ottawa, that would mean that vast numbers of Western Canadians and Maritimers would never ever get to see them. And there's another reason why Ottawa is not a major tourist destination for a lot of Canadians — it ain't exactly a pleasant place to visit in the Winter.

  • http://www.twitter.com/thisthisthisthi Karen

    People who should care and don't:

    3. Aboriginal parents whose kids won't be attending Full-Day Kindergarten because Harper pays that bill. They're used to the federal government.

  • http://www.twitter.com/globegenius Karen

    People who should care and don't:

    4. People who will never set foot in the National Music Centre in Calgary unless they're forced to (ie. they work a part-time job there in the cafeteria to pay for school, or have to attend, bored and squirming in the seats cause they're there on a school trip).

  • http://www.twitter.com/globegenius Karen

    People who should care and don't:

    5. Moriyama.

  • Claudia Lemire

    It is great, I can't wait!

  • Reverend_Blair

    Oooo, a music centre! Can Corb Lund keep his horse there?

    Note: Not a slam, I like Corb Lund, but he seems preoccupied with his horse's well-being. I also like the idea of a music centre. They should put one in every major city in the country.

  • YYZ

    As a supporter of the Arts I'm pleased. Further, it's not too important to me that 'national' things are always in Ottawa — lots of people don't have time/money/choose to travel to Ottawa.

    But in this case it seems that the moniker 'National' is being used by the federal government to justify its contribution to this and other projects. However, it's a good thing…so 'nuf said!

    • Claudia Lemire

      I don't see nothing wrong using the word "National" , I do embrace it, I love the fact that we can have different national centres all over Canada, they are part of our heritage!

      • YYZ

        I agree.

        However, it's possible here that it is being used for crass political reasons…but possibly not.

        Either way, a pleasant outcome.

        • Reverend_Blair

          Can you name something any level of government has been involved not done, at least partly, for crass political reasons?

          Still, this is the first thing I can recall the Harper government doing that I actually supported in any way.

          • YYZ

            HST is the only thing I can think of.

  • Emily

    Love the touch of Arabic architecture in it. Very distinctive.

    I often wonder though if moronic discussions like this occurred about Stonehenge, the pyramids, the Parthenon, the Coliseum….

    • Bob

      Why, are slaves building the new National Music Centre?

      • Emily

        They didn't build the other places, so why would they do so here?

        • Style

          Did you know ignorant people tend to be quite arrogant and dismissive? It's a bit of a chicken and egg question over whether the ignorance or the arrogance comes first. What's your experience been?

        • LdKitchenersOwn

          The pyramids weren't built by slaves???

          You think it was aliens, don't you.

          • Emily

            No, the pyramids weren't built by either slaves or aliens [???]

        • Bob

          Actually, slaves DID build the Parthenon and the Coliseum. Thanks for playing though.

          • Emily

            Actually they didn't.

            It takes skilled people to build such things. Architects, engineers and so on.

          • Bob

            Wow… just, wow. Do some reading. Slaves did a lot of the physical labour on both. It's an historical fact.

          • Emily

            Like I said, it took architects and engineers and skilled craftsmen, and skilled labourers to build these things. I don't know why it's an article of faith with you that slaves did it.

            You shouldn't get your history from Hollywood and Cadbury commercials.

          • Style

            Where do you get the impression that Greek and Egyptian slaves weren't skilled? They built the Pyramids and the Parthenon, after all.

          • Emily

            LOL oh now it's gone from 'slaves' to 'skilled slaves'.

            Presumably because Egyptians and Greeks and Romans and so on were very picky about who they captured in battle?

            'Do we have any architects here? Engineers? Right, you lot stand over here….the rest of you…shepherds, pig-boys, chamber-pot emptiers etc can go home.'

            I started out by saying something that is a 'public good' should be paid for by 'public money'. And that the world would be poorer for it if the bean-counters had gotten their way. We wouldn't have the fantastic architecture…and knowledge…. other civilizations have left us.

            Bob dragged slavery into this…his own tangent. So you'll have to argue it out with him.

          • Style

            Also because you could be born into slavery under any of those regimes. You started out by saying this was a moronic discussion and wondering if the same discussion happened for slave-built wonders of the ancient world. Hayek would tell you that the same dynamic is playing out with every public wonder.

          • Emily

            Like I said, it's Bob's tangent so take it up with him.

            The 'moronic' part was about not wanting to spend public money for a public good….not the revised history that seems so popular on here.

            You guys will argue about anything…purely for the sake of arguing apparently, and I'm not interested.

    • guest

      must you contaminate every thread with insults? i thought a non-partisan article like this one might be safe.

      • Emily

        ???

        People who 'know the cost of everything, and the value of nothing' exist in every party.

    • Michael Hind

      "I often wonder though if moronic discussions like this occurred about Stonehenge, the pyramids, the Parthenon, the Coliseum…. "

      I think you've got your geography wrong. They're not in Calgary!

  • Out There

    I'd rather see the federal government spend taxpayer money on a new music centre than on prisons or jet fighters.

    I hope, though, that they provide equivalent support for music and other cultural centers in other parts of the country (and not just Conservative-friendly or swing-vote regions). Calgary's a bit too far away for some of us to get to.

    • Orson Bean

      So is Ottawa.

  • Arnstead

    The first glaring omission from the article is the lack of mention of the involvement of the Cantos Music Founfation ( http://www.cantos.ca) . The organization who's efforts to preserve, maintain and ultimately grow their foundation and raise awareness of their very unique musical situation has expanded to include and emcompass the development of a "home" for Canada's music identity. Bravo Cantos for having the courage and vision for seeing beyond the scope of your own mission.

    Secondly, comparing a hockey rink to the development of a national institution, is great spin! If that rink was slated to house the Hockey Hall of Fame, or to be a training center for all hockey playing Canadians, then someone may have a point to argue. Otherwise, like I said, great media spin……

    • Holly Stick

      The Cantos website has been posted twice here in the comments, but I bet none of the commenters has actually gone there to see what it is about.

      • Holly Stick

        Of course the bracket on your link is a problem to anyone here who does not know enough to delete it: http://www.cantos.ca/

        I went on a tour of some of the Cantos collection in July, and it was fascinating to see and hear the pianos and keyboards dating back to the 1700s, the huge theatre organ, Elton John's composing piano, etc.
        http://www.cantos.ca/explore/instruments/kimball-…

  • tobyornotoby

    I hope they are planning to build subsidized housing along with the initiative so that some musicians can afford to live in Calgary.

    • Kger

      The Salvation Army is right next door to the proposed site, so they are covered.

  • ASSonance

    Yeah, that's really how National Institutions are created — everybody throws in a ton of money and hey PRESTO creativity ABOUNDS. Stravinsky watch your BACK!

    Or not. Just another meaningless official culture gesture. We'll see. Track record is not good. Maybe Calgary is different. Oh ho ho.

    • Holly Stick

      The institution is already present; the money is to grow it.

      • Santa Maria

        Good idea. Every worthwhile artistic movement needs a stodgy official academic style to smash to smithereens, and this will at least provide the latter.

  • Emily

    ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    • Style

      Your own point bores you? Astounding. Even Emily doesn't want to engage with Emily's inanities.

  • Maureen

    The new music centre is going to be a great institution – its multiuse with studios, education, museum and entertainment space and I believe it will include space for musicians in residence. Can't wait until they build it it will be a great reason to come to Calgary. Not to mention they are incorporating the old KIng Eddy Hotel for those of us who have nostalgic memories of the great blues house.

  • Oliver

    More music si always a good thing in my mind

  • Sophia

    Hello… Banff?

    • Holly Stick

      As in the Banff Centre? Good point!

From Macleans