Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

Run by children

by Aaron Wherry on Monday, November 22, 2010 10:10am - 93 Comments

In a wider conversation with CBC radio last week about his impending departure, Liberal MP Keith Martin noted the incredible power of the young and unelected in Ottawa. A rough transcript of his comments.

I think the larger problem is that within leaders’ office, the people around them are unelected, generally very young, tend to be extremely partisan, they’re hired by parties, by leaders, to do the job and they have much more power than members of Parliament do. They control much of what goes on on a day-to-day basis with respect to the tactics and strategy. But these are very young people, for the most part. They’re not terribly experienced in the real world. They may be smart in certain ways, but they haven’t gone and knocked on doors, they haven’t run for political office, for the most part, they are not as connected to the people on the ground, our citizens, as those who have gone through the election process. So the people calling the shots, that rabid partisanship tends to revolve around leaders’ offices, and they basically tell the MPs what to do. And that’s a complete perversion of democracy

I think it’s those unelected people around leaders’ office that have a lot of power. More power, as I said before, than members of Parliament. They tell the MPs what to do, they write a lot of the questions, they write the press releases…

That’s the structure that we have today. So it’s not the members of parliament who are writing these questions and doing these press releases, they come out from very young people, who are very partisan, and they have one thing in their bullseye, they see the other side and they want to destroy the other side. And that’s the behaviour that they engage in. How can we destroy the other side to get into power?

Bookmark and Share
  • peter

    Personally, I'm more concerned about the reporters. As newsrooms have been gutted to pay interest on leveraged buyouts and media consolidation, older, higher paid, less gullible and left- leaning hands have bailed or been "restructured" into "new careers". The net result has been the doggrel we see as news at spots like this and others. As for the bandwagon jumping opportunist Mr. Martin…looks a lot like sour grapes and regret over poor personal choices. When Chretien changed the funding rules the Libs days were numbered.

    • sourstud

      When Chretien changed the funding rules the Libs days were numbered
      Actually, it was when it was discovered that the Liberals were a bunch of thieving crooks that they're days became numbered.

  • Holly Stick

    As I have written before, they are the Young Jurks.

  • Holly Stick

    Trained by the Fraser Institute and US "think" tanks:
    http://www.rabble.ca/books/reviews/2010/01/not-co…

  • ezekiel

    Dude, I'm not concerned with the miss manners guide to writing posts on internet comment threads. Writing according to various standards is certainly important, but anonymous message boards are not, they're a good way to waste some time if you have it to spare. Worry about the important things in life, and you'll find it goes much more smoothly.

    • Holly Stick

      You might instead apologize for writing that unacceptable remark.

      • ezekiel

        Does it leave a bad taste in your mouth?

        • andrew

          This is what happens when you mix your metaphors. You should have gone with something about being a pain in the butt.

  • sourstud

    Why would the Liberals be hiring kids out of "US right wing think tanks"? Adam Goldenberg did graduate from Harvard, but I wouldn't describe that as a "right wing think tank", despite Iggy's war-mongering while he was there.

    • Holly Stick

      I'm talking about Conservatives like Ezra Levant having an internship financed by the Koch Institute? Like countless rightwingers being brainwashed by the Fraser Institute, which is partly and American propaganda tank?
      http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2010/11/22…

  • Ollie

    It seems to me a lot of people interpreted Mr Martin's comments differently than I did… I assumed when he was talking about the your people crowding the leader's office that he was referring to the crowd in his OWN leader's office, and bemoaning the fact that they wouldn<t let him air his nutcase ideas more freely and kept him on a tight leash…

    Anyhoo, doesn't it say more about Mr Martin himself when he admits that, despite having a popular mandate as an MP elected by his constituents, he still did not have enough spine to stand-up to a bunch of recent Harvard grads who've never suffered the indignity of working a "real job" for a single day of their lives?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ottawa_Centrist Ottawa_Centrist

    So the short version… unelected partisan people having more power than elected MPs is only OK if the people aren't young partisans.

    GET OFF MY LAWN

  • Holly Stick

    Russell Ullyatt the leaker appears to be one of the Young Jurks.
    http://www.cbc.ca/politics/insidepolitics/2010/11…

  • Emily

    Well, that explains the primitive caveman ook-ook nature of our politics, not to mention the inability to foresee consequences.

    Whose idea was it to let children run the country anyway?

  • Fido

    Mike Harris in Ontario circa 1995?

  • Guest

    It's partly due to the waves of incoming/outgoing governments, perhaps. For example, the Tories hired a bunch of youngsters, including many young Conservatives and ADQ youth upon getting elected; the Liberals lost a lot of more mature staff after 2006 due to retirement and hired a lot of younger people. Being a staffer is seen by many as a route to better things, not a career move. The salaries for some of the MA jobs are pretty low, and I don't know if the NDP staffers–the only unionized ones–are much better, on average.
    Just think: an example of a former staffer (to Stockwell Day) in the House right now is…Pierre Poilievre. Doesn't that just fill you with confidence for the future?

  • PeterboroDave

    We did, Em, we did.

    Isn't it time for a "None of the Above" law in Canada? If None of the Above wins, then all parties contesting the election are forced to either a) put up another candidate, or b) withdraw from the riding. If the choice is b, then a list of independent candidates are put forward. Anyone want to add to this idea?

    Yes this will cost a ton of dough to run, but to me elections are worth the money, like police and fire services.

  • ezekiel

    By the way, you recall a few years back when one of the constant criticisms Libs and their media shills were making was that the Tories…. DIDN'T HAVE A YOUTH WING! OMG!!! They harped on about this constantly. But now you have to have those same shills writing blog posts with insulting headlines about "children", because OMG their are "young people" who are obnoxious prats like most young people who are political geeks, but these brats aren't on Wheery's side, so now the insulting headlines come out, and the "oh, gee, where is your youth wing, you disgusting old Tories" line goes away. What a bunch of hypocritical hacks Wheery and his kind are.

  • Emily

    No one has mentioned the Con party at all in this. It's Parliament in general, and a recent occurance as that.

    You are railing against an argument that hasn't been made….a straw man.

  • Greg

    Yup. Mike Harris, 1995.

  • McC_

    Wherry wasn't writing this column/blog back when the Liberals were in power.

  • andrew

    Why can't, or won't, you spell his name right? And just what is wrong with fudge-packing that you use it thusly, along side "dope-smoking"? And how do you know that the object of your derision does either?

  • ezekiel

    What's wrong with "dope-smoking" that you use it thusly? I was just coming up with the sorts of issues that Lib Media types liked to shut down conversation on by saying "well, young people think…" as if that ever settled anything. And if you have some objection to florid language, methinks you'd have some problems with young people. As for "his" name, I'm certainly sorry for mispelling it, a;nd will refrain from mentioning "him" directly again in order to avoid repeat offense but as you can see from many of my typos, it's the least of my typos.

  • jmw

    Yup, sure does, but then I happen to agree with his point of view. I think he' a very sharp cookie. Obviously, you don't.

From Macleans