Jason Kenney: Harper's secret weapon

How he’s reinventing the Conservative party

by Paul Wells on Monday, November 29, 2010 1:00pm - 161 Comments
Harper's secret weapon

Early on, Harper and Kenney agreed new Canadians were the future of their party | Photography Blair Gable

“So in May of 2006 I head out to Vancouver,” Jason Kenney said the other day in his office under the rafters of Parliament’s East Block. “I’m trying to find someone in the Canadian Korean community out in Vancouver to talk to.”

Back then, in the early days of the Conservative government, Kenney had just been named Stephen Harper’s caucus envoy in charge of outreach to ethnic minority communities. It didn’t seem like much of a consolation prize for the ambitious Calgary MP who had been left out of Harper’s first cabinet.

His Vancouver foraging expedition led to a round table with a half-dozen Vancouver Korean community leaders. “The grandee of the community says to me, ‘Why should we even be here? We’ve always heard that you Conservatives are racist and anti-immigrant.’ ”

This did not unduly rattle Kenney. He’d heard this sort of accusation so often he had an answer ready. He listed the achievements of past Progressive Conservative governments. Brian Mulroney tripled immigration levels. Joe Clark set up a special program to welcome the Vietnamese boat people. John Diefenbaker eliminated racial and country-of-origin considerations in the immigration system.

“But then I said, ‘Now let me turn this question back on you. You’re a community with famously conservative values. Incredibly hard-working. Entrepreneurial, devotion to family, intolerant to criminality. These sound like our values. Conservative values.’ ” Why, he asked, weren’t Korean Canadians already turning to the Conservatives?

“One of the guys around the table was the president, believe it or not, of something called the Korean Canadian Evangelical NDP Small Businessmen’s Association. My jaw just about hit the floor. It sounded like the association of the hens for the fox, right?”

What had happened, the guy said, was that when a lot of Koreans settled in Burnaby, B.C., in 1972, there was a New Democrat MP who was simply good at showing up to churches and community events. He helped people with their immigration case files. People got to know him. So when that MP retired and his constituency assistant who’d worked on immigration files inherited the NDP nomination, the Korean evangelical businessmen gave her their support. And so on ever after.

“Thirty-five years of voting history established by a relationship!” Kenney said now, still marvelling. “And the light went off for me. How incredibly important relationships are. It’s blindingly obvious, but for newcomers those initial relationships that they establish are hugely important.”

So Kenney set about establishing relationships. That 2006 round table with Koreans in Vancouver has been repeated hundreds of times in dozens of ethnic and religious communities. From caucus envoy without portfolio, Kenney became Harper’s secretary of state for multiculturalism and Canadian identity and, two years ago, Canada’s minister for citizenship, immigration and multiculturalism. In every role he has led the Conservatives’ attempts to recast themselves as a party of immigration. By the 2008 election, the effort had already paid measurable dividends that were crucial to the party’s growing success. And in 2008, Kenney was barely getting started.

“One of the things that always perplexed me,” he told Maclean’s, “is that the Mulroney government ran the most, quote, ‘progressive’ immigration policy in Canadian history.” Over his nine years in office, Mulroney tripled immigration levels from 85,000 in 1983 to more than 260,000. “He brought in the Multiculturalism Act. He brought in more generous family reunification policies, which are the most popular element of immigration policy. Entire communities were founded under Brian Mulroney, like the Hong Kong immigrants pre-’97 who came in through a special investor program.”

And yet. “Why didn’t it translate into a durable coalition reflecting newcomers to Canada? After all of that, you know, is that all there is? There was virtually no durable support for the PCs among those communities to whom it reached out so aggressively. I gather that Brian Mulroney once told his caucus that the Hong Kong immigrants were going to be ‘our Italians.’ Didn’t turn out that way. We’ve done a lot of thinking about why that is.”

To simplify, Kenney decided it comes down to those personal relationships—to showing up and breaking bread. “While arguably the Mulroney PCs got it right in a political sense, at 30,000 feet, they weren’t on the ground. I suspect you didn’t see a lot of guys like Don Blenkarn and Michael Wilson”—consummate ’80s Toronto Bay Street Tories—“going to the kind of events that I do every weekend.”

Kenney’s Twitter feed chronicles an exhausting life of dinners and receptions, a lifestyle that made his former colleague Rahim Jaffer call him the “minister for curry in a hurry.” Kenney is not married. He keeps winning his Calgary Southeast riding with more than 70 per cent of the vote. He can afford to spend more time on the road than most MPs. He seems to be everywhere at once.

Bookmark and Share
  • pdpd

    "reinforcements arriving by the planeload"

    Couldn't quite bring yourself to say "boatload," could you?

  • Jonathan the Bold

    "For much of my adult life I tended to vote Progressive Conservative. In Kingston, Flora MacDonald did a great job representing our interests, so it was a clear choice for me. However, when Peter Mckay betrayed the Party and made a deal with the devil to merge us with the Reform/Alliance; I opted out. In 2004 and 2006, I voted NDP, and still have a great deal of respect for the Party and it's leader. However, if we really want to get this new Conservative Party out of office, before they totally destroy our integrity, I have to now back the party with the best chance of doing that. The Liberal Party of Canada. I am a Baby Boomer, having grown up through many periods of social upheavel. However, I believe that as a nation we have moved forward and I can no longer simply sit back and watch it be destroyed."

    Are you Crazy Emily Dee of Kingston?

    • Emily

      Never lived in Kingston, never voted NDP, my name isn't really Emily.

      But she sounds like an intelligent woman.

    • Tybalt

      Just a hint, kid. It's not polite to try to out people who are using their anonymity in a respectful and respectable way.

      • Blue

        I don`t think you know Emily.

        • Emily

          LOL oh you're just grumpy because I disagree with you.

          It's like I'm not entitled to an opinion of my own

  • SamDavies

    If the opposition is serious about stopping the Kenney threat, they better bring about "Operation Cupid"…

    • Orson Bean

      Time for Belinda Stronach or Ruby Dhalla to take one for the team.

      • SamDavies

        Claudia (from above) seems rather charmed by him. We simply need to talk her into seducing him… ;)

        • Claudia Lemire

          I am game, but my biggest crush it's my beloved Andrew Coyne, what can I say!! I like them opinionated, and with good music taste : )

          • SamDavies

            Do you have an attractive male friend that can act as a "wing man", or with whom you can switch and be "wing girl" (in case he does play for the other team)? "Operation Cupid" must take all contingencies into account!

            Alas, my respect for Coyne is dropping, as I have not been able to get him to respond to the concerns I addressed pertaining to skipping telecom related stories. I'm not a reporter, and nor am I employed within telecom (so as to have a direct stake in the manner). I'm just a regular reader who enjoys the content here, and wanted clarification on this matter. I have no problems with hearing his opinion on things, but he simply opted to ignore. Doesn't he occasionally mock Harper for ducking out like that?

          • Claudia Lemire

            Ha, I do have a couple of very attractive friends.

            About Coyne, I don"t know what to say, in the past they haven't mentioned stories that I have thought were important or relevant, I still love him though!

          • Claudia Lemire

            Oh, SamDavies wish you good luck, I hope you get an answer, I was just giving a quick glimpse to the bill, will read it tonight at home!

      • John D

        I think they are on the wrong team to be successful in that mission. You'd have to send in Brison.

        • SamDavies

          Just in case, "Operation Cupid" should definitely consider sending in some seductive sausage…

  • kcm

    Perhaps what the libs need to do [ maybe the left generally] is to work [ much much harder] at getting the youth vote out ; particular as they are losing their traditional grip on the ethnic vote. This would require something close to what Obama pulled off. I doubt if Ignatieff's the man for this job.
    I too applaud Kenny's efforts. Bringing minorities into the mainstream of Canada's political ilfe will benefit us all. Although i predict it's the CpoC that will be the ones changed.

  • Ethnic Minority

    I don't know where conservatives got the idea that visible minorities are dumb enough to vote for them for just showing up to OUR community events…. Toronto is full of visible minorities, I suggest you try your theory here!. See if you could get a single seat within the city of Toronto ? hehehe.

  • Trass D

    When he said that all good values are Conservative values. By deductive reasoning (don't strain yourself) if you don't have Conservative values you have bad values.

  • Lionel

    I'm an ethnic minority that believes in what Kenney is saying when asking about the values of those from most ethnic backgrounds, and whether or not their values are in line with conservative principles.

    I would argue that when it comes to societal moral fiber, many ethnic minorities tend to fall more on the small "c" conservative side of the spectrum than the more liberal western ideologies of "freedom". In exploring the limits of freedom, what we have seen in the western world is a deterioration of basic standards of decency, as well as a significant loss of traditional values, and the basic premise of respect.

    "Freedom" says everything is OK, but in a natural state, not everything is OK. There is what is right, and what is wrong. Our western views accept everything as right, and this is simply wrong. When it comes to issues such as same-sex marriage, abortion, and drug laws, most ethnic minorities would fall onto the right side of the spectrum.

    One of the reasons my family voted Liberal for the longest time is because they believed the Liberal party was the party of immigrants. This may be a direct result of 2.5 million immigrants flooding into the country between 1991-2000, when for the majority of that period, the Liberals were in government. However, when truly evaluating the principles each political party steadfastly supports, immigrants would be more inclined to vote w/ the CPC on the majority of social issues.

    Also, in regards to Bruce's comment in regards to immigrants paying less taxes than they reap benefits for, please, I advise you to do your research. Often, in most cases, legal immigrants end up paying much more in taxes over the course of their lifetime than a Canadian born citizen. You can refer to the study below for more information on this.
    http://economics.ca/cgi/jab?journal=cpp&view=…

    • Claudia Lemire

      Well said!!

  • Allan Wood

    An interesting look into the day of Minister Kenney. His hard work seems to be paying out as evidenced by the results in Vaughan's by-election. His characterization that most new immigrants share conservative values is spot on. Traditional values such as religion, family, work ethic and ant-crime are truly reflected in our new Canadians. Will this ultimately be the new voting block for the Conservative Party will only be revealed in the next Federal election.

    • Phil_King

      Yeah it had nothing to do with Fantino being a highly recognizable candidate of Italian descent is a mostly Italian riding eh?

      (eye roll)

      • Patchouli

        Phil, the real fun starts when Fantino decides to hold his own press conferences and say what he thinks instead of delivering talking points. I don't think this guy is going to be a Muzzled Peon — I think he might end up being harper's worst nightmare.

  • Phil_King

    It just goes to show how pathetic this crop of politicians really are when Jason Kenney of all people is touted as a "secret weapon".

    It's also quite telling when the best way you can think of selling your party is to rely on the accomplishments of a party you openly hated before destroying and cannibalizing its members.

  • SMCG

    Kenny is a master of insults — I am still smarting from his comments about KAIROS. As an adherent of the United Church of Canada, I am because my church supported KAIROS, an anti-semetic. Nothing this man does impresses me one iota. SMCG

  • Mike T.

    I recall how gleeful conservatives claimed they were going to sink gay marriage by turning ethnic minorities against gay minorities.

    I hope that if they are successful in playing to shallow stereotypes, the next generation resents them for it.

    • hosertohoosier

      I'd say it would be reasonable to expect that message to resonate with New Canadians:

      Support for gay marriage among Canadians born outside Canada (2004 Canadian election survey)
      Support: 22.2%
      Oppose: 46.5%
      No opinion/not sure: 31.3%

  • TayRuong

    That's the most cockeyed piece of analysis I've seen for a while. Harper gave to one man both the job of mustering the immigrant community for the CPC and running the immigration department. This sounds like something you do to a rival that you want to sideline — or maybe Harper is not such a bright light after all.

    If the ethnic communities muster to the CPC it will be despite Kenney, not because of him. But you have to admit that everyone loves the man and he tries hard.

  • Elbrus

    Added bonus for Harper is that he looks taller and thinner when he stands next to the short and tubby Kenney.

  • Tripp

    So let me get this right. You visit various immigrant "communities" (guess they didn't integrate), promise to bring in hundreds of thousands of their family members each year, until the indigenous population is overwhelmed by foreigners and you are a "secret weapon"? Sounds like a weapon of mass destruction. Maybe some First Nations could speak to that.

  • Jon

    My favourite part of this is that it took an MP with essentially no mandate to create the most aggressive and progressive tactic the Harper Conservatives have had, and he did it without the approval, input, or guidance of Steve.
    Whether or not you like the Cons, and I don't, you have to be impressed by Kennedy. A very smart approach to this situation and one more straw on the Liberal camels back.

  • SMcCabe

    I lost all respect for this man when he and others withdrew funding for KAIROS because those who supported it were considered anti-semetic. I have attended the United Church for nearly seventy years, and I don't hate anyone of the Jewish religion. I am no fan of Mr. Kenney, and no matter how great the Conservative party thinks he is, I would never support him.

  • Orson Bean

    Thanks for the article, Paul, there was some interesting stuff in there. Regarding that shift of the immigrant/visible minority vote from the Liberals to the CPC: I think it shows that for a long time, Liberals thought that their considerable lead among that demographic had to do with "Liberal values" etc. But actually, it may have had more to do simply with the fact that the Liberals were (almost perpetually back then) the party in power. Immigrant and visible minority voters are as practical and pragamatic as anyone else — there's not much point, from their perspective, in supporting an opposition party. Only the party in power can deliver the goods.

  • Nuckman

    Good for Kenney (and the Conservative party). The only problem I see is whether these new visible minority recruits will ever be accepted by the Conservative party membership which constantly rails against immigrants, immigration and multiculturalism. Sure, they'll accept their votes…they just won't accept them.

  • Orson Bean

    I think Kenny's goal is to have so many visible minorities become part of the Conservative Party membership that the problem that you write about will become, practically speaking, impossible.

  • Maps

    Hey Nuckman… care to guess which party has the most visible minorities as MP's???? By a LONG shot? It's that Conservative Party you just said craps all over immigrants…. funny how that it that those visible minorities manage to get elected by those very party members you say rails against them. Could it be that perhaps the immigrants have the same issues with our immigration system and multiculturalism as we do – hint, it's those pesky queue jumpers that has everyone torqued…

  • Stewart_Smith

    I think there is no question that Kenney operates on a higher strategic ground than most of his colleagues (and on a much longer timescale than his boss). Indeed, Kenney is winning the Conservatives points within ethnic communities in exactly the right way. (On this file, the Conservative message is generally positive and honest.) Kenney's challenge is that the Conservative party is still home to Vic Toews and his ilk whose voices tend to be louder at critical times. The Conservative party is also the natural home to those who are threatened by women in scarves, who equate certain religions with terrorism etc.

    If the Conservatives do gain a majority in the foreseeable future, it will have more to do with Kenney's vision and persistence than Harper's guile or Baird's cleverness. If it does happen, I hope that Claudia (above) is correct and Kenney takes the reins. I suspect I could even vote Conservative again with a clear conscience.

  • Tybalt

    I'm actually not sure that the Conservative Party *is* the natural home to those who are threatened by headscarves, imaginary terrorists in mosques, or have other delusional pastimes. I don't think their natural home is in any other major party either (maybe the Bloquistes, in Quebec).

    I think in Canada especially, their natural home is outside a center-right mass-appeal party, which is what I see the Conservatives as trying to become. And I think if there are enough gains to be made in the centre, with new Canadians, and with other traditionally non-Conservative demographics, the fire-breathers may find themselves squeezed out. If a Grand Coalition isn't possible (so far it's not ruled out, but I think there's a fundamental tension that will blow up eventually) then I think eventually it won't be the center and special interests who will be squeezed out. It will be the far right edge.

    And that, I suspect will make the Conservatives even more popular in the centre.

  • Dee

    I agree up to a point, some immigrants are looking for a left leaning centrist.

    Kenney's new immigration bill won't be popular in some circles.

From Macleans