Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

Rights and Democracy: an odd cameo appearance

by Paul Wells on Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:11pm - 47 Comments

Remember the great old days when the entire cast of Homicide: Life on the Streets would suddenly appear, in character, in an episode of Law and Order? Geek heaven. That’s how I felt last week when I saw a fascinating bit of testimony from the much-noted Nov. 23 meeting of the Commons Government Operations committee.

That was the meeting at which construction-company boss Paul Sauvé testified that he received a $9 million contract to renovate Parliament’s West Block after he paid $140,000 to Gilles Varin, who knew people in the Conservative party. Here’s the key bit from a PostMedia account of that testimony:

“Varin was suggested to us strongly as a man who had strong connections with the Conservative government and that was the go-to-guy for this type of small-cap infrastructure spending contracts,” Sauve told the government operations and estimates committee in the House of Commons. “So yes, because we paid, we received.”

He goes on to suggest all sorts of links between the construction business and organized crime in Quebec, which I know will come as profoundly saddening news to Maclean’s readers and/or Members of Parliament. But where it gets really interesting for followers of the endless Rights and Democracy saga is when Liberal MP Geoff Regan notices the passive voice in the quote above (“Varin was suggested to us strongly…”) and decides to tug at that thread:

Hon. Geoff Regan: Thank you.

Who told you that you should go to see Mr. Varin because he was the guy to see?

Mr. Paul Sauvé: We had a board member called Claude Sarrazin, who was a Conservative, I believe, at least in spirit, who requested us to contact Gilles Varin, and brought him to my attention, to my office.

Hon. Geoff Regan: Now, in terms of where the money went, would Mr. Sarrazin have gotten any of the money you paid?

Mr. Paul Sauvé: No. Board members at that time were paid an honorarium for their attendance at our different board functions over the year, but I do not believe it was part and parcel of those payments.

Gracious. Could that be the same Claude Sarrazin who runs a private-eye company called Groupe Sirco and who was called in after a break-in at Rights and Democracy in January to — well, whatever he was called in to do, it wasn’t explained to R&D employees who were questioned in his presence, and his contract to do this work was awarded without tender, and the new R&D board later voted after the fact to loosen the organization’s internal rules regarding tender for contracts,  and Sirco’s report will be one of two long-awaited reports the Foreign Affairs Committee hopes to receive within 10 days?

Worry no longer. Regan asked that question at his next opportunity.

Hon. Geoff Regan: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Mr. Sauvé, you mentioned Mr. Claude Sarrazin, who is on the board of directors of LM Sauvé. Is that the same Claude Sarrazin who is the president of SIRCO Investigation and Protection?

Mr. Paul Sauvé: Yes, it is, sir.

Hmm.

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share
  • PeteTong

    How can I get me some of this pork!

    • wmabey

      Donate to the Tories, apparently.

      • burlivespipe

        Just wait until you've got their contract signed before stealing their flagrantly expensive jacket, tho.

  • kcm

    Untendered contracts seems to be a fast becoming trend with this govt…oh well, i guess you've got to do what you've got to do, when you're on a mission to realign Canada in the moral universe.

  • http://www.translucid.ca/site/flacklife-the-translucid-blog/ bobledrew

    We're through the looking glass here people.

  • Patchouli

    Excellent work, Paul Wells! You are doing a terrific job exposing these connections of corruption, and very nearly single-handedly.

  • lannable@hotmail.com

    But how are they getting away with this? You must hit harder, put it on the front page. A man died over this malious action.

  • MostlyCivil

    Me, I'm still betting on the Christmas break swallowing this all up again. Not that I'm cynical.

  • Passing by

    I've been surprised how disciplined the bureaucracy is, even under an abusive, scoff law government like the one we have now, one that feels no particular need to follow laws it doesn't like, or disclose anything other than talking points.

    Maybe WikiLeaks is a game-changer, and federal bureaucrats will start leaking like there's no tomorrow. Maybe they can do the job that so few in the media — other than Mr. Wells and a handful of others — want to do.

  • madeyoulook

    I am pretty sure Dot is profoundly saddened, Paul.

  • Inkless

    Let's point out a few things, of a perhaps exculpatory nature.

    First, Sauvé (the guy) says Sarrazin received no payment for putting LM Sauvé (the company) in touch with Varin.

    Second, it's hardly likely that between the break-in at R&D and the arrival of Sarrazin at the R&D offices, Gauthier called the PMO and said, "I need a private eye! Ideally, one who was up to his neck in the Sauvé contract for West Block!" It seems entirely plausible that Sarrazin's hiring was coincidental.

    As for the tens of thousands of dollars worth of work that fell into his lap without Sarrazin's having to compete for it, well, jthat was ust his lucky day, for all I know. Gauthier was, at that time, hosing taxpayer money around like a drunken fireman, and just by the law of averages, some of it was as likely to land on Sarrazin as on anyone within a 50-mile radius of the Rights and Democracy office.

    So there are all kinds of explanations for all this. Just because the guy got a lot of cash after steering a construction company to a party bagman/fixer doesn't prove a link. Correlation isn't causation.

    This is probably just a little parable about the company people keep. Here's another.

    After the board of Ontario's energy utility, Hydro One, fired its President and CEO Eleanor Clitheroe in 2002 for using company credit cards for personal expenses, and obtaining club memberships and home renovations on the utility's dime, she spent four years as counsel with Gauthier & Associates, a Toronto law firm. Today she is a Senior Fellow at the Cardus Centre for Cultural Renewal. The Cardus Centre for Cultural Renewal was known simply as "the Cardus" until April, when it merged with the Centre for Cultural Renewal.

    The principal at Gauthier & Associates is Jacques Gauthier, vice-chair of Rights and Democracy, who hired Claude Sarrazin. He also hired Peter Stockland of Prima Communication (without tender) to do communications work for Rights and Democracy. Stockland's other hat was as president of the Centre for Cultural Renewal — until it merged in April with The Cardus, whose president was, and remains, Michael Van Pelt, who is also on the Rights and Democracy board.

    Dizzy yet?

    • madeyoulook

      Sauvé (the guy) says Sarrazin received no payment for putting LM Sauvé (the company) in touch with Varin.

      Presumably, "no payment" means "from Sauvé," for that is all he might know enough about to testify to. Which makes some amount of sense, because that would have been a kickforward. What we do not know is whether any portion of $ that made it to Varin (or beyond) might have become a "referral appreciation payment" in the more traditional kickback direction. Fine print: This latest supposition, I immediately hasten to add, is 150% conjecture in the absence of any evidence, and may be discounted immediately on this basis alone.

      • madeyoulook

        Although, if I have been following correctly, I suppose Sauvé could have been in a position to kickback to Sarrazin in appreciation for the contract, and Varin could have been in a position to kickback to Sarrazin in appreciation of the original (alleged!) bribe to / through Varin.

        So, yes, I am dizzy.

    • wellwell

      You're illustrating the old adage that Canada is a village of 200 people (i.e. those who matter at any given time). It's a good idea from a journalistic and democratic standpoint to keep tabs on those people.

    • PeteTong

      mmmmhhhh pork so tasty.

    • s_c_f

      There is way too much patronage, favors, scratch-my-back and I'll scratch yours, rich people doing favours for other rich people, and that sort of behaviour going on. If it smells like corruption…

    • Guest

      Not quite sure what you're insinuating, Paul. Barring nefarious and criminal intentions, which I am SURE you would never imply strongly enough and risk libelling yourself, what you're explaining is that people who work well with one another, who have a similar vision, who have respect for one another's abilities, would NEVER even think of solidifying their work relationships and/or merging business organizations. (Maclean-Hunter, anyone?) Just what ARE you saying? Or is drawing inconclusive links and pointing out correlations all Maclean's and Paul Wells does anymore?

    • gravedigger

      I'm reading back on all of this (since its coming back on top) and all seems nice and well altough i cant realy understand what mr latulipe said in his testimony other then he doesnt want to go into the sirco report and tiptoes around the bushes on that one….and to my great surprise even kady didnt pick up on that one…i'm getting the feeling that theyre is much more to this whole affair then meets the eye? or not.

  • Guest

    Wow.

  • BGLong

    Still …. clearly a case for the modern Sherlock.

  • danby

    Sadly though, Stephen Harper is no Paul Martin.

    Cue the shovels.

  • canstud

    @Paul Wells.

    First of all, thank-you for following this story. I hope you publish all of this in one big article when (if) it ends.

    Second, get a facebook page. Please.

    • SamDavies

      Looks like someone want to poke PW. ;)

      • Claudia Lemire

        Hahaha, or superpoke ; )

    • DBM

      Really, PW -

      How will we ever follow you if not on facebook?

  • Halo_Override

    Makes it rather tempting to suggest that perhaps the main difference between this government's discreet largesse and that of the Liberals is that the latter were also saving Canada at the time. I'll do my best to resist such glib fancies.

  • maureen1955

    I'm concerned, but until I see the envelop stuffed with cash (as with the LPC) this is nothing but stuff to fill up the media pages. And maybe the media could still follow up on the envelop stuffed with cash and Chretien's role in the whole mess.

    • danby

      Envelopes? Cash? Mulroney?

      • Claudia Lemire

        Whaaat, Mulroney?? Never, he would never, his father's good name would never be tarnished that way….

  • Zamprelli

    Wow. Whatever province these guys are in sounds like it might be the most corrupt in the country.

    • kcm

      PEI…i hear rumours they might be next on the Maclean's 'hit list.

  • Dizzy Spin

    Paul – Didn't you work for Ken Whyte at the Post before he was fired there? And didn't Ken Whyte hire you to work at Maclean's after he got fired by the Post? And isn't Ken Whyte friends with Conrad Black who WENT TO JAIL for fraud and obstruction of justice? So doesn't that mean that a guy you worked for who was fired and is friends with a convicted criminal HiRED YOU to work for him? Whooooooo-hoooooo, scary stuff, Paul. Get off your arse and start doing real reporting again.

    • Inkless

      It's amazing how upset anonymous people can get about two paragraphs in a blog comment.

      Oh, and Ken started working at Maclean's two years after I did.

      • AnotherAnonymous

        Good point (your first). Blogs are not worth the paper they're (not) printed on.

  • wellwell

    Time to update your organizational flowchart again, Paul.

    Imagine if the Conservatives were allowed to do everthing they wished. We'd be living in Pottersville right now!

  • Crit_Reasoning

    From Claude Sazzarin's LinkedIn profile:

    never one to stay at a desk for too long, i manage a highly professional group of investigators, and also perform my own cases with clients, strategic security and investigations is my forte.

    Finding solutions, is our mission.

    http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/claude-a-sarrazin/7/5a…

    If telling Paul Sauvé to contact Gilles Varin and exacerbating the board/employee tensions at R&D are examples of the "solutions" that Claude Sarrazin provides, then I'd say it's time for him to find a new line of work.

    Preferably, one that has nothing whatsoever to do with government agencies, infrastructure contracts, or anything else that involves taxpayer dollars.

  • Jenn_

    Good find, Crit. The key there is 'strategic' security. What the hell does that even mean in the not-conspiracy-theory world? Nothing, that's what. Which leaves us with a conspiracy theory, doesn't it?

  • Crit_Reasoning

    Thanks, Jenn! I have to admit it wasn't that good a find, though – it was the first thing that came up when googled him. ;-)

    Sazzarin's connection to both stories is certainly intriguing, but it doesn't necessarily point to a conspiracy. He almost seems like a character in a movie–one of those archetypal shadowy "fixers" with a finger in every pot and lots of connections. There's something about behind-the-scenes Quebec politics that has always seemed really "old school" to me, where's it's all about cronyism and backroom wheeling and dealing. Who knows? It could also be a coincidence, because there's no logical connection between the two stories aside from the fact that they're both in Quebec.

  • Orson Bean

    Still, I'm reminded of Stevie Cameron's book Behind Closed Doors — I don't think it was coincidental that most of the examples of corruption she trotted out in that book (which purported to be about Canada) happened to originate from, umm, Quebec.

  • Jenn_

    Well, sure, I'd buy that, except for the "strategic security" thing. Please explain to me what that means if it means something other than a plausible deniability kind of thing.

  • SamDavies

    If only his profile had video – I bet he has shifty eyes! ;)

  • Inkless

    Nonsense. He's "beau à figer le sang" (blood-curdlingly handsome) according to this celebrity gossip column from 2008. That's him between Max Bernier and Liz Hurley:
    http://www.michelgirouard.net/chroniques/2008/ind…

  • SamDavies

    Correction – Looks like he's got sexy eyes. With that said though, they could be sexy shifty eyes, non? Only video could confirm/rebuke such useless and fanciful suspicions… Is it possible for handsome men to have shifty eyes? This could be sitcom material…

  • Patchouli

    "Blood-curdingly handsome." I love that description, although his photo is actually kind of blandly handsome.

  • kcm

    What a nasty incestuous little town Ottawa can sometimes be…it's a relief to know SH's still full committed to cleaning the place up.

  • Guest

    All very interesting. It just speaks volumes to the credibility of these R & D Board members who had vowed to clean the place up. Seems that R & D Board members have been in the news a lot recently…Here is an article about David Matas' work: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/life/Doubts+cast+org…

  • kcm

    So much for Matas' credibility.

    Hey Dot you might want to have a boo at this!

From Macleans