Nothing to fear but WiFi and fluoride

The tinfoil hat is now thoroughly mainstream garb

by Andrew Potter on Monday, December 13, 2010 9:00am - 102 Comments
Nothing to fear but wifi and fluoride and . . . 

Steve Cole/Getty Images

As the cholera outbreak in Haiti continues to worsen, the population is getting increasingly desperate. In some areas, mobs have embarked on genuine witch hunts, attacking people accused of using black magic to deliberately spread the disease. At least 12 people suspected of being witches were stoned or hacked to death last week, their corpses dragged into the street and burned.

Haiti’s descent into superstition in the face of chaos might afford us a few drops of condescension to mix with our pity at the country’s fate. But it bears keeping in mind that when it comes to confronting fears, Canadians are no less prone to fits of magical thinking.

For example, back in October, parents at an elementary school in Ontario voted overwhelmingly to ban WiFi in the classroom*. Were the parents concerned that surfing the Net during class might be bad for learning? No, they were reacting to symptoms reported by their kids that included dizziness, nausea, and headaches, and which mysteriously disappeared on weekends and holidays. Deftly elbowing past the obvious explanation—going to school makes most kids want to barf—parents concluded that the in-school wireless must be to blame. And so out went the Internet routers, despite assurances from the province’s chief medical officer that they posed absolutely no threat to students.

Then, at the end of November, the Waterloo regional council voted to stop the 43-year practice of adding fluoride to the municipal drinking water, after two local residents complained that it was making them sick. Forget the fact that the only known side effect from water fluoridation—from too-high fluoride levels, specifically—is something called dental fluorosis, a.k.a. stained teeth, and that the ban was implemented despite strong opposition from the very people who stand to benefit most from the ban, namely, local dentists. Waterloo residents are now revealed as the Birthers of dental hygiene, sticking to their thesis precisely because it is so implausible.

And just last week, a small Okanagan fruit company announced that it would seek approval from U.S. regulators for its new “arctic” apple. The apple’s principal selling point is that it doesn’t turn brown when exposed to the air, which led consumer groups to immediately denounce it as “the botox apple.” Ignore that nothing had been added or injected into the apple; the company simply figured out how to switch off the gene that produces the browning enzyme.

Anyway, these are only the latest additions to what is becoming a lengthy and persistent list of public fears. A few weeks ago, the World Health Organization released a report that concluded that Canada’s lonely crusade against bisphenol-A (we were the first country to ban it) is at best “premature,” given there is very little evidence that it is harmful to humans. And then there are the familiar fears over cancer-causing cellphones, autism-causing vaccines, and the Frankenstein’s monster that is genetically modified food, which serve as the background radiation of intellectual discourse in this country’s conversation, frying every attempt at rational thought.

These cases have three things in common. First, they are all fears directed at technologies or policies with a clear public benefit. Second, the worry is always about some invisible or undetectable feature of our micro-environment, the alleged negative effects conjured out of radio waves, parts-per-billion, and statistical anomalies. And finally, the strong public resistance to these activities takes place not despite official statements that they are completely safe, but in many cases because of those assurances. In short, the tinfoil hat that was once the mark of the conspiracy theorist and the anti-state paranoiac is now thoroughly mainstream garb.

It is customary to blame the media for peddling hysteria and alarm, and there’s something to that. Politicians have to take some of the blame as well—they happily jump on any passing craze if there looks to be an electoral advantage in it. But both the media and politicians are merely playing to the crowd, happy to exploit our fears. They don’t actually create these fears, and while some researchers have proposed that our extreme risk-aversion has biological roots—only the ape that was afraid of everything managed to survive on the African savannah—our malaise actually stems from a deep-seated distrust of modernity itself.

Sometimes it seems that every society has a fixed “fear budget” to devote to things worth worrying about. In Haiti, the fear over cholera is very real, and the scapegoating of innocent citizens as witches only compounds the tragedy. But in a rich, safe, and supposedly enlightened country like Canada, we have nothing worth spending our fear budget on. Instead, we’ve developed what looks like a sort of public safety autoimmune disorder, where our anxieties are increasingly directed at the technologies, the medicines, and the markets that are the basis of civilization.

Humans may never be able to fully escape the temptation of magical thinking. But where the gangs stalking the streets of Chambellan or Jeremie are at least trying to exorcise something genuinely horrific from their midst, our own superstition here in Canada is all the more pathetic for being directed at the very source of our good fortune.

*****

*CLARIFICATION: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated the classroom WiFi had been shut off.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://ffo-olf.org/ Richard Hudon

    Over 90% of the valid science in the last 30 years and all of the science in the years prior to the fluoridation mania have all shown that fluoride compounds are detrimental to health. If teeth are harmed by ingestion of fluoride substances, i.e. fluorosis, then much more so the rest of our human anatomy. It's just not so obvious because of the immense capacity of of our body's resilience to adverse toxic ingestion. Check out this web page http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/ and see the plethora of references that point to the truth on the dangers of fluorides to health and well being. As one whose health has been terribly damaged by chronic fluoride poising over the years, I can attest to the fact that stopping most of this ingestion has allowed me to regain my health and well being. This is then an indisputable fact.

    • http://www.translucid.ca/site/flacklife-the-translucid-blog/ bobledrew

      And the systematic review of something like 220 studies published in 2000 in the BMJ concluded:

      "Given the level of interest surrounding the issue of public water fluoridation, it is surprising to find that little high quality research has been undertaken. As such, this review should provide both researchers and commissioners of research with an overview of the methodological limitations of previous research.
      The evidence of a reduction in caries should be considered together with the increased prevalence of dental fluorosis. No clear evidence of other potential negative effects was found. This evidence on positive and negative effects needs to be considered along with the ethical, environmental, ecological, financial, and legal issues that surround any decisions about water fluoridation. Any future research into the safety and efficacy of water fluoridation should be carried out with appropriate methodology to improve the quality of the existing evidence base."

  • Lachlan

    Its Propaganda like this that exist that circulate dissinformation. Every one with half a brain that has not been calcified by Fluride woulds now that is detremental to the pineal gland and has NO dental benifits whatso ever. Also the only cholera that has been spread in Haiti is by the UN! WAKE UP!

    • http://www.translucid.ca/site/flacklife-the-translucid-blog/ bobledrew

      Lachlan, could you provide research that links fluoride to a health effect in humans? The only research I can see is that of Dr. Luke of Surrey. Is that your source?

  • Mitch

    Where has this guy been hiding under a rock, everyone knows Fluoride is poison.

    • http://www.translucid.ca/site/flacklife-the-translucid-blog/ bobledrew

      So is chlorine. So is selenium. So is zinc. So is hydrogen. So is nitrogen. So is Vitamin A. The poison is in the dose.

  • http://www.translucid.ca/site/flacklife-the-translucid-blog/ bobledrew

    What would your assessment be of the systematic review carried out by the UK's York University and published in the BMJ in 2000. Their conclusions:

    "Given the level of interest surrounding the issue of public water fluoridation, it is surprising to find that little high quality research has been undertaken. As such, this review should provide both researchers and commissioners of research with an overview of the methodological limitations of previous research.
    The evidence of a reduction in caries should be considered together with the increased prevalence of dental fluorosis. No clear evidence of other potential negative effects was found. This evidence on positive and negative effects needs to be considered along with the ethical, environmental, ecological, financial, and legal issues that surround any decisions about water fluoridation. Any future research into the safety and efficacy of water fluoridation should be carried out with appropriate methodology to improve the quality of the existing evidence base. "

  • Guest

    having done considerable research myself into the wifi fear craze…the handful of self-proclaimed experts who say it's NOT safe (like Dr. Magda Havas) have as yet only offered "proof" that wouldn't fetch a passing mark at a grade school science fair…it's hooey!

    Do real science be silent

  • Guest

    oops….meant to say do real science OR be silent :-)

  • chiefumtaga

    I looked on pubmed for results of research on fluoride safety and one result I found very credible was from the European Archives of European Dentistry (PMID 19772843). It found there was "…no association between adverse events and water fluoridation."
    Another interesting place to look for credible medical information is on the Quackwatch website.

  • Robert Logan

    "The only known side effect for water fluoridation is dental fluorosis" ?
    Are you kidding me?
    Fluoride has been shown to cause an increase in bone cancer, a lowering of IQ in children, increased Aluminum levels in the brain and brittle bones, among many other things.
    And large studies comparing cities that have fluoridated water to cities that don't have fluoridated water show no difference in tooth decay.
    Populations are swimming in fluoride not only in their water but their food and governments adding it to the water supplies is nothing more than involuntary mass medication.
    It came out in the Neurenburg trials that the Nazis added Fluoride to the water supply in their concentration camps. You can be sure that they did not do this to benefit the prisoners teeth.
    The fluoride waste that is generated in the manufacture of aluminum or phosphate fertilizer is considered a highly toxic industrial waste and it is illegal to dispose of it on land or in water. But apparently if they put it in the drinking supply they it is good for us?
    Water fluoridation is a massive health fraud and its negative effects have been suppressed for decades.
    This article is not journalism, it is garbage.
    There's a little thing called research, absolutely none of that was done here.
    Macleans is a joke.

  • hana

    guys wt do u think the thesis of this article is??

  • Ken

    You got a problem with democracy?

  • Margaret

    There is scientific evidence, apparently, that GMOd food will affect the bacteria in our innards . . changing them.

  • toquer

    Citation please.

  • c_9

    Sometimes. Physics, biology and chemistry are not determined based on popular vote, so maybe scientific decisions in the world deserve better?

  • M_A_D_world

    Having people agree with a unfounded idea only proves the lack of effort at understanding. (ie People are too lazy to learn.)

  • Euphemia

    Yes, actually. If 51% of the population says you ought to die, are they justified in coming for you? "It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried." ~Sir Winston. In view of that wisdom, there ought to be things that are out of the hands of the mob.

  • Iain Martel

    “Since microwave ovens (albeit at much higher wattage) operate at the same frequency, there maybe something to the claims.”
    Lying in the sun all day without sunblock is dangerous. Therefore, I should blow out that candle immediately! After all, the sun and the candle both produce light (albeit at very different wattage).

From Macleans