Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

Seventy-six shoulders strong

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, January 5, 2011 3:23pm - 25 Comments

In his first news conference as a minister of state, Ted Menzies is asked to explain why the ministry is so much larger than it was when the current government first took office and proceeds to offer a number of words in response. For the sake of saving readers some time, I’ll bold the words that seem most relevant to the question.

Well, first of all, I’m honored to be part of this cabinet. Many of us have played a role, a pivotal role, many parliamentary secretaries that don’t have a seat at the cabinet table. We are in some very unique and challenging times right now and the more shoulders behind the wheel that we have, I think, will help us. There has been some many – many challenges we faced. We feel that we have done a good job. We need to stay the course and keep moving towards what Canadians have asked us to do and that is get back to balanced budgets and whether, you know, the numbers  at the cabinet table — we have seen more historically in the past. I don’t think that is as big an issue as the quality that we have there, the strength in this cabinet that are working in unison, as recognized by some of the papers in the U.S. just in the last couple of days. Canada is the envy at getting our fiscal house in order, encouraging new businesses to invest. That is the important thing. We are talking about jobs here today. The more we can do to encourage jobs in Canada, I think the better off we will all be.

Our Andrew Coyne notes that Mackenzie King made it through his challenging times with a ministry of 17. More recently, when Mr. Harper became Prime Minister he named a 27-member ministry (with 26 parliamentary secretaries). He now has a 38-member ministry (with 25 parliamentary secretaries).

The increase in ministry membership seems mostly attributable to the creation of separate minister of state portfolios. At present there are 11, including assignments for sport, foreign affairs, western economic diversification, democratic reform, science and technology, economic development in Quebec, small business and tourism, finance and seniors.

For whatever it’s worth, the parliamentary website lists 32 official departments of government. Two of those—the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario—were created by the Harper government.

Bookmark and Share
  • Emily

    Translation: But there are so many unemployed Cons out there!

    • DBM

      "The more 'we' can do to encourage jobs in Canada, I think the better off 'we' will all be."

      'We', of course, referring to Conservative members and staffers in all cases.

  • sourstud

    Go Canada Go! Those stinking Ruski's don't stand a chance tonight! w00t!

    • jonatwitan

      I'll second that: w00t w00t!

    • Dave

      I hope not. Else, Harper might create a Minister for the State of Canadian Junior Hockey.

      • sourstud

        FU@()#&$(*@&$*(@&$CK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE FU@$*(&$ING NEED IT NOW!!!!!!! ELECTION PLATFORM BLAAARGGGGHHHH!!!!!! :D

    • gottabesaid

      You jinxed them. I blame you. You, sourstud. You.

      • sourstud

        F$^%!!!!!!!!!!!! I take full responsi-F@#%$()%&@*$(*@-bility

        • McC_

          <giving you my special hard stare>

  • NOT a PM but a KING

    A Minister of State is just cronyism … to buy votes … with our money.

    How many ? As many as it takes to but the next election … with our money.

    • sourstud

      So you're against the subsidy for political parties then?

      • BCer in Mtl

        Actually the income tax credit for political contributions is a bigger subsidy, do away with that first

      • NOT a PM but a KING

        The so-called subsidy was put in place when we removed corporate donations in order to better our democracy. KING Harper when in Opposition (and when had less donations for is party) voted for the change.

        If and when the Parties want to debate them, they can.

  • Wascally Wabbit

    What's the point of the window dressing? Harper makes all the decisions anyway!

  • Jon Smyth

    Got to keep dangling the proverbial carrot of getting into cabinet in front of the backbenchers..

  • http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/ Open_Democracy

    What happened to Mr. Harper's "small government"? Canadians have now seen the number of Ministers increase by 42 percent from Mr. Harper's first Cabinet in 2007.

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/

  • non-partisan

    Everyone knows the real cabinet is the plans and priorities committee. Everything else is just for show and to make people feel better about themselves.

  • burlivespipe

    Just a small tith to hold over the future environment ministry farm system until a corporate directors' job opens up. Now that Harper has slashed corporate taxes the CEOs and such are finally able to get their heads above the gold-plated water line…

  • wilfredday

    Despite the Ministry's size, only five of the 38 are from Quebec: 13% is serious under-representation, a bad sign for Canadian unity. Three other Quebec MPs are parliamentary secretaries, omitting only Maxime Bernier, byelection victor Bernard Généreux, and, oddly, the talented Steven Blaney, an environmental engineer who drew my attention last April 20 when he said “I want to remind my colleague that the Bloc Québécois is over-represented here in the House with respect to the percentage of votes in Quebec.” Nice to see a Conservative make the case for proportional representation.

    Blaney is right: if we had a democratic voting system, Quebec Conservative voters would have elected seven more MPs in 2008, and the Bloc 19 fewer. Those seven would have represented Conservative voters in the Greater Montreal area, l'Estrie and Mauricie who are all unrepresented today. And we would have had a cabinet which, like the House, would be a true representation of the country.

  • PeteTong

    The Chief Government Whip is a Minister of State as well.

  • tedbetts

    Conservatives in 2011:

    "the more shoulders behind the wheel that we have, I think, will help us."

    Conservatives in February 2006, introducing a small cabinet:

    "More focus and purpose; less process and cost"

    “It’s a cabinet that’s built for work, not for show."

    “The objective is to enable ministers in the cabinet to do what they promised to do within the constraints of a minority government”

    And this beauty:

    "The aim of a smaller cabinet is to create a system that “encourages informed discussion and clear decisions and discourages procrastination.”

    A larger, fatter cabinet, of course, being just the opposite of all of that.

  • brooster2

    A bigger cabinet and a bloated PMO…these Cons are the epitome of restraint, as long as it applies to everyone else.

  • Heather

    Spoken likea leftie with no hope

  • brooster2

    Not a leftie…a taxpayer (with no hope).

  • NOT a PM but a KING

    In Harperland, we don't need anyone in Cabinet or the House of Commons or the Senate … why pay for any of it … KING Harper knows BEST.

    He is a one man show and the rest are puppets.

From Macleans