How the Conservatives plan to turn a minority into a majority

Doug Finley on Harper’s election playbook

by John Geddes on Tuesday, February 8, 2011 8:37am - 92 Comments
Harper’s playbook

Sean Kilpatrick/CP

From his second-floor office in Parliament’s East Block—once John A. Macdonald’s lair and still appointed with some of his furniture—Sen. Doug Finley has a direct sightline across Wellington Street to Stephen Harper’s office in the Langevin Block. He points out the Prime Minister’s window for a visitor. Asked if they ever wave to one another, Finley deadpans, “Not much.” Neither man is known for his playful gestures.

What they are known for is partnering to reshape the federal political landscape. But that relationship is now changing. Finley, 64, is undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, and is stepping down as Harper’s campaign director. He’ll remain, though, a key adviser to the Tory machine, which he largely assembled and kept oiled for eight years. He recently summed up his role this way: “I’m not the world’s greatest strategist, or the world’s greatest pollster, or the world’s greatest advertising man, but somebody has to pull these bits together.”

That’s a deceptively chipper job description for a notoriously hard-driving party boss. Finley’s few moments in the public spotlight solidified his reputation as a tough customer. He was once ushered out of a House committee room by security, after he showed up at hearings demanding to testify according to his own timetable, refusing to wait to be called. He banished would-be Tory candidates who didn’t meet with his approval. He lashed out at the CBC in a fundraising letter to Conservative supporters.

But in a rare interview with Maclean’s last week, Finley sounded like the methodical backroom organizer Tory insiders talk of in awestruck tones, rather than the intimidating figure who occasionally emerged to brief bursts of media attention. He sketched a road map to majority that the party will surely try to follow in the next election.

His starting point is elementary election arithmetic. Of the 308 seats in the House, each of the Conservative, Liberal, NDP and Bloc Québécois parties, he reckons, can reasonably be allocated about 40 seats at the outset of a campaign. That leaves just 148 up for grabs. So to claim a majority, the winner would need to grab 115 of those ridings. “To win 115 of 148 seats is a huge, huge undertaking,” Finley says. There’s no clear sign of either party cresting toward the roughly 40 per cent of the popular vote needed to accomplish that feat. Conservative and Liberal polling numbers have remained stubbornly consistent since the 2008 election, the Tories in the mid-thirties, the Liberals in the high twenties.

Still, that puts Harper several precious percentage points closer than Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff to majority territory. To get the rest of the way, Finley says, means converting voters who can’t be easily corralled under either of the two parties’ banners. “There’s a sizable group of people, perhaps enough to sway an election, who could be Blue Liberals or Red Tories,” he says. How to switch Liberal voters in that centrist group to his side? With a gruff laugh, Finley says they must be “transmogrified”—the trick Calvin, of the defunct Calvin and Hobbes comic strip, while playing a spaceman, accomplished using a hair drier as a ray gun.

In the political playground, the tools used to transform voters aren’t so harmless. Attack ads have been a hallmark of Finley’s style. The most recent batch of Tory TV ads again take aim at Ignatieff’s character. They accuse him of returning to Canada, after about three decades in Britain and the U.S., not to serve his country, but to satisfy his ambition. The acerbic tag line: “He didn’t come back for you.”

Bookmark and Share
  • psiclone

    Excellent article and spot on as fars as I can determine – well done :)

  • whiskey

    A growl from an old political dog who is laid up for this hunt.

    Nothing new here.

  • gottabesaid

    Love these stories on (usually) background guys.

    I hope Mr. Finley makes a speedy and successful recovery from his decidedly more important fight.

    • http://canadiansense.blogspot.com/ CanadianSense

      that was a nice thing to say.

      Thank you.

  • o'reilly

    Finley is proof positive that our immigration policy does not work!

    • Norman_OustonBC

      O'reilly. . . I suppose that name background reveals something more acceptable? O'reilly, just another spud eater with ridicule softly emerging from the lilt of the tongue. Having the Scots being held at the lower level of the ladder is their natural goal. Too funny, but we welcome both of you to our fair land here across the seas.

      • snaardvark

        you know you're dealing with OLD-school racists when they're trying to figure out which british isles background to discriminate against.

        perchance have either of you ever used the word "eye-talian" ?

        • TimesArrow

          I believe Whops would be the favoured perjoarative of these um…gentlemen, or eyeties.

          • Mike514

            That would be WOPs, "Without official papers."

          • TimesArrow

            Thanks, i couldn't remember the spelling.

  • LaxAtlDfwYow

    Canada's Karl Rove.

    Key difference: Rove does his thing whilst earning his keep in the private sector. Canada's version sucks on the taxpayer's teat.

    That aside, I wish him well in his cancer struggle.

  • Sue

    It has been quite a rare and fascinating process to watch as the three rightish parties (by Canadian standards) went about merging and launching their brand. Seven years have flown by, but the Party, to me, does not seem institutionalized already, but rather it seems odd that the Party is always referred to in the media as if it has been, around forever.

    Corralling and lumping the best of the historical foibles or negatives about the three former rightish parties, is a good tactic, for opponents, but it just does not seem to be resonating with many Canadians. Canadians sense that indeed it is Harper as the main strategist, and after his White House trip there may be many more new supporters after seeing him more than holding his own. It is very reassuring.

    • Mike R

      Three?

    • Adam S

      And which three parties are those?

      I recall the Progressive Conservatives and the Canadian Alliance (formerly the Reform Party). And considering that the Reformers started as a break away from the PC's it's not so much that the two parties were united as they were reunited later down the line.

  • Leo

    Why???

    • filturk

      DUH !!!

  • Tony Quirk

    Excellent article. The only concern I have is that Calvin's transmorgrifier was an upside down box, not a hairdryer.

    Please try to do a little more research on these important details.

    • snaardvark

      Transmogrifier Mk. 1 was an upside down box, it was then adapted from a water pistol for portability and was powered by telepathy.

      • Tony Quirk

        But we are agreed, it was never a hair dryer

        • snaardvark

          Agreed.

  • Passing by

    The part of their get-a-majority strategy I like best is how they manage to find one spin-friendly journalist each week to write a story about how they intend to get their majority through double-secret, super-stealth, invisible micro-targeting.

    The fact that there is zero evidence pointing to any possibility of a Harper majority not only doesn't refute the merits of that strategy in the least, it actually confirms it.

    • jonatwitan

      Wow….thanks Passing by! And you are….? Oh, nobody? Mmmmm.

      I really don't mean that condescendingly, it's just that I'm allergic to presumption, and you are full of it my friend.

    • Garry G

      "Double-secret", "super-stealth"? Ya, that's why they're telling journalists all about it. Your last sentence fragment makes no sense whatsoever.

  • Canada needs chemo

    It was Doug Finley and Tom Flanagan that went to Chuck Cadman with the bribe and it's too hard to get past that to see this man as anything but corrupt. I hope Canadians realize how truly incompetent this bunch is, how detrimental they have been to our democracy, and how they like to bend our laws to suit their crimes and never allows them to intrench themselves in our political system.

    • Realistic

      Got any proof? Or are you just flapping your gums?

      • hollinm

        Just flapping his gums.

      • albert

        Proof? You didn't see the film clip of Harper saying he knew it (the bribe) wouldn't work. I believe both names were mentioned as orchestrator of THE BRIBE.
        But then self-induced blindness is convenient and catchy, isn't it?

    • Blue

      Why would you choose to use a cancer treatment method as your blogging name in an article about a man fighting cancer ?

      If it is your position that a Party other than the Conservatives should be the government, don`t you think that you only help the Conservative cause, and harm your own Party, by acting like such an insensitive, vulgar jerk ?

      • james

        I thought you tories were fed up with all the sensitivity and political correctness.

        Screw this guy. I hope he dies.

        • excanuck

          Oh, oh. Please show some respect.

          • james

            I'd pay good money for the chance to say it to his face.

          • Holly Stick

            For a guy who justifies using negative ads? No respect.

    • Garry G

      That statement in the final sentence applies more readily to the Liberal party, buddy.

    • Anguished senior

      I recall very well that Doug Finley was reported to have been one of the two Conservative operatives who, Donna Cadman — Chuck's wife — claimed her husband had told her had tried to bribe him to vote to save the Conservatives in Parliament. She said that Chuck had told her they had offered him a $100,000. insurance policy to vote with the Cons. after he had left the Cons and become an independent. Isn't it strange that now Donna Cadman is a Conservative M.P. in the Parliament of Canada. (Or is that now to be called the Parliament of Harper?) Wouldn't you think that after Chuck Cadman,a dying man, had made such an effort to get to the House Of Commons to vote for the Liberals –he was an honourable man, after all — that his wife would pay him the honour of declining the Conservative offer to help her get into parliament as a Conservative?

      I wonder if Diane would dishonour her husband like that? Too bad about the cancer but that didn't play into the strategy of using anything or anyone to win a majority. After all, just think what could come out of a majority Harper government.

      Seventy-eight year-old grandma who is worried about dishonesty and disintegration of a democratic, humane, healthy society. (Senior's angst)

  • Realistic

    Yes, a nightmare for liberals.

    • Poker Face

      Oh, *that's* what a "true canadian" is….

  • Skinny Dipper

    "Immigrants used to be bedrock Liberals. Finley claims the Tories have won many over by pointed reminders that 'their values—family, hard work, entrepreneurism, etc.—are very similar to Conservative values.'"

    I thought the Conservatives do not like recent migrants like Ignatieff and immigrants.

    Conservative line: "Immigrants, vote for the Conservatives; just don't run for prime minister. You're just visiting."

    • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

      I don't see a lot of people coming back after more than 30 years to become prime minister. But maybe that's just me.

      • jonatwitan

        Yeah, his/her little attempt at a clever jab never got off the ground. I mean, I simply don't see too many Canadians immigrating to Canada, but that could just be me (and Dennis).

  • Skinny Dipper

    Egypt has its autocrat; so, too, will Canada.

    Autocrat Harper!

  • PoliticalPundit

    Finley and the other 52 or 53 Senators will use their offices, and the funds that flow through them, to campaign for Harper's majority.
    Finley's approach is not highly original but it could prove effective. His bewitching brew is shrewd mixture of ideologies – communitarian Christian values conservatism focused on 1950s style middle-class suburban families; neo-liberal fiscal conservatism (although most ardent fiscal conservatives are angry at Harper's unrestrained spending since he came to office in 2006); libertarianism when it suits them, western populist democracy (50% + 1 vote rules) for those seeking a Triple E Senate, and nationalist conservatism in Quebec.
    Finley also knows that elections are won in the trenches and in the air wars. The Conservative War Room has unlimited cash and enough energized angry militants to do all the hard and dirty work required to identity and then get the conservative voters to the polls.
    If the NDP gang keep attacking the Liberals then Finley and Harper will get their majority and Finley can retire in peace.

    • TimesArrow

      Even if the libs and Dippers would just call a truce until Harper is gone it would help. No reason for them to get hitched or waste a lot of energy trying to change each others views – the enemy of my enemy is my friend stuff. It continues to baffle me that diehards in either party can't make this simple calculus – after all it's just about what the reformers and the PCs managed to do, even if they did have more in common then the lib/ndp. It could also be said that more than a few PCers have come to realise they didn't have as much in common with the reformers as they may have first thought they did.

      • psiclone

        quite simply impossible – the NDP are by their nature Liberal and the Liberals are by their nature nothing .. if anything the Conservatives and the NDP have more in common in that they both want to carve up the LPT – in point of fact a careful analysis of what is happening at present might, just confirm my hypothesis – If Jack was smart he would come out swinging big time against Iggy as he has already started the process. There will be no ABC .. no Coalition .. no agreement … instead we see the direct consequence of the new strategy needed for the NDP to gain ..then again a consequence of this is that the Conservatives also gain – BUT – perhaps that is the overall strategy for the long term as both Harper and Layton are playing slice and dice with the LPT right now and will continue this until the NDP become the official opposition and then Canadians will have a clear decision right or left because as it satnds the LPT is nothing and neither and only concerned with power for powers sake.

        • TimesArrow

          Funny how they almost suceeded in putting their differences aside in 08.

          Libs and Dippers have worked together both separately and in previous minority govts.

          NDP numbers aren't looking too good right now – no carving there.

          Libs chase power for its own sake – and just what the hell is Harper doing then??

  • TimesArrow

    "How to switch Liberal voters in that centrist group to his side? With a gruff laugh, Finley says they must be “transmogrified”…

    In the political playground, the tools used to transform voters aren’t so harmless. Attack ads have been a hallmark of Finley’s style. The most recent batch of Tory TV ads again take aim at Ignatieff’s character. They accuse him of returning to Canada, after about three decades in Britain and the U.S., not to serve his country, but to satisfy his ambition. The acerbic tag line: “He didn’t come back for you.”

    Well that's BS for a start. The end game of Finely's tactics is to turn uncommited voters off and make them stay home if you can't get em to vote for you – pure Rovinism.

    • hollinm

      You may try to blame Finley but the fact remains the lack of leadership of the Liberals and there failed policies are causing their voters to stay home. It has nothing to do with Finley. It is the Libs themselves who are causing their own to dissaffect.

      • TimesArrow

        Some truth in that. But Finely is doing nothing to turn the trend of low voter turnouts around. Why should he, it plays o the CPCs strengths, if you want to call them that.

        • hollinm

          It is not the job of Finley to improve voter turn out. He is a politico who is playing the game as he sees fit. It is up to Canadians to decide if they want to vote or not. It is Canadians themselves who are responsible for low voter turn out.

          I would just make the point. Would you stay home and not vote because somebody is using negative advertising? That's not a credible explanation for low voter turn out.

          • TimesArrow

            Now you're being disingenuous really. Attack ads don't help to drive down the voter turnout? They certainly aren't the cause but they sure as heck aren't helping. It's in the CPCs interest to do nothing that helps voter turnouts right now, given that 2/3rds of the country don't support them and it's a fair bet many of those who aren't voting wouldn't either.

          • hollinm

            I would remind you again what I said. Voters do not turn out to vote for a variety of reasons. Some we will never know. However, I would suggest the opposite effect could also happen. If the voters as you suggest are so incensed with negative advertising then you would think they would show up to vote against the party that is doing the negative advertising. I think your suggestion that negative advertising is the cause is pretty facile. People say they don't like negative advertising but is a proven fact they pay attention to them.

            It is not the job of any political party to encourage or discourage voter turnout. The issues are there and it is those issues that Canadians should focus on.

            You know I get pretty tired of this thing about 65% of the electorate don't support them. That is virtually the case in every election. No party receives 50% of the vote. Did the election of Jean Chretien with 38% of the vote in 97 or 2000 somehow deligitimizes his majority government.

          • Thwim

            The difference being that rarely has the winning party been the last party that the majority of Canadians would have voted for.

          • hollinm

            Aren't we the clairvoyant one? You have no idea what you are talking about. It is your opinion and only your opinion. Once again here we go…Canadians are stupid and know not what they do. Give me a break!

          • hollinm

            hollinm continued…..

            We get to vote for one party in an election. The fact that 65% of the electorate is spread among four opposition parties is not the fault of the CPC. We have a first past the post system which has been in place since the country was founded. Now somehow because we have a CPC government and weak opposition parties the system is broken. Come on!

  • Guest

    Fascism (def) One common definition of fascism focuses on three groups of ideas: the Fascist Negations of anti-liberalism, anti-communism and anti-conservatism; nationalist, authoritarian goals for the creation of a regulated economic structure to transform social relations within a modern, self-determined culture; a political aesthetic using romantic symbolism, mass mobilisation, a positive view of violence, promotion of masculinity and youth and charismatic leadership

    • Keith in Brampton

      And this relates to this article and discussion…how?

      • HarveyMushman

        Well…the last part of it says something about "charismatic leadership"…so obviously he's not talking about Canada.

  • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

    You mean for all true left-wingers.

    • Wictorwictor

      65% of canadians identify as centre or centre-left

      it's not at all fair to say you're not a "true canadian" if you don't want harper gone… but it's also probably true that most canadians want him gone

      • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

        Harper's share of the vote, which has reached about 37%, has not been that much lower than Chretien's, who I believe once only gained 38%, and didn't rise above 40%. So, by your logic, most Canadians wanted him gone, too, right?

      • Len Esau

        I don't think we even know what a "true canadian" is. We do know that Harper has moved the Conservatives to the centre which I never would have thought. He certainly does not seem to be a "true conservative". He appears to me to be a "true politician" … at least one that will do most anything to remain in power. Small p power – i.e. minority government. Harper simply is not genuine enough to move beyond small p – he seems to wear a coat of many colours :)

      • jonatwitan

        Ugh…I can't believe people still say this!

        Who would you have us replace Harper with? You do understand that by your own logic, even more Canadians do not want Ignatieff, and even more Canadians do not want Layton.

        What the *expletive* is your point then?

        If you are proposing a united left, fine, but keep in mind that the Liberals and NDP have never been a united party, ever. At the end of the day, to insist on breaking down the Canadian electorate into a simple dichotomy of left-wing vs. right-wing does not do justice to reality, and therefore is not beneficial to the conversation.

        So please, please, please stop *expletive* trying to do it!

        Ugh!

      • Garry G

        Let's wait for the next election to prove the falseness of that statement.

  • psiclone

    In an exclusive poll conducted for Postmedia News and Global News, 64% of surveyed Canadians said the federal political process is working “just fine” and that there’s “no need” for an election. Only 36% said an election is necessary – when the numbers are like this any party that forces an election runs the likelihood of experiencing ' The Punishment ' factor – consider the amount of close call 3 ways out there and Harper could get the majority right now if the LPT is stupid enough to force one

    • Wictorwictor

      With the CPC polling at pre-merger levels, the idea of a majority government led by Harper is even more laughable now than it was in 2006. Dream on…

    • HarveyMushman

      No worries…no election in 2011.

      Jack's turn to turn turtle.

  • excanuck

    Poor sensitive wee flower, you are.

  • Moby

    Terrorist drives car full of explosives to a Mosque http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNq-SX8Uhug&fe…

    Wonder why Macleans, Star, Globe, Post, CNN, FoxNews, BBC did not report it? Russian TV America picked up the story. So much for a free and fair media!!

  • RealisticCanuck

    The problem with the Liberals is that their stuck making some very bad choices. Iggy went out saying that voting for the NDP or the Bloc was a vote for Harper, and that they should vote Liberal to save the country.

    The problem is that the NDP is more better placed to stop the Conservatives in many ridings. This is especially the case in BC where the Liberals are behind both parties and, in some areas, even behind the Greens. If the NDP-lite voters were to support this notion, they would be handing the Conservatives ridings on a silver platter. Same goes in Alberta and in the Ontario that's outside of GTA proper.

    The Liberals haven't offered anything concrete to set themselves apart from the rest.

    • excanuck

      there vs their vs they're: Sir or madam, please learn the difference. Nobody takes seriously an article that leads off with a vulgar spelling error. And you are not the only one in these columns who confuses "there" with "their". And no, I am not an old fart.

      • HarveyMushman

        They're, their excanuck….calm down.

        • excanuck

          One is a pedant about spelling. One simply cannot help oneself.

  • Kathryn_C

    As for those sought-after soccer moms, Finley says they crave safe communities for their families. So he expects the Tories’ ongoing push for longer prison terms for a wide range of crimes, along with more police, to appeal to them.

    And yet last I read, the CPC have the very least traction with women.
    And that was before working moms who put their kids in daycare got an earful of Ms Findley.

    • illbethejudge

      Doug and Diane Finley are actually married to each other, btw. They are both equally partisan and equally vicious

  • Andrew (not PorC)

    I was under the impression that Senators should be tending to the legislative duties. Surely, the institution shouldn't be filled with full-time party operatives on the public payroll?

    • Blue

      And do you remember when Senator Davey, and Senator Kirby, and Senator Smith all worked on Liberal campaigns and I`ll bet Andrew not P or C was real bothered by that.

      • Andrew (not PorC)

        I've never defended the practice, nor should you. I'd rather the Senate was composed of non-aligned members chosen on merit. This proposal has the benefit of being constitutional, unlike elected senate schemes.

  • Andrew

    The transmogrifier was a cardboard box, not the hair drier raygun that Spaceman Spiff used.

  • BC Ed

    We already do have a working majority federal government. Minority Conservatives simply work closely with separatist Bloc Quebecois to form a majority.

    Bloc Quebecois joined federal politics in 1992. Party members are drawn exclusively from the province of Quebec. Bloc Quebecois has publicly stated goals of "devotion to Quebec and secession from Canada". Bloc Quebecois is a separatist party. Their actions and decisions are devoted to dividing Canada.

    It is deeply concerning that we have an exclusive separatist provincial party governing Quebec (Parti Quebecois) while another exclusive Quebec provincial party (Bloc Quebecois) functions in the federal arena without a majority or mandate from all of Quebec to go about pursuing secession during daily Ottawa federal business.

    I hope Harper Conservatives and (separatist) Bloc Quebecois do not acquire sufficient seats to allow them to continue making defective laws and distributing billions. This coalition government has demonstrated the habit of distributing large amounts of cash, instead of smaller, more easily traceable amounts, which is an identified means of making embezzlement easier.

    This sounds like a valid concern after reading macleans.ca Sep.24, 2010:

    "Quebec: The most corrupt province
    Why does Quebec claim so many of the nation’s political scandals?"

From Macleans