Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

New year, new fight

by Aaron Wherry on Tuesday, February 8, 2011 9:15am - 9 Comments

Ten months after the Speaker’s ruling on documents related to the treatment of detainees in Afghanistan, the House is presented with a new confrontation.

The Commons finance committee in November was denied the right to see government projections of corporate profits before taxes, and was refused a look at studies on the cost of Conservative changes to the criminal justice system. Both are being withheld on the grounds they are cabinet confidences.

“Mr. Speaker, withholding the requested information from the committee does not serve the public interest,” Liberal finance critic Scott Brison said Monday in the Commons on a motion of privilege. ”In fact, withholding this information impedes Parliament’s ability to fulfil its duty to scrutinize the estimates and hold the government to account.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Emily

    Open-transparent-accountable govt.

    What part of their OWN platform didn't they understand?

  • gottabesaid

    I'm looking forward to seeing the government's 'comprehensive response' to this one. With the Afghan detainee issue, the sticking point was national security — an understandable concern, but one that the Speaker said was insufficient to prevent MPs from seeing the docs if they asked for them. I'm at a loss to understand why the cabinet deems this information should be kept secret, particularly when it has been made public in the past. I would love to know what their reasoning is.

  • Greg

    Documents? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Best laugh I have heard today. Maybe the Liberals and BQ should form another committee.

    • danby

      I hate it when Greg drops acid and tries to get in touch with his inner wit

      • Thwim

        I think you missed a "t" in that last word.

  • gottabesaid

    Well, that was my first suspicion too, but I also don't imagine that the Conservatives want to pick another fight that requires a ruling from the speaker. I don't think it's horribly damaging to the party, but I don't think it helps them a whole lot either, to be obstinate for the sake of being obstinate.

    I might also assume they have something to hide, but my pea brain can't conceive of what that might be.

  • Thwim

    Okay. Spam gets a thumbs down and a report from me every time. Kindly stop it.

  • Thwim

    Huh. Gee, if only somebody could have predicted something like this the last time the opposition let the CPC off the hook.. with the assistance of the Speaker.

    I've precious little sympathy for the opposition on this one, and nothing but contempt for the Speaker at this point.

    madeyoulook: Looks like you were right. Unfortunately.

    • Jenn_

      And yet all the more reason to fight vehemently this time around. We've got to overturn that precedent!

From Macleans