Rising prices and revolution

The uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia can be blamed in part on inflation.

by Chris Sorensen on Friday, February 11, 2011 1:08pm - 5 Comments

Inflation isn’t normally associated with serious social upheaval, at least not in Canada, but recent events have shown that spiralling prices can have profound effects on emerging economies. The chaos in Egypt, much like the uprising in Tunisia earlier this year, can be blamed in part on inflation—namely rising food and energy prices that have left jobless Egyptians feeling desperate.

It’s an especially sharp problem in developing countries where a substantial portion of income is spent on food. But even big global players are growing concerned lately. China, for instance, is worried that rising prices are making the cellphones, dishwashers and clothing churned out by its manufacturing sector less attractive to foreign buyers. And no country, it seems, is more sensitive about inflation than Argentina. Independent firms have pegged inflation there as high as 25 per cent, more than double the official figures, and are reportedly being threatened with government reviews of their methodology and potential fines of $125,000.

What’s behind all this inflation trouble? According to a recent Scotiabank report, the run-up in prices is fuelled mainly by soaring commodities, thanks to a combination of reduced global supplies of everything from grains to vegetable oils (many producers cut capacity during the recession while bad weather has ruined crops) just as demand in many parts of the world is beginning to rise with the recovery. But some have also singled out a weak U.S. dollar as a key culprit. Four months ago, the U.S. Federal Reserve launched a second round of quantitative easing—essentially printing money to juice the economy—by buying US$600 billion in U.S. government bonds. China and other developing nations say the move is causing money to flood into their economies, further pushing up prices of food, energy and other commodities, while also forcing their currencies higher.

Not surprisingly, U.S. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke has dismissed the criticism by blaming developing countries for failing to properly manage their own monetary policies—a fair point, although one that is likely to fall on deaf ears once the citizenry has taken to the streets in protest.

Bookmark and Share
  • SunshineCoaster

    For roughly a decade now there has been a "war on global terror" conducted from North America. Events in Egypt would suggest it would have been far more effective to conduct a "war on global poverty". The Egyptians managed to remove a tyrant with very little violence or bloodshed; they used no arms and all words to achieve their aim. Too bad our leaders hadn't thought of that.

    • Sam Steele

      It wasn't the Egyptian people that removed Hosni Mubarak from power; it was the Egyptian military. Mubarak was overthrown in a military coup that has had the backing of the people, at least so far. The military junta that now runs Egypt has already told the people in Tahrir Square to go home. If the unions persist in their strikes and the people in Tahrir Square refuse to go home, Mubarak's state of emergency will continue. Those days of soldiers fraternizing with demonstrators are over. Tahrir Square may look like Beijing's Tienanmen Square in 1989 before it's all over.

  • M_A_D_world

    If inflation and hunger are the drivers of unrest, then mere political change won't change much in the short term. Many regions very much need a better 2011 in farming or this time next year the unrest will spread to other once stable countries.

  • Philanthropist

    Mom wants to put 'clean' ethanol foodstuffs in the gas tank of the SUV, it makes her feel good – and her good feeling is more important than a bunch of hungry foreigners. Obama knows this too, if he can please Mom-the-voter by printing money, the consequences of his incompetence may not show up until after he gets re-elected.

    • M_A_D_world

      Not to mention the general inefficiency of ethanol. It's taking more litres/gallons of ethanol to travel the same distance in the same car than it would for regular gasoline. That's not even accounting for the diesel spent transporting and manufacturing the ethanol.
      Clean fuel that has dirt under the rug of mandated regulations without net positive results.

From Macleans