Beyond The Commons

Beyond The Commons

Aaron Wherry covers all the goings-on in and around Parliament Hill. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @aaronwherry

The House: Further reading

by Aaron Wherry on Tuesday, February 22, 2011 9:20am - 6 Comments

For their assistance when I was putting together last week’s piece on the House—and for the indispensable sites they respectively maintain—I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Michael Mulley of openparliament.ca and Cory Horner of howdtheyvote.ca. I also must thank Ned Franks, both for his writing on Parliament and omnibus legislation and his perspective.

Those seeking perspective and data, should start with Parliament’s own tallies of private members’ bills passed, legislation adopted and sitting days.

Beyond those, there are several other texts that proved helpful.

-Ralph Sultan’s essay on the power of the private member

-Michael Chong’s essay on reforming the House

-A transcript of a roundtable discussion of MPs on private members’ legislation (published by Canadian Parliamentary Review)

-Laura Stone’s review of recent private members’ bills

-A paper prepared in 1999 by the Canadian Election Study about the state of Parliament

-The Library of Parliament’s review of cameras in the House

-John Pepall’s Against Reform

-Mark Kingwell’s essay on civility

For my own part, I’ve written about the House at length on a couple of occasions: on the question of civility last March and on the question of cameras in the House last September. Some of the ideas in last week’s piece were probably first explored in those pieces.

Bookmark and Share
  • bergkamp

    I read your long aticle in the magazine over the weekend, Wherry, and thought it was terrific. Needed to be said. I find it amazing how many MPs are willing to turn themselves into lickspittles for $155,000 a year.

    Canadians are incredibly apathetic when it comes to politics, if people cared more maybe we would have better class of pol.

    • tobyornotoby

      I don't mean to be argumentative, and I do wish that Canadians cared more, but I'm pretty sure that apathy is an effect rather than a cause. I think apathy is induced when Canadians feel like their voice or vote or donation doesn't matter and we feel powerless to change anything about the way our system of governance is structured and operates.

      The threshold for meaningful involvement is so very high that most people can't see themselves having an impact. Can we blame them if they feel unable to make or support change when educated and articulate elected MPs and even cabinet ministers are politically impotent and utterly disregarded by the small group that actually makes decisions? (and I don't mean just in this government)

  • Crit_Reasoning

    Great job, Wherry!

  • BCer in Mtl

    Sounds like an Oscars acceptance speech.

    Has the music started playing?

    Seriously though, very good article, it kind of did a reset on my perceptions of what parliament does.

  • http://secondthots.blogspot.com Dennis_F

    I think Parliament has always had its ups and downs, but has a party ever decided to literally run away from our legislature because it wasn't getting its way? http://www.indystar.com/article/20110222/NEWS/110…

    But some people only seem to care about these things when it's conservatives who are in power.

    • John.K

      In 1994, Republican members of the California Assembly refused to show up for floor sessions in an effort to prevent Democrats from electing Willie Brown as speaker with less than a majority vote.

From Macleans