Inside the Liberal effort to resurrect Michael Ignatieff

Ignatieff has done a lot of things right, but he’s still dead in the polls

by Paul Wells on Monday, March 14, 2011 10:19am - 361 Comments
Flatlined

Photograph by Christopher Pike

Michael Ignatieff has been among the people.

“I’m in Newfoundland two weeks ago,” the Liberal leader said over tea in the sunroom at Stornaway, the official Opposition leader’s residence. On the wall behind him was a landscape by the Winnipeg artist Ivan Eyre, all slate-grey skies and autumn foliage. “And I’m in a training centre run by the operating engineers’ union. Great union. And this training site is training people in heavy machinery. Everything from bulldozers to cranes.

“A third of the kids in the course are women. Half of the women are on social assistance. They’re desperate to get a union ticket to be bulldozer drivers or crane operators. They’re fabulously determined. It’s a tough course. They put me into these damned cranes and I don’t know what the hell I’m doing, and they look fabulous. One of the women said to me, ‘You know, this is my ticket out of here. This is the ticket that allows me out of social assistance. This is my ticket that allows me to feed my kids. But I can’t do this if I don’t get child care.’

“When you hear a woman tell you that, you understand a lot about the economy. Unless we make these kinds of investments—in child care, in post-secondary education, in home care—we’re not going to meet the economic challenges we’ve got.”

Many hundreds of times since Ignatieff acceded to the Liberal leadership amid the wreckage of Stéphane Dion’s doomed late-2008 attempt to form a coalition government, he has read that he is a poncy silver-spoon egghead who can’t begin to imagine the struggles of ordinary Canadians. He handles this challenge by assuring a visitor repeatedly that he is not a poncy egghead. Addressing the plight of that young woman in Newfoundland “isn’t social policy,” he says. “This is rededicating ourselves to the equality of opportunity that made our country strong.”

As he spoke, there was at least a slim chance Ignatieff would find himself in a federal election campaign within a week. The semi-annual frenzy of election speculation—every September and March like clockwork—was rocking the nation’s capital. The papers were full of theories. Baroque manoeuvres in the Commons could bring Stephen Harper down any day. Everyone has to be ready for a campaign, just in case.

Now here’s the thing about Michael Ignatieff. He is doing almost everything better than Stéphane Dion was doing on the eve of the Liberal wipeout in the 2008 election. Ignatieff has spent nearly a year on the road, honing his retail skills, often for audiences of strangers he had to learn to persuade. He is not putting any highly divisive policy in the window comparable to Dion’s carbon-tax scheme. He can defend himself against attack, comprehensibly and often better than that, in two languages. His Office of the Leader of the Opposition is disciplined and coherent. His caucus deploys serious talent well. Ties between his parliamentary shop and the national Liberal party are smooth and respectful. Fundraising is a gong show. You can’t have everything.

Bookmark and Share
  • TimesArrow

    "If we don’t go, we’re no worse off. In fact, we’re probably better off for having defined ourselves and laid down the markers. And if we do go? It’s a minority government. Things happen. These things aren’t meant to last forever.”

    Boy it's hard to take much comfort from this article if you're a liberal. The guy's unpopular and it doesn't look like that's going to change anytime soon, and things might conceivably get even worse down the road. So go now and hope something gells, some magic happens because you never know during an election, and nothing's happening outside the writ period anyway.

  • TimesArrow

    The libs are in a bind. They have a song but no singer and this may be the best way to get rid of the lead singer because there seems no other way to find out if he can really sing. Well. it's good o know he believes he can. We'll see. But i have a nasty feeling that if you're going to ask the public to choose between a guy they just can't warm up to and another who they just can't warm up to, then your message should be a really compelling one. For myself i would much rather the libs [ and the opposition in general] were going into this as Andrew says with a strong package of democratic reforms to offer – not just evil meanie Harper. Who knows, maybe it's in the platform…i really really hope so, if only for MI's sake.

  • ergo sum

    He looks even more ridiculous in jeans trying to appear like a "real Canadian".

  • Al Stienstra

    Doesn't sound like MA will be the one to take up the issue of gold plated public servant salaries and pensions- just add to the giant sucking sound with child care workers.

  • http://isthereanelection.ca Greg McDonald

    I got tired of reading about Ottawa politicians a few months back. The site isthereanelection.ca is the only thing I regularly check now :)

  • http://www.google.com mars

    Lets take Iggy out of the equation 4 a moment–he's hopeless–has nothing of relevance 2 offer—so take Layton– even worse. so here is my question– hope someone looks into it———-Jake Layton(nothing 2 offer either) looks more like he was away having a "face Lift"—–than a hip operation? anyone?? He wouldn't lie– would he???. Thanks.

  • FPiorkowski

    Deifenbaker killed the Arrow and Canada lost an entire aviation industry. He was an idiot. Chretien killed the helicopter purchase and cost us a billion dollars and a thousand jobs. He is an idiot. Now Ignatieff says that if elected, he will cancell the fighter jet contract so that our forces can continue using thirty year old aircraft. He is an idiot. Does he drive a thirty year old car every day?

  • Linda

    One of the main reasons the Libs have been unable to carry thru on their child care program is because they're always paying down the deficit left by the cons. Not that I'm in favour of instituting a national child care program at this time, as I'm not. Before we try to nationalize another expensive program, it seems to me we need to ensure we can fund the ones we have i.e., health care, employment insurance that includes job re-training and Canada Pension. For this reason, I think there needs to be less talk about child care and more planning of maintaining and improving these existing programs.

  • Igeey

    All you left wing thinkers along the Pacific coast in BC, Go bankrupt yourselves and vote NDP!!!!

    Cdns. have short memories of the huge scandal under Liberals that cost the country a dung load of taxpayers money!!!

    If you want increased censorship in the country then vote Liberal.

    Ignatieff will never become PM, Bob Rae, the ex NDPer will not either!!!

    Do all you Cdns. want to waste alot of taxpayers money togo to the Polls, I don't, quite satisfied with the current Gov't. and current Gov't. will get in again!!!!

  • HeyAll

    Present Gov't. is perfectly doing and has done over 5yrs a very good job.

    Cdns. have short memories of the boondoggle scandal ot the Liberals spending a dung load of taxpayers money!

    Ignatieff and or Bob Rae the ex NDPer (provincially) will never become PM either if he ever becomes Leader of the Liberal Party.

    NO carbon tax for me!!!

    All you west coast BC left wing thinkers should Go and vote NDP and bankrupt the country!!!!!

    And all you people in the east – Vote Liberal, you'll get your handouts that you're always looking for!!!! AT taxpayers expense!!!!

  • Geez you people!

    Hey, current Gov't. is the best.

    All you left wing thinkers/voters who vote NDP, you want to bankrupt the country!

    All you easterners want a free ride from a Liberal Gov't.

    Liberal last boondoggle …. anyone remember that $ fiasco paid at taxpayers expense!

  • Bugs

    If the Liberals would just get rid of the long gun registry the Conservatives would be out… regardless of the leadership… no one cares. The Conservatives are hanging on to their votes because gun owners don't want another tax imposed on them per gun… Gun owners have to be licensed to possess any, so why add on a tax per gun?

  • Happy

    I don't get all you people! This stuff is not rocket science!!

    Liberals big spenders, they always put the country in big debt!

    National Programs have to be funded with increased taxes and that's what the Liberals will do and the Socialists NDP as well!!!!

    NDP with its platform of increasing Corp. taxes, Companies will go south and there will be no jobs left in Canada, less people will be working, than there are now and NO tax $s to fund Nationalchildcare. Heck, we can't even afford Nationalhealthcare right now, its a mess!!!!

    The problem with media, is the Liberal/NDP bias – big time and CBC is so leftwnged, it should be privatized!!!!

    The biggest scam and ethical problem is with the Liberals backed by NDPand Separatist Bloc in taking down our current Gov't., wasting millions of taxpayers money on calling and having a totally unnecessary Fed. Election!!!! No 3 headed Prime Minister – Coalition!

  • Happy

    The biggest scam and ethical problem is with the Liberals backed by NDPand Separatist Bloc in taking down our current Gov't., wasting millions of taxpayers money on calling and having a totally unnecessary Fed. Election!!!! No 3 headed Prime Minister – Coalition!

  • HAPPYGOLUCKY

    Margaret, what are you talking about shadow gov't. BS, you don't know what ur talking about. i WORK IN GOVT AND YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT UR TALKING ABOUT!!!! UR HAVING A MID LIFE CRISIS OR SOMETHING!!!!

    I guess you like Jacko Wacko (Jack Layton) with the increased taxes to fund his programs or Iggy's increased taxes to fund new programs as well. THE BIGGEST SCAM ON ETHICS WAS LIBERALS BACKED BY NDP AND SEPARATISTS IN BRINGING DOWN OUR CURRENT GOV'T SPENDING WASTING MILLIONS OF TAXPAYERS DOLLARS!

  • Guest

    You're all nuts with yur shadow govt. and consultants …. what the hell!

  • Guest

    hey ur all nuts, ya all want higher taxes to fund these useless programs; the Feds. should not be involved in Nationalchildcare! its a provincial responsibility with the HST taxes that each Prov. collects. its a shame and scam that Liberals backed by socialist NDPand separatists brought down our current Gov't.

  • Guest

    Shadow Gov't. what the hey is that???? I work in Gov't. and U don't know what You're talking about!!!! BS!!!!

  • West newf

    The social assistance and union crowd. Yeh that's Iggy's crowd! Far left hand out specialists yelling gimmie, but I no workie!

  • Observant

    Hey, kcm … it's an indisputable fact that Iggnatieff was the father of the $50 Billion Carbon Tax scheme and Dion agreed to include it in his Green Shift … and you know what happened next ….LOL

  • kcm

    So what. It was an idea before its time and badly sold. Calling it cracy! A tax on everything didn't help much either.

  • Observant

    If Liberals or a Liberal-led coalition becomes the gov't before 2012 (when Kyoto Treaty GHG targets were set to be met), you can bet they will resurrect a multi-Billion$$$ Carbon Tax …. so that they can purchase Billion$$$ of Chinese Kyoto Carbon Credits to mitigate our inability to physically eliminate our 30% GHG excess …. and to help finance Chinese high sulfur, coal-fired power stations being built and operated by Liberal-connected Canadian businesses in China … and you know who I mean.

  • D.D.S

    I no workie………………..seriously…??…….that's just offensive…and you probably don't even know why

  • alvin54

    this response is so very typical of the brain-dead folks who believe the Harper propoganda. If you had a union, you probably would be working. Don't count on the greed-based corporations to create a job for you. They're not in it for you, only their gigantic salaries and shareholder dividends. Harper is simply their autocratic front man.

  • kcm

    Hey that would make a good attack ad. Maybe you should pass it on to the PMO – just mark it personal/paranoid. No doubt It'll get prompt attention.

  • Observant

    If you're impressed by the superficial, vote for Iggy and be happy. It's not surprising that you would vote for the BQ, because so-called Liberal-voting "federalists" in Quebec are actually covert sovereignists who put the interests of French Quebec ahead of the interests of Canada.

    Knowledgeable political pundits in Quebec are forecasting that the BQ will win upwards of 60 ridings in the next election … mainly because of Charest Liberal corruption … and scratch a Liberal voter in Quebec and you find a BQ voter …. soooo obvious.

From Macleans