Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Cannon in Cairo

by Paul Wells on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 7:42pm - 25 Comments

The foreign minister visited Egypt today and came bearing modest and probably useful gifts. I have hoped such a visit would happen, so good on Lawrence Cannon for going to the place where, arguably, a disproportionate share of Northern Africa’s hopes and dangers reside.

Cannon says he saw “a genuine and authentic push toward real democracy.” As his boss has sometimes noted, that can be messy. This Saturday Egyptians will vote on interim constittuional amendments on the way to legislative and Presidential elections and, it is hoped but not yet certain, the establishment of some kind of constituent assembly to write a new constitution. The amendments face a rough ride. I see no evidence that Cannon expressed a preferred outcome for Saturday’s vote. That’s the way it should be too. We can provide resources that help Egyptians make decisions, but they must be Egyptian decisions.

Today’s action by the minister wasn’t much, but in the middle of a crazy busy week, when Cannon could have concentrated on Libya to the exclusion of everything else — or cut ribbons in the Outaouais — he put Canada’s foot in the door as a modest ally for real change in Egypt.

Bookmark and Share
  • Jenn_

    Good for him. It's always nice when there's a rare opportunity to not complain about what a member of The Harper Government has done, and I have no complaints on this.

    I mean, I could wish the 11 million were over two years instead of five, but as we've seen before (Haiti) it isn't enough to just throw money at a problem if the processes for using that money to solve the problem aren't in place. And of course I could also wish we HAD 11 million, uh, no, I do wish that–for this and many other things.

    But I'm very pleased that along with the support he didn't add "you should do this" kind of unsolicited advice.

    • David_M.

      And not one partisan jab at the opposition back home. Very refreshing. HUGE improvement. Yes, good on Lawrence Cannon. Hope its a trend.

  • former_ADB

    Yes, This good news from our government.

    My relatives in Cairo are very excited about the referendum this weekend. Their first chance to vote with their photo identity cards (although those have existed for years). It seems they will vote NO! The changes to the constitution don't go far enough and the proposed date for a general election is too close. Only the Muslim Brotherhood and the NDP (Egyptian version) are pushing for a YES, which of course is another reason to vote NO.

  • OriginalEmily1

    I think it's kinda sad that it's news when our foreign affairs minister goes to Cairo, and doesn't totally screw up.

    • derek

      What is really sad is that it doesn't matter either way.

  • Leo

    Well at least it is something pro-active and positive while the rebels in Libya get creamed. A few G8 countries are going to be sorry.

    With Cannon's political pedigree, it's too bad he doesn't get more opportunities like this.

    “In light of the recent developments in the Middle East and North Africa, the focus of my discussions was the situation in the region,” said Minister Cannon. “As Canadians, we cannot simply hope, we must help. We cannot simply applaud change, we must act."

  • Budster

    Lawrence "Band Wagon Jumper" Cannon was about 7 weeks too late. The pro-democracy protesters could have used the support when they were defending themselves against the brutality of the Mubarak government. A few million bucks aren't going to buy Harper any friends in the Middle East given his unconditional support for Israel. Oathetic.

  • TimesArrow

    Better late then never. Good for Cannon!…oddly enough i've never written that before.

    He actually seems like a decent sort. Just ineffectual.

  • TimesArrow

    Is there a role for R&D in all of this? They seem to have disappeared off the radar?…mine anyway

    • McC_

      they wrote some awful press releases a few weeks back, Inkless linked to them in this space.

      • Dot

        Is that so? I seem to recall he totally ignored them after I posted the links.

        • Dot

          And to refresh your memory, you were the first one to comment on my post: http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/25/what-canada-ca…

          Sorry to throw a wrench into your narrative.

          • McC_

            Credit where credit is due: I apologize DOT, you're absolutely right, you posted the links, not Wells (and yes, I do remember discussing them with you in the comments thread). It wasn't a narrative, just a misrecollection — I knew I had jumped to the press releases from a Inkless blog post, but the links were in your comment, not his article.

  • john g

    I heard that his baggage was mishandled, and toothpaste got all over his clothes. He was heard complaining that he'll never get the toothpaste back in the tube again.

    • Stewart_Smith

      Joe Clarke has a wicked sense of humor apparently.

  • John D

    Good on Cannon, seriously. Now it would be great to see some real movement from the West on Libya.

  • McC_

    My best guess of an answer is that the author of those press releases had no idea who the intended audience was. NGOs (and QUANGOs) must compete for scarce grant and contribution monies from governments, charitable foundations and multilateral agencies for their programming, their target audiences should be stakeholders among these three groups (who would be paying attention), as well as media to get their organization's name in press, their projects/products covered and their experts called for background, analysis and quotes when news happens releated to their specializations. IMHO a well written release is easily turned into media coverage and would be read with appreciation by stakeholders, a shoddily written release would be ignored by the press and met with disappointment/disgust by informed stakeholders, undermining the organization's credibility and competitiveness for future grants and contributions. should note that I'm not alleging conspiracy when incompetence is a credible explanation.

    • TimesArrow

      Since incompetence was the, more or less, constant in Wells' odyssey i'm gonna invoke occam's razor and go with incompetence…unless leopards have suddenly starting sporting stripes….Braun's still there; Gauthier's still there…colour me sceptical.

    • Dot

      So, in this particular case, you are suggesting that the Canadian media, repeating R&D's support for the insurrections in Egypt etc as outlined in their press release, would help support their efforts in that part of the world, no?

      If that's the case, the Canadian media dropped the ball. Or simply choose not to report/comment on anything that is not negative about R&D.

  • McC_

    "You must have a job or some expertise in communications."
    not particularly, no
    "How would events be different in Egypt and Libya?"
    I'm not sure where you're leading me with this line of questioning. I thought you were asking about the intended audience of the press releases, not about the extent to which press releases from Montreal-based QUANGOs influece revolutions in other countries. And my answer was based on my assumption that the primary goal of their press releases should be to raise the profile and credibility of the organization in the eyes of donors and decisionmakers, and so the target audience would be people who could raise that profile and credibility. However, an organization's credibility would have to be pretty poor for such crummy press releases to achieve an increase in its credibility, and when an organization's credibility is that poor, its outputs are ignored, as these press releases were.

    • Dot

      And my answer was based on my assumption that the primary goal of their press releases should be to raise the profile and credibility of the organization in the eyes of donors and decisionmakers, and so the target audience would be people who could raise that profile and credibility

      Well, that was in part where I was leading you. If the main objective of an QUANGO is to maintain its viability/impress its funders, then maybe it doesn't deserve funding to begin with.

      A sense that the importance of R&D has perhaps been grossly overstated.

      • McC_

        You're twisting things and ignoring the words I wrote even as you cite them faithfully, I explicitly said "primary goal of their press releases". It should without saying that there's a difference between the main objective of an organization as a whole and the main objective of an organization's communications. The latter should support the former but they aren't the same thing!

  • Crowsnest

    DEMOCRACY:
    ***a state of society characterized by formal equality of rights and privileges.
    .***a political or social unit governed ultimately by all its members
    ***political or social equality;
    ***a political or social unit governed ultimately by all its members

    http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/201103…

    " When a committee was assembled to draft the amendments ( on the new Constitution), not a single woman was on the panel. And on March 8, International Women's Day women took to Tahrir Square ……….they were heckled , booed, and threatened."

    I wonder if Foreign Minister Cannon had that noted on his 'issues to address in Cairo ' : push for democracy for 40 Million Egyptian women who helped spearhead the Revolution.

  • bergkamp

    What took Harper so long in sending his toady over to Egypt to dole out some cash and generally look useful? Surely there are some good images to be broadcast back home in Canada while promoting democracy in Egypt/North Africa.

    Also, maybe people will be distracted by people fighting for real freedom in far away countries and pay less attention to Cons transgressions/scandals.

    Xinhua as a source? ChiCom State propaganda is not best news source. I thought a good overview of what's going on in Egypt was at Telegraph:

    "For Ahmed Shafiq, Egypt's newly-appointed prime minister, it was a lesson in the perils of live television that few of his predecessors in the old regime ever had to worry about. Pitched into a studio debate with guests who actually dared to criticise and answer back, he did the one thing that rarely looks statesmanlike on screen: he lost his temper."
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaa…

  • former_ADB

    The quote from the Telegraph is old news. Shafiq was removed and Essam Sharaf is the current prime minister.

    Check back next week to see if he is still there.

From Macleans