The Canada bubble

The Canadian economy is booming and investors are flooding in. Is it too good to be true?

by Jason Kirby with Erica Alini on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:05am - 48 Comments

Investors would be hit hard, too. The Canadian markets have never been more exposed to the resource sector. The S&P/TSX Composite is four times as resource-intensive as Canada’s overall economy, according to CIBC World Markets. If commodity prices tank, the energy and mining companies that powered returns over the last decade could act like an anchor on investor portfolios.

But it’s Canada’s housing market, and those who have overextended themselves with massive mortgages, that stand to lose the most. The housing sector has become inextricably tied to the broader story of Canada’s elevated standing in the world. It’s a powerful and psychological link, says Shiller, who explored how bubbles form in his book Irrational Exuberance. “Bubbles are mediated by price increases and new-era stories,” he says. Any time you hear talk of a new era—such as Canada becoming the envy of the world, or that soaring commodity prices are here to stay—and it’s used to justify rising prices, it’s a good sign you’re in bubble territory. If a commodity bust does occur, one of the key foundations of the housing bubble would crumble along with it.

The Canada bubble

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

For now, economists remain divided on how the Canada boom will play out. Doug Porter, deputy chief economist at BMO Capital Markets, says the brief commodity market downturn in 2008 revealed how much Canada needs the resource sector to remain strong. But he argues the 20-year bear market in commodities during the ’80s and ’90s means we are only halfway through the current rebound. Likewise, Haber says those forecasting a downturn are themselves misreading history. “What Canada has are strategic resources that emerging economies need,” he says. He points to Canada’s oil sands, which are seen as a more stable source of petroleum given unrest in the Middle East, and says that supply shortages will keep oil prices high for a long time to come. “This is only the second act of a three-act play.”

On the other hand, Tom Bradley, president and co-founder of Steadyhand Investment Funds in Toronto, has been warning Canadians not to buy too heavily into the mantra that Canada is a safe haven. “People see us as a safe play on the emerging markets,” he says. “But that doesn’t mean we’re safe.” If anything, with the dollar so strong and the TSX near its all-time high, Bradley says now is the time for Canadian investors to look beyond our borders.

Perhaps there’s another reason to be anxious. Lately the term “Northern Tiger” has been used a lot to describe the Canadian economy. Given what happened to that other once-booming, now devastated “tiger,” the Celtic one in Ireland, it’s best not to get too used to it.

Bookmark and Share
  • Heidi Bevington

    Every bubble bursts, and this one will as well. If we use the profits from this run of good fortune to pay off debt then we will be fine. If we run up huge debts, they we will be in trouble.

    But I don't think this is just our bubble…it's the world's bubble. The biggest threat to our economy in the short term is a drastic reduction in demand from China or the collapse of the US. If either of those things happens, the whole world is toast.

  • Johnny Canada

    Average wage: 38,000
    Average small house price: 275,000 (mine on west coast, 2 bedroom single floor falling apart: 360,000)
    Add in almost no real apartments for rent in much of Canada and you get a serious problem.

    Something is going to have to give, sooner or later. Government doesn't want to encourage apartments for fear of popping the housing bubble. After all, Canadians wouldn't have to buy a house if there was affordable apartments available.

    And few in their right mind would buy a house if you stood a good chance of going underwater, especially if there is decent cheap apartments available. Write your MLA and MP and tell them you want affordable apartments. Give apartment builders and owners the same kind of tax breaks that housing and condo builders and developers get.

    We might even be able to put some homeless in-doors.

    • Captain Awesome

      More apartments might be built if their property taxes weren't so much higher than houses. If you were a builder and you had the choice of building an apartment to rent out the units (and pay 4% property taxes every year, while home owners only pay 1%), or a condo where you just sell each unit and let the new owners pay their 1%, then the condo looks like a much better deal.

  • Mike T.

    Nonsense! If there was going to be a recession we would have had it by now.

    • filturk

      Better pull your head out of the sand before it's too late.

    • TheWholeTruth

      Don't fool yourself. Economic cycles affect ALL countries. The countries who feel that they are an "exception" to the rule are the ones who suffer the most. There were recessions in SE Asia when there weren't recessions in North America. The US remained strong during a number of European downturns. Japan has lurched from stagnant period to stagnant period while Korea has boomed. The US fell into recession while we stayed strong in Canada. (This time!) The unique circumstances of each country or geographic area lead to unique timing of boom/recession periods.

    • Thwim

      Well.. *I* got it..

      • Tach

        That's what I was thinking too!

        • McC_

          "not my regular audience"

  • novagardener

    The current govt. created a housing bubble with 0/40 mortgages, then 3/35 and 2 mos. ago said they'd change the regs which will change in 2 days. Why didn't they announce it to take effect the next day as did Australia. Their last announcement has created all the greater fools to buy overpriced homes because the RE industry (biggest newspaper advertisers & scam artists) warn the ignorant masses they better buy now or they'll be priced out forever. This govt also wanted to deregulate the banking sector when in opposition. The banks are laughing as CHMC (we taxpayers) will be on the hook for billions in losses. This con artist govt will do and say anything to hoodwink the electorate.

    • West newf

      Your full of Sh!t. Both were permitted first under Paul Martin. Nice try idiot! Conservatives closed down both options with 35 y set to end this fall.

      • Joe Q.

        CMHC-insured 0%-down, 40-year amortizations were first introduced in 2006, after Stephen Harper was elected prime minister. The minimum requirements changed to 5%-down, 35-year amortizations in July 2008.

        When the financial crisis hit in late 2008, Jim Flaherty directed the CMHC to insure more mortgages to keep demand up and buoy the housing market.

        In January of this year, Flaherty announced that the minimum requirements will now include a 30-year amortization (instead of 35 years). The changes officially take effect on Friday March 18th 2011 (not this fall). Hence the surge in buying, especially entry level properties, across the country over the last few weeks.

      • Thwim

        Stop lying.

      • mrCatfish

        Very classy.

    • kevin

      how much of the increase in price is due to those policies compared to the increase from foreign buyers?

      the bubble will burst when the overseas money slows. who knows when this will be

  • http://www.steadyhand.com/blog/ c_stephenson

    Banking on a commodity supercycle would mean this cycle is different. That's usually a poor long term bet! http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/inv…
    Valuations are stretched and we're wary at Steadyhand- http://www.steadyhand.com/globe_articles/2011/03/…

  • OriginalEmily1

    'the best place in the G7 for them to put their money'

    Mmmhmm look who's in the G7

    France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, United States.

    Puuuuure flim-flam here

    • TheWholeTruth

      Does anyone else find it amusing that one of the impartial sources for this story was a person who manages Canadian investment funds? Oh, and his analysis is that “investors are realizing the best place in the G7 for them to put their money is Canada.” Duh. That's a shocker.

      • OriginalEmily1

        Heh….no conflict there eh?

      • McC_

        who said they were impartial? their credentials were fully disclosed, it's up to the reader to decide what credibility to afford their comments, and whether to take them at face value or not.

    • Leftcoast7

      I basically agree with you, with the caveat that I don't think Germany is exactly "flim-flam" at the moment. As for the rest of them, yep, pretty much. I certainly think that the US, in particular, is heading for a catastrophic fall if they don't change course.

  • West newf

    In the minds of Liberals, yes it's to good to be true. Or at least they wish it were not so.

  • Philanthropist

    Everyone should thank Conservative voters and Stephen Harper for the Canadian economy being in good shape.

    Imagine if the world's recession had given the socialists in the Liberal/NDP/Bloc coalition an excuse to go on a borrowing and spending spree – unemployment would be higher, taxes would be higher, investors would be fleeing – and your house would be worth half of what it cost you!

    • Dude

      The same socialists nut-bags that balanced the federal budget in the 90s?

      • Philanthropist

        Perhaps you don't follow along, but we have new socialist nut-bags, and in order to grab power they would have to form a coalition with even crazier socialists – that would be a lethal combination for our economy.
        In the 90's the IMF ordered us to clean up our act – no government would have had a choice but to stop reckless spending.

        • FVerhoeven

          And Preston Manning's presence in the House should not be underestimated.

    • wictorwictor

      What part of this government's fiscal policy could not be fairly described as a "borrowing and spending spree"

    • Kathryn_C

      Thanks Conservative voters and Stephen Harper – thanks to you the Federal debt set to hit historic high. Thats' according to those socialists at the Canadian Taxpayers Federation:

      http://www.montrealgazette.com/entertainment/Fede…

  • filturk

    Of course the bubble will burst in Canada, just like it did in the US, the reason being that the economy is very much global. It's just a question of time. The governments, corporations and media of course want us to think otherwise, because it is in their interest to do so, as they do not want to cause panic thereby disrupting the status quo.

    Anyone who doesn't see this, i.e. that the sh!t will again hit the fan, is simply in denial. It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better, that is if there still remains any potential for it to get better. We may be past the point of no return, given the nature of the human beast.

  • West newf

    Hey Filturkey, the ones in denial are all those Loony Lefties who have been predicting financial disaster since 2008. It hasn't happened yet, much to your disappointment, and is much more unlikely now that the global economy has recovered some what. So go piss on someone else's parade!

    • filturk

      Hey West newfie ostrich, obviously two birds of different feathers do not flock together. Keep your head in the sand big bird, ignorance is bliss !

      • TheWholeTruth

        Hey Filturk, obviously West newf likes to take a positive view of things. A blind, foolish, irrational, stupid view, but positive nonetheless. Don't try to confuse him with facts.

  • madeyoulook

    Prices rise and fall as supply and demand shift. Only that’s no longer seen to be the case in Canada.

    The perfect definition of a bubble scenario. Here's a good rule to live by: Things that cannot go on forever, won't.

  • s_c_f

    It's a combination of things. It's a combination of the booms of real estate and commodities, along with government policies that have improved our competitiveness with other advanced nations, particularly the one to the south. Sales taxes have dropped, corporate taxes have dropped, and the regulatory burden has remained reasonable.

    Meanwhile, our industries have avoided the speculative and regulatory boondoogles plaguing other countries, such as the financial boondoggles in mortgages that plagued wall street and the banking sectors of various countries, the government boondoggles in wind and solar that has plagued Spain and California, the costly cap and trade schemes and other regulatory burdens plaguing Europe, the bondoggle in expanding public entitlements plaguing Greece and the US, and and the list goes on.

    • Huzzah

      -1 for excessive use of boondogle.

  • http://twitter.com/Punditzview @Punditzview

    A humorous cartoon I made about the CMHC & Canada's Housing bubble. Common sense shows we're in trouble when banks' risk controls are thrown out the window. I think every taxpayer who believes the housing market is stretched should watch this:[youtube Xk3j6g50Krs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk3j6g50Krs youtube]

    • FVerhoeven

      I like the approach of using this sort of video to explain the ins and outs of house-buying ect.

      But if this video is geared to the younger, mostly uninformed crowd, I would like to say that not the entire inventory can collapse, so the numbers talked about are quite a bit distorted………..

    • http://twitter.com/Punditzview @Punditzview

      I hear you Fverhoeven & I would completely agree that not the whole $473bn inventory can collapse. There are still many older mortgages backed with lots of equity. On the whole, any mortgage that is backed with equity is going to do its darndest to not default unless prices fall below the mortgage figure – and even then of course, default is not a certainty.

      What I was trying to do with this video is give viewers a sense of the magnitude and potential impact of the CMHC's activities. I did not spell this out in the video, but of the $473bn total insurance in force, 40% was done in just the last 3 years to 2009! (I use 2009 data, because believe it or not, the last published data from the CMHC is only 2009.)

      Moreover, I've seen in the press, the CMHC making insinuation as to the high average "equity" of their insured mortgages. I feel it's misleading because "average" is not important here. What is important when doing risk analysis is the "marginal" borrower. I have only a little bit of data to work with – and it does not reassure me. Check out the table on pg 91 of the CMHC's own 2009 annual report. It shows that even based on current (i.e. 2009) housing values, 28.9% of the entire insurance-in-force has less than 20% equity. That seems a remarkably low amount of equity to me, given how long the CMHC has been in business, and goes to show how active they are at current prices. If prices fall just 20%, 28.9% of their insured mortgage holders will be underwater. Let's hope prices don't fall more.

      Ultimately there's 2 issues to remember:
      1) potential losses to the CMHC/taxpayer
      2) And I think this is the bigger issue – how inflated have prices become because of the CMHC? Common sense & valuation tells me will be a lot of ancillary economic damage should prices normalize.

      • YYZ

        "If prices fall just 20%, 28.9% of their insured mortgage holders will be underwater. Let's hope prices don't fall more. "

        While this would obviously have an impact, equity levels are only one relevant determinant. The whole structure of the mortgage industry in Canada is set up so that you actually have to be able to afford to pay your mortgage in order to get one. This was not true in the American sub-prime crisis where people literally could not afford to make the payments they signed up for.

        Point being – even if there was a 20% price drop tomorrow, lots of people (maybe even most people) would be able to continue paying their mortgage – while in the US they couldn't.

  • http://www.kathymm.com AgentHomes

    Boom or Bust we are better positioned for the future than the US or the rest of the G8

  • Atherien

    Ignore Robert Schiller at your peril, the soft spoken economist is brilliant ! When China its the wall, Canadians will get an overdue reality check.

  • Rolf_Auer

    Harper has done a bad job on the economy:
    "The Tories and Canada are Incompatible" (longish article)
    http://www.clearpolitics.wordpress.com

    (Click "About" re reading posts, or on my picture.)
    @Rolf_Auer

  • http://twitter.com/konop @konop

    We are not doing as well as australia, truly a better comparison than all other countries because of the similarity of our relative size, population density and natural resources. In Australia, they have less than 5% unemployment and a minimum wage of 15$ an hour…most adults getting at least 20$. This is far better than what Canada does…

  • canadiansheeples

    Wow, we’re still pumping Canada, the darling economy! Be jealous other worthless debt ridden G nations fools! We do things much better in Canada like tax our sheeples to death and they’ll take it and beg for more…more DEBT! Please build more condos and mcmansons in the burb, we want to compete with the joneses, have our cake and eat it too. Our resource will save us, since the resource industry hires a majority of the Canadian workforce, who needs manufacturing when all u need is dig crap out of the ground or cut all those trees down and sell it to the rest of the world when oil price is so cheap?! We have enough oil in Alberta to fuel our the pigs, ops i meant american neighbour without destroying the ecological system in the area and waste valuable fresh water in the process.

    Our economy is sound really, listen to your corrupt politians and compliant mainstream media. Everything is ok, what me worry? Crony capitalism is alive and well, you better believe it.

  • http://twitter.com/PRMdesign @PRMdesign

    Time to rethink. Times have changed and our days of opulence needs rethinking and reshaping. Our world is under big changes environmentally and financially. Canada has been a safe haven for investors. No country is impervious to collapse.
    Canada has always been behind the US by 3-5 years. I would like to think Canada is safe haven is true, however my gut is telling me not to be so sure. Canada is one of the highest taxed countries in the world. Our countries debt is growing. What Canada has is natural resources and lets not kid ourselves, our politicians will surely sell us out, when we need them most. Which includes our water. We need to be less complacent and stand up for what we believe in!

  • DaveWR

    The difference in this commodity boom is that it is being driven by developing countries that have over half the world's population. That being said, China and India could have a recession, (they will eventually), and then all bets are off.

  • Joe

    Chinese individuals have essentially only three options for investments: bonds that pay next too nothing, a VERY volitie stock market, or housing. That is because the Chinese government severely restricts investments outside China. Hence the housing bubble and the resulting global commodity boom.

  • andy

    Just buy shares in the big Canadian banks and relax.

From Macleans