Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW

Ignatieff starts filling in the blanks

by Paul Wells on Monday, March 28, 2011 3:09pm - 157 Comments

Perhaps the most interesting news out of Michael Ignatieff’s news conference this morning at Toronto’s Royal York hotel came, not from the candidate, but from his tormentors in the press gallery: of perhaps a dozen questions, only one was about the Liberal leader’s plans, or lack thereof, for an anti-Conservative coalition after the next election. (I didn’t ask any questions at today’s presser. I’ll have some later in the week when he starts rolling out policy.) So it looks like Ignatieff won’t have to spend the next month talking about the coalition and nothing else.

Also interesting were the hints about what the next week holds. Ignatieff is going to roll out a detailed, costed policy proposal every day, starting with something on “learning” tomorrow and ending with the release of a full platform within a week. Few details yet, except this: “Here’s the key thing about it: This electoral program of the Liberal Party of Canada will cost less – it will cost less than the Conservative program. And we will not raise taxes on ordinary Canadian families. And you know why? Because we’ve said no to corporate tax giveaways.”

Of course the Liberals are saying no to corporate tax cuts that were already introduced, in January of this year, from 18% to 16.5%. As former Liberal finance critic John McCallum told reporters while Ignatieff was crowd-surfing in Chinatown, that’s a tax increase. One question facing voters this week is whether the policies Ignatieff will roll out will be worth the tax increase that will help pay for them.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://twitter.com/matwilson6 @matwilson6

    Let's not expect any miracles. All we can expect from Ignatieff is an intelligent man at the helm, and we certainly need that.

    http://ahabit.com/letter.htm

    This is a time when Canada can use an academic, and rest assured, the status quo hates academics, so that's one great reason to vote for Ignatieff.

    If you want the quality of life to continue to decline, you can vote for Dictator Harper.

    Don't get fooled into thinking Harper is a conservative, Ignatieff is the fiscal Conservative in this race because Martin will be in control of the economy, and he certainly was much better than Flaherty's record deficit.

    It's your choice !

    • Ariadne

      No wonder, Ignatieff sounds more like living in lah-lah land, he's living inside his books.

      • Thwim

        I'd rather a man who lives in books than inside his own fantasies of power.

    • chet

      Promising "spending discipline" while at the same to offering up a massive new entitlement does not sound "intelligent" to me.

      Careful of the travelling snake oil salesman offering up the painless cure for what ails you.

      That he speaks with a cultured, slight European, accent shouldn't cause your guard to go down. To the contrary.

    • Ariadne

      Why do many academicians arrogantly think that they are more intelligent than everybody else? Can't they see that many of those working outside the teaching field have university degrees as well? When one put his/her brain on it, many academicians have only half the knowledge of those who put their learning in practice and gained more from applied and practical knowledge.

      As for the deficit, was it not Ignatieff, together with Layton, who pressured the government to aid the ailing car industry even before this industry asked for any help? They even threatened the government to form a coalition then, if their wishes were not met.

  • Kaplan

    Fear not, as Paul Wells pledges to ask a question on policy real soon now.

  • Ariadne

    I thought he has been filling the blanks with so many planned spending, months before election is even planned and called. Remember Universal day care, stadiums for every province, universal long term senior care plan, universal student plan, universal travel plan (international field trips/vacation) for students, and etc. etc. It scares the hell out of me to note that there are still blanks left he needs to fill. Gosh, is that what he means as spending discipline?

    • Holly Stick

      And just think how many of those we can afford if we don't waste $28 billion on planes and unknown billions on building prisons that we do not need.

      • Atchison

        While we're releasing hardened criminals back into the public we should use the money we're saving to give them all a handgun in appreciation of a sentence 1/5 served.

        • JSC

          If they are building these prisons for violent criminals and people that scam people out of their life savings, that’s fine.
          But I don’t trust that the real motive is to copy the US and fill them with pot smokers.

          • Atchison

            I know quite a few pot smokers who've been arrested with both small quantities (a few grams) and large quantities (several ounces). Those with a few grams have received a $400 fine if the receive anything. Those with several ounces have received either a fine or a couple months house arrest at most.

            We need more prisions because of overcorwding resultant of slashing double, triple, or more off sentences for time served and because of stories like this http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1234972.html.

          • Thwim

            Yes, but that was before the CPC legislation on minimum sentencing.

          • Atchison

            No these people were arrested within the last year. Minimum sentences for six months start at 4 plants (each producing approx. 4 lbs of pot) so at about 12 lbs of pot. Such individuals are not 'kids with a couple joints'.

    • sammy

      If you have committed an horrific crime, then I say build more prisons They happen to keep us safe.if one of the goons/thugs gets out.We the public are in trouble.Build them way way up north where it's freezing.I dont need to keep someone like creepy Williams safe, i need him in prison, and many like him.The jets are not until 2016! and the liberals liked and then disliked them.They will tear down our military again

  • chet

    So the latest is a massive new entitlement. Another in the provincial sphere, education.

    In one breath he speaks of spending discipline and with the next opens up the bank.

    In one breath he talks spending discipline and with the next he mocks Harper's cautious income splitting (conditional upon the fiscal house getting in order).

    We already know Iggy is a traveller. Could he add snake oil salesman to the description? Apparently he's got the fix for what "ails" us….and for next to nothing….not like those doctors who keep telling us the cure will be a bit painful.

  • HarveyMushman

    Really…I thought the headline was not accurate either.

    Maybe: "Ignatieff Shooting Blanks" would have been more appropriate.

  • sam

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkdXycwDUxA

    Plainly says by all three parties there was no coalition in 2004 in a poll, I just saw that only17% believe iggy and the other two!

    My day feels fine.Iggy is in TO, liberal land, that means safe.

  • Holly Stick

    So how much is Harper planning to waste on planes? $28 billion? And on prisons? Oh right, the minority Conservative government refused to provide the data on that, for which THEY WERE FOUND IN CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT.

  • bergkamp

    I wish our main parties aspired to be more than tweedledum and tweedledee.

    The federal budget is more than $250 billion and all the can find to disagree on is 1.5% difference in corporate tax rate and a few programs that add up to a couple billion $$$.

    And they don't even really disagree on corporate taxes because Libs/Iggy were for these tax cuts 2/3 budgets ago before they were against them.

    Is this election going to be Seinfeld election … about nothing? It seems complacent or decadent to me that parties are taking position that Canada is perfect just the way it is, except for a few minor details. People have issues with how the country is run but debate people are having is not reflected in campaign.

  • Mike R

    Well, we've been in Afghanistan since 2002 and it wasn't an issue in 2004, 2006 or 2008, although it may have been mentioned in passing. It won't be an issue in 2011, any more than our involvement in Libya will be. Foreign affairs, and defence issues (other than juvenile arguments over the appropriate level of pork-barrelling) have almost never been the issue in federal elections. I don't expect this one to be any different.

  • TimesArrow

    If the so called strategist would just stop yelling COALITION!! at max decibels, perhaps we could have a debate. At the very least the cons could defend their record and the libs/ndp could say what they would do differently. Thankfully there are signs this may be happening. Froma partisan pov i hope Harper keeps yelling coalition like it was still 08 – it would have worked then, but now there's a chance he may start looking like the one wh's obessed.

  • Pele

    The Canada Action Plan was an excellent, well-executed anti-recession response. Your livelihood as a Canadian is dependent on it's being allowed to finish the job.

    Ignatieff has thrown a monkey wrench into a very competent plan to strengthen our economic prospects for years to come. Now he wants to introduce his own "plan" in it's place.

    With closet NDP ers like Bob Rae and Gerard Kennedy in the background, we can only hope that pragmatic Canadians carry the day and vote a Conservative majority.

  • filturk

    "One question facing voters this week is whether the policies Ignatieff will roll out will be worth the tax increase that will help pay for them."

    Of course they will, you don't think the Liberals would divulge policies, knowing they would not be popular !?! It's a question of priorities. As one would say : jets & jails vs 'investments' for the people.

  • filturk

    Why give Big Corpo a $6,000,000,000 tax break ? Yeah right, they're job creators. Gimme a break.

  • madeyoulook

    The Action! Plan was one of the dumbest moves an allegedly conservative governing party could make:

    Some people are losing their jobs? Quick! How fast can we piss away tomorrow's prosperity? Faster, people, faster! Just make sure the signs are ready!

  • brooster2

    You should stick to soccer. Even at your age, you're probably still better at it than at political commentary.

  • tarkwell robotico

    –" I'm guessing you've never worked in business or follow the markets at all.

    Are you talking about Michael Igntieff… although, unlike him, I have made an investment decision in my life.

  • tedbetts

    I'm sorry but I can't even credit you with a "nice try" for that attempt at deflection and avoidance.

    Your answers and comments are enough confirmation of my guess. You don't need to go on proving it so.

  • Pele

    Fil, the CAF is in desperate need of new technology. Our jails are in a terrible state and in dire need of up-grading. These "priorities" have deteriorated to the breaking point under Liberal governments.

    The Conservatives are not only upgrading what the Liberals allowed to falter, but they are doing so with a balanced approach that still serves the average Canadian family better than any Liberal agenda.

    It's a no-brainer, the Conservatives are the only choice for pragmatic Canadians.

  • catherine

    So, how much of the prison budget is for the upgrading you mention and how much is tied to increased number of prisoners associated with new crime legislation? I don't think credible studies support these type of increases in incarceration for reducing crime. So, to me, that initiative looks like a waste of money meant to capture votes based on ignorance and fear, rather than facts and evidence.

  • Just Joe

    "It's a no-brainer, the Conservatives are the only choice for [paripatetic] Canadians."

    – Hobo CEO

  • filturk

    Re: refurbishing the military and prisons, yeah ok. However, at the end of the day, it's a question of priorities. And if Ottawa doesn't collect taxes, then there's obviously less in the treasury. So in the end what kind of system do we want : socialism with free entreprise like in Scandinavia ? or… rampant libertarianism ? Comme to think of it Harper has shown his true colors ever since he took power. We thought he was a 'reformer' à la Manning, what we got was this Frankenstein hybrid machiavellian autocrat who will do anything to stay in power, obviously so he can achieve his primary goal which is to transform Canada into a friendly fascist corporate state.

    I invite you to become enlightened Pele… http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Friendl…

  • Reverend_Blair

    It was an issue in 2004, 2006, and 2008. Just because they didn't talk about it and the media let them get away with their silence doesn't mean we didn't here about it.

  • Atchison

    A couple years ago in Halifax a man was released on parole after 7 months of a 5 year sentence for robbing a gas station at knife point. While he was in the process of robbing a man on the street yet again at knife point an American sailor attempted to stop him and was stabbed to death.

    Two days ago a violent offender in Halifax was released on parole for the third time after: first beating two brothers in an ally and being an accomplice to ones death, then getting released on parole only to be arrested after he was involved in a drive by shooting, then getting released again on parole only to be arrested walking down the street holding a quart and a knife in his hands. We are currently waiting for him to murder someone.

    For the publics safety these criminals need to be locked up not let out. If we keep releasing criminals we may as well hand them a crack rock and a handgun on their way out.

  • HarveyMushman

    Speaking of election promises and issues…when was the last time we had any leader of any party bring up Global Warming and/or Kyoto?

    Sure has fallen off the radar hasn't it? Certainly Iggy would be very happy to never hear of it again…carbon taxes and green shifts are not exactly endearing to voters right now. Certainly Harper is glad to have it off the table, I suspect Jack is as well.

    Who's that leave? Elizabeth May to carry on the (complete with pre-purchased carbon credits) torch?

    Could it be that the economy , "climategate" and (perhaps) "the sky is falling" fatigue syndrome mean that this will not even be mentioned by any of the mainstream candidates? Very possible I think.

  • Atchison

    Harper was hated by Manning because he constantly criticised the Reform Party publicly.

  • Thwim

    Do you have links to these stories you could provide?

  • Atchison

    Violent offender from two days ago http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1234972.html

    Murderer who stabbed the sailor http://www.metronews.ca/halifax/local/article/244…
    I couldn't find the articles from 2006 that discussed Wrights prior convictions and early release.

  • Mike R

    I suppose I'm definging "issue" as a matter that is the subject of debate in a campaign and a matter on which the parties offer differing views that may change people's votes. The foreign policy of Canada was not an "issue" in that sense in any of those campaigns. That is not a rarity. It has been an issue of importance in 1988 and 1963 most recently.

  • Reverend_Blair

    Ah, so you get to decide what I should consider issues? Sorry, you don't get to pick my ballot issues. Point is that there are a lot of people who don't see their issues raised in an election and a lot of issues are interconnected. Look at Harper trying to define this election as a one-issue (economy) debate. That's crap. It ignore the environment, human rights, corruption/accountability, foreign policy etc. Not only are those issues I'm voting on, they are all connected to each other.

  • sam

    Iggy will bring in a carbon tax and other taxes, that's for certain

  • Holly Stick

    To their collective shame.

From Macleans