Inkless Wells

Inkless Wells

Paul Wells on all the latest out of Ottawa—along with the occasional post about jazz. Follow Paul on Twitter: @InklessPW
He also offers his thoughtful perspective of Stephen Harper’s last 10 years in his recent eBook, The Harper Decade.

"I'm not interested in having multiple debates"

by Paul Wells on Thursday, March 31, 2011 10:48am - 176 Comments

During the televised four-headed leaders’ debates of 2006, Paul Martin went off on one of his trademark tangents, declaring he would be delighted to debate Gilles Duceppe anywhere, any time, about the future of Quebec’s place in (or, to be fair, out of) Canada. Then he got cut off and the moderator changed the subject and the moment was lost.

But Duceppe, no fool, announced in Montreal the day after the debates that he would be delighted to take Martin up on the offer. “Here I am!” he announced gleefully.

The then-prime minister made himself small while his staff put out remarks to the effect that he had a full schedule and couldn’t be expected to do another debate after the two (French and English) just televised. But somebody else would. Stephen Harper.

With the televised consortium debate already finished, the Stephen Harper Conservative campaign put out a news release formally offering to debate Duceppe one-on-one where Martin wouldn’t. “If Paul Martin refuses to stand up for Canada, Stephen Harper will,” one of his helpers told reporters. I fussed over this moment a bit in my book, writing that it was a moment when Stephen Harper began to look and sound like a prime minister.

Today Harper said he isn’t interested in any debates beyond the televised four-headed network consortium debate.

Bookmark and Share
  • Alain

    Ducepte vs Harper debate should also be interresting

    Sure That Ducepte will eat Harper in a debate

    Harper got charisma but It not an Intellectual

    Igniatieff and Ducepte are both Great Intellectual.

    So in a Debate Igniatief and Ducept got the upper hand

  • RhealR

    I notice that all conservatives have very short memories. When the conservatives won a majority they litterly destroyed the country both in the federal and the Ontario provincial elections . After Mulroney the conservatives had to go through a name change and a wait of many years for people to forget ( even the conservative voters ) they barely got any seats and we ended up with a liberal gov't for quite a few years . the same thing happened with the Harris gov't . it will be years before the public including the conservatives forget what he did.

  • michael

    Hey Paul, if its too hot for you, get out of the kitchen- Paul bans twitter account for commenting on his biased reporting

  • J Teller

    Harper's campaign has been stuck in the starting gates since last week. The momentum is shifting toward the Liberals and I think it's in large part because Harper didn't really want this election. (insert partisan rhetoric here if you want, I don't really care, frankly.)

    His heart isn't in it. No fire in the belly. His voice sounds flat and tired. Ignatieff hasn't even broken a sweat yet and I think we're going to see the polls swing sharply in favor of the Liberals over the next few days. It's early times, mind you, but for a party (the Tories) that is flush with cash and has been in permanent campaign mode since the last election, it tells me they've got nothing new to share with Canadians. This might be due to the top-down management style of Mr. Harper. It might be that Harper is surrounded by sycophants and is out of touch with even his members in caucus, who knows. All I can say at this point is that Harper looks like a man who actually wants to lose this election.

    And this is week one! There's still five more to go! Fascinating. I feel like I'm watching a train wreck.

  • Mike T.

    I wonder if past success has made them overestimate what they can get away with?

  • catherine

    Harper has been such a political gamer, that I have a hard time believing he will not snap out of whatever is throwing him off his game now. However, so far, I am quite amazed at just how poorly he is campaigning.

  • Proud Canadian

    "All I can say at this point is that Harper looks like a man who actually wants to lose this election". There may be some truth in that statement. I've noticed over the last 20 years or so that the Tories run up huge debt, hand the mess over to the liberals, liberals make hard choices, dig us out of debt and build a surplus, tories attack, come back and do it again. What a cycle…

  • Kathryn_C

    I think he's just been spending way too much time surrounded by sycophants and inferior minds:

    "Our first preference was a direct debate with the leader of the coalition," Harper said, highlighting a message he has been hammering since the election campaign kicked off.
    "Mr. Ignatieff insisted that his first preference was to have his coalition partners there at the debate," he added.

    You can almost hear him pause for the desk thumping and ragh-ragh of QP with every "coalition".

  • danby
  • Reverend_Blair

    I remember Inkless writing or saying that Harper does best when he gets a long period of time off to go strategize. Could it be that Harper is losing it because he hasn't the time to do that?

  • Weird

    Harper wanna roll with The gangsters, But he's too white N' nerdy

From Macleans