Russell Williams’s final victim: his wife

Mary Elizabeth Harriman appears determined to hold on to what little is left

by Michael Friscolanti, with Cathy Gulli and Martin Patriquin on Monday, April 11, 2011 9:05am - 95 Comments

Her only crime was trusting himAs good pilots always do, Russell Williams stuck to a strict plan that Sunday afternoon: smile, don’t ask for a lawyer, and answer every last question (honestly or not, depending on the tactical benefit). In his mind, twisted as it is, he truly believed he could talk his way out of that tiny interrogation room.

When Det.-Sgt. Jim Smyth explained exactly what police were investigating—two home-invasion sexual assaults, the slaying of Cpl. Marie-France Comeau, and the recent disappearance of Jessica Lloyd—Williams didn’t alter his strategy. He even agreed, without hesitation, to provide fingerprints, a DNA sample, and the brown leather boots on his feet. Anything to appear innocent.

Finally, after 2½ hours spent sitting across the same table, Smyth found the colonel’s weak spot: the gold wedding ring on his finger. “Another thing that can often happen in cases like this is that people become concerned about things like extramarital affairs,” he said. “Is there any contact you may have had with any of those four women that you may not want your wife to be aware of?”

For the first time, Williams looked insulted. He took a deep breath and shifted in his chair. “Absolutely not.”

He didn’t know it, but his wife of 18 years—Mary Elizabeth Harriman, a senior executive at the Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada—was already staring at the truth: a team of officers inside her home, searching for signs of a serial predator. They arrived on Feb. 7, 2010 at 5:36 p.m., the exact moment Williams was scoffing at the notion he might be an unfaithful husband.

Her only crime was trusting himAs the interview wore on, Williams would mention his wife again and again. When Smyth asked about the tires on his Nissan Pathfinder, he said “we” put them on because “our” dealership recommended them. When asked about his whereabouts on the night of Nov. 24, 2009 (Comeau was murdered early that morning), Williams recalled how he and Harriman dined at a restaurant in Ottawa’s Westboro district, where their new townhouse—the one now swarming with cops—was under construction. “I kissed my wife goodbye and headed back to Tweed,” he said.

The couple had been living a temporary commuter marriage, connecting mostly on weekends, since Williams took charge of CFB Trenton seven months earlier, in July 2009. He spent Monday to Friday at their Tweed, Ont., cottage, a 45-minute drive from the base, while she remained in Ottawa, 200 km away. Their cat, Rosebud, stayed with her.

As the clock approached 6 p.m., Smyth went for the jugular. He told his suspect the tires on his SUV matched a set of tracks left in the snow near Lloyd’s house. He then pulled out a sheet of paper depicting two footprints: one from Lloyd’s backyard, the other from the bottom of Williams’s boot. “These are identical,” Smyth said.

The commander of Canada’s largest and most important air force base stared at the paper, his brain spinning. When he finally did open his mouth—”Well, I don’t know what to say”—Smyth played the one card that would bring Williams to his knees. “Right now, there’s a search warrant being executed at your residence in Ottawa, okay. So your wife now knows what’s going on.”

Bookmark and Share
  • guest

    Unfortunately I have no sympathy for Williams' wife. How petty can one be after the devestation, horror & sorrow he caused that's she's concerned with scratches on her floor. This shows incredible callousness, no empathy & it would appear her & Williams were a good match. If this is the type of person the Heart & Stroke leads with, they won't get any more of my money. How vile & vulgar is her actions. Not once did she say to the victims' families her regret. She visits him in jail. Before he is arrested I read she was colluding to have the house changed into her name. A repugnant person with an ego like his..only thinking of her own skin.

    • jonatwitan

      You have no idea what you're talking about. All the better that you decided to just type in "guest." I hope you enjoy the view from way up there.

      • jonatwitan

        I know that what "guest" said is in the hearts and minds of the majority. The hearts and minds of the majority is rarely compassionate in such situations. Also, the premise of the above article is that perhaps what is in the hearts and minds of the majority is unfair to Ms. Harriman, and that people should strive toward a little more understanding.

        Given the information that we know, I will say that no reasonable person ought to ever say or imply that Ms. Harriman is somehow guilty of something that led to the death of others. That is ridiculous, and if you weren't anonymous, I would demand you retract that statement.

        Ms. Harriman wanted the people of Ontario to pay for her hardwood? First, its a drop in the bucket to the people of Ontario. Besides, to reason from that that she cares more about her floors than the lives shattered by her husband is outrageous. The two things simply are not connected.

        You think I'm depraved based on what I wrote above? Well, then I can't imagine what you think about Ms. Harriman. Do I support Russell? Absolutely not. But while I don't expect you to be able to understand this, and I also suspect that you will use it to jump to all sorts of conclusions about me and my thinking that simply are not true, I do feel compassion for Russell.

        By the way, did you read the article?

        • Stewart_Smith

          Who would have guessed. jona not such a twit. well said.

        • AnotherGuest

          I agree. She wouldn't be the first to be fooled by a depraved but clever and deceitful spouse.

        • karla homolka (ish)

          i can make some conclusions about you… sinec you brought it up, you work for the gov ", its a drop in the bucket to the people of Ontario" also it looks like you have a personal relationship to this scum "Do I support Russell?" also you have rich parents your most likely rich yourself ( not rich but somewhere around the 125y mark) only sheltered people left wing people are so quick to forgive sex offenders " people should strive toward a little more understanding." ps have fun at church on sunday

    • Guest

      I absolutely agree with you and your clear thinking. The number of people already here who think Ms. Harriman is completely innocent and write in support of her are appalling. I do not believe she is without blame it and never will. Michael Edelson, the lawyer, would be behind the scheme to shield the assets and the reason the woman who was victimized by him is having a problem settling her case. The pension that Williams receives should be taken from him to help women/children/disadvantaged people. Any woman who ignores the type of activity that Williams was involved in, is guilty by association. I question her association and I do not believe these are the only crimes he committed.

      • aggie lloyd

        ditto

    • MTB

      I can't believe that people feel they can make character judgments about Harriman based on her reactions in the aftermath of a shock that no sane person could possibly imagine going through. If I was in a state of emotional devastation, I'd probably be trying to hang on to money and assetts too….for fear that I may never be able to work again and would need them to keep a roof over my head into old age. And then there's the fact that, you know, she loved this guy for years, and no matter how much of a monster he turned into, I'm sure it's not easy for her to just let go overnight. I'd love to know how many of the women here who are bad-mouthing Harriman have stuck it out with men who neglected them, disrespted them, cheated on them, or generally didn't love them as much as they loved the man. Not so easy to admit when it's not working out, is it? So why should a woman who had "the perfect marriage" for well over a decade be able to let go overnight?

      • MARTA

        She can nurse her memories the way she wants…. But she is after MONEY she isNOT entitled Russ's part should go to the crown….THIS IS WHITEWASH .I dobt that "perfect marrige" claim.

        • Healthcare Insider

          Are you sure she is not entitled to the assets. Did she had assets prior to coming into the marriage that he agreed at the time of the marriage that she could keep? Maybe there was a prenup.

          • Patchouli

            You're awfully defensive of the indefensible, HI. Do you work with heart and stroke too?

          • Healthcare Insider

            No, I do not work at Heart and Stroke. I am just raising possibilities that you people have not even considered. You have really no idea what Ms. Harriman's financial situation is. Maybe is weighed down by credit card debt. Are you sure there aren't mortgages on the property in Ottawa – secured lines of credit, etc. The point is that everyone is making assumptions without the full information of support them.

        • Really?

          Why should it go to the crown? If he died and left it to her in his will, it would be hers. In a divorce settlement it might be hers. Why should she have to settle for a lower socioeconomic status because of what he did? She's not charged and not guilty, and shouldn't have to pay.

    • also guest

      there seems to be lots of support for this woman here. much more than im sure you could find on the street. she tried to hide a killers money and people just love her on this site right now. i wonder why that is? it wont work you know people will always hate this women not just for the floors or the hiding of money that should go to the victims but also and perhaps more so for acting like she is a victim aslo she is not… ps have fun in church

      • MelaniAnne

        I don't support her-not at all. She has not said a word, publicly. If my husband had done such a thing, and I really knew nothing about his behavior, I would gather the press and announce my innocence and apologies to the families. The only thing she has done is to lay low and cover her financial assets. This is a warm, loving, intelligent, caring person? Not in my book.

        • aggie lloyd

          totally agree

          • MelaniAnne

            If you are a relative of Jessica Lloyd, my heart goes out to you and your family, and friends of your beautiful Jessica. It was a senseless act of a depraved individual. There are no words to describe that vile man.
            The victims here are the women who were attacked, without provocation, violated, murdered, in cold blood, and coldly left. How horrific is that? And we are expected to view Ms. Harriman, in her new home, freshly replaced flooring, with her pension-sucking husband safely tucked away in prison, as a victim? It's disgusting.

    • HOW DARE YOU

      for some reason any post i put up is flaged. they have have been in realtion to the true nature of a victim. and how this women in this case is not. im hoping that they are reposted. if you work for macleans and are involved in filtering posts you should that this would be the kind of thing that gets you fired. there are two sides here one is standing up for real victims right and the other is working some pr bs. who do you think will fight harder and longer?

  • Michael

    I disagree, she's just a women, who has been humiliated in the most public of ways.

    I don't see how the police ruining her floors has anything to do with the victims, and if she wasn't justified in her complaint, she wouldn't have recieved the compensation, especially in a case with this high a profile.

    As for the financial deal, well, can't say i disagree with that either. It goes without saying that their relationship ended when she discovered he was a lunatic, his assets will (hopefully) all be confiscated… yet he is only really entitled to half the marital assets. Since he seems geniune and sane enough when it comes to his wife, I believe it was probably better they came to a quick agreement that they both might move on with their lives… such as they are.

  • Guest2

    Did you guys actually read this article?

    “Woman after woman after woman that I’ve encountered in these cases—and I’ve been doing this for 35 years—knew nothing,” says Louis Schlesinger, a leading forensic psychologist. “I absolutely believe them. Leading a double life is very, very typical. It’s the rule rather than the exception.”

    It doesn’t matter that Williams was a high-ranking, universally respected colonel with a sense of humour and a natural ability to lead. People still cling to the false belief that all predators come with greasy hair and dirty trench coats. It makes us feel safe to think we can spot the monster in our midst.

    Which helps explain why Harriman’s name now generates 145,000 Google hits. Judging her from afar—if she just looked in the printer box, he could have been stopped—is strangely comforting. “Most people believe they can detect deviance or deception by looking at or talking to someone,” Schlesinger says. “It’s not true. But people want to believe that because it gives them a sense of security.”

    • jonatwitan

      It is nice to see that Guest2 is a much better reader, and much more reasonable, then his/her predecessor.

      • guest3

        hey you… yeah jonatwitan you ….. i read some of your posts here and other places and your a funny little guy… spend alot of time online dont you. : ) if only the world knew just how great you are they would put you in charge in a flash eh… i know one day youll show them all just how great you are… but till then just going to be a smart mouth online eh?

  • Toad

    Is Ms. Harrison's negligence not being exaggerated just a tad? I can only speak for my self here, but I'm not in the habit of routinely searching all of the boxes in my garage for evidence.

  • Healthcare Insider

    I am surprised that the people who are demanding a pound of flesh from Harriman are not also placing blame on Russell's family of origin. Surely his parents must have done something grevous to have raised a son capable of the monsterous acts he perpetrated. What of his siblings….best friends…close neighbors. I am sure we could twist logic to convince ourselves that all these people had if not knowledge of what he was doing, at least some inkling that he was a sociopath. Too bad he didn't procreate. We could blame his children for something too.

  • Jay Anderson

    Jan and Virginia, IS Harriman trying to hold on to more than half the marital assets? We don't know that because the domestic contract has not been made public. She is certainly entitled to half of all assets. She had a full-time well-paying executive job and contributed to their combined wealth. She is asking for ownership of their house in Ottawa, but I assume would not get the house in Tweed. Also the article mentions that she has offered to settle out of court with Williams' victims.

    Williams should be (and is being) punished to the full extent of the law. But if Harriman was unaware of his crimes (as you both seem to believe) it would be unjust to seize her assets to pay for his crimes. And it's unfair to expect her to acquiese to an injustice.

    • Patchouli

      But Jay, we do know that one of his victims, who he raped and humiliated and abused but who lived to tell the tale, believes that Harriman ruthlessly made a deal to protect assets so that she, the rape victim, could not get anything from a civil suit. It just seems awfully rational and self-serving coming from a woman who has every ability to continue on in life with her terrific well-paid job.

      So is she one of the execs at Heart and Stroke who decided to sell that check mark that indicates a product is healthy to the highest bidders? Because that was a pretty freaking unethical decision, wasn't it? I mean, no she wasn't raping and killing, but she was willing to profit at the healthful expense of others.

      • Judy

        why would the rape victim think she should get anything in a civil suit, the province pays her bills and even compensates her if she feels she is not capable of work? why should she get any more than any of the other thousands of rape victims in Ontario? Oh, because the rapist is someone of notoriety whose wife has a little money? Again, that 'victim' now wants to victimize someone else who is equally victim to this man.

    • Jan

      Oh, yes, she wants it all…according to earlier reports and her affidavit, she paid Williams $60,000 and "gave" him the $120,000 cottage — AFTER she took out everything she wanted. The cottage is a murder scene – good luck selling it, Williams. Meanwhile, she keeps the cottage contents and the $700,000 home in Westboro. She's entitled to half his pension too, probably. And don't forget the newly-finished flooring!

      Poor, poor Mary-Liz! All she lost was a murdering pervert. Sounds like she's counting on coming out WAY ahead. She apparently offered the surviving victim $70,000 to shut up and go away.

      • Patchouli

        Jan, is this so, the offer to pay off the victim? If so, that is disgusting.

        • Jan

          Yes, Laurie Massicotte reported it in an interview this past week; she turned it down and is working with her lawyer.

          No one quibbles with Harriman keeping half the marital assets. But she should not be getting Williams' half as well. If she doesn't like it, she can sue him and get in line.

      • Healthcare Insider

        There is no pension, Jan. The military took it away.

        • Healthcare Insider

          OOPS! Me bad! Apparently there is a pension. Maybe he is keeping that. Do you know if she had any assets coming into the marriage? That would make a difference in the settlement. If she already owned an expensive home, she would get to keep more assets.

          • MelaniAnne

            " If she already owned an expensive home, she would get to keep more assets. "

            I'm sorry, but that isn't correct, unless they had a premarital agreement. A good friend of mine married a woman who was on public assistance. He had a very good job and a home before he met her. After ten years of hell, for him, they were divorced. She got one-half of the value of the house, and other assets.

        • aggie lloyd

          and where did you find that military pension information.better check that one out again. get the facts

          • Healthcare Insider

            I already admitted I had it wrong.

      • Healthcare Insider

        Jan, my guess is "poor Mary-Liz" would change places with you in a heartbeat. My question is would you change places with her…given how she has benefitted so much. No, I didn't think so. She is now infamous through no fault of her own. Everything she believed to be true has turned out to be a lie. People are demanding that she offer the victims and they families compensation for her soon to be ex-husband's brutality. However, when she does so, people like you and Patchouli call her actions disgusting and say she is paying people to "shut up and go away".

        • Jan

          You seem to willfully misunderstand what people are saying, "Wealth Insider". What I am saying is this: Mary-Liz should not give up ANY of her own money, not one thin dime. She worked for it, it's hers. Half of everything they earned together is hers, too.

          But IF she is divorcing that killer (about whom you claim she never had a clue) then HIS half/money should go to the victims, NOT to her. 50/50 of all marital assets is normal in every division of property in a divorce. Got that so far? And if their property was damaged as a result of his crime, then he owes her. Neither you, me, or his victims should pay for that damage, but we all did.

          What I don't understand at all is why people like you think she should get his half, BEFORE his victims? Please explain that, it's really stumping people.

          No, I wouldn't change places with the lofty, social-climbing Mary-Liz. I pity her lack of human compassion and dysfunctional dearth insight into her own life. And if you know anything about what real-life compensation courts award for crimes like this, you will know that what Mr & Mrs Williams offered his survivor was a vile insult added to her horrendous injuries.

    • karla homolka (ish)

      who is Harriman lawer? there is someone we should get on too : )

  • Guest

    Why must we endure another l-o-n-g article and photos of that person WIlliams? And WHY must the cover have a picture of that person and his wife?
    Let us be DONE with this murderer and not give him one more second of our time. Let us be done with recounting his crimes. He is in jail where he will stay until he dies. Is it not punishment enough for Canadians to have to PAY for this wretched person's food, shelter, clothing and 'protection' while he lives?
    Here's an idea! Tell me about the lives of his victims and stories of their childhood adventures and friends and activities. Tell me about the parents of victims and their families. Enough with glorifying the scum of the scum of our country.
    Let's elevate our minds out of the gutter.

    • aggie

      I would like to see him serve a lot of time and then be put in with some cellmates, maybe they could serve better justice

      • Judy

        nah, they'll probably just plunk him down with those other 2 infamous men, Olson and Bernardo who, I have been led to understand, have their own private wing.

  • Patchouli

    I dunno, people. Your husband goes for long walks alone at night, in the dark. You never offer to go with him? Or you do and he says no? And women start being raped right there where you live — still no curiousity about those walks?

    An astonishingly incurious woman.

    • Spitfire

      Exactly!!!! For 2 years he took walks "alone" mostly at night and then within a few "doors" down of their very homes….rapes, robberies and weird things started to occur that surely the everyone talked to her about. Did she ever question and possibly put 2 + 2 together? Did she ever say to her perfect husband "honey I'm scared tonight so can you stay home with me"? How about buying a treadmill to cure his chronic back pain? 2 years = 730 nights and over 88 break-ins all within a 2 mile radius of her neighbourhood(s). Surely the Heart and Stroke foundation didn't hire no dummy.

      • Spitfire

        I can only imagine a typical day in the life of the Williams household as being: Russ comes home from a long day of leading the Canadian Military, she comes home from a long day of assisting with serious health issues of Canadian people. They chat about their day, enjoy a nice dinner and watch the news then Russ retires to his private study for 3 hours to download child porn, photo's of him masturbating in a 12 year old neighbours bedroom, video of raping women and then heads to bed with is loving wife. Certainly after 18 years, she would "feel" some form of changes in her husband and his routine from the previous 15 years. So many questions which we may never know or why do we want to know? What is crazy is that he's still receiving FULL PENSION of $60,000 every year as there is no policy to cancel the entitlement, hmmm who in the Government is going to change this? The military burned his uniform, medals and any memorabilia of him, but they are forced to still pay him. Who's getting this money? I would suggest regular donations to Victim Services in lieu of canteen orders at Kingston Pen

        • Healthcare Insider

          I understood they cancelled his pension.

          • Patchouli

            You keep saying this but you are wrong. They could not claw back his pension, or they would not.

          • Spitfire

            He is still getting his pension

          • MelaniAnne

            This is the second comment that you have made without checking your facts.
            He IS getting his pension. I suppose it isn't often that a retired base commander ends up in prison for murder, rape, child pornography, and breaking and entering. They haven't made an exemption clause for it., yet.

        • aggie

          I agree his money should go to the victims

    • Healthcare Insider

      Patchouli – hate to burst your buble but many of us hard working, well-paid women, go to bed really early because we get up really early. Ms Harriman has a demanding job – I'm sorry she didn't know her husband was a sociopathic murdering rapist or she might have stayed up and insisted on accompanying him on his "walks". Think about your spouse – how much do you monitor his/her movements? Could she/he be carrying on a long-term affair? It happens all the time and people are caught unware. Why? It is called "trust". If you aren't doing anything wrong, why would you suspect your partner of doing anything wroing?

  • Alex

    I really wonder why no-one, least of all your magazine and article-writer, refuses to respect or acknowledge this lady's right to privacy. She is not the criminal. She did not know what her husband was up to. Can she be allowed to live a semblence of a normal life?

  • karla homolka (ish)

    her husband raped and killed two woman and this woman has flooring problems? remember when karla homolka was also concerned with her stuff after the police had been in the house. it takes a special kind of women to love these guys i hope this story never gets old. lawsuits that go on for years and leave this women with nothing.

    • HSW

      How can you compare Ms. Harriman to Karla Homolka??? Homolka knew what her husband was and what he was doing and participated in his crimes. Ms. Harriman shares no blame with the monster that she married and does not deserve to lose her home and future security.

  • http://onelinecritic.wordpress.com/ DirtyOldTown

    Anyone can be fooled by a monster. And of course she shouldn't have to take the blame for his actions. But at the same time, it is hard to work up sympathy for a woman with no dependents who earns a 6 figure salary, owns a $700,000 house, and still feels the need to ask taxpayers to replace her floors (and a $1400 lamp, if I am not mistaken). Perhaps these claims were made in the throes of grief. But her attempt to transfer assets between herself and Williams before any of the victims had an opportunity to seek compensation doesn't sit well either. In any case, it is up to the courts now to determine how the assets will be split, and what compensation the victims will receive, if any. (Though I am sure no amount of compensation will bring their loved ones back.)

    • Ello-Elle

      How much is your loved one worth before U start feeling better?

  • HOW DARE YOU

    how dare you think that you this maifa wife and turn her in a victim. two of the othe victims are dead. two are going through pain you clearly will never understand and they all have family that are bleeding in the most painful ways. this woman tried to hid assets. money that will be needed inorder to overcome the damage done. but she is also a victim. HOW DARE YOU

  • lyndalee

    just a couple of comments. No one knows someone until you live under the same roof as that person. Neighbours, friends, coworkers may see the facade that "great guy".. you know them, the domestic abusers are an example of that, but she knew him better than anyone, with that said, even if she suspected something even an inkling of something, who would ever want to think their husband could be capable of such horrific crimes. Your mind just wouldn't go down that path.
    I agree with others though that she should not be written about to such a degree but there is a curiousity, a fascination with creatures like Williams where people want to know how they could be that way? How they could hide it? and unfortunately she is the closest thing to getting an understanding of him.
    I think as a society the more important thing to learn from this is how men end up like this and what we can do in society for our young boys so that they grow up to not become every woman's worst nightmare.

  • Page Turner

    This story has haunted me since it first came out. My family member is a retired leftenant colonel, he has lived in New Orleans for many years.He is cold, and always has been as cold as ice to me ( his and our brother's victim when I was a child). This man, who is revered by his collegues and friends, has now legally robbed me of my inheritance now my parents are gone, because I told the story of family abuse which included him( to no avail) when I promised I wouldnt to survive. There are many hidden monsters in the military. When issues arise, like these, they close ranks and blame and silence the victim whenever possible. The MP who drove me home, when he found me trying to escape from Camp Valcartier at age three, cried when I told him why, claiming (likely correctly) that he had no choice but to take me home, even though he had just heard the nightmare that was and would continue to be for me. I still have great affection for men in the armed forces in general. My father and grandfather lived dedicated honourable lives, therein. It is THIS generation, that is recruited based on bloodthirsty, heartless ambition ( and my brother proudly admits this IS the current criteria for military recruitment) that everyone should notice and insist on accountability and CHANGE!

    • Guest

      Bless you Page T. I am sorry that you were abused. You did not deserve it at all, you were just a wee child.
      I hope you heal and that you continue to share with others the strength that got you to today. Take care.

      • marta

        the military does have alot of these types…as Russel….. it is a great place to hide /just like the Churches/ and still have a sheltered good life

  • Guestnn

    I've been reading about the origins of serial killers and rapists since this story started. And it's kind of shocking to me how everyone is fixating on Ms. Harriman when all the literature I can find – including by profiler Roy Hazelwood – asserts that almost all were severely abused – often sexually &/or psychologically terrorized – by female caregivers. Given that, why are we giving Ms. Harriman such a hard time, when no-one is writing about his parents?

    From what I've read, unless we're in a 'Karla' situation, which I doubt, the research implicates mothers FAR more than wives.

    • Wendy Kubik

      Not so much mothers as fathers . . . and stepfathers. Doesn't mean women are perfect by any means but the majority of perpetrators in the area of sexual abuse within families are men. Women are equally guilty of emotional abuse which can be every bit as damaging as physical or sexual.

  • Ello-Elle

    2007 – All of a sudden – cancer … brain cancer maybe?

    • PFB

      ? this is not up to me to judge. Unfortunately she (his wife) will wear these scarlet letters (the MURDERERS wife) for the rest of her life.

  • Hope

    She is no less of a monster than her loser husband. Arrogance seems to be the tie that bound these two idiots..one a murder the other one a self centered bit**

  • MelaniAnne

    "No one can say what they would or would not have done if they were Ms. Harriman." Agreed, however, this entire article is biased toward the angelic Ms. Harriman. How can the author/s possibly know what she knew, or didn't know since she hasn't made any public statements. The only communication that I've seen is her request to close her divorce proceedings and her medical file to the public. Curiously, one has to ask – her medical file? Was she seeing a therapist because of her relationship and her suspicions about her husband's odd behavior?
    I don't know how many of you are married, but would it not strike you as odd when, instead of going to bed with his wife, the male half of this relationship would go jogging? There were, I believe, at least 1000 pieces of clothing – underwear, bathing suits etc. in boxes. During their move, and while their new home was being finished, most wives would ask about them. They weren't in a storage unit, but in their home. Are we expected to believe that Ms. Harriman saw no change in habits, behaviors, or acquisitions?
    The emperor has no clothes!

  • MelaniAnne

    Seriously, was this article written by a friend/or friends of Ms. Harriman? She hasn't granted any interviews, so how could you know what she knew, how she feels, what she wants, or if she has any empathy for the victims and their families? She has worked very hard to distance herself from the creature Russell Williams, but doesn't mind retaining his money. Actions always speak louder than words.
    I'm not impressed.

    • Patchouli

      The author Friscolani has written several articles on her here in MacLeans. I imagine he is working on a book about the whole hideous mess.

      • MelaniAnne

        "The author Friscolani has written several articles on her here in MacLeans. I imagine he is working on a book about the whole hideous mess."
        ——————————————————————————————————-
        Haven't we all had enough? There was an episode of Law and Order, shown this past week, which strongly mimicked this case. There was a commentary last weekend (W-five?). The book has been released. A news item was mentioned in the past day or so regarding keeping the divorce private. Enough!
        It's like reliving the Paul Bernardo/Karla Homolka case – it went on for years.
        The apparent megalomaniac (Williams) doesn't need more publicity, so that he can relish and relive his disgusting past deeds. And we don't need to hear about the innocent bystander Ms. Harriman, who must have been in a catatonic state while this was going on. What's next? An article about the cat?

  • Fred

    As usual I'm shocked at the amount of people that:
    a) didn't read the article
    b) didn't understand the article
    c) have jumped to wild conclusions with little or no facts to back their theories
    d) all of the above

    • MelaniAnne

      I read the entire article. I understood what was written. I feel that the article was more theoretic than factual regarding Ms. Harriman. What do you find shocking? What did the rest of us miss?

      • Wendy Kubik

        Theoretical sweetie, theoretical. Not theoretic. And what you missed has already been posted but you are in no mood to pay attention. You just want to spew hate. Well, you have to live with yourself.

  • guest

    I have absolutely no sympathy for Williams' wife. How petty can one woman be given the cruelty, horror & sorrow her husband caused. Her vulgar concern was not for the massive human destruction williams caused but for the scratches on her floor. She is nothing but a self-absorbed person who displays zero empathy. She and Williams were a very good match. The Heart & Stroke will never get another cent of my money as this is the kind of person they support.
    She has never publicly expressed any regret to the victims' families her regret. She continues to visit him in jail in Kingston.

    She wants privacy only because she has not separated herself from him…they are still a couple in her eyes. She'll never say a bad word about him…she's no victim!

    • guest 45

      What a bizarre, insensitive post. Can you imagine if YOUR spouse did something horrible. Wouldn't you want to make them pay? If you read you'd learn she's divorcing him. That money is hers. To say SHE should give her money implies she's guilty of something which is just not true. And what does where she works have anything to do with anything? Can you imagine the lawsuits if companies could fire people for what their RELATIVES did? So if your brother was a crook, you should be fired. Try some compassion.

      • Guest

        "Bizarre and insensitive" describe Mr and Mrs Williams, that's for sure. She can keep "her" money. But his money should pay restitution to the victims of his crimes, don't you think? That includes you and me, if you are an Ontario taxpayer. Because, rather than get her lamp and floors money from her husband, who, at the bottom of it all, is responsible for their damage, she wants you and me to pay for OUR police having damaged them! She's a piece of work, all right. She's last on the list of people I feel sorry for. And yes, I stopped giving the H&SF the $600 a year I'd been donating. And told them why. If they can afford to keep someone like her on, they're getting way too much money.

  • Newsbum

    Bottom line is he killed the young ladies, not his wife. She too is a victim and those trying to make it sound like she somehow approved of his actions are being foolish. She just cannot turn off the emotional taps and connection to him after so many years together. Like anyone of you could.

  • jjm

    Until you have lived in her shoes, you have no right to pass judgement on this woman. I do not know anybody who could cope with this situation. Lots of folks with spouses are truly upset when they discover the black side of his or her's personality. Her husband's dark side is very difficult to handle emotionally. Give her some deserved empathy.

  • Anonymous

    It’s interesting to note what the Macleans’ article leaves out : Mary Elizabeth Harriman’s behaviour AFTER her husband was found guilty by police. The woman is despicable – and weird to boot. 

  • Anonymous

    It’s interesting to note what the Macleans’ article leaves out : Mary Elizabeth Harriman’s behaviour AFTER her husband was found guilty by police. The woman is despicable – and weird to boot. 

  • marta

    I am standing by my opinion If the monster has significant wealth he should pay for his
    jailtime it should be in the SENTENCE !!!
    his wife and this monster went to layers and went into manoevers to write over properties so it is hers now…. that is why i say she somewhat partner in this messy business.
    Why property rights are sanctuary and untouchable!!! it is not right…

  • Dan

    People want to believe the best about those with whom they are close, and that desire is very powerful – powerful enough to blind someone.

  • John D

    I'm guessing this will be one of those articles that will get to 200-300 comments. Please folks, try to be respectful. This is a serious issue.

  • W.Barnes

    Disgusting tabloid journalism at it's worst. There are no words to express your opportunism and lack of concern – let alone compassion for Ms Harriman;
    Shame on you – count on me never, ever to read or purchase any poroduct by Macleans or it's parent company.

  • Virginia

    Harriman's settlement has blood splattered all over it. If she had any dignity, she would refuse any property from Rus. My first husband deceived me by leading a double life so I can attest to the fact that even astute women can be duped by such duplicitous and cunning planned behaviour. However, to accept money of any kind from him is deplorable.

  • Michael

    Agreed… how many friends have you seen end up with partners that are clearly terrible for them, that logically they should leave this minute… but whom they "defend to the death" when challenged about them, even by the closest of friends and relatives.

    What's worse is this guy was a master manipulator… no one saw this coming, no one could give warnings… not one person in all this has come forward to say "I told you so."

    If this guy wasn't so phsychotic he would have made a great secret agent.

  • Jan

    I don't think anyone believes that Harriman knew about his crimes, certainly not anything beyond his lingerie fetish. What people have a big problem with is that she is trying to hang on to more than her half of the marital assets. His half should be vulnerable to seizure by his victims as compensation.

    Her attitude is obviously that Williams owes her first priority on the list of those entitled to compensation from him. Any person with an ounce of empathy for others would beg to differ with her on that point. She may be just as cold, calculating and self-centered in her own way. We know that she'd rather see taxpayers suffer than go after Russ for her precious floors.

  • bergkamp

    Has Mrs Harriman hired a pr team or something?

    This is second or third column I have read about Harriman as victim. While she might not have known what her husband was up to, I think it is sad and offensive that Harriman is trying to gain sympathy or overshadow proper victims of her husband.

  • Healthcare Insider

    Knowing how much federal government employees make and how much criminal lawyer's charge, my guess is that ALL of Williams assets went to paying his legal bills. Ms. Harriman is in a high profile job, making a good wage. I disagree that she should lose her assets, when she likely contributed more than half to the marriage, because her husband is a murdering sociopath.

    Should she hang her head and be contrite for crimes she did not commit? Deep down, Jan, you like others, feel she owes the victims restitution when she did nothing to harm them.

  • without

    Some investigative journalism in a Canadian publication longer than 1/2 page WITHOUT the comments closed!?!?

    Amazing what the threat of being usurped by an American news story can do!!!!!!

  • Reality

    Thanks john, what would we do without your guidance?

  • Really?

    I hope for your sake that no one close to you ever does anything wrong, or by your logic you can be left penniless and homeless.

  • Judy

    of course, the fact that she probably paid for the house herself, but had to have him on the mortgage agreement simply because legally they were married, doesn't mean a thing, does it? nor does the fact that she made more money than him or that SHE lived in the house, not him? That means nothing to people who think that a wife should be thrown out on the street because her husband ws a sociopaathic murderer. That must mean she was guilty too? guilt by association? She couldn't possibly be a victim, now could she? why, because he didn't beat her?

  • HSW

    Did we read the same article?? Ms. Harrisman did not participate in the article and is only the subject of the article. She has, understandably, not given any interviews. How is that "trying to gain sympathy"?

  • Guest B

    As his wife, she is certainly entitled to her half of the marital assets and does not owe her husband's victims any restitution. What bothers many people, however, is that she seesm to be getting not just her share of the marital assets but his as well – assets which could otherwise be seized to compensate his victims.
    As for the floors – it seems to me that if your husband has just been arrested and charged with the most heinous crimes, a few scratches on your floor should the least of your concerns.

From Macleans