Harper still far from majority: poll

Meanwhile, a divide is forming between Quebec and the rest of Canada

by Jason Kirby on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 9:22pm - 160 Comments

Despite some high profile gaffes and billions in new spending promises, after two weeks on the campaign trail, the main parties barely budged in the minds of Canadian voters, according to a survey done for Maclean’s and 680 News.

When asked which party people would vote for if there were an election today, 39 per cent of respondents on Innovative Research Group’s Canada 20/20 panel picked the Conservatives, virtually unchanged from 39.1 per cent after the first week of the campaign. The Liberals move up, but only slightly, to 28 per cent, from 27.5 per cent, while the NDP was flat at around 17 per cent.

The poll also shows Stephen Harper still enjoys the most support for prime minister. Of respondents to Innovative’s survey, 36 per cent said Harper would make the best prime minister, compared to just 22 per cent for Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff and 19 per cent for NDP leader Jack Layton.

But Harper still remains far short of his coveted majority. “If Michael Ignatieff brings the brand loyalists home, he’ll inevitably do better than in the last election,” says Greg Lyle, Innovative’s managing director. “Harper’s challenge is greater. He needs to reach outside his safe zone of party loyalists to people who don’t feel the Conservatives are their party but will vote for the Conservatives regardless.”

As the election moves forward, research by Innovative suggests a divide is forming between Quebec and the rest of Canada. While the Federal parties enjoy a strong connection with voters in most provinces, in Quebec the electorate is simply tuning out. In la belle province nearly half of panelists said this election is less interesting than most others, a far higher number than in the rest of Canada. Not only are Quebec voters less aware of the various campaigns—just 74 per cent of voters in Quebec had seen or heard anything about Harper or Ignatieff, compared to 87 per cent and 82 per cent respectively in the rest of Canada—barely half say the parties are talking about issues that matter to them, compared to 62 per cent in the rest of Canada.

There’s an irony in the different way Quebeckers and other Canadians are approaching this election though, says Lyle. While Quebec voters say they’re less interested in the campaign, they’re actually paying more attention to the issues than most Canadians are. Innovative asked panelists what they’d read, seen or heard about each of the leaders. In the case of Harper the dominant thing people in the rest of Canada recalled was the controversy that erupted after several people were ejected from Conservative rallies because of Facebook links to other parties. But in Quebec the most common news item the panelists recalled was the release of the Tory election platform. It was the same situation with the Liberals. While the dominant memory most Canadians had of that party’s campaign were inappropriate comments by Liberal candidates, those in Quebec primarily recalled the Liberal promise to replace Montreal’s Champlain Bridge.

Across the board, the Tory controversy threatens to hurt them at the polls much more than the Liberal gaffes do. Close to half of those surveyed said they were less likely to vote for the Conservatives after the Facebook incident, while less than 20 per cent said racist comments by a former Liberal candidate in Manicouagan would negatively impact their decision to vote for the party. Having said that, Tory loyalists have generally ignored the issue and remain staunch supporters.

As in past elections, there have been complaints that the media are spending too much time covering gaffes and that not enough attention is being paid to the issues. Yet the results of Innovative’s survey show that for most Canadians, it’s the gaffes and gossip they pay the most attention to. “On the one hand people tell us they want to hear more about issues,” says Lyle. “but on the other hand it’s the gaffes that get the most interest.”

The survey results were drawn from 2059 randomly selected respondents who live in the province, and are part of Innovative’s nation-wide online panel. Responses were gathered April 8-11 and the margin of error is plus or minus 2.16 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. To join Innovative Research Group’s Canada 20/20 panel, visit www.canada2020.com.

Bookmark and Share
  • ilikecheese

    Wow Faisel
    I was too scared to even attempt to read that post.

  • Judge Roy Bean

    One wonders how long western countries will last considering the huge divide (and growing) between the left and the right. I would far rather see the country split up than be 'ruled' by a bunch of parasitic lefties. The States looks like it is in the same position. Oh well, I guess nothing lasts forever. Too bad Trudeau showed up and started the downward slide.

    • KeithBram

      See, it's attitudes like yours that are causing the rift to begin with; absolutely no room for compromise. I know you're not from Quebec, so I'm guessing Albertan…

      • modster99

        hey I am from Alberta – let's be nice.

        I do agree with the 'rift' that appears to be forming. Both sides seem to be set in their ways, unable to compromise. I wonder if that is why the Liberal party is struggling so much – there are less and less middle of the row voters.

        Could this mean we are doomed to minorities forever? Contrary to what some people believe, I don't think minority gov't are good for the country.

        Whether or not we compromise, I think that we all need to treat each other with respect. I have seen too many posts on this website that are vile, insulting, and ignorant. It is getting tedious. Most people don't use facts, (most use their opinion, spoken like a fact) and figure they can ridicule people who disagree with them until they shut up.

        There used to be a guy who had some incredibly thoughtful posts, but he left because of the environment of this site. It was sad to see him go.

        • KeithBram

          Hey Modster,

          Sorry if I offended you there; it's just that since this election started there have been a lot of posts from the west – most from Alta – that have threatened separation if anyone other than the CPC wins. I don't know if they are serious or if it's just a bunch of CPC trolls trying to scare Liberal supporters, but threatening and bullying always get my back up.

          The real irony is that many of them are in the same breath complaining about Quebec separatists – not seeing that they are mirroring the very behaviour they hate in others.

          It just drives me nuts, and I wish they'd grow up.

    • Proud Canadian

      The real right wing agenda is to split up the country? The Alberta fire wall Harper built is taking shape. Only trouble is that it is built with tar sand and when thats gone, your wall will crumble.

  • JSC

    I’ve been expecting the U.S. to break out in Civil War/Revolution for a few years now. I can’t believe how spineless they are. They should be out on the streets by the millions with their pitchforks and torches and enough rope to Hang from the streetlights many of these people that stole all their money and the Politicans that allowed it to happen.

  • JSC

    I use to think that way…Law of the Jungle, Survival of the Fittest, Every Man for Himself….But I seen the Light.
    I’d rather my taxes go to Educate someone, get them a Job, and have them pay taxes and be a contributing member of Society.
    Or the alternative is to pay to imprison them at a cost of $50,000. – $100,000./yr. Of course you could try to Execute them all. But Good Luck trying to get away with that for very long.

  • Marv

    Now let's see – this election cost is but 1/3 of what Harper spent on the G20 fiasco. Who indeed played politics with money – Harper purely and simply.

  • Popsiq

    If the amount of Tory bashing (thumbs down) is any indicator, the 'Harper Government' could be in for a surprise. But then all those Tories like to tell themselves that they're still at work, not like the Lib's, unemployed, and most of them are linguistically challenged anyway.

  • Proud Canadian

    So when did you give up your socialist healthcare? Date please!

  • JSC

    It surprised me too, that it let me do it in 1 post…I copied & pasted it from someone posting it in Facebook.

  • Kathryn_C

    You mean the bloc Albertois? Harper is indeed scarey but I wouldn't call him a terrorist.

  • Ron

    It is telling that so many Conservative supporters here are so willing to tear up our Constitution and Charter of Rights. These guys are trying to get rid of the need for search warrants for the police. Their use of facebook to exclude non-Conservaties from their rallies speaks volumes. Unchecked with a majority, they will turn Canada from a free and successful place into an unhappy dystopia with Orwellian overtones.

  • Ravage

    Every election we see the Liberal Party steal from the political platforms of the other parties. For example in particular from the NDP. When the NDP says they are spending more money towards health care we know it will be going directly to health care. When the Liberal “adopts” this election promise it means they will be spending the money on the Bureaucrats administrating health care. Liberal policies are more directed to benefit the bureaucrats and their families than you and me. That’s why if I’m a bureaucrat it would be in my interest to leak documents so that once the liberal get into office I can get an increase on my great perks.

  • Grant Dale

    Please note that a majority of Canadians would vote against Harper. This is truly a case for the introduction of proportional representation.

  • balabu

    Wow, the leftist scaremonger parasites are out in force. Harper will eat your babies.
    For people that don't know how to vote. Go look at the CBC Liberal broadcasting service compass. No matter what you think or chose it will always points you to vote for the Liberals. Try to navigate with such a compass you will end up going in circles.

  • Mother_of_12

    The polls are clearly showing that neither Harper nor Iggy will form a majority government after May 2. Either Harper will again attempt – and fail – to govern as if he had a majority or else a coalition, or at least some form of strategic alliance, will be called on to form a government.

    Many say, "Oh, how could Harper and Iggy ever work together in any kind of coalition?" Given the mutual will to collaborate, it's not so hard. Look at British Columbia.

    The party that calls itself the "BC Liberals" is in fact an alliance of social liberals and fiscal conservatives. Like any alliance it's not always easy to manage, but it has worked so well for BC that the opposition New Democrats have been driven far to the left of the "safe centre" and are now surviving in a leaderless game of Rope-A-Dope.

    The reason, of course, is that liberals and conservatives – in an alliance – draw each other toward the moderate centre. The liberals won't let the conservatives outlaw abortion, privatize prisons or indulge any of the wilder fancies of the fringe right. Similarly the conservatives won't let the liberals tax and spend across the board while outlawing everything that isn't compulsory.

    The moderate centre is what Canadians want. If Stephen Harper and Michael Ignatieff sincerely desire the best for our country they will form a coalition not unlike the Cameron-Clegg alliance in Britain. Such a coalition will be fractious, often raucously contentious, but its compromises will produce of the policies that Canada needs.

  • Anne

    Anne:

    If I were this Leaders they should help one another win or lose for the sake of our country..
    Life is too short. We need peace and love.

  • Brad

    Could be the end of Harper

  • KeithBram

    I'd like nothing more, but he acquitted himself quite well – esp. if one isn't that familiar with the issues. Made some genuine points – and lied convincingly when he had to. I just hope media coverage calls him out on the lies.

  • Jenahlin

    Haha. You wish!

  • Donna

    maybe you should take the time and find the truth yourself and not rely on snips from the media

  • KeithBram

    Or maybe you should get your information from a source other than the CPC. Case in point re the lying: During the debate, Harper claimed support from the CLC for his budget. The President of the CLC tweeted him to ask that he refrain from misrepresenting the CLC's position.

    I'd have to go back and review the video to get other specific examples (memory fades after a couple of days and I wouldn't want to mix up what was said in the debate vs what was said at other times) but I remember noting a few other "misstatements" and deliberate deflections during the evening.

  • kathryn c

    Good run down on the truth / fiction rating for all the candidates here: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadavotes2011/r…

    I know, the leftist cbc… whatever.

    The CPC claim that we are topping the developed countries' economies is a lie that should be outed by any reputable journalist never mind the opposition parties, yet it never is.

    One from the debate that particularly made me scream at the tv was "the majority of economists" agree that raising taxes (ie rolling back the tax cuts) would cost thousands of jobs. Pure BS.

  • Kathryn_C

    If you use intensedebate you can enter long posts.
    That nobody will read, in this case.

    Can't say it strongly enough: punctuation and paragraphs highly recommended.


    And with IntenseDebate, you can come back and edit your posts.
    Or delete them.

  • KeithBram

    I use IntenseDebate, but can't manage any longer posts than before I signed up.

    The "edit" function is only good until someone replies to your post; once that happens, the ability to edit goes away (presumably so people don't alter their comments to render the reply invalid).

  • Jace

    so did harper win yet?…i have dont know anything about politics…all i know is that i dont want higher taxes plus i think stephen harper is great priminister

  • modster99

    I have edited a post after it had a reply. (only for a typo) other posts I cannot edit. I think it is a time sensitive thing . . .?

From Macleans