Guergis works the comeback trail

The former cabinet minister is fighting for her political life against the full might of the Tory electoral machine

by Charlie Gillis on Friday, April 15, 2011 6:10am - 76 Comments
Working the comeback trail

Photograph by Colin OConnor

The familiar war colours still grace her signs—white block letters and crimson ribbons, on a background of Tory blue. But the word “Independent” lies spray-stencilled beneath Helena Guergis’s name, while blots of paint covering the Conservative party logo summon to mind a bandage on an open wound. “It’s Conservative against conservative around here,” says Guergis, summing up one of the most bitter constituency battles of the federal election. Not only is she fighting for her political life, says the former junior cabinet minister, she’s doing so against the full might of the Tory electoral machine.

No surprise. Since the uproar surrounding the arrest and lobbying activities of her husband, Rahim Jaffer, Guergis has been one of Stephen Harper’s biggest headaches, demanding that the Prime Minister reveal his reasons for punting her from caucus while insisting she remains a big-C Conservative—in spirit if not on paper. Harper’s office cited unspecified allegations of misconduct on Guergis’s part when it expelled her in April 2010, but a subsequent review by RCMP found no evidence of wrongdoing. Still, the Conservatives refused to re-admit her to the party fold, and last month her old constituency association held a nomination meeting to replace her.

Judging by the campaign muscle they’ve sent the new candidate, a pediatric surgeon named Kellie Leitch, the party brain trust would dearly love to see Guergis gone. At least six Tory heavyweights have swung through the farm country of Simcoe-Grey in recent days, including Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Minister of State for Seniors Julian Fantino. Tory icon Hugh Segal has also dropped by for photo ops. So has Pamela Wallin, the Conservative senator and former broadcaster.

On the strategy side, Leitch has been drawing on the wisdom of friends like Jeff Bangs, a veteran campaigner for the Ontario Progressive Conservatives, along with former Ontario premier Bill Davis.

That’s a lot of firepower to throw at one party-less candidate. But Guergis remained defiant this week during an interview at her home in Angus, Ont. “Harper does not want to lose to me,” she told Maclean’s. “It would be embarrassing for him. It would be a strong message that, yes, we like Conservatives in Simcoe-Grey, but we’re not impressed with Harper’s own behaviour. I’m not surprised to see him putting an extra effort in.”

Getting election-ready wasn’t easy, Guergis admits. She’d spent most of last year rebutting tales of her tantrum at the Charlottetown Airport, along with reports she got abnormally favourable terms on a mortgage on her Ottawa home (“False,” she says of the latter). As if that weren’t enough, she gave birth four months ago to her son Zavier and began juggling her duties as an MP with motherhood.

Now, with the campaign under way, Jaffer has slipped into Mr. Mom mode, greeting a visitor to their house wearing sweatpants, with a mild case of bed-head and the infant in his arms. Guergis has her campaign chops back. For days, she’s been attacking Leitch’s shallow roots in the constituency, while promising to vote with the Tories in the Commons if she is elected. Leitch counters that she’s lived five years in Creemore, Ont., and dismisses Guergis’s attempts to portray herself as a de facto Tory. “The voters aren’t fooled,” she told Maclean’s. “They know there’s one Conservative candidate, they’re supportive of the Conservative party. I think they’ll base their vote on that.”

The danger, of course, is that some won’t. Guergis’s expulsion drove a deep wedge into the party’s local riding association; a similar reaction among right-of-centre voters could result in a victory for Liberal challenger Alex Smardenka, the NDP’s Katy Austin or Green candidate Jace Metheral.

Guergis acknowledges this risk, but portrays her candidacy as a necessary response to a Prime Minister she says puts his electoral fortunes before all political considerations. “I haven’t done anything to deserve this disastrous treatment,” she says, the colour rising in her cheeks. “I’ve worked incredibly hard and I’m standing up—not just for democracy, which all Canadians value, but also for myself.”

Bookmark and Share
  • Claudia Lemire

    She won't be reelected, she became her worst enemy!

    • jane

      I agree, and I think still think there is more than we know about this story.I think Harper has not told it all, all but she should go very carfeul

    • SamDavies

      I watched her media scrum today, and I think she handled it rather well.
      I'm surprised you're not standing up for a fellow sister, who got played by the mans rules…

      • Patchouli

        I'm with you, SamDavies. Not a Conservative, not a Guergis fan — but the way she's been treated — becoming a joke across the country when we now know the allegations were trumped up — is just plain wrong.

        Harper is a fan of incrementalism. I wonder if the incremental shrinking of his ethics will ever catch up with him.

        • SamDavies

          Yeah. We're on the same page. I'm not a fan, but I do believe that after so many years of service, she deserved more than to be thrown under a bus as such. I feel ashamed for believing he had tossed her out for what I believed were sound reasons.

      • Mike T.

        But Harper, he's so dreeeeeeeeeeamy! And oh so smart!

        • A_logician

          And those killer dimples!

        • SamDavies

          What's his shoe size? You know what they say… ;)

      • Claudia Lemire

        SamDavies, I believe on an individual man or woman.

        I strongly disagree about her handling well her media scrum. She is incompetent at best.

        Even though she had a very valid reason to be upset, she became her very own enemy, she needed patience instead she went babbling non stop every interview she could have done, she did. She won't be reelected and she won't be able to sue anybody, I posted one of her interviews here and it was another even better where she informs the PM was going to meet with her but she cancelled, can't find that one but she screwed up her chances, she probably would be back with the tories had she chosen better words. You can stand up for yourself, comeback on top with the right words.

        Someone at my office said today she is very emotional, she is hormonal, well I have been pregnant five times and l know a thing or two about hormones and believe is not a good excuse, you need to have your head on your shoulders especially when you hold such a public position, if anything is more questionable your mental health, this scrum will backfire (By the way, I am in PR and advertising none of my colleagues or I will ever allowed any of our clients do this, if we did they should fire us for incompetents)
        http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/06/helena-guergis…

        Another thing I predict a divorce and more scandals from Jaffer.

  • Sane Soul

    I don't live in her riding but I would like to see her win just because she's plucky and she has been so horribly mistreated by the Prime Minister. A little humble pie would do him a world of good!

    • Andrew (not PorC)

      I would vote for her if I lived in her riding.

      • janie

        Sure you would, even how she treated the people at the airport.Shouting at them throwing her shoes. I think this lady has problems

      • Guest

        I would've been with you on that, except for her stated plans to vote along Conservative party lines. If re-elected, she would've been in an amazing position to vote per constituency's wishes, and instead she'll squander the opportunity just to get into Harper's good books.

  • Joepavelsk

    She hates people. Don't be fooled by her smile.

    • Mike T.

      In many ways she fit right in with Harper's party until she became a liability and it wasn't worth keeping her around.

  • Stewart_Smith

    Hopefully, Harper holds a rally there. It would be great fun if Guergis showed up (preferably with Zavier) to wish him well.

    • Claudia Lemire

      He is cute but not even that will give her an advantage her media scrum today will backfire, sorry but it is my job I know what I am talking about : )

      • Stewart_Smith

        How do you imagine it can backfire… she has nothing to lose.

        • Claudia Lemire

          Perception as a public figure is your number one asset and she is obviously emotionally unstable, perhaps she has a valid reason but nobody wants someone like that representing them, would you be ok?

          She needed to be strong and determined (sp?) needed to show her strengths not her weakness, you can be a victimized but not a victim, IMO it cost her. Not a good choice of words.

  • TheAttic

    With the timely release last night (using the very legal Access to Information protocol) of the letter Harper's minion wrote to the Elliott of the Mounties outlining outrageous charges against Ms Guergis – none of them substantiated with even a scintilla of evidence – isn't it now high time that Mr. Harper offered the long-overdue apology that Ms Guergis deserves? Moreover, it would be an appropriate (if unlikely) act of contritement on the part of the Tories to ask their official candidate in the riding to pull out of the race.

    • Atomic Walrus

      No – there's no need for an apology. This is politics, not a court of law, and Guergis had become a lightning rod for bad optics. It's also easy to forget that the media and opposition politicians were all too ready to believe (and attempt to capitalize on) those allegations at the time.

    • Patchouli

      Harper will never apologize to her. Never. It's just not in his dna.

      Although if she won her riding…and it was a minority situation…who knows? Surely he has no ethics, and she would be hungry to get back to her fold. Such as they are.

    • modster99

      How come when there is a convicted criminal in the CPC fold, everyone thinks, it is their fault – they had to have known. But with this situation, everyone assumes, 'poor Helen – treated so badly'. Did it ever occur to people that there is more to the story than we know. There might not be proven criminal activities, but Harper might be privy to information that lets him know that she is bad for the party image. If nothing else, her husband was using her email address, and pretending he was still in government (I am sure I read that, and if I am mistaken, I apologize). Had she stayed with the CPC, and a scandal followed in the future, these same people would blame the conservatives or not have seeing it coming. Maybe the fact that she was thrown out will prove to be a good thing, as she and/or Jaffir weren't able to cause trouble.

      I am always amazed that people are so ready to ass-you-me

      • Gayle

        "Did it ever occur to people that there is more to the story than we know."

        No. You know why? Because Harper told Canadians he reported her serious conduct to the RCMP, and it turned out what he reported was a bunch of bullsh**. Even if I were inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, he certainly would not get it here where it has been established so clearly the facts do not support his claims.

        • modster99

          That is kind of what I am saying, there isn't enough proof to charge her, but enough people in Ottawa know things that were going on, and that is all that is needed.
          Are you saying that an MP would need to be criminally charged and convicted before a leader should expel them from the party?

          • Gayle

            Why on earth would you conclude that from my comment? I am saying Harper relied on allegations he knew were unsubstantiated gossip. Only idiots believe if something is said it must be true.

            Harper lies all the time. Why would this be any different?

          • modster99

            so you believe 'Harper lies all the time'. This means that you might as well not discuss him anymore. If that is your fallback statement, then there really is no point.
            Harper was well within his right to boot her. Her husband was a liability to her, and would have been a liability to the CPC. There doesn't need to be criminal charges, that is what I am saying. All that needs to happen is a political party has to feel that a MP can and will cause harm to them and the government. Out the door they go. Helena and Jaffer were drunk on power, and it was probably only a matter of time until something happened. That you don't know the information of why it happened is crying shame, I guess, but you don't need to know.

          • local lad

            Oda, Kenney, Etc, Etc……Carson

  • hosertohoosier

    Oh cry me a river – I love how many of the same people that would have been shouting "resign" a year ago, now embrace Guergis as a damsel in distress (it works both ways too – once upon a time Warren Kinsella was liked by many Tories because of his sniping at the Martin government).

    Nobody has a right to be a Conservative MP. If somebody endangers the agenda of the government, it is absolutely appropriate to get rid of them, whether the accusations are just or not. That is the choice governments have to make – to have their days dogged by accusations, or to take care of business.

    • gottabesaid

      Fair enough… but if she's been cleared of wrongdoing, and she was 'good enough' to be in the Conservative Party before, why isn't she now? I don't fault Harper for kicking her out at the time… but I don't get not accepting her back when she's been exonerated.

      • hosertohoosier

        For much the same reason that Adam Giambrone is not mayor of Toronto. Guergis didn't commit any criminal acts, but she showed bad judgment, and tarnished her brand. People will always be suspicious of her as a result (incidentally it goes beyond just her and Jaffer, voters turfed out three of her relatives in municipal elections last year).

        I think the comparison with Carson is unfair. Carson was a crook, but he served his time and by all accounts he was very good at his job (for obvious reasons, Conrad Black is just about the only person willing to go to bat for Carson in the press). Guergis is not a crook, but exhibited bad judgment, and was a lousy minister. When Ignatieff attacks the former and defends the latter, I really have to question his liberal commitment to the idea of rehabilitation and redemption.

        • gottabesaid

          Don't get me wrong, I'm not condoning Iggy's obvious (yet hardly surprising) opportunism. But her ouster was based on those allegations, and those allegations were proven to be unfounded. I'm a big believer in getting rid of cabinet ministers who are in the midst of being investigated, or who come under a cloud of suspicion. But, if the allegations are proven not to be true, you welcome them back… if not to cabinet, at least to caucus. I didn't expect Guergis to come back to cabinet, but I did figure she'd get back into caucus.

          • Atomic Walrus

            Politics is a high-stakes game, and there are a lot of people who'd like to stand for election as an MP. You don't necessarily earn a do-over, particularly not if you've got a record of causing headaches for your party leader and haven't provided much benefit in return.

          • gottabesaid

            Do-over? She didn't 'do' anything wrong in the first place.

          • Stewart_Smith

            Hence the reason, she is not allowed a do-over… to get a do-over you really do need a do to do-over.

    • craigola

      I just enjoy the drama.

    • Gayle

      Here is your problem.

      Harper had plenty of opportunity to fire her for the reasons cited by the opposition when they were "shouting" at him to fire her. But he didn't. He could have – but he didn't.

      Instead of appearing as though he was doing something the opposition demanded he do, he invented some criminal allegations and then told the entire country that is why he was firing her.

      • hosertohoosier

        You well know that ministers rarely get fired when they are in the crosshairs of the opposition – they get quietly shuffled out a few months later. It is entirely possible that Guergis was a dead woman walking before the allegations broke.

  • steve

    what is a "patrongage trough"?

  • Paris

    I get a kick out of the Liberals and the Star on this issue. The Star prints a sensational story, the Liberals pounce on it and demand she get turfed. Harper fires her. The Star and Liberals then claim Harper is a meany for doing so.

    classic.

    • Lucky

      The liberals and other opposition parties said, she should be relieved of her ministerial duties pending an inquiry. I know the CONS. don't like the truth getting in their ways of doing things. Bruce Carson inspite of his five convictions was given front seat access to very important, Country business. I know the CONS. love the low-lives of society, just maybe those mega prisons will come in handy soon especially with the RCMP investigations of several CONS. officials of breaking our laws.

  • SamDavies

    You might also want to learn how to communicate more effectively. Just sayin….

    • Susie

      Thanks Sam! I, too, live in "Collindwood"…but I have a Guergis sign on my lawn!!

  • aSaucerFullofSecrets

    Wow! Harper and his inner circle has taken political victimization to a whole new level. This is a case of pure injustice towards Ms. Guergis ( who still remains a devout Christian) just because her husband happens to be a Muslim. While convicted felons like Mr Carson remain as close aides to the PM, Ms Guergis incurred the full wrath of Mr Harper on charges with no evidence to back them up. Whatever is the outcome, Ms Guergis is a brave woman to take this whole issue front on and not give up

    First Ms. Guergis and later Ms Aslam ( The so-called " Facebook Girl"),….whats happening Canada? I strongly believe Mr Harper and his well known "political friends" are trying to sideline a specific community and those who have any connection with it from all walks of Canadian society and committed on taking the country down a dangerous path. I plead to all Canadians to see the truth and vote this government out on May 2!

    • modster99

      now this is about Islam – that is quite a stretch.

  • ABHarperRegime

    Dictatorship with minority!

    Majority?! LOL! can you imagine the Harper regime with a majority government?! SCARY!.

  • aSaucerFullofSecrets

    Yes,Atomic Walrus, however unfortunate and contrary to Canadian values this is. Its about time we call a spade a spade.

    You have to ask yourself these questions: If there is hard evidence to the accusations against her then why isn't this issue been brought to the court's attention? And lets just assume even if there is a slightest element of truth to the accusations then why is Ms Guergis been persecuted the way she is? You have bigger "convicted" criminals running Mr Harper's government.

    Also, the source of the accusations, a private investigator himself denies any substance to the charges brought forward.

    The track record of Mr Harper's treatment towards a certain community, his staunch support for a particular lobby and his undemocratic leanings gives me all the right reasons to believe this. Here, I have laid it all out for you, do you need any further evidence?

    On May 2nd, we have to make a choice between Harper or Canadian values. I know what choice I will be making that day.

    • modster99

      You have laid out your opinion, but haven't given any evidence.

      Harper has the right to kick someone out of the CPC for giving it a bad name, or if he thinks they will in the future. Same as any party leader, and we would expect that from all of the.

      Let's be clear, this is a party that needs more seats – the easy thing would be to invite her back. There is a valid reason, you will probably never hear it, though. It has nothing to do with religion.

      • local lad

        Carson, Oda,Kenny, Nuke girl , etc., etc……..

  • janie

    I try not to follow peter mansbridge anywhere They are all over the map with this story.

  • Leo

    Hard to say. She is running as an independent but still a conservative.

    Maybe a restraining order that Jaffer is not allowed within 500' of the HoC??

    • Patchouli

      Or maybe a welcome mat with their hers and Jaffer's initials entwined for the front hall of their new home?

      • Claudia Lemire

        Oh Patchouli that'll never happen, Jaffer has shot every door there is not a chance of any MP of any stripe will even return a call. Now having said that, why doesn't Ignatieff invites her to be a Liberal he is all about fairness and democracy!

        • Mike T.

          The liberals can field much stronger candidates than HG. Sadly, she only looks good as a CPC rep.

  • dennis

    Helena: Your irrational outbursts at the Charlottetown airport contrasted with your weepy, pity me, little girl voice with Mansbridge scream instability and your boss did his best to save you from yourself.

    • Mike T.

      At least she pushed back when told to join in adscam. Remember voters – you can probably get most of the same policies, without the attacks on democracy by voting for Ms. Guergis.

  • Mike T.

    If you can't say anything nice, Mr. Clement….

  • TheAttic

    The PM's comments today (Friday) are a clear indicator as to how things work in Harperland. He couldn't even bring himself to use Ms Guergis' name instead referring to "the individual in question". Everything is black or white, no shades of grey whatsoever. Once you've been shunned by the party you become an unperson immediately, for life. Forgiveness is unknown, mercy is never shown. Fundamentalists/fanatics of all types exhibit this type of behaviour and Harper and company fit the mold to a tee.

  • Mike T.

    I'm sure his answers were clear and decisive. And utterly self-serving and only tangentially fact based, if at all.

  • Lost faith

    These guys are not conservatives – true conservatives died a while ago – The conservatives are the Canadian version of America’s tea party – Wake up Canada it’s our future – Frankly give me a parliament of independents representing the people of Canada. I thought cons represent the faithful – faithful to what – corruption.

    • Lucky

      Can't have said it better.

    • jim tasko

      Very well said. Independents would at least represent their riding instead of being a lapdog for the PMO's office.

  • teo

    Too bad she is not in my electoral district so that I don't vote for her.

  • chet

    Media:

    Guergis in CPC – evil witch

    Guergis out of CPC – poor victim of CPC machine.

    While the examples of the lefist media becoming unhinged with Harper hatred are almost countless, the storyline intstantly transforming Guergis once she became "correctly" anti-Harper is near the top.

    • Gayle

      Oh look. Biff is lying again.

  • Gayle

    Sure you do.

  • Claudia Lemire

    Then why are they talking about it?

    • Mike T.

      wooosh!

  • JDW

    Who said Helena was found to have had political issues which means she is not welcome back into the Conservative party? Harper.
    Who supported her when she was having difficulties performing her Ministerial duties adequately?
    Harper.
    Who was the person who appointed her to a position to which she was not suited?
    Harper.
    Who had the chance to shuffle cabinet portfolios at any time?
    Harper
    Who chose to treat her with contempt and disdain the first time he got some damaging information about her behavior?
    Harper.
    Who could have informed her of the charges being investigated by the RCMP about her?
    Harper.
    Who could have shown class by acknowledging the unjust actions taken toward Helena?
    Harper.
    Who chose to display behavior which, as a male, I find reprehensible simply from the point that one does not treat any individual with this level of contempt, male or female. Oh right, who doesn’t show this contempt for males? Bruce Carson’s name comes up here.
    Harper

  • Bobby

    I just sick of her, end of the story.

From Macleans