Is Stephen Harper a hologram?

Rick Mercer on what he learned on the campaign trail with the party leaders

by Rick Mercer on Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:30am - 149 Comments
Is Stephen Harper a hologram?

Chris Wattie/Reuters

Grown men all over North America pay big money for the privilege of riding on a horse, sleeping on the ground and spending 12 hours a day driving cattle down a dusty trail with actual cowboys. For me, going out on the campaign trail, riding on the planes and following the leaders is pretty much the same thing. This wasn’t so much an assignment as it was a trip to a dude ranch. Some men want to strap on leather chaps and breathe in the aroma of cow dung; I want to slap on a press pass and breathe the same air as Harper, Iggy and Jack.

To get a seat on those planes is not an easy proposition. The Conservative party charges media organizations $50,000 for a seat. In return you get fed and watered—after that, all bets are off. There is no guarantee you get to ask a question, just the guarantee you won’t.

My week at the dude ranch started with the big gun: Team Harper. I met up with them in Rivière-du-Loup, Que., rode the bus to Edmundston, N.B., flew to Fredericton, crossed the pond to Conception Bay South, Nfld., back to Sydney, N.S., and then on to the Nation’s Capital.

In hindsight, I spent too much time with the front-runner. To get a feel for the Harper campaign you only need a few hours. The differences from one event to the other are minuscule. In English Canada they start each event by singing “O Canada,” and Stephen Harper tells the crowd he’s proud to lead a party that starts every event this way no matter where they are in the country. In Quebec they skip this part and they hide the Canadian flags in the plane. Barring this nationalism of convenience, if you have seen one Harper event you have seen them all. The Harper campaign is far and away the most disciplined, the most professional and the most scripted. Every word is on a teleprompter, it is delivered in exactly the same way, and the Prime Minister does something I have, in a lifetime of watching live performers onstage, never seen before: he actually stops and sips his water in the same spot every time. Nothing is left to chance. Either that or he is a hologram on a loop.

My first Harper campaign event in Quebec was held in a senior citizens’ home, what we in show businesses call a captive audience. No vote mobs here.

Politics is a dirty racket, and certainly all politicians on occasion must do things they find personally distasteful, but I would like to think that most of them would draw the line at scaring old ladies. No such luck on this tour.

It’s one thing to put ominous, spooky commercials on TV during the Juno Awards, but to actually show up in a seniors’ home and tell the residents that the world is a scary, evil, dangerous place and that “chaos is lapping at our shores” without so much as a warm- up joke or a pleasant story takes a real commitment to fear.

The promise to write off a portion of their gym membership starting in 2014 might have taken the edge off, but I didn’t feel it in the room.

And then it was cue the music and head for the door.

This is another thing I learned about Stephen Harper: he loves to head for the exit. It is a cliché and a fact that during a campaign every successful politician is a security detail’s nightmare. Once a campaign starts, politicians of all stripes basically say to hell with the RCMP and they wade into crowds, lean down from the stage to shake hands or run across streets to speak to groups of strangers. It would have taken the strength of a thousand men to stop a Ralph Klein, a Jean Chrétien or a Brian Mulroney from glad-handing a crowd during a campaign stop. To them that personal interaction is like a shot of pure adrenalin into their veins. Stephen Harper is that rare breed of politician: he is a security detail’s dream. Even in a room of just 75 seniors, there is no wading into the crowd for this guy. To ask the Prime Minister to do that would be like asking Superman to dive into a pool of liquid kryptonite. Even if he wanted to, he just couldn’t. The damage to his system would be too grave.

And so day one could be summed up this way: “Scare some seniors, go to lunch, repeat.”

It was during lunch that I became reacquainted with the Tories’ not-so-secret campaign weapon, the ever-present Sen. Marjory LeBreton.

LeBreton’s job is to “assist the media.” This is a nice way of saying she never leaves them alone and listens to every conversation they have. She is a legend in Conservative campaign circles; she has been on practically every leader’s tour since the Diefenbaker days. She does not sleep, she does not take nourishment.

On this day, while reporters were shovelling back snack packs of takeout chicken and wet-napping the grease off their keyboards, Marjory went from one reporter to the next, eyes darting across laptops, loudly declaring that “ooo that smells good,” “mmm those french fries are delicious,” and “isn’t this the best chicken ever?”

This is the Conservative campaign strategy in a nutshell. Make something up, repeat it enough and eventually people believe it. A separatist coalition is coming, only Stephen Harper can stop a $75 iPod tax that does not exist, and these frozen french fries in the little greasy bag are the best damn french fries a person could eat.

From my perspective, I could not have joined the Conservative campaign at a better time. Events, as they say, occurred.

Brad Trost, a Conservative MP from Saskatchewan, reopened the abortion debate and Dimitri Soudas, Harper’s communications director, became a story himself when he was the subject of kickback allegations. Nothing has been proven of course, but when your campaign begins to resemble a subplot on The Sopranos that’s generally not a good thing.

And I will never forget the chilly Newfoundland morning when Stephen Harper faced not just a disappointingly low turnout, but a cantankerous teleprompter that left him standing on centre ice at a hockey rink in total silence for seven long seconds. Eventually our quick-witted leader said, “Jeremy, could you bring me my notes?” a sentence he kept repeating until Jeremy did just that. Thank God for Jeremy, because this mercifully allowed Harper to begin the same speech that he had given 50 times since the campaign began. Nine minutes later it was over: “Chaos is lapping at our shores,” “thank you and goodbye.” Later in that same rink Harper taped that night’s one-on-one interview with Peter Mansbridge; 24 hours later an Ipsos Reid poll was released suggesting a Harper majority. High above the skies of Eastern Canada a Conservative staffer wandered up and down the aisle of the airplane, white napkin over his forearm, serving champagne to all.

From there it was on to the Liberal campaign. Tragedy plus time equals comedy. Twenty-four hours after reports that the most successful political brand in the history of modern democracy was flirting with junk bond status was a perfect moment for all involved to look back and laugh.

Michael Ignatieff came on the plane, wandered to the back and welcomed the newcomers aboard. He inquired about someone’s mother and said he was looking forward to the rest of the campaign with a sense of serene optimism. I couldn’t help but note this is reportedly what victims of hypothermia experience in their final moments. He was wearing loafers, no shoelaces—just an observation, nothing more.

The differences between the Harper and Ignatieff campaigns are vast. With Ignatieff each speech is different, so you have to pay attention, and of course, perhaps the biggest contrast of all is that Ignatieff takes questions.

I have no idea if the general public is aware of or cares how few questions the Prime Minister will allow. I expect that they don’t care that if the Prime Minister rolls into a university town, student publications are not granted a single question. With Ignatieff the pendulum swings the other way—you can ask all the questions you want. From a journalist’s perspective it’s great, ask a question, get an answer; from a campaign’s perspective it’s a dangerous game, but a practice he seems committed to.

And then there was Prince Edward Island, where, in a curling club, Ignatieff showed off a set of skills I had no idea that he possessed. From a pure showbiz perspective he killed. Speaking without a teleprompter or notes he gave perhaps the best speech I have heard since watching Gen. Rick Hillier address the troops in Kandahar. Whatever happens, he has a bright future on the rubber chicken circuit.

Emboldened by the P.E.I. experience the Liberal team headed to the airport, and as luck would have it, minutes before takeoff our BlackBerries started buzzing—more polls, and more bad news.

I admit I had no intention of getting on the NDP plane. My plan, based on an astute political mind and decades of Monday morning quarterbacking, was to visit the Conservative and Liberal campaigns and ignore the NDP altogether. When news broke that the NDP had moved into first place in Quebec, I, like so many others, said a hasty goodbye and headed over to the NDP. The NDP in the lead in Quebec? I hadn’t heard anything as outrageous since 1979 when my older brother assured me that the dog up the road had kittens.

Karl Bélanger is Jack Layton’s senior press secretary. I have known him, not personally but professionally, for a very long time. He is from Quebec and he is a fixture on Parliament Hill. If you see Jack Layton on TV, look behind him and there is Karl. He’s been standing there for almost a decade. I do not know if in my entire life I have been as happy as Karl Bélanger was that night I hooked up with the NDP campaign. I was actually worried his head might come off.

At first I believed Jack’s new-found success among anglophone voters in Quebec could be attributed to the fact that in the French language debates his translator sounded like Sean Connery, but clearly it’s more than that. And while the crowds are larger than Jack is used to, Jack is doing exactly what he has done for almost a decade. I watched him get a rock-star response at a Sikh Khalsa Day celebration in Toronto, I saw him talk blue-collar issues for a boisterous crowd in Saint John, N.B., and finally parlez-vous them into a frenzy in Gatineau, Que.

And as I pulled out of the parking lot at week’s end only one thought was running through my head: why?

Diefenbaker was the last politician to cross the country by train. It was once a standard way of doing things, but campaigning by train became extinct the day the first political party chartered an airplane and began to charge the media to sit in the back to pay for the gas.

Since then the only consequential change to a leader’s campaign has been the introduction of the inflatable thunder stick. I think we can agree there is a special place in hell for whoever came up with that idea.

But times have changed. In a modern political campaign it is the air war that matters, the advertising matters, the debates matter, interviews matter, photo ops matter, but the leader’s campaign does not. It exists because it is a tradition.

My time with Harper on the road was excruciating for the Tories. Abortion, kickbacks, failed teleprompters and low turnouts—what saved the day was Harper’s successful high-profile interview with Peter Mansbridge.

Michael Ignatieff had the converse experience. He travelled the country and gave barn-burner performances, but when the lights came on in the studio with Mansbridge, Ignatieff dug up the corpse of the coalition and danced it around the room. A thousand speeches in a thousand hockey rinks won’t make up for that.

And Jack Layton is a great campaigner but a good speech in Gatineau doesn’t put the NDP in first place in Quebec. Jack made that happen on French debate night. Again, it’s the air war.

I’m glad I got to join the campaign this week, but now I view the national leader’s tour not just as a romantic notion but a nostalgic one. This was perhaps the most exciting week in politics in a very long time and I felt removed from the story, even though I was within 50 feet of a leader at any given point.

Very soon a national leader is going to make a quantum leap and launch a national campaign by staying home. He or she will enter a bunker in Ottawa and from there they will Skype streaming video into 10 curling rinks in 10 provinces in one night. They will hold a dozen town halls in a single afternoon. They will take or refuse questions from all over Canada from all sorts of people. By staying home they will reach more Canadians.

The national campaign as we know it will continue for the time being but I predict fewer journalists will spend less time on board. The parties, desperate for gas money, will have no choice but to fill those seats in the back of the plane with more tourists like me.

Rick Mercer’s column will appear each week during the election campaign

Bookmark and Share
  • shouldIsellyourwheat

    My hypothesis about Harper is that he has Asperger's.

    • http://dougsamu.wordpress.com dougrogers

      Narcissistic sociopath is more likely.

    • Katherine

      My hypothesis is that his campaign strategy is "turn people off opponents, don't screw up by going off-message". His campaign strategy is to scare people, make sure all the Conservative voters turn up at the polls, and try to scrape up seats here and there to make up a majority. Trying to make people like him or gain any level of broad national agreement with his policies doesn't play into it – so he's completely open about his contempt for anyone who's not part of the Conservative base.

  • shouldIsellyourwheat

    Nanos and Ekos call cell phones.

    • Katherine

      Good for them for getting with the times. That may explain why the NDP's polling so well.

  • mamapeggie

    Now that the Carnival Man could become Prime Minister I hope that the posters here remember their comments. I do not need an entertainer for Prime Minister, or a lecturer, or someone that caters to the leftist press. I want a competent man, nose to the grime stone, and working for me and my family. But then, I really liked Robert Stanfield and was discussed with Piere Trudeau and his finger to the West, NEP and his arrogant attitude.

    • Wes

      "Grime stone"?! It's "grindstone."

  • Trudeau lover

    Canada, (Trudeauvia) is the hologram, slowly but surely disintegrating from the distortions and denials of history and traditions, and the divided, estranged populace, that watches helplessly as the special interests and the corrupt media lead the country into the abyss. Good times.

  • Suezy7

    It is amazing to me that Jack had zero support until the media started playing him up …. now all these "posters" have come out in favour of him. Where were you all these years? Jack has not changed his mantra since he became NDP Leader 8 years ago. Jack has a great personality but his policies would be so bad for Canada.

    So, Who do you want to run the country – the FUN guy with the great personality or the boring stable guy that is fiscally responsible?

    Don't forget that Libs/NDP/Bloc were the ones that forced the deficit on Canada. Remember why Harper prorouged parliament? The Libs/NDP/Bloc voted non-confidence to his budget because it DIDNT contain a HUGE deficit spending package …. oh and he was going to take away their subsidy gravy train too. Also fiscally responsible!!!!

    • Mpmosher

      Harper squandered the surplus he inherited and put us into a deficit long before the other parties forced him to acknowledge the recession and do something about it.

    • mpmosher

      …and if you really believe he was trying to get rid of the subsidy because he's fiscally 'responsible' your completely delusional. It is 100% a political manuver to give the conservatives an unprecidented advantage

    • Chris

      Suezy, you talk about a subsidy gravy train… but you're ignoring the subsidy elephant. 75% tax return on all political donations, meaning those with money get to decide which political parties get subsidized by ALL taxpayers.

      The $3 per vote subsidy is peanuts by comparison and is COMPLETELY DEMOCRATIC. One $3 subsidy assigned per voter, regardless of their current financial situation, meaning the poor have some voice. I know that's not popular with those who already have the wealth, because they want to keep the status quo which sees them in power. But please don't be deceived into believing that taking away the per-vote funding is about ending political subsidies… it's a naked power grab for the conservatives, nothing more.

    • jcam

      Suezy, I think a little bit of fact checking is in order. When libs got in in the 90's, they inherited a scary deficit from Mulroney (con). Libs did some unpopular junk, cut stuff, and got rid of deficit, started posting surpluses. Harper got in, and BEFORE the recession, took us back to historical deficit. It is a joke to hear Harper campaigning on responsible economic performance – but as Rick says (ok, I'm paraphrasing… sorry Rick), Con strategy = lie until somebody proves it isn't a lie, then continue to lie, because busy, tired, hard working people don't have the time to fact check, and many (maybe enough to get your another minority?) will believe you because they don't expect to be bald-faced lied to!

      • jcam

        sorry – lie until somebody proves it IS a lie…

  • Greg

    Entertaining and right about Ignatieff. I wonder if Rick will do the same as Andrew Coyne and say he will vote Liberal. Rick has influence with students. Being gay, he could also influence much of the gay vote too.

    • Katherine

      That makes about as much sense as saying "being male, Rick could influence the male vote". Gay people aren't a monolith.

  • bert

    You know so little about hypocrites and phonies ,just keep listening to Layton and you will learn.The man has nothing more than a smile.No experience at anything.A monkey could be leader of the NDP.They can promise anything and know they don't have to deliver the goods to Canadians.He has no idea about the real world outside of his own party and we certainly have had enough of Chretien types.No one that you know Awysteria can come close to being as respected on the world stage as PM Harper.Grow up and learn something about politics before you comment.

    • http://twitter.com/therealjoxer @therealjoxer

      I know that Harper is not a Tory, but a Reform man, ready to sell us all out to American corporate interests (like the Liberals). Only the NDP has a strong pro-citizen stand on the internet while Harper has thrown out all due process in his rush to appease the dying business model of a few entertainment companies. Our future rights and freedoms are being decided right now by these back room deals. BTW, also a lifelong conservative until the last election. The self-serving 'Harper Government' doesn't deserve my vote with their betrayal of the individual and cheap scare tactics.

      • http://twitter.com/MitchWoodcock @MitchWoodcock

        Def a good call, sir.

    • Chaos

      His a politician so the rest is assumed!

    • Geo

      bert…as respected as Harper on the World Stage? Where did you get that idea? Because of the photo-ops or because he told you? Steve had never travelled outside of Canada before he made PM. He has no life experiance, only ideology. How is his hockey book coming along. Ha, this is not a man who will write books but he will have books writen about himself and the danger he is to a truly Canadian existance.

      How could a man who is afraid of most canadians engage with world leaders in any meaningful way?

      And by the way, what happened to NASCAR, and wear red on fridays and all of those other "timmies" moments showing Stevie's "common" touch?

    • joe Lanteigne

      Bert, I'm not an aggressive guy , and I don't want to put you on the defensive. My beliefs from years of growing up to Aynn Rand books (totally capitalistic doctrines, if you're not familiar) ,but the pendulum has swung way too far.! The Conservatives are all business. There are a few rich doing extremely!!!!!! well , and their policies will support this trend! We have a plethora of resources in Canada,and we'll come through any world recession. Don't let fear mongering dictate your vote. In the news today…Argentina is increasing corporate taxes on oil companies. Also today ,"record profits in the first quarter by exxon and Shell and BP. Around 7 to 10 BILLION each. Its just grotesque! This $ does not benefit the general public in any way. Really, I could go on… I spend this time replying because I sincerely hope you investigate this yourself a little further, objectively. Personally I'm a green supporter, but there is a chance I will strategically vote,because of our ridiculous !st to the post system.

      • moonfire

        Well said Joe!

    • Naomi

      Hey Bert – your comment to Awysteria is so disheartening. How would you know anything about what Awysteria knows about politics based on her comment? If you want to talk about monkeys, that's exactly what Harper wants us, the citizenry, to be for him. Obedient chimps that let him run this country as if he were a King. He doesn't want PARLIAMENT to ask him questions, let alone his constituents, let alone the constituents of other parties. And before you suggest someone else "grow up and learn something about politics" be sure you don't bare your own ignorance in public. Jack Layton has been in public service for 30 years and lead the NDP since 2003 – if you are speaking logically, that is quite of a lot of experience, in many things. But I imagine that you are speaking dramatically – employing bullying techniques like name calling and belittling to make yourself feel stronger and more powerful. That is what I see children do on the playground. So, in all fairness, I would suggest YOU grow up and learn something. Literally.

    • OkrdSod

      I think you'll find that Jack has more knowledge of the rest of the world, than Harper did when he came to the job. As to respect for Harper around the world, sorry, most people don't even know who he is. Suggesting that someone "grow up and learn" merely because they do not share your point of view, smacks of the same level of arrogance displayed by Harper.

    • kellyb

      How can you tell someone in one breathe to grow up and learn politics and in another say that they know so little about hypocrites and phonies when the man you (i'm assuming) support tells english Canadians they always play O'Canada and then pander to Quebec separatists by hiding any reference to Canada as a nation. Maybe it's time you did some objective research on Harper (not on CTV or SunMedia) and then cite your reasons why you still support him. All leaders deserve the same scrutiny, Jack,Iggy and Liz all let reporters and citizens alike ask as many questions as they see fit, because they know they work for us. Harper doesn't do ANY of that so that tells me right there he doesn't think he works for us, that he thinks we should just fall in line. If you can't see that the Harper campaign does whatever it can to stop normal citizens from learning about their beliefs then I'm not sure democracy will survive.

  • blatanville

    I think the benefits for the environment alone would make a stay-at-home campaign something to consider…all that jet fuel, all those decorations and bunting and signs…

  • Brian in Napanee

    I’m amazed at those who post about Harper’s fiscal responsibility even though he took a surplus and turned it into the largest deficit the nation has ever seen, in spite of the stability of our financial system that protected us from the meltdown in the rest of the western world. The job losses we suffered had much less to do with the economy than with his friend continuing to ship jobs offshore, only at a higher rate than ever because their own portfolios were suffering … That kind of fiscal responsiblity we can do without … If you keep repeating the same lies, they do not become truth, except in the minds of the liars.

  • Nick

    There is absolutely no logical reason why the NDP is so high in the polls. The numbers are skewed, they are artificially inflated by 3 times. A perfect storm has been created to get people to vote for the party that is close to the NDP to stop them from getting into government. They have slotted the Liberals a distant third so that they won't be a factor. People will panic and vote CONservative giving harper his coveted majority.

    Vote strategically. http://www.projectdemocracy.ca

  • StJack?

    Saint Jack would be well advised to get his crack team of candidates in Quebec in order. Including asking Ruth Ellen Brossard of the riding Berthier- Maskinonge if she plans on returning from her Las vegas vacation in time for election day.
    NDP in Quebec surging and ready to lead. Seriously Quebec are ya bonkers?

  • McC_

    <wince>

  • Katherine

    About 90% of the Green Party's platform is shared by the NDP. I'd gladly vote for Elizabeth May if I were in her riding, and will volunteer for her on election day, but sadly I'm just over the riding boundary.

    When parties are close in terms of beliefs, voting for the one that actually has a chance is sensible.

  • Progressive Canadian

    If Stephen Harper isn't an evil robot overlord, why can't he stand up in front of a croud and speak from the heart? How is giving the same speech over and over again supposed to win support for the Conservatives. Harper has taken the idea of the frontrunner campaign to a new low.

  • Judy Gibson

    As always, Canada owes Rick Mercer for the most astute political commentary on politicians. Looking at the Sierra Club's list of organizations which the Harper government no longer will support says it all…anything that is environmentally or charitably oriented is slated for destruction, but mining companies are allowed to destroy the environment. Go Jack Layton! I voted for you!

  • modster99

    The NDP is the closest thing we have to a socialist party in Canada. Caps lock or not, it is true.

    Not sure if Jack has been sainted, or if he is the hardest working, but he and his wife are sure good at adding to their expense account. At our expense. Jack racked up the highest expense account of any MP, despite being the leader of the smallest party. Olivia wasn't far behind. Imagine how he will spend if he is in power.

    Don't believe me, check for yourself – be sure to compare him to Harper. . .
    http://www.parl.gc.ca/PublicDisclosure/MemberExpe…

    • Sam

      Your comparison is flawed because King Steven gets provided with many more freebies such as accomodations, transport in DND planes,etc. You probably would never accept that Harper is a liar and a cheat but the proff is in the pudding. The Crime Minister is an arrogant dictator who will be lucky to even get a minority.

      • modster99

        for the record, the majority of my post had nothing to do with Harper . . .

        You had me for a while, thinking you were trying to make a valid point, and then you went off ranting. (it's proof, by the way).

        Compare Jack to almost any other MP, if Harper offends you that much. . .

  • votinggirl

    I have been comparing his actions to sociopaths too,lol

  • IvanTheScientist

    Not a hologram (although he behaves like he could be), but not quite a sociopath either.

    A number of commentaries have, for several years now, noted that Harper displays the hallmarks of being a "malignant narcissist", which makes him only slightly more cuddly than a full-blown sociopath. For example, see:
    http://www.metaball.ca/2008/ball_Mar-08/0308_01.h…
    http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2009/09/10/HarperUnfit/

    The bottom line — *don't* vote for the Harper Government!

  • saskboy

    I'm terribly disappointed in Mercer for missing such an obvious fact. At least he's backhandedly endorsing May, without even realizing it!

  • Guest

    Here's some Harper advertisement out takes:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhlMiCtrr84&fe…

  • http://court-aaron.com Aaron

    Too bad Rick wasn't running for office. I'd vote for him

  • Leslie F.

    As a Canadian living south of the 49th for 15 years I plead: Beloved Canadians please demonstrate continental leadership by rejecting Harper and thus regain the world's respect as a righteous nation.

  • Joe Lanteigne

    OMG you're right… And the picture thing is really creepy.

    • IvanTheScientist

      You nailed it Joe… "creepy" is the word. I don't think there could be a better description of the reported removal, "of all images of any other Canadian political leader from the PMO offices as well as from the government lounge of the House of Commons, and replacing them with images of himself" [Harper] (Finch, 2008 — http://www.metaball.ca/2008/ball_Mar-08/0308_01.h…. There's no other way to look at that than it being just plain weird.

  • Joe Lanteigne

    Please Rick. Tell us now. Are you going to run in the next election? C'mon Ronald reagan , Arnold Swaarttzenhaegaer, TV personalities are valued commodities. ,but you have to promise to come back and tell us about the aliens that brief you when you win the election, and they explain to you why you can't do all those nice things you wanted to do. If you you do run, be ready, There is a chance you would win.

  • Freddy

    I don't know why so many, hate people who vote coservative.

    I'm the guy who:
    -worked overtime and paid extra taxes
    -picked you up hitchhiking:
    =to work
    =from work
    -will help you fix up your Mums house to make it safer for her.
    -actually goes to a meeting
    -actually pays attention.
    -likes the idea of taxing families as a unit
    -wants lower taxes because:
    =i will have more money to spend in my community
    =the martin transfer cut cost are still trickling down through the system.
    i need to be able to afford the municiple tax increases that are yet
    to come.
    -never wanted universal daycare despite raising 3 kids
    -expects the true north strong and free.
    -thinks criminals need to be punished before we can rehab them.
    -thinks harm reduction means decreasing access to drugs.
    -would rather lose a seat on a council than put my countrymen at risk to
    apease an unelected government.

    • MTB

      In other words, you think you're special for doing what Canadians of all political stripes do. Maybe people don't hate you for voting Conservative. They just hate you because your a narcissist.

From Macleans