How in God’s name do you explain?

Rick Mercer on how, in Canada, time spent at the massage parlour is a positive, at Harvard not so much

by Rick Mercer on Monday, May 9, 2011 9:25am - 111 Comments
How in God’s name do you explain?

Rick Mercer

Having led the Conservative party to a majority government, with the Liberal party lying bloodied and dying at his feet, Stephen Harper saw the breadth of his domain and wept, for he had no more worlds to conquer.

Twenty-four hours before Canada went to the polls, I went on BBC Radio International to explain to a very pleasant radio personality with excellent diction why Canada was having yet another election.

Now it’s one thing to go on the radio and blather about politics in Canada—the audience knows the cast of characters and it’s safe to assume they are somewhat familiar with our recent history. But when you go on BBC International, the audience is in the tens of millions worldwide and you have to bear in mind that the average listener is likely tuning in from a shantytown in Nigeria or a loft in Oslo.

How do you explain in a few minutes just what an accomplishment a majority would be for the Conservative party? How do you explain how Stephen Harper became the leader of a grassroots western-based regional party, a party that existed solely to give voice to individual MPs, and somehow transformed it into a national party so centralized in its power structure that no more than five of its MPs are allowed to speak in public?

And how in God’s name do you explain that the demise of the Liberal party would be a seismic shift on our political landscape? And really, did anyone have an explanation for the orange crush?

And why, my Nigerian friends may wonder, did the last-minute revelations of a visit to a sketchy massage parlour 15 years ago lead to increased support for the leader of Canada’s socialists, especially among separatists in Quebec?

How do you explain that Michael Ignatieff was shaping up to be a loser of Ben Johnsonian proportions, not for having cheated or for having lied but for having been vilified for doing too many things in his life and for having lived in too many places?

Yes, my Nigerian brother, in Canada, time spent at the Velvet Touch massage parlour is a positive, time spent at Harvard not so much.

And speaking of Quebec, why on the eve of the election was the most senior government cabinet minister in that province, the minister of foreign affairs, facing certain defeat at the hands of a part-time karate instructor, collector of medieval weapons and one-time member of the Communist party?

One assumes the phone lines at Immigration Canada did not light up that night.

Luckily, the conversation soon turned to something any person with a passing knowledge of democracy could understand no matter where they lived: election night. It was shaping up to be a barnburner and the host assumed correctly I would be glued to the results. “But,” she inquired, “is the rumour true that twittering about election results in Canada as they come in is a criminal offence?”

Yes, I was loath to admit, Elections Canada was attempting to succeed where Mubarak in Egypt and Ahmadinejad in Iran had failed. They were attempting to stop people from tweeting.

When the interview was over, I declined an offer to be interviewed the following night after midnight to report how it all turned out. This was a wise stroke of foresight. I know me. Why is that man yelling and why is there the sound of ice clinking in a glass?

The producer of the program wasn’t too disappointed. Canadian election results hardly warrant great international scrutiny, especially in the aftermath of Osama bin Laden’s death and sexy Will and Kate honeymoon updates.

By now we all know that on election night it was all over by 10:15 Eastern, with most networks declaring a Conservative majority.

For many Conservative voters, this was simply closing the deal on Stephen Harper’s promise of a stable government for the next four years; it was a vote for more of the same, please. For others, this indicates that Canada has finally taken a big step to the right, and they hope to see a very different Canada emerge.

All we do know right now is that the animal farm in Ottawa has changed dramatically. The once cocky and entitled Liberal, an animal that once roamed wild in the nation’s capital, has ceased to exist. In its place we have a population explosion of a new breed of NDPer. Not only have their numbers doubled, but they have gone from earnest to unctuous in one historic night. Very soon they will gather in Stornoway—Jack will play guitar, they will shake their lentil jars and plot the next once-impossible step. They have supplanted the natural governing party of Canada in opposition, next stop 24 Sussex Dr. God give me the strength to sit through any of those conversations.

And then there are the Conservatives: the staffers, the supporters, the MPs themselves. For them a majority is uncharted territory. This changes everything.

Liberals, even when in opposition, are always surprised when they meet someone who isn’t a liberal. They tend to believe everyone looks at the world the way they do, everyone is on the same team. Conservatives are the opposite. No matter how much success they achieve, they constantly believe someone is out to get them. Conservatives always believe they are swimming against the current, even when there is ample evidence to prove otherwise. This has served them well; it has allowed them to remain united and focused. The one ideological characteristic all Conservatives in Ottawa share is a complete loyalty to the authority of Stephen Harper and his quest for a majority. But along the way a lot of Conservatives have been told to sit down and shut up and wait for the big day. Now that it’s here, what now?

Will the Prime Minister take this opportunity to relax, be more amicable, comfortable in the knowledge that the opposition’s power has been erased? I think we all know the answer to that. Or will Mr. Harper go to work and salt the earth, remove the subsidies to political parties, making it more difficult for the opposition to function?

And more importantly, will he be able to keep his own troops down on the farm now that they have seen the glory that is a majority?

All we can be certain of is that for the time being, with a comfortable majority in the House, Stephen Harper will do whatever the hell he wants. That’s what Canada voted for.

The more pressing question is, what will the Liberals do? The talk on election night, despite Harper’s historic victory, was all about them. In four years from now, on election night, will the Liberals be mentioned at all?

Some people, Liberals among them, say this is the best thing that could happen to the party. It’s been called tough medicine, the political equivalent of a bankruptcy protection that will force them to restructure and refocus.

But this is not just a train wreck for the Liberal party. This is Lockerbie. Yes, this is a plane crashing into a Scottish village. If you are a Liberal it must be very hard to imagine any good coming out of this.

But election results are not random events, they are not natural or man-made disasters; they are just that—results.

And the results are stunning. A Conservative majority, the rise of the NDP, the annihilation of the Bloc Québécois, the near death of the Liberals. We saw two national leaders get defeated and Elizabeth May win. In Quebec, a 19-year-old voted in his first federal election, for himself, and is now a newly elected NDP MP. Had he lost, he would have sought summer employment at a golf course.

We have had 41 federal elections in this country and one hopes the plan is to have many more. And if history has taught us anything it is this: we show up at the polls and at the end of the night governments may rise and governments may fall. For some of those running it will be the greatest night of their lives. Others will find themselves in the glare of TV lights wearing a smile while secretly cursing the day they considered public service.

And while we ponder the results and we study what happened, and speculate what it all might mean for Canada, it doesn’t hurt to think about what didn’t happen on election day.

No shots were fired, no cars were burnt, nobody was intimidated at the polling booth and nobody died.

And while that mightn’t make headlines on the BBC World Service, that’s exactly the way it should be. It’s why we are a nation worth voting for.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3LTTP6244OE6S3WTQLQYLB3WXA Bernie

    I think we spend enough on Native affairs. Let them get their own house in order now.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3LTTP6244OE6S3WTQLQYLB3WXA Bernie

    Hell for you, bliss for us. Enjoy.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3LTTP6244OE6S3WTQLQYLB3WXA Bernie

    Hell for you, bliss for us. Enjoy.

    • Anonymous

      we’ll see. cannot wait to see the AG’s final report.The emperor has no clothes 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3LTTP6244OE6S3WTQLQYLB3WXA Bernie

    Umm, it’s “State Broadcaster”. Let’s be accurate here. Just like North Korea and China. Yeah, Canada!

    • Noob Goldberg

      And don’t forget the UK’s contribution to state broadcasting: the BBC. Heaven knows they’ve never provided a useful contribution to international journalism.

    • Noob Goldberg

      And don’t forget the UK’s contribution to state broadcasting: the BBC. Heaven knows they’ve never provided a useful contribution to international journalism.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3LTTP6244OE6S3WTQLQYLB3WXA Bernie

        My point proved. Another state broadcaster preaching to the masses.

    • Noob Goldberg

      And don’t forget the UK’s contribution to state broadcasting: the BBC. Heaven knows they’ve never provided a useful contribution to international journalism.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3LTTP6244OE6S3WTQLQYLB3WXA Bernie

    Umm, it’s “State Broadcaster”. Let’s be accurate here. Just like North Korea and China. Yeah, Canada!

  • Anonymous

    @rickmercer I am with you on the yelling and clinking ice in the glass.Thank goodness I live in SGI or I wouldn’t have been able to get out of bed morning after.  

  • Anonymous

    the interesting thing about EMay’s win was that people from all parties voted for her, including prominent conservatives. And she ran a respectful campaign which was incredibly refreshing. She has the ability to bring people together on issues that they can agree on which is exactly opposite to the divide and conquer tactics of the current gov’t. She was by far the best candidate in our riding. We still vote for candidates here, not PM. Although one of the four con calls that came to my house asked me if I was voting for Harper. I told him he had the wrong postal code.

  • Anonymous

    respect has to be earned. still waiting for that one. how about respect for our democratic institutions and traditions?  

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alvin-Croll/573820875 Alvin Croll

    Seems to me that nobody is remembering how the Conservatives were in the same boat that the Liberals are in now after the election following Mulroney’s departure where the electorate took them to the woodshed and reduced them to a handful of seats. Only a total blood transfusion from the Alliance brought them back to the land of the living. 

    Good thing voters have such short memories or elections would become a choice of who we hate the least. Oh, wait, isn’t that how we do it now???

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alvin-Croll/573820875 Alvin Croll

    Seems to me that nobody is remembering how the Conservatives were in the same boat that the Liberals are in now after the election following Mulroney’s departure where the electorate took them to the woodshed and reduced them to a handful of seats. Only a total blood transfusion from the Alliance brought them back to the land of the living. 

    Good thing voters have such short memories or elections would become a choice of who we hate the least. Oh, wait, isn’t that how we do it now???

  • DBM

    You raise a great point about the attention the Liberal party has received in defeat. Everyone wants to know wither the Liberal party. Meanwhile, the Liberals have gone behind closed doors to grumble and fight over who will be interim leader.

    I remember a time when a meeting of Liberal party bigwigs ended with a brief discussion of – what is going to be our message when we go out that door. Everyone agreed, and that was what everybody said.

    Liberals are once again failing to jump on the opportunity to avail themselves of attention, and risk once again allowing themselves to be defined by others.

    How hard is it?

    Everyone say "Canada still needs a party that represents the moderate centre. We will still be that party for Canadians". Repeat ad nauseum.

  • Maximrw

    Watched part of the Mercer Report on TV and tuned out. Have not seen you in years and will not be reading McLeans again

  • Kevin

    Another reason not to go on the BBC again – lines like "this is Lockerbie." Too soon, Rick.

  • Claude

    Rick Mercer is a funny guy with a leftist bent.
    He lives off tax payer's dime and comments on how surprised he is the Tories have risen to the top and how simply foolish we are for rejecting a fellow Toronto elitist.
    I hope the CBC's funding is cut and Mercer is forced to find his way in the real world. Maybe then he would realize we didn't reject Iggy because of where he was educated but because of the education he clearly lacked which was obvious in his policies and his attitude towards the peasants who wouldn't "rise up, rise up" at his command.

  • Thwim

    NDP support was up across the country, even though it only translated into a significant number of seats in Quebec.
    Liberal support was down across the country.

    Mercer's analysis seems solid.

  • http://www.truthhammer.com truth

    that's because all the people who were voting for the Liberals against harper, voted for who they have wanted to all along, since the haprer majority was unstoppable, they decided to stop strategic voting.

    The swing voters, aka middle class people with jobs, will never EVER vote for a fringe party like the NDP, no matter how much the media spins it. They voted the liberals into consecutive majorities, and now they will vote the conservatives into consecutive majorities. The economy is always the number one issue, and the liberals became too corrupt and entrennched. Harper fought up hill against the left wing media, won minorities, showed he wasnt the demon they portrayed him to be, and now the Conservatives have become the centrist party to manage the economy.

    Eventually they will go the road of the Liberals, become too entrenched and too much cronyism, and out they will go and back come the Liberals.

    The only difference between the harper governement and the chretien/martin governments, is there might be a little more privatization and tax cutting, and morality and the family will be held in status quo, instead of further sliding into the ruin of post modern hedonistic relativism.

    There will be no extreme social activism from the conservatives, (unfortunately), because it would just put the liberals back into power.

  • James Walker

    Rick Mercer is a jerk.

  • john

    Awwww, sorry to see you go……

    Keep up the good work Rick!

  • Observant

    Canadian youth shouldn't be masturbating over politics; they should be fornicating … fecund females and horny boys … practicing to make new little homegrown Canadians.

    Stop, I say STOP, Rick … don't confuse the youth with dirty politics that divert them from their natural activities .. sex, sex and more sex.

  • Angelle

    "And while we ponder the results and we study what happened, and speculate what it all might mean for Canada, it doesn’t hurt to think about what didn’t happen on election day.

    No shots were fired, no cars were burnt, nobody was intimidated at the polling booth and nobody died.

    And while that mightn’t make headlines on the BBC World Service, that’s exactly the way it should be. It’s why we are a nation worth voting for." The results are what they are…..so be it…but then again we have so many of our First Nation people who do not have clean drinking water and I do not see any solutions anywhere in the horizon. I do not need a "poll" to inform me that most people in Canada do not care about this issue.

  • Captain Obvious

    Rick is from Newfoundland. Hint: that's nowhere near Toronto.

  • TwoYen

    In my view, Rick Mercer is a funny guy who is pretty adept at being non-partisan.

  • modster99

    "Liberals, even when in opposition, are always surprised when they meet someone who isn't a liberal. They tend to believe everyone looks at the world the way they do, everyone is on the same team."

    Brilliant. I have said this myself, and been criticized for it. The reason the Liberals lost is their almost total disconnection from reality. They (like anyone with an opinion) feel that they are right. The difference between them and others, is their belief that anyone who opposes their beliefs is uneducated/stupid/ignorant. Basically, they believe everyone will eventually end up thinking as they do.
    Their fatal flaw is that they cannot comprehend that their opponents have well thought our opinions. They cannot understand their opponents beliefs as rational, and therefore dismiss anyone who holds the beliefs. I feel this is why conservatives seem to feel that the media is unfair to them. It is in the way that the conservative are 'opposed' in the media. It has this idea, behind the stories, that only stupid people can think this way, and the reporter (obviously to themselves) is not stupid. The story sometimes has that feel to it. When liberals are 'attacked' in the media, it is usually on policy or on something the person has said/done.

  • macGen

    He's from Newfoundland & Labrador as we all know. They used to be the brunt of jokes in this country but not anymore. And if I remember correctly ex-Premier Danny Williams found out about the Harper Government and liked him so much he went ABC. Wonder who he voted for. He must be a jerk too?

  • Observant

    No more mushy middle Canadians … we've bravely polarized between left and right … as it should be.

  • Arturolexo

    Centrism is an abstract. An illusioin. It is where the left and the right go when at risk of losing votes by being labelled "too far left" or "too far right".

  • Mason

    The Conservatives and PM Harper have good reason to be skeptical and cynical about the msm. They don't trust the msm, and they have proven time and again they cannot be trusted. Maybe if the msm starts giving the PM of Canada at least the level of respect the position warrants, and stops giving Jack Layton a free pass on everything and anything he says or does, and stops fawning over Layton's every word; then maybe the conservatives of Canada who elected our government , and the CPC, will give the msm some respect. Until then, that's not on. The absolute best part of this election result is the giant, and unequivocal "middle finger salute" that Canadian voters gave the leftist msm. Canadian voters showed them who will be selecting our government, thank you very much. Hint: not the leftist msm.

  • Mason

    It wasn't the fact that Iggy was a Harvard teacher, or that he had "international experience" – most Canadians would see these as positives. It was the FACT that Iggy lived outside the country for 30 PLUS consecutiveYEARS, and returned just in 2005 solely for the purpose to take the biggest jofb in the land. Some how the Liberal elite that plucked Iggy from foreign lands, didnt' think this might be a "problem" for Canadian voters. This was viewed by most of the country as the worst case of Liberal Arrogance we've ever seen. the Liberals tried to spin it as "international experience = good"; thinking Canadians were too stupid to notice the difference between that, and the real deal – a carpetbagger and convenient Canadian.

  • michael st. paul's

    As an astute political observer, Rick, I'm guessing you predicted last Monday's Conservative majority in your BBC broaaadcast. I didn't hear it so I just have to guess, mind you.

    What's that you say Rick – you didn't see it coming – but …. but ….

    Michael St.Paul's

  • DBM

    So you're saying there's a desire among voters for a party that's neither too far left, nor right.

    I think you may be on to something here.

From Macleans