Jesse Brown

Jesse Brown

Jesse Brown offers critical thoughts on technology and what it means. Follow Jesse on Twitter:  @JesseBrown

I’ve seen the future, and it’s Android over iPad

by Jesse Brown on Friday, July 29, 2011 3:22pm - 79 Comments

As a rule I don’t make technology predictions, for a couple of reasons:

First, my job is to talk about what’s going on in the world right now, not to foretell the future. It’s weird how often tech journalists are looked to for their soothsaying powers (it’s also weird how often they’ll play along). We don’t ask, say, business reporters for their stock picks, but somehow anyone who reviews a gadget is deemed capable of prophesying the fate of massive companies and their products.

Second, guessing at the future of technology is a mug’s game. You will almost certainly be wrong, and therefore you are almost certainly making an ass out of future you. I like future me. I like his hovercraft pants and his metallic beard, and I refuse to embarrass him from this meager past.

That said, I will now break my rule and make a technology prediction. Even worse, I will make a tech prediction that was made by someone else, two days ago.

There will eventually be more Android tablets in use than iPads.

This of course was stated as fact, not prophecy, by a research firm called Informa. Informa should change their name to Obviousa, because theirs is the safest prediction I’ve heard in a while.

The phenomenal growth of Android smartphones illustrates the new normal when it comes to mobile devices: there’s Apple and there’s everything else, and everything else will run Android. Hardware companies have finally got the message that they are hardware companies—consumers don’t want their crappy, proprietary, incompatible software. Android is free, open and good, and as more and more of the unApple world adopts it, it will soon boast more apps than Apple.

But I bet you’d still take an iPad. Fair enough, but consider this: iPads remain expensive toys for grownups in countries like Canada. Teens and kids here would sooner spend that cash on an Xbox, and folks from poorer nations just want stuff that works. Any Android slab—even a lousy one—works. As long as it’s a glowing touchable rectangle running Android, you’ve got the basic functionality of an iPad. Reviewers like to pick at the details—maybe it’s a bit heavier, not as bright, less responsive, whatever.  To 91% of the world’s population it’s 91% of the way there, and if it sells for 19% of the price, then that will be the determining factor.

In a sense, Apple has screwed itself by making the iPad so elegant and simple. How can they continue to differentiate it? Change the colour, make it thinner, slap a camera on each side—and then what? Additions will only subtract.

The tablet is a great invention, but it will ultimately be rendered generic. The race is now on price, and Android will win it.

So it is written, so it shall be.

Jesse Brown is the host of TVO.org’s Search Engine podcast. He is on Twitter @jessebrown.

Bookmark and Share
  • Jon A

    I am still sticking with Apple.

    http://website.ws/jonanthony

  • http://chuckwelch.com Chuck Welch

    Oddly enough, Macleans has an ad for their new iPhone & Blackberry apps, but nothing for the Android phone I’m using to post this comment.

  • http://chuckwelch.com Chuck Welch

    Oddly enough, Macleans has an ad for their new iPhone & Blackberry apps, but nothing for the Android phone I’m using to post this comment.

  • http://chuckwelch.com Chuck Welch

    Oddly enough, Macleans has an ad for their new iPhone & Blackberry apps, but nothing for the Android phone I’m using to post this comment.

  • http://chuckwelch.com Chuck Welch

    Oddly enough, Macleans has an ad for their new iPhone & Blackberry apps, but nothing for the Android phone I’m using to post this comment.

  • http://chuckwelch.com Chuck Welch

    Oddly enough, Macleans has an ad for their new iPhone & Blackberry apps, but nothing for the Android phone I’m using to post this comment.

  • http://www.videoconverterfactory.com/dvd-ripper/ Ares

    I think it is premature to say so! Apple still have many options to overpass Android OS. After the upsurge of Android passes, many digital lovers would find that Apple is still great!

  • http://www.videoconverterfactory.com/dvd-ripper/ Ares

    I think it is premature to say so! Apple still have many options to overpass Android OS. After the upsurge of Android passes, many digital lovers would find that Apple is still great!

  • http://www.videoconverterfactory.com/dvd-ripper/ Ares

    I think it is premature to say so! Apple still have many options to overpass Android OS. After the upsurge of Android passes, many digital lovers would find that Apple is still great!

  • http://www.videoconverterfactory.com/ Jessica

     Yes, I think Apple pay too much attention to itself, it should concern more…One day Android will be over it…

  • http://www.videoconverterfactory.com/ Jessica

     Yes, I think Apple pay too much attention to itself, it should concern more…One day Android will be over it…

  • http://twitter.com/eh_eh Andrés Aquino

    Jesse, although you’re right that Android will become the most popular tablet (especially in the ‘rest of the world’) don’t discount the innovation and impact that will come from future iPads. Apple has never put all their eggs in one “hardware centric basket” (like new colours, thinner, camera on all sides, etc). Apple’s tablet innovations will come from a blend of hardware, software, and user experience delight… just like they’ve been doing for decades in their other product lines.

    Tablets are still babies learning to walk. We haven’t seen what an adult tablet is capable of (think fully integrated augmented reality software) but I’m certain that Apple, and Android, will both be leading the way – there’s room for multiple leaders in this market.

  • http://twitter.com/eh_eh Andrés Aquino

    Jesse, although you’re right that Android will become the most popular tablet (especially in the ‘rest of the world’) don’t discount the innovation and impact that will come from future iPads. Apple has never put all their eggs in one “hardware centric basket” (like new colours, thinner, camera on all sides, etc). Apple’s tablet innovations will come from a blend of hardware, software, and user experience delight… just like they’ve been doing for decades in their other product lines.

    Tablets are still babies learning to walk. We haven’t seen what an adult tablet is capable of (think fully integrated augmented reality software) but I’m certain that Apple, and Android, will both be leading the way – there’s room for multiple leaders in this market.

  • Jonathan Dursi

    “There will eventually be more Android tablets in use than iPads.”

    Mother of God.  That’s your bold prediction?

    In other crazy, contrarian predictions: I predict there will also continue to be more PCs than Macs. Just as there were many more generic MP3 players than iPods, and more feature phones than iPhones.  And if Android phones don’t already outpace iPhone sales, at some point they will.  And Apple doesn’t care.   No business should, although it seems to fascinate tech bloggers, because the metric of business success isn’t units shipped, it’s profits, and Apple made $7B in profits last *quarter*.

    Apple is in the business of selling premium products in an otherwise cutthroat, low-margin industry.  Your line, “The race is now on price, and Android will win it.” not only misses the point, but gets it completely backwards.   Android tablet manufactures will compete amongst themselves on price, driving costs and margins down by cutting corners, while Apple will continue to charge roughly the same amount for future generations of their products, and out-profiting all of the Android manufactures together.

    The reason why Apple *can* charge a premium for products and get away with it is that it seems to have learned a lesson no one else in the ecosystem cares to learn – people will pay extra for a well-designed product that works better.   It inhabits that sub-market by doing things which expressly reduce its market share – restricting native apps to the App store, imposing restrictions on developers, and, famously, by having a very limited product line.   Those all limit market share, but give more control over the UX, allowing them to charge premiums because things (mostly) “just work” (or at least work better than their competitors).

    Now, *why* no other big company has decided to also compete in this obviously very lucrative space is an excellent question, and one I can offer no answer to.

    There are definitely apple *users* who want Apple to dominate the market for the latest hot device, but Apple itself has never shown any real interest in this at all.   It creates a well-designed product that completely shakes up a product category (iPod, iPhone, iPad), extracts huge profits from this, and while the competitors scrable to copy the product idea to carve their own niche in this newly-created market, Apple is already working on the next thing.

    Me? I’ve got an iPad, and love it, but competition is good, and I look forward to see what’s next.

  • Jonathan Dursi

    “There will eventually be more Android tablets in use than iPads.”

    Mother of God.  That’s your bold prediction?

    In other crazy, contrarian predictions: I predict there will also continue to be more PCs than Macs. Just as there were many more generic MP3 players than iPods, and more feature phones than iPhones.  And if Android phones don’t already outpace iPhone sales, at some point they will.  And Apple doesn’t care.   No business should, although it seems to fascinate tech bloggers, because the metric of business success isn’t units shipped, it’s profits, and Apple made $7B in profits last *quarter*.

    Apple is in the business of selling premium products in an otherwise cutthroat, low-margin industry.  Your line, “The race is now on price, and Android will win it.” not only misses the point, but gets it completely backwards.   Android tablet manufactures will compete amongst themselves on price, driving costs and margins down by cutting corners, while Apple will continue to charge roughly the same amount for future generations of their products, and out-profiting all of the Android manufactures together.

    The reason why Apple *can* charge a premium for products and get away with it is that it seems to have learned a lesson no one else in the ecosystem cares to learn – people will pay extra for a well-designed product that works better.   It inhabits that sub-market by doing things which expressly reduce its market share – restricting native apps to the App store, imposing restrictions on developers, and, famously, by having a very limited product line.   Those all limit market share, but give more control over the UX, allowing them to charge premiums because things (mostly) “just work” (or at least work better than their competitors).

    Now, *why* no other big company has decided to also compete in this obviously very lucrative space is an excellent question, and one I can offer no answer to.

    There are definitely apple *users* who want Apple to dominate the market for the latest hot device, but Apple itself has never shown any real interest in this at all.   It creates a well-designed product that completely shakes up a product category (iPod, iPhone, iPad), extracts huge profits from this, and while the competitors scrable to copy the product idea to carve their own niche in this newly-created market, Apple is already working on the next thing.

    Me? I’ve got an iPad, and love it, but competition is good, and I look forward to see what’s next.

  • Rick Smith

    I think, Bill Joy, Founder of Sun Microsystems said something very similar way back in 2002 ?, in some MIT article not sure.
     But the PC/Desktop is sadly DEAD ! everything will be done on a big handheld. and you’ll be able to plug virtually any peripheral device(s) that you need to it. …

    Unfortunately, playing with any graphically intensive application, and/or game on a “handheld” just cannot beat my beautiful big HD Monitor, and on any scale yet.
     But for blithering textual garbage like this ? – the handhelds are great
    :)

From Macleans